watched the right hand tonight

[gideongallery]

it the episode where porno dan ran the breast cancer charity event

he was proud that he raised over 2k for breast cancer reconstruction.

seriously is that it.

[Socks]

It is quite common in the English language to end a question with a question mark. We even designed it a unique symbol, and have gone to great lengths to include it on all standard English keyboard layouts.

Your posing of a question with a period is perplexing at best, and confounding at worst.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by Socks

It is quite common in the English language to end a question with a question mark. We even designed it a unique symbol, and have gone to great lengths to include it on all standard English keyboard layouts.

Your posing of a question with a period is perplexing at best, and confounding at worst.

Is that it ?

happy now

[Caligari]

Seriously it's more than your lame ass has done, with the exception of your massive contribution to time shifting.

.

[marlboroack]

Your a piece of shit and i hope you suffer from cancer... Every dollar put together counts when a cancer patient is undergoing treatment of any kind. It's nothing to even joke about or share negatively no matter how much you hate the human race.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by marlboroack

Your a piece of shit and i hope you suffer from cancer... Every dollar put together counts when a cancer patient is undergoing treatment of any kind. It's nothing to even joke about or share negatively no matter how much you hate the human race.

1. the charity was boob jobs for people who went thru mastectomies not to try and get a cure

2. i have raised more for diabetes just on a personal level

3. fans would have paid 1-2k per ticket to be part of a party like that so it was a total waste to only raise 2k.

[kane]

I have said for a long time that Gideon is a scumbag and a piece of shit. Every chance he is given he sides with thieves and criminals, but until now he has done it by wrapping himself in the flag of the so called freedom fighter. He has painted himself as the hero standing up to the mighty media companies and defending the helpless against the powerful and horrid copyright holders. But this thread finally shows his true colors. Someone does something nice to help people out and Gideon bashes them because it is not up to his standards or it is not a cause he believes in. And in standard Gideon format he claims to have done better, but as we all know he will never show proof because he never shows proof of anything.

Gideon has finally outed himself for the type of person he really is.

[L-Pink]

Originally Posted by kane

I have said for a long time that Gideon is a scumbag and a piece of shit. Every chance he is given he sides with thieves and criminals, but until now he has done it by wrapping himself in the flag of the so called freedom fighter. He has painted himself as the hero standing up to the mighty media companies and defending the helpless against the powerful and horrid copyright holders. But this thread finally shows his true colors. Someone does something nice to help people out and Gideon bashes them because it is not up to his standards or it is not a cause he believes in. And in standard Gideon format he claims to have done better, but as we all know he will never show proof because he never shows proof of anything.

Gideon has finally outed himself for the type of person he really is.

.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by kane

I have said for a long time that Gideon is a scumbag and a piece of shit. Every chance he is given he sides with thieves and criminals, but until now he has done it by wrapping himself in the flag of the so called freedom fighter. He has painted himself as the hero standing up to the mighty media companies and defending the helpless against the powerful and horrid copyright holders. But this thread finally shows his true colors. Someone does something nice to help people out and Gideon bashes them because it is not up to his standards or it is not a cause he believes in. And in standard Gideon format he claims to have done better, but as we all know he will never show proof because he never shows proof of anything.

Gideon has finally outed himself for the type of person he really is.

did you see the episode the bar bill for that event would have been more then 2k

he could have given more by just giving up the party life and donating that money.

it sick that you actually thinking that type of publicity stunt was anything about doing something nice.

That a PR move

even a half assed auction to his members giving them a chance to party with pornstars would have gotten 5-10 times that amount.

I have nothing against the charity or donation but don't try and tell me that "raising" 2k when your blowing 5k-10 buying don for your pornstar buddies is a charity fundraising.

[kane]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

did you see the episode the bar bill for that event would have been more then 2k

he could have given more by just giving up the party life and donating that money.

it sick that you actually thinking that type of publicity stunt was anything about doing something nice.

That a PR move

even a half assed auction to his members giving them a chance to party with pornstars would have gotten 5-10 times that amount.

I have nothing against the charity or donation but don't try and tell me that "raising" 2k when your blowing 5k-10 buying don for your pornstar buddies is a charity fundraising.

I didn't see the episode. All I know is that someone raised 2K to help someone who had cancer and you not only bashed them, but then came off like their event lacked merit because of what it was for. Not only that, but you went out of your way to make a thread for the single purpose of bashing them. Your words speak for themselves.

Could it have been a better event? Maybe. You said you have raised much more than that for Diabetes. Prove it.

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by Socks

It is quite common in the English language to end a question with a question mark. We even designed it a unique symbol, and have gone to great lengths to include it on all standard English keyboard layouts.

Your posing of a question with a period is perplexing at best, and confounding at worst.

that is fucking brilliant

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by kane

I didn't see the episode. All I know is that someone raised 2K to help someone who had cancer and you not only bashed them, but then came off like their event lacked merit because of what it was for. Not only that, but you went out of your way to make a thread for the single purpose of bashing them. Your words speak for themselves.

so your talking out of your ass and bashing me when you haven't even seen the show.

1. I never objected to raising money for cancer, Diabetes is a charity i care about because my dad had it and died from complications due to it. I never once said anywhere that diabetes was better then cancer

2. I corrected marlboroack bald face lie that it was money going to treatment, it wasn't it was to go for boob jobs for cancer victims AFTER they went undergone treatment. Again never said that was better or worse charity, just pointed out the bald face lie.

3. maybe you should watch the episode before you defend him. It was a promo event pretending to be a charity to get more press. your defending giving 2k to a charity when you drop 3-5k buying drinks for pornstars at the event. Your defending donating $1 for every girl that flashes your CAMERA CREW (basically buying flashing content) when he could have gotten fans to pay 2k a pop hang out with their favorite pornstars (horror no free content).

Could it have been a better event? Maybe. You said you have raised much more than that for Diabetes. Prove it.

you are such lying bastard, I said more personally not much more,

when i was a sales person i used to give my entire Christmas pay period commissions to diabetics because the company i worked for matched the donation. That company bumped commissions by 1.5X during christmas instead of giving bonus so convincing them to go to 2x wasn't really hard.


if i were present a tax reciept from that year you would harp on how it not much more
ignoring the fact that what personal vs a full fundraising event.

tell you what i will do anyway knowing that the shit your going to pull if you produce
1 real record label investment money on a band "before they were ever heard on the radio"

you know your semsonic example was total bullshit since cherry disc (there first label ) got them on the radio at the local level with there first album.

[kane]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

so your talking out of your ass and bashing me when you haven't even seen the show.

1. I never objected to raising money for cancer, Diabetes is a charity i care about because my dad had it and died from complications due to it. I never once said anywhere that diabetes was better then cancer

2. I corrected marlboroack bald face lie that it was money going to treatment, it wasn't it was to go for boob jobs for cancer victims AFTER they went undergone treatment. Again never said that was better or worse charity, just pointed out the bald face lie.

3. maybe you should watch the episode before you defend him. It was a promo event pretending to be a charity to get more press. your defending giving 2k to a charity when you drop 3-5k buying drinks for pornstars at the event. Your defending donating $1 for every girl that flashes your CAMERA CREW (basically buying flashing content) when he could have gotten fans to pay 2k a pop hang out with their favorite pornstars (horror no free content).







you are such lying bastard, I said more personally not much more,

when i was a sales person i used to give my entire Christmas pay period commissions to diabetics because the company i worked for matched the donation. That company bumped commissions by 1.5X during christmas instead of giving bonus so convincing them to go to 2x wasn't really hard.


if i were present a tax reciept from that year you would harp on how it not much more
ignoring the fact that what personal vs a full fundraising event.

tell you what i will do anyway knowing that the shit your going to pull if you produce
1 real record label investment money on a band "before they were ever heard on the radio"

you know your semsonic example was total bullshit since cherry disc (there first label ) got them on the radio at the local level with there first album.

You said :"1. the charity was boob jobs for people who went thru mastectomies not to try and get a cure"

A person getting a boob job after losing a breast to cancer is part of the treatment. The way you wrote it made it come off like you didn't approve and it reads like you don't approve.

I am not going defend the episode because it doesn't need me to. If they spent a million dollars to raise $2,000 for her that is still money that they raised for her. Big charities spend a lot of money every year doing all kinds of publicity and paying people big salaries. The United Way could give out ten times what it does if they didn't spend so much on CEO pay, bonuses and other things, but that doesn't change the fact that they still do it and anything they give is more than that person had before.

I mis-spoke when I claimed that you said you raised MUCH more than they did on a personal level. Going back and reading it again you did state: " i have raised more for diabetes just on a personal level." This means you personally raised or donated more than $2,000, but it doesn't say how much more.

I'm not going to rehash the old record label argument. Show proof if you want. Don't if you don't want to. This is why you are shit stain because whenever you are backed into a corner and asked to provide proof of your claims you always attach some kind of stipulation to it. It doesn't matter what or how many bands I list you will you find some way to make it so that they don't count and you don't have to show proof. So you can choose to show proof or not, it is up to you.

None of this changes the fact that you watched the event and then went out of your way to come here and make a thread bashing the event. That is a pretty low thing to do and to me it shows exactly what kind of a person you are. You are a hateful little freeloading scumbag who clearly is angry at the world.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by kane

You said :"1. the charity was boob jobs for people who went thru mastectomies not to try and get a cure"

A person getting a boob job after losing a breast to cancer is part of the treatment. The way you wrote it made it come off like you didn't approve and it reads like you don't approve.

there you go again so i never said i approves but YOU read it like i didn't approve so you FALSE attributed your misreading to my intent.

it not as bad as when you bald face lied and claimed that advocated the loss of copyright for wrongfully suing when i only advocated that for wrongful free speech censoring/privacy violating actions (like take down notices)

Originally Posted by kane

In the past when people have talked about sending out blanket lawsuits against copyright violators you have advocated that if they wrongly sue someone who is innocent they should have t put their content into the public domain. I just wanted to make sure you were going to hold these guys to the same standard. But, as per usual, you rush to the defense of pirates at every opportunity.

I am not going defend the episode because it doesn't need me to. If they spent a million dollars to raise $2,000 for her that is still money that they raised for her. Big charities spend a lot of money every year doing all kinds of publicity and paying people big salaries. The United Way could give out ten times what it does if they didn't spend so much on CEO pay, bonuses and other things, but that doesn't change the fact that they still do it and anything they give is more than that person had before.

wow so justify the scum bag move of using a charity event to buy content for pennies on the dollar you misrepresent the percentage that the united way uses for administration

Under Canadian law, a charitable organization must spend at least 80% of the amounts for which it issued official donation receipts in the preceding year on its charitable activities.

There is no fucking way admin can be anything more then 20% your not legally allowed to call yourself a charity any more.

I mis-spoke when I claimed that you said you raised MUCH more than they did on a personal level. Going back and reading it again you did state: " i have raised more for diabetes just on a personal level." This means you personally raised or donated more than $2,000, but it doesn't say how much more.

mis-spoke requires you to have read something that lead you to believe that what i said

you sir bald face lied.

I'm not going to rehash the old record label argument. Show proof if you want. Don't if you don't want to. This is why you are shit stain because whenever you are backed into a corner and asked to provide proof of your claims you always attach some kind of stipulation to it. It doesn't matter what or how many bands I list you will you find some way to make it so that they don't count and you don't have to show proof. So you can choose to show proof or not, it is up to you.

ok then let make it cut and dry
you claimed that i said people should lose their copyright if they simple sue and fail.

the quote is above

when i asked you for direct quote you said you didn't have the time to do it.

Well if you expect me to waste my time producing a receipt for a donation then i don't think it unreasonable for me to expect you to waste a tiny fraction of the time validating your libellous accusation.

None of this changes the fact that you watched the event and then went out of your way to come here and make a thread bashing the event. That is a pretty low thing to do and to me it shows exactly what kind of a person you are. You are a hateful little freeloading scumbag who clearly is angry at the world.

For that event to legally qualify to be a charity, the entire cost of that event had to be less then $400 based on how much raise for the charity.


It legally can not be called a charity and you say I am a scum bag for point it out.

Faking a charity fundraising to pay to for a party with your friends and get content at below normal cost is a scum bag move.

[kane]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

there you go again so i never said i approves but YOU read it like i didn't approve so you FALSE attributed your misreading to my intent.

it not as bad as when you bald face lied and claimed that advocated the loss of copyright for wrongfully suing when i only advocated that for wrongful free speech censoring/privacy violating actions (like take down notices)






wow so justify the scum bag move of using a charity event to buy content for pennies on the dollar you misrepresent the percentage that the united way uses for administration




There is no fucking way admin can be anything more then 20% your not legally allowed to call yourself a charity any more.





mis-spoke requires you to have read something that lead you to believe that what i said

you sir bald face lied.




ok then let make it cut and dry
you claimed that i said people should lose their copyright if they simple sue and fail.

the quote is above

when i asked you for direct quote you said you didn't have the time to do it.

Well if you expect me to waste my time producing a receipt for a donation then i don't think it unreasonable for me to expect you to waste a tiny fraction of the time validating your libellous accusation.






For that event to legally qualify to be a charity, the entire cost of that event had to be less then $400 based on how much raise for the charity.


It legally can not be called a charity and you say I am a scum bag for point it out.

Faking a charity fundraising to pay to for a party with your friends and get content at below normal cost is a scum bag move.

Typical Gideon. You acted like a douchebag, and now you are deflecting and changing the topic to try and make yourself out as something other than a shit stain. All you are doing is making yourself look worse.

This event likely wasn't a charity, it was probably a fundraiser. Those are two different things. Every day all across this country people carry out fundraisers. That doesn't mean that they are registered as a non-profit charity.

Look, it is really simple. You can choose to show proof that you have given as much as you claim to charity and make yourself look a little less like an asshole than you already do or can you continue to deflect and change topics and show your true colors. I don't really care which you do, it is up to you. As I said before, your words in this thread speak volumes on their own.

[NewNick]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

it the episode where porno dan ran the breast cancer charity event

he was proud that he raised over 2k for breast cancer reconstruction.

seriously is that it.

Someone does something for charity and you bitch that they have not done enough.

What a loverly man you are.

[CurrentlySober]

I'm the hottest cuban in porn.... crazy cool and tons of fun. queen Castro is what i like to be called... lol

http://www.angelinacastrolive.com/updates.html

[Jel]

Originally Posted by Socks

It is quite common in the English language to end a question with a question mark. We even designed it a unique symbol, and have gone to great lengths to include it on all standard English keyboard layouts.

Your posing of a question with a period is perplexing at best, and confounding at worst.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by kane

Typical Gideon. You acted like a douchebag, and now you are deflecting and changing the topic to try and make yourself out as something other than a shit stain. All you are doing is making yourself look worse.

This event likely wasn't a charity, it was probably a fundraiser. Those are two different things. Every day all across this country people carry out fundraisers. That doesn't mean that they are registered as a non-profit charity.

are you seriously trying to defend the abuse of that loop hole by claiming that tons of people do it.

It ok to abuse that loophole to fuck the world up because lots of people are doing it.

If they spent a million dollars to raise $2,000 for her that is still money that they raised for her

using your example, a company would write off a million dollars in expense and pay 500,000 less tax to the government

500,000 dollar that would go to homeless shelters, food banks, free clinics (the first things to get cut when the government doesn't have enough money) was lost so that some worthy charity got 2k.

people who would have been ok if corporation had paid it fair share of taxes need to sleep in the street, starve to death, die of aids so that some worthy charity get a measly 2k.

And that corporation gets a party thrown for his /her friends on the government dime.

Look, it is really simple. You can choose to show proof that you have given as much as you claim to charity and make yourself look a little less like an asshole than you already do or can you continue to deflect and change topics and show your true colors. I don't really care which you do, it is up to you. As I said before, your words in this thread speak volumes on their own.

I stand behind my words 100% (not your bullshit misrepresentation of my words)

I 100% believe that if your going to take 50k out of the tax coffers to throw a fund raiser you should give the charity at least 400k. That 20% is more than enough to cover administration/fundraising costs (if charities can cover all fundraising AND administration then corporations can certainly do that too)

I 100% believe if you can't do that then the cost of the "fundraiser" should NOT be tax deductible.

I 100% believe that any company (porn or mainstream) that takes advantage of that loophole to throw TAX DEDUCTIBLE parties for his/her friends are scum bags.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by kane

Look, it is really simple. You can choose to show proof that you have given as much as you claim to charity and make yourself look a little less like an asshole than you already do or can you continue to deflect and change topics and show your true colors. I don't really care which you do, it is up to you. As I said before, your words in this thread speak volumes on their own.

sure like i said

Originally Posted by kane
In the past when people have talked about sending out blanket lawsuits against copyright violators you have advocated that if they wrongly sue someone who is innocent they should have t put their content into the public domain. I just wanted to make sure you were going to hold these guys to the same standard. But, as per usual, you rush to the defense of pirates at every opportunity.

just produce 1 single quote from any of my post that valid this statement and i will start wasting my time providing you proof.

[kane]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

are you seriously trying to defend the abuse of that loop hole by claiming that tons of people do it.

It ok to abuse that loophole to fuck the world up because lots of people are doing it.

You of all people should understand this one because the pirates and freeloaders you defend all day use loopholes in the laws and rules to hide from the law and steal content.

I have asked you this same question before. If millions are using a site to illegally download content, but a few are using it to legitimately time shift or backup content they have paid for should the site be allowed to still exist? You have always said yes.

using your example, a company would write off a million dollars in expense and pay 500,000 less tax to the government

500,000 dollar that would go to homeless shelters, food banks, free clinics (the first things to get cut when the government doesn't have enough money) was lost so that some worthy charity got 2k.

people who would have been ok if corporation had paid it fair share of taxes need to sleep in the street, starve to death, die of aids so that some worthy charity get a measly 2k.

And that corporation gets a party thrown for his /her friends on the government dime.




I stand behind my words 100% (not your bullshit misrepresentation of my words)

I 100% believe that if your going to take 50k out of the tax coffers to throw a fund raiser you should give the charity at least 400k. That 20% is more than enough to cover administration/fundraising costs (if charities can cover all fundraising AND administration then corporations can certainly do that too)

I 100% believe if you can't do that then the cost of the "fundraiser" should NOT be tax deductible.

I 100% believe that any company (porn or mainstream) that takes advantage of that loophole to throw TAX DEDUCTIBLE parties for his/her friends are scum bags.

Let me clarify. I sometimes use big numbers just to prove a point, but talking to you is like talking to a 5 year old or a dog, you can't understand that and you take everything as literal. I often write big numbers when I respond to you because it is funny to me knowing that you are going into a froth reading them.

Do you know 100% for sure that this event was done under a formal charity and that they wrote all this off? Maybe, as you claim, they did this as a work event to get content and they raised some money on the side. I have no problem with that.

The bottom line continues. You came in here acting like a douche and now you are again lashing out at those who did something good for someone in a desperate attempt to legitimize your actions. Your major personality flaw is that you can't admit that you don't know something or that you are ever wrong or made a mistake. A reasonable person might have just said that they overreacted in the moment and that they are sorry for bashing the event and bowed out peacefully, but you continue to dig yourself into a hole.


Dig away shit stain. . . dig away. With every post you show your true self to the world.

[kane]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

sure like i said





just produce 1 single quote from any of my post that valid this statement and i will start wasting my time providing you proof.

So once again you choose not too show proof. Every single time without fail when someone asks you to prove your claims you come up with some kind of stipulation that keeps you from having to show proof.

I'm not going to find the quote. I don't really care that much, but let me make a counter offer. If I admit that I am wrong and you never made that claim will you then post proof?

[kane]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

sure like i said





just produce 1 single quote from any of my post that valid this statement and i will start wasting my time providing you proof.

Okay, so I had a second while I was taking a shit and found this. This is from your twitter, or at least I assume it is yours because it has all the same crap that you post here on it.

You wrote "@MPAA would the mpaa still support the bill if the penalty for making a false rogue claim was the revocation of all the accusers copyrights"

To me that sounds like if a person wrongly sues someone who is innocent you would want them to lose all of their copyrights. Am I not reading it correctly?

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by kane

Okay, so I had a second while I was taking a shit and found this. This is from your twitter, or at least I assume it is yours because it has all the same crap that you post here on it.

You wrote "@MPAA would the mpaa still support the bill if the penalty for making a false rogue claim was the revocation of all the accusers copyrights"

To me that sounds like if a person wrongly sues someone who is innocent you would want them to lose all of their copyrights. Am I not reading it correctly?

Why would you believe that a statement that explictly says "would the mpaa still support the bill" have anything to do with any of the existing LAWS that allow you to sue for damages.


You can't tell the difference between suing someone (using the current existing laws) and making a claim that they are a rogue site worth of being DNS BLACKLISTED under the new bill.

like I said i only argue in favor of the loss of copyright for false accusations that CENSOR free speech (like a DNS blacklist because of a BOGUS rogue site declaration)

[kane]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

Why would you believe that a statement that explictly says "would the mpaa still support the bill" have anything to do with any of the existing LAWS that allow you to sue for damages.


You can't tell the difference between suing someone (using the current existing laws) and making a claim that they are a rogue site worth of being DNS BLACKLISTED under the new bill.

like I said i only argue in favor of the loss of copyright for false accusations that CENSOR free speech (like a DNS blacklist because of a BOGUS rogue site declaration)

As I figured you found a way to back out of it. Clearly it doesn't matter what I would post you will find a way around it. The quote shows your general attitude that you want copyright holders to risk losing their content if they wrongly sue someone. But it doesn't really matter. You will never post proof of anything no matter what quote I come up with. This is why I am not going to spend the time to search for one because no matter what I find you will say it isn't exactly what you meant.

[candyflip]

Hate gideongallery all you want. 90% of the time, he is spot on.

[Caligari]

Let me just alter that a little.

Hate gideongallery all you want. 90% of the time, he is a shit stain.

I do agree with that.

.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by kane

As I figured you found a way to back out of it. Clearly it doesn't matter what I would post you will find a way around it. The quote shows your general attitude that you want copyright holders to risk losing their content if they wrongly sue someone. But it doesn't really matter. You will never post proof of anything no matter what quote I come up with. This is why I am not going to spend the time to search for one because no matter what I find you will say it isn't exactly what you meant.

so you proof was a quote that didn't even have the word sue anywhere in it (that the point you started at)

your pointed the exact portion of that quote that proves i was talking about the SOPA bill (which doesn't even mention anything about suing people for statutory or actual damages)

and your still trying to argue that "you want copyright holders to risk losing their content if they wrongly sue"


seriously how fucking hard is it to produce a quote with the actual words you claimed i said.

it three words total

wrongly sue , copyright

you could use the search function and find it 2 minutes if it really existed.

you won't look because you know your a lying sack of shit

who

bald face lied about what i claimed twice in this thread

libelous claimed that the united way is pocketing 90% of their donations

[kane]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

so you proof was a quote that didn't even have the word sue anywhere in it (that the point you started at)

your pointed the exact portion of that quote that proves i was talking about the SOPA bill (which doesn't even mention anything about suing people for statutory or actual damages)

and your still trying to argue that "you want copyright holders to risk losing their content if they wrongly sue"


seriously how fucking hard is it to produce a quote with the actual words you claimed i said.

it three words total

wrongly sue , copyright

you could use the search function and find it 2 minutes if it really existed.

you won't look because you know your a lying sack of shit

who

bald face lied about what i claimed twice in this thread

libelous claimed that the united way is pocketing 90% of their donations

Keep posting Gideon. With each post in this thread you look more and more like an asshole. You have taken a thread that was about a fundraiser and are trying to make it about copyright. You bash the fundraiser and make yourself look bad and now you are trying to deflect.

[ArsewithClass]

Originally Posted by Caligari

Seriously it's more than your lame ass has done, with the exception of your massive contribution to time shifting.

.

Here here


As they say... if you haven't got anything worth saying, don't say it at all... This thread was not worth saying except.... congrats to Porno Dan for raising 2k for Breast Cancer