I Could Shave You Even Though We're Using NATS - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

European Lee · 12-18-2004, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bret
Anyway, I am not trying to bust your balls. But a false sense of security is far worse then no security at all.

Agreed and that was the point i was ultimately making

Regards,

Lee

Basic_man · 12-18-2004, 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dalai lama

Nice reply, POST WHORE !

evanmorgan · 12-18-2004, 09:17 AM

if it is true of every program, why put one programs name in the title of the thread? Might fuck up their reputation for no reason.

Evan

European Lee · 12-18-2004, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by evanmorgan
if it is true of every program, why put one programs name in the title of the thread? Might fuck up their reputation for no reason.

Evan

Because it was the first program that came to mind while i was writing the thread title.

Plus, nats really is the hype of the industry right now, just like in 6-12 months time a different program will be.

Regards,

Lee

J.R. · 12-18-2004, 09:32 AM

The NATS Crew run a tight ship!

I am thrilled to be using it

NATS does not suppor this option unless you
fuck with the coding or something.

I am willing to be that 90% of the sponsors
that pay PER SIGNUP and offer more then $35 a
join are shaving

Partnership is coming back faster then the Polar Express!

Quickdraw · 12-18-2004, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PBucksJohn
I'm done with this thread. It's a Saturday morning and believe it or not I have things to do.

I've stated our standing 30 times in this thread alone. If you don't get it by now you never will.

Enjoy your day everyone.

I was wondering why you were arguing with a THIEF.

He is a scumbag that only deserves to be reminded to pay what he owes.

Didn't his last sig sponsor demand he take their brand outta his sig before the month was up?

European Lee = Lying thief, and he admitted it in the BlueDesignStudios thread a while back

TGCashin · 12-18-2004, 09:43 AM

I got to agree with the trust issue. I personally love my affiliate system. I self coded it and it is very customizable to my system and affiliates needs. I know EXACTLY how it works and can easily add anything as needed.

Now on that note, my partner wants to move to NATS because "people trust it and it will bring in webmasters." I know dam well I don't rip anyone off. My current webmasters know this too. I don't think paying 700 a month for a system that does EXACTLY what mine does, with extra shit I don't need, and the customization that makes mine nice, is worth it.

I know dam well I can easily edit databases and shave my affiliates using NATS. If I wanted to, all I have to do is change the Epoch post back database to show sales under other affiliates and you will be "Shaved." I would NEVER rip off people because they make me my money.

bangman · 12-18-2004, 09:58 AM

I really hate fucktard attention whores.
I really do.

Fucking idiot.

BossDVDs · 12-18-2004, 10:08 AM

The false sense of security point made me want to reply to this thread. This whole "we make it harder, etc." marketing approach along with open battles with the owners of MPA3 doesn't seem right. I'm sure there are individuals with the similar mind set of PIBCASH (known thief's) who'll try to bank on the fact that webmasters may actually believe "anyone who uses NATS can't shave". I know NATS owners throw in lines saying "but we never said it couldn't be done" etc. but these words seem to come a little too late. Also, all these claims of "oh, we'll take away you license, etc." .. well how about putting into effect the same policy when sponsors go the extra step themselves and say "We are using the NATS affiliate system and cannot modify your stats." .. allowing that should be a crime in itself.

andrej_NDC · 12-18-2004, 10:46 AM

I liked NATS when they camed out, but to be honest I don't like the way they promote their product. MPA fucked up and made a shave feature, yes, it was a stupid fault. But Im tired of hearing about it in every "NATS" thread, that they don't made shaving that easy like "some other" company.

Jer · 12-18-2004, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bangman
I really hate fucktard attention whores.
I really do.

Fucking idiot.

Same here.

Jer · 12-18-2004, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by andrej_NDC
I liked NATS when they camed out, but to be honest I don't like the way they promote their product. MPA fucked up and made a shave feature, yes, it was a stupid fault. But Im tired of hearing about it in every "NATS" thread, that they don't made shaving that easy like "some other" company.

But that's the pure truth. Plain and simple.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 12-18-2004, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by European Lee
I KNOW it can be

Regards,

Lee

Aye.

J.R. · 12-18-2004, 11:00 AM

MPA2 is and was a joke!

I lost money, had fucked up ratio's lost databases and
I had PHP problems almost every day! We crashed more
times in a month then I can even remember.

We lost MORE webmasters due to FUCKED up ratios
when we used MPA2.

Once we switched to NATS, bette ratio's, more money
and happier webmasters! BEST OF ALL, WE HAVE NOT CRASHED
ONCE AS A RESULT OF NATS!

You do that math!

Pipecrew · 12-18-2004, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by J.R.
MPA2 is and was a joke!

I lost money, had fucked up ratio's lost databases and
I had PHP problems almost every day! We crashed more
times in a month then I can even remember.

We lost MORE webmasters due to FUCKED up ratios
when we used MPA2.

Once we switched to NATS, bette ratio's, more money
and happier webmasters! BEST OF ALL, WE HAVE NOT CRASHED
ONCE AS A RESULT OF NATS!

You do that math!

Didnt your right hand man quit and then told everyone how you shave at like 40%? I dont think mpa was the reason you lost webmasters.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 12-18-2004, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pipecrew
Didnt your right hand man quit and then told everyone how you shave at like 40%? I dont think mpa was the reason you lost webmasters.

LOL! Now thats a great.

J.R. · 12-18-2004, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pipecrew
Didnt your right hand man quit and then told everyone how you shave at like 40%? I dont think mpa was the reason you lost webmasters.

HA.. if that were the case then I would not have any bills
or credit card debt.

No, we had 2 regular employees quit and move back
to Calif. 1 of them was pissed cuz' I refused to pay him
commissions when he gave me 1 days notice and left
me hanging. ( this was 15 months ago )

I later agreed and paid him since he was a long time friend.

Thats why hiring friends is BAD BUSINESS!

My right hand guy still works with me.

European Lee · 12-18-2004, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by J.R.
BEST OF ALL, WE HAVE NOT CRASHED
ONCE AS A RESULT OF NATS!

But you have had some technical issues with nats

You might want to actually click your sig once in a while

Regards,

Lee

bigdog · 12-18-2004, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by J.R.
The NATS Crew run a tight ship!

I am thrilled to be using it

NATS does not suppor this option unless you
fuck with the coding or something.

I am willing to be that 90% of the sponsors
that pay PER SIGNUP and offer more then $35 a
join are shaving

Partnership is coming back faster then the Polar Express!

damn didn't know partnership programs are in the in thing now

- Jesus Christ - · 12-18-2004, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by European Lee
But you have had some technical issues with nats

Thats a config or mysql issue you fucktard.

QualityMpegs · 12-18-2004, 11:45 AM

You two are repeating the same things over and over. Time for Lee to STFU.

TMM_John · 12-18-2004, 11:50 AM

That is a mysql issue, not a NATS issue. You are grabbing for desperate things now, I don't know why you feel the need to attack NATS.

However, even thought it is not a NATS issue we can not reach joel but we are on his server looking to fix it

It seems that mysql is not running at all, but myisamchk is so it appears as if his host is trying to do something with mysql. We are on top of it and it will be fixed shortly.

THAT is the kind of service NATS provides it's clients.

TMM_John · 12-18-2004, 11:56 AM

I've reached Joel's host. One of his harddrives became full and they are moving the MySQL data to another partition.

It will be back up shortly.

NOT a NATS bug. Not a software issue. Lee, you need to stop making the assumptions and throwing accustations around.

The problem will be resolved shortly even though Joel is not around and it's a saturday afternoon. NATS takes care of our customers.

ironlung · 12-18-2004, 12:11 PM

good for you yerapeein lee

J.R. · 12-18-2004, 12:22 PM

It's *not* a NATS issue.

Are partition filled up and my host XXXWEBHOSTING.com is
fixing it now.

It's a database issue that we already knew about.

J.R. · 12-18-2004, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PBucksJohn
I've reached Joel's host. One of his harddrives became full and they are moving the MySQL data to another partition.

It will be back up shortly.

NOT a NATS bug. Not a software issue. Lee, you need to stop making the assumptions and throwing accustations around.

The problem will be resolved shortly even though Joel is not around and it's a saturday afternoon. NATS takes care of our customers.

Thanks John.. my host spotted the problem prior
to any of us knowing

XXXWEBHOSTING has alerts installed to let them know
if something is wrong before it gets out of hand.

I have been with them since 1997, there is a reason for that.

OY · 12-18-2004, 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by J.R.
MPA2 is and was a joke!

I lost money, had fucked up ratio's lost databases and
I had PHP problems almost every day! We crashed more
times in a month then I can even remember.

We lost MORE webmasters due to FUCKED up ratios
when we used MPA2.

Once we switched to NATS, bette ratio's, more money
and happier webmasters! BEST OF ALL, WE HAVE NOT CRASHED
ONCE AS A RESULT OF NATS!

You do that math!

Joel from Boobdollars.com was repeatedly shut down using MPA2 due to non payment of his rent fees.

I believe we shut him down 5-6 times during the course of him being an MPA2 client for non-payment and let him slide for months when repeated promises to pay us kept on being made.

After the last time we shut him off for non-payment he moved away from using MPA2. I would too if I was Joel - he could not afford having Mansion Productions shut off his MPA2 anymore.

This is not a unique occurrence with MPA2 clients that this happens. But Joel was one of the worst. He is a liar and I have all the communication with him in emails and ICQ if anyone doubts my word on this.

That is all I should need to say about the above comments from Joel the ex-MPA2 affiliate program owner that does not pay neither for his affiliate program rent fees nor his affiliates. PS. (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...02#post6092102)

I would stay away from Boobdollars.com no matter what affiliate program software he use.

As for Nats - they seem to have a good program going for them and I wish them all the luck in this industry with clients like Joel and Boobdollars.com

TMM_John · 12-18-2004, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oystein
As for Nats - they seem to have a good program going for them and I wish them all the luck in this industry with clients like Joel and Boobdollars.com

For a minute there I thought you were actually not going to take a stab at us.

dig420 · 12-18-2004, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PBucksJohn
For a minute there I thought you were actually not going to take a stab at us.

I think he was taking a stab at Boobdollars, not you John ;)

European Lee, you're an idiot who keeps saying the same idiotic thing over and over no matter what response you get. The very definition of a pain in the ass.

Oystein is good people without a dishonest bone in his body. John and Fabian from NATS are two of the smartest, most practical problem-solving programmers I've run across in this industry. European Lee is an attention whore.

TMM_John · 12-18-2004, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
I think he was taking a stab at Boobdollars, not you John ;)

If I mistook him I appologize

European Lee · 12-18-2004, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
European Lee, you're an idiot who keeps saying the same idiotic thing over and over no matter what response you get. The very definition of a pain in the ass.

So you are saying that even though John has openly admitted it IS possible for an affiliate program to shave if they use NATS.. they cant shave?

Tell me how you came to that conclusion please

I have said the same thing throughout this thread.. that it is possible to shave when using NATs affiliate system, John agrees.

Regards,

Lee

dig420 · 12-18-2004, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by European Lee
So you are saying that even though John has openly admitted it IS possible for an affiliate program to shave if they use NATS.. they cant shave?

Tell me how you came to that conclusion please

I have said the same thing throughout this thread.. that it is possible to shave when using NATs affiliate system, John agrees.

Regards,

Lee

no I'm saying you're a repetitive moron.

Regards,

Bernie

TMM_John · 12-18-2004, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by European Lee
So you are saying that even though John has openly admitted it IS possible for an affiliate program to shave if they use NATS.. they cant shave?

Tell me how you came to that conclusion please

I have said the same thing throughout this thread.. that it is possible to shave when using NATs affiliate system, John agrees.

Regards,

Lee

Can you shave WITH nats? No. That's what we've said. That NATS has no shave feature.

Can you fuck with the #s outside of NATS. Yes, you can not send checks, edit the database (noticable by resellers and triggers flags in NATS< etc.), etc. These things are not "shaving" per say.

Stop half and mis quoting me. I'm starting to think you're really a nobody with nothing better to do. I've seen a bunch of people come in here and call you a tool and not one person claim you're a stand up guy.

The horse is dead. This will be my last reply to you.

Biggy2 · 12-18-2004, 01:53 PM

Lee,

Why would you start a thread like this and burn bridges with someone you don't even know?
Just for record, when I spoke to John about installing NATS - he made it very clear if someone were to install a Shave feature, he would sue them, then go after personal assetts.
When he spoke about it, he had this look in his eye, it was almost evil - like, this is one dude I don't want to fuck with

Think about it, a guy that is dedicated to the long term by selling a recurring solution, wants his software to be around for a long time... dont start threads and burn bridges with not only one of the smartest guys in the biz, but also one of the nicest ones as well...

European Lee · 12-18-2004, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Can you fuck with the #s outside of NATS. Yes, you can not send checks, edit the database (noticable by resellers and triggers flags in NATS< etc.), etc. These things are not "shaving" per say.

Thats what i said originally, an affiliate program CAN SHAVE even if they USE NATs.

I didnt say that they could shave WITH NATs. We are both agreed on that and it would seem, we are both agreed that affiliate programs, if they wanted to, even though they were using the NATs affiliate program, could shave their webmasters.

Quote:

Stop half and mis quoting me.

I havent misquoted you anywhere in this thread, we are both in agreement that NATs has no shave feature but it is still possible for an affiliate program to shave.. even if they do use NATs.

Quote:

The horse is dead. This will be my last reply to you.

You also said that on page one. For the record but, lets stick to the issue at hand, that it IS POSSIBLE for an affiliate program using the NATs system to shave their affiliates.

This isnt only true for NATs it is true for any affiliate system.

Regards,

Lee

European Lee · 12-18-2004, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Biggy2
Lee,

Why would you start a thread like this and burn bridges with someone you don't even know?
Just for record, when I spoke to John about installing NATS - he made it very clear if someone were to install a Shave feature, he would sue them, then go after personal assetts.
When he spoke about it, he had this look in his eye, it was almost evil - like, this is one dude I don't want to fuck with

Think about it, a guy that is dedicated to the long term by selling a recurring solution, wants his software to be around for a long time... dont start threads and burn bridges with not only one of the smartest guys in the biz, but also one of the nicest ones as well...

Again, i know he has made it clear however, it is possible to shave WITHOUT installing or modifying anything in the NATs program. John agrees with me.

Regards,

Lee

European Lee · 12-18-2004, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PBucksJohn
These things are not "shaving" per say.

Shall we call it 'creative accounting' then if that makes it any easier for people to understand?

Regards,

Lee

Biggy2 · 12-18-2004, 02:03 PM

Lee,

I just have one question for you..

WHY would you start this thread? Why would you take someone's good work, talk about it with a negative connotation, for no reason whatsoever...

XPays · 12-18-2004, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BossDVDs
The false sense of security point made me want to reply to this thread. This whole "we make it harder, etc." marketing approach along with open battles with the owners of MPA3 doesn't seem right. I'm sure there are individuals with the similar mind set of PIBCASH (known thief's) who'll try to bank on the fact that webmasters may actually believe "anyone who uses NATS can't shave". I know NATS owners throw in lines saying "but we never said it couldn't be done" etc. but these words seem to come a little too late. Also, all these claims of "oh, we'll take away you license, etc." .. well how about putting into effect the same policy when sponsors go the extra step themselves and say "We are using the NATS affiliate system and cannot modify your stats." .. allowing that should be a crime in itself.

Wow- good post. Competing sponsor programs, using proprietary software, have been courteous in response to the Nats-client-driven FALSE ADVERTISING. Many program owners have known all along that a little mod_rewrite for example on the inbound traffic sorting and whalla- shaving. So for months we watched the false advertising desperation of nats clients. It is refreshing to see that the less familiar webmasters are exposed to the simple reality.

I don't support Lee, but it is time for Nats to correct the false advertising that they prospered off of and focus on the benefits of their program- or at least admonish the multiple programs that falsely claimed no-shave like beating a dead horse for so long while intelligent program owners sat back and watched. Time for some professional courtesy and official press release clarifying the previous lies.

XPays · 12-18-2004, 02:17 PM

and btw- supplying affiliate software to a lot of companies is a big job with a lot of grief at times. nats provides a needed service for many that we found in the past to be not worth our efforts. we would rather focus on our own programs than cater to others virtual programs. so, i wish nats success in their field is my point.

dig420 · 12-18-2004, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by XPays
Wow- good post. Competing sponsor programs, using proprietary software, have been courteous in response to the Nats-client-driven FALSE ADVERTISING. Many program owners have known all along that a little mod_rewrite for example on the inbound traffic sorting and whalla- shaving. So for months we watched the false advertising desperation of nats clients. It is refreshing to see that the less familiar webmasters are exposed to the simple reality.

I don't support Lee, but it is time for Nats to correct the false advertising that they prospered off of and focus on the benefits of their program- or at least admonish the multiple programs that falsely claimed no-shave like beating a dead horse for so long while intelligent program owners sat back and watched. Time for some professional courtesy and official press release clarifying the previous lies.

Where is the false advertising? Nats is built without a shave feature and as far as I can see that's 100% correct. You're saying NATS should 'admonish' their clients for advertising that they use NATS?? LOL!

Nats is a real program. It isn't a shady scheme to sue rival webmasters for any small thing while you claim gangstahood or a huge bulkmail operation that they have to worry about getting sued by AOL over. John and Fabian actually provide a concrete service and make their money the right way, without fucking over webmasters and surfers alike like some programs do.

XPays · 12-18-2004, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

you must have missed the months and months of webmasters flying sig's claiming - screw every other program- use us because of....

dig420 · 12-18-2004, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by XPays
you must have missed the months and months of webmasters flying sig's claiming - screw every other program- use us because of....

Because of what? Because you'll sue the fuck out of them once you get your patents? Because you'll pay them less thru xpays than if they just sign up to the program themselves?

What are you doing for anybody? What service do you provide?

XPays · 12-18-2004, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
blah blah blah oral vomit blah blah blah

whatever you say pal.

TheEbonyFelony · 12-18-2004, 03:04 PM

wow this is interesting...dont trust those yurop peepole

bigdog · 12-18-2004, 03:06 PM

the nats and mpa2 drama is better then watching jerry springer

dig420 · 12-18-2004, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by XPays
whatever you say pal.

I'm not inclined to aggravate my ulcers pissing on the boards, I have enough entertainment in my life and we have a mutual friend in d-money, but you have more skeletons in your closet than any other webmaster I can think of off the top of my head. You don't need to be here yanking John's chain for sig views.

XPays · 12-18-2004, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
blah blah blah jealous spew blah blah blah penis envy blah blah blah napolean complex

still bitter i told your partners about the $10k you STOLE from them when we bought sexpays.com from you?

playing the d$ card? LOL

"sooooooo angry - damn that rap music"

whatever you say buddy

dig420 · 12-18-2004, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by XPays
still bitter i told your partners about the $10k you STOLE from them when we bought sexpays.com from you?

playing the d$ card? LOL

"sooooooo angry - damn that rap music"

whatever you say buddy

You didn't buy it, you sued for it and THEN you bought it. What are you planning to do with your patents G? Who's going to be your first victim? Me?

I don't give a fuck if you listen to rap, that's all I listen to myself. I don't wear the chains and bling out though, as I realize that I'm a white guy.

What are you doing for money now that AOL shut your mailing down?

XPays · 12-18-2004, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
carry on my wayward son

we have no mail - c & d your false accusations. we get spoofed plenty though since we have a lot of domains. btw- we were and are whitelisted at AOL and we settled with Microsoft months ago after protecting our db for 17 months at great expense. have a nice day

our first patent enforcements will be public knowledge in early '05 and we are not pissing in our sandbox as you are in this thread, ya boardstalker

12-18-2004, 09:17 AM	#53
evanmorgan Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 2,490	if it is true of every program, why put one programs name in the title of the thread? Might fuck up their reputation for no reason. Evan __________________ Perfect for Asian, Petite,Teen, Exotic, Bikini, Solo girl, Panty, Softcore and Cameltoe Traffic 100% Exclusive Girls and Content NEW JOON MALI Tour - LILY KOH 60% Lifetime Rev Share, 10% Webmaster Referral - Epassporte

12-18-2004, 09:43 AM	#57
TGCashin Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Buffalo, NY Posts: 103	I got to agree with the trust issue. I personally love my affiliate system. I self coded it and it is very customizable to my system and affiliates needs. I know EXACTLY how it works and can easily add anything as needed. Now on that note, my partner wants to move to NATS because "people trust it and it will bring in webmasters." I know dam well I don't rip anyone off. My current webmasters know this too. I don't think paying 700 a month for a system that does EXACTLY what mine does, with extra shit I don't need, and the customization that makes mine nice, is worth it. I know dam well I can easily edit databases and shave my affiliates using NATS. If I wanted to, all I have to do is change the Epoch post back database to show sales under other affiliates and you will be "Shaved." I would NEVER rip off people because they make me my money. __________________ Email: [email protected] AOLIM: TGCashin

12-18-2004, 09:58 AM	#58
bangman Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: PA, USA Posts: 5,283	I really hate fucktard attention whores. I really do. Fucking idiot. __________________ - David Hall ICQ: 312744199

12-18-2004, 10:08 AM	#59
BossDVDs Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 835	The false sense of security point made me want to reply to this thread. This whole "we make it harder, etc." marketing approach along with open battles with the owners of MPA3 doesn't seem right. I'm sure there are individuals with the similar mind set of PIBCASH (known thief's) who'll try to bank on the fact that webmasters may actually believe "anyone who uses NATS can't shave". I know NATS owners throw in lines saying "but we never said it couldn't be done" etc. but these words seem to come a little too late. Also, all these claims of "oh, we'll take away you license, etc." .. well how about putting into effect the same policy when sponsors go the extra step themselves and say "We are using the NATS affiliate system and cannot modify your stats." .. allowing that should be a crime in itself. __________________

12-18-2004, 11:00 AM	#64
J.R. WantBoobs.com Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Calif & Washington Posts: 3,472	MPA2 is and was a joke! I lost money, had fucked up ratio's lost databases and I had PHP problems almost every day! We crashed more times in a month then I can even remember. We lost MORE webmasters due to FUCKED up ratios when we used MPA2. Once we switched to NATS, bette ratio's, more money and happier webmasters! BEST OF ALL, WE HAVE NOT CRASHED ONCE AS A RESULT OF NATS! You do that math! Last edited by J.R.; 12-18-2004 at 11:02 AM..

12-18-2004, 09:32 AM	#55
J.R. WantBoobs.com Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Calif & Washington Posts: 3,472	The NATS Crew run a tight ship! I am thrilled to be using it NATS does not suppor this option unless you fuck with the coding or something. I am willing to be that 90% of the sponsors that pay PER SIGNUP and offer more then $35 a join are shaving Partnership is coming back faster then the Polar Express!

12-18-2004, 10:46 AM	#60
andrej_NDC Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 7,760	I liked NATS when they camed out, but to be honest I don't like the way they promote their product. MPA fucked up and made a shave feature, yes, it was a stupid fault. But Im tired of hearing about it in every "NATS" thread, that they don't made shaving that easy like "some other" company.

12-18-2004, 11:45 AM	#71
QualityMpegs Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Orlando, Florida Posts: 3,521	You two are repeating the same things over and over. Time for Lee to STFU. __________________ PAYSITES CATEGORIZED AND THUMBNAILED BY NICHE - 69767780

12-18-2004, 11:50 AM	#72
TMM_John Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 6,660	That is a mysql issue, not a NATS issue. You are grabbing for desperate things now, I don't know why you feel the need to attack NATS. However, even thought it is not a NATS issue we can not reach joel but we are on his server looking to fix it It seems that mysql is not running at all, but myisamchk is so it appears as if his host is trying to do something with mysql. We are on top of it and it will be fixed shortly. THAT is the kind of service NATS provides it's clients. __________________ Skype: JohnA1078 Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

12-18-2004, 11:56 AM	#73
TMM_John Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 6,660	I've reached Joel's host. One of his harddrives became full and they are moving the MySQL data to another partition. It will be back up shortly. NOT a NATS bug. Not a software issue. Lee, you need to stop making the assumptions and throwing accustations around. The problem will be resolved shortly even though Joel is not around and it's a saturday afternoon. NATS takes care of our customers. __________________ Skype: JohnA1078 Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS! Last edited by TMM_John; 12-18-2004 at 12:00 PM..

12-18-2004, 12:11 PM	#74
ironlung Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: nofx, florida Posts: 1,012	good for you yerapeein lee

12-18-2004, 12:22 PM	#75
J.R. WantBoobs.com Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Calif & Washington Posts: 3,472	It's not a NATS issue. Are partition filled up and my host XXXWEBHOSTING.com is fixing it now. It's a database issue that we already knew about.

12-18-2004, 01:53 PM	#84
Biggy2 Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 1,821	Lee, Why would you start a thread like this and burn bridges with someone you don't even know? Just for record, when I spoke to John about installing NATS - he made it very clear if someone were to install a Shave feature, he would sue them, then go after personal assetts. When he spoke about it, he had this look in his eye, it was almost evil - like, this is one dude I don't want to fuck with Think about it, a guy that is dedicated to the long term by selling a recurring solution, wants his software to be around for a long time... dont start threads and burn bridges with not only one of the smartest guys in the biz, but also one of the nicest ones as well...

12-18-2004, 02:03 PM	#88
Biggy2 Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 1,821	Lee, I just have one question for you.. WHY would you start this thread? Why would you take someone's good work, talk about it with a negative connotation, for no reason whatsoever...

12-18-2004, 02:17 PM	#90
XPays Team Player Join Date: May 2004 Location: Inside the most accurately counting and reporting affiliate system in the world at XPays.com Posts: 13,002	and btw- supplying affiliate software to a lot of companies is a big job with a lot of grief at times. nats provides a needed service for many that we found in the past to be not worth our efforts. we would rather focus on our own programs than cater to others virtual programs. so, i wish nats success in their field is my point. __________________ InterNext Expo Domain Auction Live Now thru Feb 5 HuntingMoon GFY Domains Marketplace is LIVE XPays always pays! Top Site: * RealJasmine.com * + HotelHeiress® with The Paris Hilton Sex Video Insert the HotelHeiress® HD FEED into your members areas XPin.com Opening for Pin Partners Soonish Mainstream Offers For Emailers and DomainersNONADULT.COM Like Us!

12-18-2004, 03:04 PM	#95
TheEbonyFelony Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: hidden village of the sand..TRAINING TO KILL NARUTO Posts: 1,964	wow this is interesting...dont trust those yurop peepole __________________ no you cannot know what im promoting you nosey fucks!

12-18-2004, 03:06 PM	#96
bigdog Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 6,964	the nats and mpa2 drama is better then watching jerry springer