Quote:
Originally posted by XPays
Wow- good post. Competing sponsor programs, using proprietary software, have been courteous in response to the Nats-client-driven FALSE ADVERTISING. Many program owners have known all along that a little mod_rewrite for example on the inbound traffic sorting and whalla- shaving. So for months we watched the false advertising desperation of nats clients. It is refreshing to see that the less familiar webmasters are exposed to the simple reality.
I don't support Lee, but it is time for Nats to correct the false advertising that they prospered off of and focus on the benefits of their program- or at least admonish the multiple programs that falsely claimed no-shave like beating a dead horse for so long while intelligent program owners sat back and watched. Time for some professional courtesy and official press release clarifying the previous lies.
|
Where is the false advertising? Nats is built without a shave feature and as far as I can see that's 100% correct. You're saying NATS should 'admonish' their clients for advertising that they use NATS?? LOL!
Nats is a real program. It isn't a shady scheme to sue rival webmasters for any small thing while you claim gangstahood or a huge bulkmail operation that they have to worry about getting sued by AOL over. John and Fabian actually provide a concrete service and make their money the right way, without fucking over webmasters and surfers alike like some programs do.