Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17853739)

It isn't any different. I know you need help understanding so I will explain it and hopefully I won't use any words that you find too difficult.

You make blanket accusations against people that you have no proof against. Cam companies typically have similar unfounded accusations made against them. By reason of association you are "sucking the dick" of the cam companies who may or may not be taking advantage of affiliates and models, profiting off their intellectual property (performing on cam) without due compensation.

Post proof that you are not helping those folks get burned.

Post proof of tube content you know is "illegal". I am sure Pink Visuals would've loved to have it when they went after the tubes, but oh well... never too late right?

Post proof that you are not just a whiny little bitch. Oh, that's right... you started this thread so you already incriminated yourself there. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17853784)

Could not have said it better myself. Hopefully you never catch on to the fact that you are helping more than hurting me with all your tirades. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Thanks BRO!

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17852733)

Fabian has been caught out talking bullshit over and over again. Even a basic question like how many toilets in the office caught him out.

He has a site that lives off piracy. Even though Youtube removes all clips of serial offenders he gives up bullshit about talking to his lawyer. Then can't tell us the outcome. And won't remove pirated content from repeat offenders.

He said Brazzers spend as much on a porn scene as Vivid, or was it Wicked? I've seen the content and that's clearly not true. Or he's paying well over the odds. Or Vivid are producing crap content these days.

He told me in an email that the sites retention is the highest in the industry. How does he know? Based on what I saw I doubt it. The content is nothing special that would keep people as members. Many sites have better.

He ridiculed my estimate for floor space. Then saw where I could confirm my estimate and changed his mind. In all my years of dealing with office installations the boss knew how many people he employed and the size of the offices. He clearly doesn't.

On a thread about conversion ratios Brazzers support rep said that if you work with them that can improve ratios. 10%, 50% or 100%? From what others posted their ratios would need to improve far far better. The way the rep was talking it sounded like they had a magic button to press. Maybe it was Fabian posting as the bullshit meter was off the scale.

I have no idea of the real size of Manwin. And neither does anyone else. Because we've had nothing solid, except the posts of a person who clearly makes mistakes when posting.

arock10. It was a good question and one anyone who works in the office would know.

Originally Posted by adultmobile (Post 17853797)

Actually I still cry for Commodore 64 and Amiga computers being out of market, I was doing very well there and everyone known and respected me, in another thread some old guys cry about how BBS's and IRC #Efnet it was cool, but that's history and not today's business, is just old times to talk about, and history material.
Sure I am not still using a Commodore Amiga, no more in BBS's or IRC channels, and not blaming Microsoft(manwin) or Bill Gates(Nathan?) for having caused all the bad of the universe. As well as I am not organizing shoot of content for launch teen sites anymore, altough someone does still so managed to adapt in some way, an dI cooperate with them by put live cam teens in their member area and it all works well for all of us.

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane (Post 17853747)

BS. Your "proof" was the one and only movie by that uploader. If there were only one movie, removed for copyright reasons, then there couldnt be any movies left for you to "prove" what you claim :error

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17853701)

Seriously? I mean come on, what the hell is this dribble bullshit?

Unlike eharmony, all Youtube would have to do is prove where they left up one colored persons video, and your case would be lost. It's not like eharmony, not at all, even a tiny bit, not even if you tt it.

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17854006)

I just want to know if will67 will leave if manwin buys GFY.

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17853854)

whoa... took you two posts to get all that in. Thanks for reminding me how to spell hypocrite though.

I don't know though and that is my point. Until you or anyone else provides proof, other than all the innuendo and unfounded accusations you and others have provided thus far... I am going to go with my own first hand knowledge and move forward accordingly.

You're right. I had a choice. I made my choice based on first hand experience and legal advice. What are you basing your accusations on? I mean besides hunches, gossip, accusations, and suppositions.

You know, you could cut down on your hypocracy if you just go ahead and find another board like you said you were going to do.

(By the way, your whiny sense of entitlement and superiority complex speaks of serious mommy issues. Were you not breast fed? Or were you suckled too long?)

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 17853666)

i will the point again

TOS do not supercede the LAW

you tried to argue that nat could take down the content/ban a user for any reason because they said they could in the tos.

and i addressed that point before

eharmony got sued and lost because they banned gay people from their site, (by not allowing male seeking male.women seeking women signups) they even had a legitimate reason they had no idea 49 points of compatibility that worked for straight people would apply for gay people and it was not cost effective to test it out for only 10% of the population

even financial viability was not a valid defense against descrimination laws

bottom line if youtube was to remove all the videos i post , i would point to the one example of the video staying up and ask the question why is a white person videos allowed to stay up when their account was banned and they would lose and would pay out just as much damages as if they had said they did it because i was a hahahahahaha

bottom line nothing you are pointing to changes the fact that youtube does not remove the videos when they delete an account

they only take down the videos that have a violation that has been logged, weather that be a legally justified internal tos condition, a law or dmca takedown notice.

everything else stays up. and dscrimination laws guarrentee that example has to be universally applicable rule.

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 17854032)

yawwwn.. you started becoming boring about 3 posts ago.

As much as I am sure you would be upset to see me stay and I should stay just to piss you off, I will still go if Manwin buys gfy.

Nathan farted again, run along to sniff it up Farrell.

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 17854025)

so all i have to do blatently discriminate against hahahahahahas is hire one token black guy

do you know how much discriination would go on if that was all that was necessary to get away discriminating against someone

companies have been sued because the percentage of negative ruling against i minority was higher than against white people

i could still argue rasism based on the percentage banned accounts

if black peoples accounts were banned and all the videos were dropped 20% more times than white that would be enough for a case.

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 17854025)

so rather than follow the normal dispute resolution policy of youtube to get your video legitimately restored you deliberately violated their process and put the video back up again

i love your proof youtube takes down all videos when they ban an account for individual violations is a case where you deliberately violated youtubes policies on an account level
in the worst possible way (by circumventing their dispute resolution policy and over riding their decision).

don't you realize that an apples to oranges comparision.

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 17854018)

what the fuck are you talking about
i specifically looked for a user who was booted for multiple violations


and then posted a video that he posted that was still up

thst the point the point
the infringing videos went down
the account went down
the non infringing video stayed up

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 17854018)

there is no safe harbor for deleting videos there is only a safe hrbor against copyright infringement claims

nothing else is safe harbored

so of course you can't lose safe harbor for something that doesn'[t have a safe harbor in the first place

but that the point
the liablity for the takedwon is transfered FROM the host to the copyrright holder only if the takedown notice is sent.

so taking shit down without a takedown notice increase the liablity from zero (because the copyright holder takes it instead) to something (because it can't be transfered to anyone)

i suggest you hire a real lawyer because your talking out of your ass

or maybe actually read the law your talking about.

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links (Post 17854125)

What did I miss from page 4-till now? loolol

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17854082)

Which must be why you felt the urge to reply time and time again with volumes of vitriol and bilious remarks as well as spent so much time searching my former posts... which is just downright stalker-like behavior.

btw... you forgot to post the one where I had sincerely apologized to you and you told me to fuck off - such a gentlemanly and mature thing to do.

I see you are already teeing up the notion that you will stay in spite of your threat of leaving. The hypocracy never ends.

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17651703)

I just want to help Will76 talk about himself more because I know the weight he carries to convince anyone he is someone everyone should like and trust and respect is almost Chuck Norris epic.

Don't worry76 dude... we are here for you. We76 are here to help.

(Notice how I avoid calling Will76 "bro" since that would connote neg-reptitude)

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thum bsup

HENCEFORTH:

Make every day about Will76 day on GFY! End all pissing matches now because Will76 won76 before they even began!

End all tube debates now because Will76 has already determined he is right and YOU, YOU, and yes, YOU are WRONG76.

All negrepping ends at midnight tonight or you risk being driven off the board and forced to perform cam shows in diapers!

Make all future use of the letter "W" in a word76 end with the number "76" to show your Will76 love.

Thank you. I believe Will76 says it is ok to go back to work now.

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links (Post 17854125)

What did I miss from page 4-till now? loolol

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 17854032)

yawwwn.. you started becoming boring about 3 years ago.

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 17854173)

LMAO, this from the guy who STARTS entire threads about me, and I am the stalker... nigga please. you smoking some good stuff called denial.

Another Will76 thread, because the world needs more, please help!





LMAO, I quote you a couple times and I am a stalker, yet you start entire retarded threads about me, and that makes you what.... ? hypocrite. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh just:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh face it you are a hypocrite and sniff Nathans Ass. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Keep playing and I will keep making you look like the fool you are.

All cam sites shave lmao.

hey I am Far-L, I got featured in newsweek back in 1902, none of you people can talk unless you spent as much money as i did fighting acacia, look at me, I sniff Nathan's Ass.

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17854113)

It always says multiple... it says the same message all the time.

Originally Posted by Nathan (Post 17854393)

Also, just because a user has uploaded infringing content, for example 5 out of 100 videos get a DMCA. That does not make the other 95 pieces of content red flags.

Originally Posted by Nathan (Post 17854438)

Dane, this is what "red flag" means... its NOT a red flag...

Originally Posted by Agent 488 (Post 17853490)

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links (Post 17854125)

What did I miss from page 4-till now? loolol

Originally Posted by BareBacked (Post 17853991)

Brazzers content is super good. I really dont know how anyone could say otherwise. Have you seen the vampire thing? Very high end production..

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy (Post 17854576)

While the content is not something I personally enjoy, as a content producer I can say that it is of the highest quality and there is no doubt a huge market for it.

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 17852971)

Really? I find that unbelievable.

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 17854583)

Of course it is.

Paul is doing teh trolling.

Again.

I'm astounded you all fall for it time and time again. Even when he starts talking about the number of fucking bogs in a place ffs. How more obvious can you get?

Remember kids, 19 HD videos for 150 bucks!

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17854623)

When are we going to be treated to the next episode of Porn Beer?

Originally Posted by Nathan (Post 17854747)

Paul, no comment on people confirming our content is good? Including haters like Dwb?

Originally Posted by Agent 488 (Post 17854381)

will76 killed a perfectly good thread about manwin's washrooms.

Originally Posted by garce (Post 17854197)

I fixed that for you.

I find it amazing how many old school "bros" are closing up shop and ripping off loyal webmasters; or shoving their wet, hungry-for-past-glory tongues up the assholes of the big dog of the moment.

Like Nathan said, we'll see what happens in five years. I'll be here.