And people wonder why terrorists want to destroy the USA
 

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/....us/index.html

"WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Bush administration is considering taking a hard-line approach toward the government of Iran that could include efforts to destabilize Tehran's Islamic regime, a State Department official told CNN on Sunday..."

Reshaping the Middle East for Israel. Who would have thought?

and as always,
it's nice to see why real Australian players don't post bullshit,
they are busy making money

http://www.carlajayne.com/couriermail_may03/index.html

while idiots like 6 packs save the world
;-))))

Isreal is the reason for every political argument in the universe. If there is life somewhere other than earth, and an uprising happened, I would blame Isreal.

Hey, they're doing it all for the good of those damn sand******s. The towelheads just don't know what's best for them, but Dubya most certainly does - christianity & capitalism or death, baby! :thumbsup

Maybe, but you can remove the "Christianity" part.

What gave you the bizzare idea that I would ever want to be considered a "player"?

:1orglaugh

you can't...you don't have brains, stemina and street smarts for that...

Like I said, its not an ambition of mine.

This sounds absolutely reasonable, the Iran government has for a long time not been at war with the US or any other country, it has also not held any US embassy prisoners. Plus it has not invaded anywhere else.

Also it tried to get involved in the politics of a neighboring country that had been invaded. It me have been concerned to the stability of this country and the likelihood of their country using WMDs against is AGAIN.

So I see Mr. Bush has the perfect right to destabilize the elected government. Anyway they are towel heads so who cares?

Plus do there supporters give one cent to the Bush re-election fund, like those nice guys from Israel? Have you seen what those saints are thinking about in Israel? They are going to give back some of the land they "liberated" from the towel heads.

And keep giving $$$$$$$$$ to the "Re-elect Bush fund"

See here is your proof what kind of people Bush is up against.

This information comes direct from the same source that told us of the Iraqi's WMDs.

Proof enough I think.

it doesn't matter if it is or if it isn't...

you just can't do it even if you try...but you know that already,
you tried
;-)))

Errrr... no I didn't.

You do not possess one of the aformentioned qualities and yet it didn't stop you.

Not to mention the dumbass can't spell.

Terroist <b>want</b> to destroy the United States. They can fucking "want" until hell freezes over.

As long as the majority of american citizens support a war on terroism, countries that interfer with the operation will be dealt with. It is no secert. They can cooperate or not.

hmmm...brush your teeth before I cum in your mouth next time...

Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

...and this si why I love GFY...

http://cotac.com/GFY.gif

Exactly.

But I think what you meant to say was ". They can cooperate or we will blow them all to hell"

Especially if that nice, honest Mr Bush says they are the enemy.

Paul again in Eva's machine.

... same here !!

... and no, I am not going to comment on that great brizzy article ...

There is truth to that, you take a large group of people the bell curve drops. Goverments are large groups of people. No society is perfect. Is bush honest? I seriously don't think he is doing it for kicks. I don't know the things he knows I am not presented with the inteligence he has. He could be dishonest, I can't say for sure. Its your opinion that he is dishonest, and you probably have good reason for it. The same applies for my opinions.

When Bush is out of office and the war on terroism remains. I wonder how some people will react. Will they just start throwing darts at the new president. Will they realize that it is bigger then one man

I will say it for him.

The USA is at war...and from day one of this war the President has stated that you are either with us or against us...so any nation that does not "cooperate" is subject to have the hell blown out of them. I do not know how this administration...with the backing of Congress...the Court and the people could have made this any clearer from the beginning of this war. It has been stated that this war will continue for 10-30 years.

:1orglaugh


<img src="http://www.continet.com/robbpynes/sdi/speed_bump.gif">

Exactly now this guy has his finger on the pulse of things.

"Unless you back us in what ever we tell you is the truth you are against us and probably terrorist to boot."

Do you think before the US declares war on the rest of the world they could start showing us some evidence?

Yesterday I just thought you were smoking dope now I don't know what the fuck you're on, Angel Dust?

CHARLY

You just don't get it do you. The evidence was 9/11...and the President declared war...with the backing of Congress...the Court and the people. Any country that presents the appearance of being hostile towards the USA is subject to pay severe consequences. What fucking part of that do you not understand?

... most of the hijackers came from saudi arabia not iraq though ...

<img src="http://www.ci.bakersfield.ca.us/cityservices/pubwrks/TrafficEng/TrafficBroc/images/detail1.gif">

The fact in this matter is that Iraq wasn't cooperating for shit. They could of destroyed those weapons in the last minute, they could have gave them to somebody else. If they never had them, all they had to do is present the UN will detailed information on how, when, where they destroyed them. Using such weapons agaisnt the United States would result in more Iraqi troops being killed opposed to american soilders, being that the military is well prepared to under go such a attack. Not only that, but then the rest of the world would come down on them as well. Iraq was trying to play physcological warfare by attemping to make the public lose support through the media. That was the only chance they had. Saddam is gone but his physcological war continues on. Probably the smartest move he could of made, because now we got people saying "where is the evidence?". If it really was propaganda from the USA wouldn't they have planted the weapons by now?
I think the war on Iraq served multiple purposes. They unleased a awesome military might and put hostile countries in check. It is the war on terroism.

It could be propaganda from Iraq it could be from the US. I know one thing for certain. Nobody here lnows exactly what the fuck went down

Oh yeah that's right... where are those weapons of mass distraction?

:1orglaugh

I think you love the cock.

The point about 9/11 is not where individual hijackers come from. The point of 9/11 is...attacks on the continental USA will not be tolerated...and the terrorists are from Muslim countries.

There were multiple reasons for the invasion of Iraq and one of those reasons was to send a message to the Muslim countries...get your act together or face the consequences. The USA will dismantle every Muslim country, one by one, if they are perceived to be hostile towards the USA...including Saudi Arabia.

Seriously though, the propaganda can work both ways. Bush delivers a 48 hour warning, Sadam had the weapons moved as planned. His sons withdraw 1 billion dollars from the Iraqi national bank on the 18th. They all leave the country. They fight with phycological warfare in attempt to make the american public lose support, being that there is no way they can win using military force. Worse case they are hiding in another country with a fortune and the United States comes up empty handed, making them look bad.
Or it can very well be weapons of mass distraction. I dont know the exact truth in the matter. You don't know the exact truth in the matter. So lets set here on a adult webmaster board and fire our opinions with no chance to prove the exact events.

Now that's the Joe Sixpack I know!
It had been so long since you posted any inflammatory bullshit I thought you were on medication.

I wish! :winkwink:

Mmmmmm.... medication.

Iraq was a secular nation under Saddam. Alcohol was sold freely and women didn't have to wear a veil. It was the most Westernized of all Arab nations before the first Gulf War.

If a couple of nutters from Portugal bombed a building in Washington, would you support the invasion of Spain?

Saddam attempted to make Iraq a secular nation but it was, and is populated by Muslims. If any country is hostile towards the USA and is providing safe harbor...or financial aid to terrorists...they are subject to having their country dismantled.

I will repeat that the reasons for the invasion of Iraq were multiple and primarily strategic in nature. Saddam was a fool and made himself and his country a likely and easy first target.

good links. thanks serge.

If someone from spain did that today nothing will happen to spain. However if spain was a dictatorship, the dictator had a violent history supported terroism. Was known to interfer with the interst of the united states, then people would have a different view on spain.
Goverments that support networks of terrorism, finace networks of terroism, need to change. They will be changed one way or the other. Cut of the terroist money flow, give them no safe place to operate, put them under pressure no matter where they go. It is the war on terroism. Change or remove the goverments that provide them safe haven and they will go away. They can't operate if they are to busy running and hiding, trying to get money. etc.