GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Can You Trust Your Content Provider? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=127356)

AaronM 04-23-2003 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jreaka
The P.O. BOX THE P.O BOX!!!!!

What do I win?

I think we will stick with what our LAWYER has to say.......not our lord and savior AaronM

Good advice. Now go hire a compentent lawyer.

AaronM 04-23-2003 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JConway
No offense :1orglaugh but you are one annoying fucker.
Addicted to my post, huh?

You can leave anytime. It will not hurt my feelings.

Kinda cool seeing all of the idiots come out of the woodwork though.

I still need some popcorn. Anybody have any?

jreaka 04-23-2003 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM


Ingornant fool.

If work was slow then one might think that I would have updated my content site at least once in the last year.

Sorry if it offends some of you stupid fuckers that I am trying to make sure that YOU, as a possible client of these companies, have your ass covered as well.

I love it when the uneducated speak. :1orglaugh


Damn! You got me oh' holy one!

Sorry if I misspoke excellency, I will now go back to my humble place in life and continue to worship AaronM

Paul Markham 04-23-2003 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jonesy

I do believe most reputable forgeign Content companies as well as American ones have model records on file, (what western country wouldnt have a law like that?) as most ive visited from that list have it in their licensing contracts but not veiwable on the site itself.

bottom line is: have your ass covered.:thumbsup

The last bit is right, the first sentence (I quoted) wrong. never rely on someone else to keep your arse out of jail.

Ask an attorney and see if he advises "Yes it's perfectly fine for you to let Boris Ivabignob the Urals" :1orglaugh

LadyMischief 04-23-2003 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jreaka
The P.O. BOX THE P.O BOX!!!!!

What do I win?

I think we will stick with what our LAWYER has to say.......not our lord and savior AaronM

Heh.. if your lawyer isn't telling you that a P.O. Box is not acceptable, time to hire legal council that's well versed in 2257 laws and precidents. I have spent much money on legal council that is both well versed in adult and specifically 2257 laws, and they, and several other lawyers who SPECIALIZE in this area all say it is NOT LEGAL. A P.O. box is NOT a physical address or a place of business. My mailing address is a P.O. box, yet if you check my custodial information, I have my PHYSICAL address listed. Why? Because it's the LAW. If you aren't willing to put you address up, time to find a new business.

J.R. 04-23-2003 01:01 PM

If the FEDS want to get you, they will regardless of what
some stupid ass html page says.

You don't think Frank Bongiorno had his 2257 in place
with the Attorney General said he was a child pornographer ?

jreaka 04-23-2003 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM


Good advice. Now go hire a compentent lawyer.

What is your rate oh powerful one?

LadyMischief 04-23-2003 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM


Addicted to my post, huh?

You can leave anytime. It will not hurt my feelings.

Kinda cool seeing all of the idiots come out of the woodwork though.

I still need some popcorn. Anybody have any?

Cheetos Cheese Popcorn. Want some?

AaronM 04-23-2003 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jreaka



Damn! You got me oh' holy one!

Sorry if I misspoke excellency, I will now go back to my humble place in life and continue to worship AaronM

I do not want your worship..I do not want your acceptance. I want you to pull your head out of your ass.

CDSmith 04-23-2003 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM
Anybody else see a problem here?
Yeah, there is no street address listed there, only a PO box and an email addy. According to what I've read, that's not good enough.


I thought I read something as well about a person's right to anonymity online, some time in the past 4 years? I wonder if I can find that again.... and if so, might there be some way in which these two laws conflict....?

I find myself agreeing with both points.... a person SHOULD have the right to maintain some anonymity in order to prevent psychos from stalking them etc.... but at the same time I agree that people who peddle content need to keep legal accurate release records and be able to prove it at all times.

It's a catch-22 situation we have here.

AaronM 04-23-2003 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jreaka


What is your rate oh powerful one?

You could not afford to hire me to mow your lawn.

Run along now.

AaronM 04-23-2003 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
Yeah, there is no street address listed there, only a PO box and an email addy. According to what I've read, that's not good enough.


I thought I read something as well about a person's right to anonymity online, some time in the past 4 years? I wonder if I can find that again.... and if so, might there be some way in which these two laws conflict....?

I find myself agreeing with both points.... a person SHOULD have the right to maintain some anonymity in order to prevent psychos from stalking them etc.... but at the same time I agree that people who peddle content need to keep legal accurate release records and be able to prove it at all times.

It's a catch-22 situation we have here.

Can't agrue with that.

jreaka 04-23-2003 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM


I do not want your worship..I do not want your acceptance. I want you to pull your head out of your ass.

It is now out sir, again thank you for letting me breath the same air you do.

Paul Markham 04-23-2003 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM


Good advice. Now go hire a compentent lawyer.

Good advice.

But try to steer clear of the lawyers that advise you to put your liberty and business into the hands of some guy you never met, but exchanged e-mails with.

Cos they are even bigger dick heads than some of the clowns posting here.

LadyMischief 04-23-2003 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jreaka


It is now out sir, again thank you for letting me breath the same air you do.

So, Mister Martyr.. have you had your break today?

CDSmith 04-23-2003 01:08 PM

The only real winners I see here are the fucking lawyers.

AaronM 04-23-2003 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
The only real winners I see here are the fucking lawyers.
Kindly change your screen name to "Sad But True"

jreaka 04-23-2003 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief


So, Mister Martyr.. have you had your break today?


His almightness AaronM has not said if I could have a break.

AaronM 04-23-2003 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jreaka



His almightness AaronM has not said if I could have a break.

Kinda funny that you have to find people who you are tied to (WantBoobs) to step up and play back and forth with me...Yet some of my competition is doing the same for me.

Go find an unrelated party to back up your bullshit.

Paul Markham 04-23-2003 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
The only real winners I see here are the fucking lawyers.
They definately will be winners if some of the idiots here get pulled in by the law.

Paul Markham 04-23-2003 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
The only real winners I see here are the fucking lawyers.
They definately will be winners if some of the idiots here get pulled in by the law.

It's about making yourself as bullet proof as possible, but to listen to some here you would think they are immune.

J.R. 04-23-2003 01:40 PM

Enough fun for one day, I am going back to work now.

AaronM 04-23-2003 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by J.R.
Enough fun for one day, I am going back to work now.
Me too. We can piss again later.

I wil actually be back for more later today though....:glugglug

StuartD 04-23-2003 02:21 PM

So who all have updated or fixed their shit and who have just bitched and moaned and left it as it is?

I wanna know who I would and wouldn't buy from :winkwink:

jact 04-23-2003 02:37 PM

I'm still amazed that people are taking this as a personal attack. Maybe I just don't take things to heart like some, who knows.

prostock 04-23-2003 02:56 PM

AaronM

You didnt have me on your list good or bad , but i did as you said and went and looked and i did find a prob and i do belive all is right , if you are still adding to your list please do us , as well as if there is still a prob please let me know thanks
:thumbsup

jact 04-23-2003 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by prostock
AaronM

You didnt have me on your list good or bad , but i did as you said and went and looked and i did find a prob and i do belive all is right , if you are still adding to your list please do us , as well as if there is still a prob please let me know thanks
:thumbsup

Looks good to me.. But hey, what do I know? :1orglaugh

jonesy 04-23-2003 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM


Looks like we understand each other perfectly.

Fuck you very much. :glugglug

Nooooo, I insist, fuck you very much!:winkwink:

StuartD 04-23-2003 03:40 PM

is 2257 3l33t enough to be 1005? :1orglaugh

jact 04-23-2003 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
is 2257 3l33t enough to be 1005? :1orglaugh
You're an idiot.:321GFY

LadyMischief 04-23-2003 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jact


You're an idiot.:321GFY

Yeah, but you were telling me just last night that you like the way his ass looks in tights.. Sour grapes?

jact 04-23-2003 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief


Yeah, but you were telling me just last night that you like the way his ass looks in tights.. Sour grapes?

You mean in the tutu? :D

StuartD 04-23-2003 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jact


You mean in the tutu? :D

looked better than your man boobs in a tube top! :1orglaugh

AaronM 04-23-2003 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
So who all have updated or fixed their shit and who have just bitched and moaned and left it as it is?

I wanna know who I would and wouldn't buy from :winkwink:

Feel free to buy from any of them. Just use the list to determine which ones YOU wish to do business with.

StuartD 04-23-2003 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM


Feel free to buy from any of them. Just use the list to determine which ones YOU wish to do business with.

yeah, definitely good to have.... I mean, I know nothing about that 2257 compliant stuff.
So I'd have no clue which content providers would or wouldn't get me in trouble if I used their stuff.

Digipimp 04-23-2003 07:02 PM

I don't see Jezebel Content on the list, what's their status. And no I'm not in any way affiliated with them, but have been to their site many times and was thinking of buying some stuff from them.

12clicks 04-23-2003 07:19 PM

I put my grandmom's address down. That usually slows the feds down enough for me to skip town.:thumbsup

AaronM 04-23-2003 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
I put my grandmom's address down. That usually slows the feds down enough for me to skip town.:thumbsup
I listed a black uncle of mine.

Great minds and all that shit.......:thumbsup

kaylacam 04-23-2003 09:52 PM

AasronM is right...he is ALWAYS right...all bow before AaronM!

StuartD 04-23-2003 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kaylacam
AasronM is right...he is ALWAYS right...all bow before AaronM!
uh uh.... no way, he got me to do that bowing thing in front of him once and... well, let's just say, I nearly had a mouthful :1orglaugh

I still can't believe all the threads about this. What the hell? He posts to the people just to give them a heads up about who they're doing business with and whether or not there's legal risk there and suddenly he's the bad guy?

The only thing I can think of for those complainers is.... "those who are guilty complain the loudest"

I mean... it seems to me that people who are compliant, or are willing to fix what ever they need to be compliant are being real civil about it. Those who aren't just want to bitch and complain and blame someone else for something to draw attention away from their own screw ups.

Paul Markham 04-24-2003 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
The last bit is right, the first sentence (I quoted) wrong. never rely on someone else to keep your arse out of jail.

Ask an attorney and see if he advises "Yes it's perfectly fine for you to let Boris Ivabignob the Urals" :1orglaugh

Sorry that sounds messed up, even I don'tknowwhat I'm trying to say half the time. This is what I meant to say.

No attorney worth a damn will advise you to let someone else protect your business and your freedom. Especially if that guy is overseas and definately if the guy you bought the content from is between him and you.

The only thing they will tell you is be your own document holder, examine each and everyone to authenticate it.

Of course Dave Clark knows 4 or was it 5 attorneys who say trust someone else. :1orglaugh

Paul Markham 04-24-2003 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan


yeah, definitely good to have.... I mean, I know nothing about that 2257 compliant stuff.
So I'd have no clue which content providers would or wouldn't get me in trouble if I used their stuff.

Can I suggest, respectfully, that you find out what the laws are that govern the business you are in.

AaronM 04-24-2003 01:03 AM

300 any time soon?

Kimmykim 04-24-2003 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by J.R.
You don't think Frank Bongiorno had his 2257 in place
with the Attorney General said he was a child pornographer ?

Oops, had to kick in here.

Frankie was NOT prosecuted by the Federal court system per se. Frankie was targetted, along with several others, by a woman from Michigan who happened to be running for elected office, had no concept of the law or how it worked, and was not actually prosecuted, but threatened at a point in a campaign where being able to publicize these threats was a primary point in the campaigning.

Saying that Attorney General was after him is like saying that Bobby Kennedy was after the KKK back in the 60s, and it's just not true in this case.

JeremyB 04-24-2003 03:33 AM

Aaron, could you add us to the list here?

Our 2257 info is linked on the bottom right of every page throughout the site and is compliant even though we are based in the UK:

http://www.adultcontent.co.uk/

http://www.adultcontent.co.uk/info/18usc2257.phtml

Cheers :-)

BTW - your "contacts" e-mail address is bouncing :-(

Triple 6 04-24-2003 04:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM
300 any time soon?
lol, i see u really do jerk it to post counts:1orglaugh

:thumbsup

AaronM 04-24-2003 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jeremy-RR
Aaron, could you add us to the list here?

Our 2257 info is linked on the bottom right of every page throughout the site and is compliant even though we are based in the UK:

http://www.adultcontent.co.uk/

http://www.adultcontent.co.uk/info/18usc2257.phtml

Cheers :-)

BTW - your "contacts" e-mail address is bouncing :-(

Done. Thank you. :)

Digipimp 04-24-2003 09:07 AM

Aaron I asked about Jezebel Content, they aren't on your list and I was considering buying from them at some point so can you tell me what you think of their status?

AaronM 04-24-2003 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Digipimp
Aaron I asked about Jezebel Content, they aren't on your list and I was considering buying from them at some point so can you tell me what you think of their status?
They are not compliant.

LadyMischief 04-24-2003 09:49 AM

I'm a little teapot....


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123