Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
As I figured you found a way to back out of it. Clearly it doesn't matter what I would post you will find a way around it. The quote shows your general attitude that you want copyright holders to risk losing their content if they wrongly sue someone. But it doesn't really matter. You will never post proof of anything no matter what quote I come up with. This is why I am not going to spend the time to search for one because no matter what I find you will say it isn't exactly what you meant.
|
so you proof was a quote that didn't even have the word sue anywhere in it (that the point you started at)
your pointed the exact portion of that quote that proves i was talking about the SOPA bill (which doesn't even mention anything about suing people for statutory or actual damages)
and your still trying to argue that "you want copyright holders to risk losing their content if they wrongly
sue"
seriously how fucking hard is it to produce a quote with the actual words you claimed i said.
it three words total
wrongly sue , copyright
you could use the search function and find it 2 minutes if it really existed.
you won't look because you know your a lying sack of shit
who
bald face lied about what i claimed twice in this thread
libelous claimed that the united way is pocketing 90% of their donations