![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Normally if take one of those beams of steel and heat it up to 500 degrees or whatever, it would take some time to degrade it. But if you slam it with a an airplane, boil it in jet fuel, and then demand it hold up twenty floors on it's own, well, it's gonna give way a lot quicker. |
Quote:
I'm curious. |
Quote:
I'm not trusting a single (poorly put together) web page. I've a ton of books, on both sides, including "debunking 9/11". The number at the top don't impress me at all. It uses numbers like "1,200+ Engineers and Architects" - which quickly translates for me into "only 1200 engineers and architects". So you mean to tell me "only" 1200 out of what - a few hundred thousand? A million? I have a friend of mine who is an engineer for the city of Walnut Creek, California - And I wouldn't trust her to babysit my sister. As for your "unignited fragments of nano-engineered thermitic pyrotechnics" they found "eight years later", well, what could that be? I'm guessing a lot of people here never have never been to the WTC; It was in fact a city into itself. People don't seem to understand that anything the WTC needed, it had - such as lines of compressed air that ran all the way roof... For the window cleaners, oddly enough. I learned about this (gasp) during my reading about 9/11. Water, steam, oil, hydraulics.... But of course they wouldn't need "pyrotechnics", right? And this is where people get utterly fucking stupid. You read "pyrotechnics" and your only response is "oh my god, they used pyrotechnics" to bring down the World Trade Center, right? I mean, it's not like pyrotechnics are used in.... Circuit breakers? Lightbulbs? Matches? Better yet, do you know what "nano thermite" really is? Isn't just Aluminium, copper, and maybe magnesium. I'm not a fucking engineer here, but I'm guessing you can find this in any computer. And there was a lot of fucking computers in the WTC complex. People are sheep. |
Quote:
The difference is you nut jobs think the govt is lieing to us 100% of the time and you can't use common sense and logic to see what is real and what might not be real. 911 100% no doubt was a terrorist attack and the most our govt might have been involved was by being incompetent and maybe (just maybe) on some level someone might have looked the other way, if they even detected it before hand. Anything beyond that is just lunacy. Now shit like WMDs in Iraq is a different story, they even admitted it was "bad intel" hell for all i know it was a straight up lie. Who knows the govt might have been feed bad intel they might have made it up. Normal people can be skeptical and look at things logically, you nut jobs go to extremes and disagree with what 99% of the population thinks, and you can't even prove your theories... General rule, our govt is good (at trying atleast) to cover up mistakes, but there is no way they are competent enough to plan and pull off conspiracies especially on the scale of 911. It's funny you people hate them but at the same time give them too much credit for what you accuse them off, because no matter how much you think you "know" the truth you can't prove shit. No one else believes you except for a few other nut jobs. So if they did do it, as you think, damn they must be good to have pulled it off without getting exposed ... with you know REAL PROOF. too funny, you not going to waste your time to back up why you t hink 911 was an inside job... there are some serious nut jobs out there. |
Quote:
Operation Northwoords was a "plan". It was a mental exercise on paper. They also thought about trying to make Castro's beard fall out. These means.... Nothing. It means someone had an idea, nothing more. I don't understand what Iran Contra has to do with this. (Oddly enough, the next book I plan on reading is is by Oliver North.) The Iran-Contra affair was our government trying to get around an arms embargo - not the innocent killing of Americans. And last my personal favorite - Operation Paperclip. The US government sent teams into Germany at shortly before the fall of Nazi Germany directly after the fall, in order to find German scientists to ensure they didn't fall into the hands of the USSR. While this was a secret at the time, it has nothing to do with any "false flag" operation. In fact, this is operation is how we ended up winning the space race. The problem here is that your pointing out things that our government has lied to us before, and then claiming that it would have no problem killing thousands of Americans. That's a bit much. Jesus fuck already. If the US government was behind this they would have just bombed the buildings and be done with it. Not fly airplanes into them. |
Quote:
On one side you have shit like video of planes flying into a building, taking out most of several floors, building falling and on the other you have bits and pieces of little minute things like "pyrotechnics" that these morons grab onto. They ignore the mountain of reality of what happened and they look hard to try to find little "clues" that means it had to all be a conspiracy and they are ubber smart and busted the govt and we are just sheep. |
Dont spend too much time on it. No one did shit about the truth coming out about Gulf of Tonkin in 2005.
For 9/11 non-conspiratorial Facts go here: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/evidence.html |
Quote:
|
Quote:
- United States Flag Code take it up with your congressman. |
You guys forgot to mention the plane that crashed in the field - they did tests and did not find ANY fuel. A plane crashes with 10,000 gallons of fuel, and they couldnt find any.
This is what pisses me off - people just say NUP, not true - dont wanna hear about it. They dont look into it, they just say NOPE your crazy. But then the people who do look into it, research it and come to a different conslusion are just crazy. |
Quote:
When a person is bashing the image over the content, the lack of argument is obvious. The covers for "Relativity" of Albert Einstein suck, too. Quote:
Pure rhetoric, what a surprise. Wasting my time here. "How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think." -Adolf Hitler |
Quote:
The simple fact that you believe the government is in control, proves how much you are not well-educated. Study a little more history, culture, society... especially the NATO war agenda, oil and energy industries, militarization worldwide, media disinformation, politics, religions, lobbying, psychology and economy. You probably don't even know what the heck is the Gaza Strip, except from Wikipedia. Your opinion is 100% certain, no doubt involved, the antithesis of Science and Education. |
Quote:
If you really think the government care for 3000 victims, you are naive. It's all politics. |
Quote:
In 40 years, people won't care anyway. This is like wikileaks.org and their Afghan War Diary (2004-2010). Nobody gives a fuck. http://wardiary.wikileaks.org/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
well there weren't jack squat in PA. Not one fucking screw, not one fucking wire, not one fucking skull. That is what they are calling "vaporized".... not one single shred of proof that there ever was a plane crash. Just a crater in the ground. now c'mon dude..... that doesn't happen and you know it. you can't expect any intelligent person to accept some story about a plane crash when there is no plane crash. The investigators tht got to the scene first reported, "where's the crash"? are you really just going to eat the government cheese and call it a night when Captain Obvious is flicking you on the forehead? |
Amputate, retardboy, you keep acting as if it's not possible planes hit the tower. When are you gonna us tell what did hit the towers? Come on man, you seem afraid to say it. I wonder why. You think we're gonna make fun of you? You should be used to that by now.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
They didn't fall the way buildings fall at all - they fell the way buildings fall with destruction charges, but otherwise no buildings have ever fallen this way before. They were hit at the top quarter and third part of their structures - which means they had up to 75% of the building to support the upper floors. You can't say there was nothing to support the upper floors. Quote:
You're wrong about the claims - the government claimed the fire/s brought down the towers. The towers weren't nearly sliced in half. They were built to withstand a jumbo jet crash. They were "sliced" two thirds and three quarters of the way up. The only part of the plane that could have damaged the building's structure was the engine. The rest is light weight and aluminum. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Regardless, the building fell straight down - vertically, symetrically - which is hard to achieve with controlled demolitions generally, but the ultimate goal and the only time and method where buildings collapse straight down. Quote:
The dust and smaller debris may have been sent to New Jersey but that's it. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Aluminum doesn't rip apart steel. And the engines wouldn't have taken out 90 to 100% of the bulding's structure, top to bottom. Quote:
Most of the building's structure couldn't have been damaged by anything but the plane's engines. And jet fuel doesn't "boil" steel. Six tests/simulations conducted didn't lead to global collapse, beam failure or anything explaining why over a thousand feet of vertical steel support failed that day. Quote:
But I figure there's a difference between copyrighted, military grade thermitic material and the stuff found in chips and hard drives... or they wouldn't have published a paper on the stuff... |
Quote:
However, I just watched a video where a small jet plane crashed into a concrete wall and I don't recall seeing any fuel after the fact, or much of anything after the fact? What's your point? Now your saying there wasn't a plane that crashed into that field? If not, what was it? And where did all of those people go? Did they line them up at the airport, put a bullet to the back of their head, and shoot them dead? Where are the bodies? How come no one has come forward about this? Your picking out one thing from a huge investigation and blowing up into something huge and coming to a conclusion saying "there was no jet fuel, thus there was no plane". Which obviously isn't possible. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
really? do you know how hot Titanium has to get to vanish completely? Where are the engines? Why isn't the hole in the wall massive? Planes still have wings right? Where is the damage from the wings? And again I ask.... how can there not be a single piece of that plane left? Why did the government run around like headless chickens confiscating all the surrounding area video? And why are we not allowed to see said video? Titanium: Physical properties: Phase solid Density (near r.t.) 4.506 g·cm−3 Liquid density at m.p. 4.11 g·cm−3 Melting point 1941 K, 1668 °C, 3034 °F Boiling point 3560 K, 3287 °C, 5949 °F Heat of fusion 14.15 kJ·mol−1 Heat of vaporization 425 kJ·mol−1 Specific heat capacity (25 °C) 25.060 J·mol−1·K−1 |
Quote:
Here's some pictures from the Flight 93 crash site... They weren't too hard to find really. http://content.screencast.com/users/...09-13_0713.png http://content.screencast.com/users/...09-13_0715.png Here's one of the engines.... http://content.screencast.com/users/...09-13_0716.png |
Quote:
They found all kinds of debris including a huge piece of fucking landinggear in the Pentagon itself? Wtf man? 9 years later and plenty of pictures with plane parts later you come here telling us there we no plane parts at all? Wtf is going on in that peasized brain of yours? Did you really drink that much alcohol that you're this fucking retarded now or what? How the fuck can you get this fucking stupid. Jesus christ. Unbelievable. |
Quote:
He read somewhere no fuel was found so that means there was no plane. The fact that you show plane parts is less strong evidence for him. That's how they lunatics work. |
I can show the pictures from the Pentagon plane parts to Amp now but he won't care about it. A big fucking landing gear inside the Pentagon is no evidence for him whatsoever. However the fact that inside his walnutbrain he believes that the wings should've stayed intact is evidence to him that no plane entered the Pentagon.
You see what i'm saying? How these retards think? |
The 100's of videos showing planes flying into the wtc towers is no evidence for Amp that planes were used. Not at all. Totally not important to him.
The fact that they didn't find big plane parts IS evidence to him no planes were used. People like him should be forced to get mental help. It scares me that people like him are free to go and do and say whatever they want. They shouldn't have that freedom. It's bad for them and could possibly be very bad for other (sane) people. |
hahahaha trash heap is imploding :1orglaugh
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Those pics could mean something, in a real and independent investigation. Two of them are unsourced though. Quote:
:D |
Quote:
|
76 posts and The Trash Heap is already having a mental breakdown. :1orglaugh
|
Quote:
Btw, why don't you tell use what hit the WTC towers exactly. Come on man, i want to have a good laugh. |
Quote:
http://brokenzombie.com/junk_bin/gfy/puppeteer.jpg |
Quote:
Drink some more moron. Or go fuck some pigs. I know you like to do that. |
Quote:
http://brokenzombie.com/junk_bin/gfy/YouDaMan.jpg |
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
:D |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123