Quote:
Originally posted by BossDVDs
The false sense of security point made me want to reply to this thread. This whole "we make it harder, etc." marketing approach along with open battles with the owners of MPA3 doesn't seem right. I'm sure there are individuals with the similar mind set of PIBCASH (known thief's) who'll try to bank on the fact that webmasters may actually believe "anyone who uses NATS can't shave". I know NATS owners throw in lines saying "but we never said it couldn't be done" etc. but these words seem to come a little too late. Also, all these claims of "oh, we'll take away you license, etc." .. well how about putting into effect the same policy when sponsors go the extra step themselves and say "We are using the NATS affiliate system and cannot modify your stats." .. allowing that should be a crime in itself.
|
Wow- good post. Competing sponsor programs, using proprietary software, have been courteous in response to the Nats-client-driven FALSE ADVERTISING. Many program owners have known all along that a little mod_rewrite for example on the inbound traffic sorting and whalla- shaving. So for months we watched the false advertising desperation of nats clients. It is refreshing to see that the less familiar webmasters are exposed to the simple reality.
I don't support Lee, but it is time for Nats to correct the false advertising that they prospered off of and focus on the benefits of their program- or at least admonish the multiple programs that falsely claimed no-shave like beating a dead horse for so long while intelligent program owners sat back and watched. Time for some professional courtesy and official press release clarifying the previous lies.