Does anyone actually take "Cherry 7" seriously?

[MaxCandy]

I am curious, does anyone here on GFY actually take "Cherry 7" seriously?

I certainly do not.

He seems like a jealous child that likes to criticize me and others in content just to make himself feel better.

Sad really.

[lucas131]

you take it seriously otherwise you would not care just do not care and keep up the good work!

[Alex1776]

You and Dean Capture - such sensitive artist types - can't take any criticism!

[MaxCandy]

Originally Posted by lucas131

you take it seriously otherwise you would not care just do not care and keep up the good work!

Nope, genuinely just curious.

In fact the truth is i like having a hater, well one that is so obviously an amateur.

Now if Dean Capture and alike starting on me, that i would take that seriously.

[MaxCandy]

Originally Posted by Alex1776

You and Dean Capture - such sensitive artist types - can't take any criticism!

Actually like criticism from people that i respect. Its incredibly helpful.

[Scott McD]

Cherry7 is an illegal immigrant...

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by Scott McD

Cherry7 is an illegal immigrant...

That would explain his disgraceful pro turning UK into darkieland position.
Thank god he is not some liberal guilter scum, just immigrant who stand by his own kind.

[MaxCandy]

Originally Posted by Scott McD

Cherry7 is an illegal immigrant...

More curious if anyone takes him seriously?

He seems to love criticizing others, just curious if anyone at all thinks he has a leg to stand on?

[rogueteens]

Originally Posted by MaxCandy

More curious if anyone takes him seriously?

if anyone does then they are being very quiet right now

[Oracle Porn]

[MaDalton]

Originally Posted by Scott McD

Cherry7 is an illegal immigrant...

actually he's a polish communist...

[JFK]

Originally Posted by MaDalton

actually he's a polish communist...

still some of those around ?

[MaxCandy]

Originally Posted by JFK

still some of those around ?

a few, mainly older people that miss the good old days LOL

[shake]

Originally Posted by MaxCandy

More curious if anyone takes him seriously?

He seems to love criticizing others, just curious if anyone at all thinks he has a leg to stand on?

Just another troll, I don't think anyone takes him seriously.

[MaxCandy]

Originally Posted by shake

Just another troll, I don't think anyone takes him seriously.

Its kinda of what i thought.

[Cherry7]

Hate to disappoint you all here, but people don't exist here, just ideas.


It is the ideas you find upsetting, me you do not know.

I do like your guesses though they are amusing. Jewish Illegal Immigrant Polish Communist

One out of five right.

I have found though that in making erotic films we reveal more about ourselves in the films than the models that undress.

[MaxCandy]

Originally Posted by Cherry7

Hate to disappoint you all here, but people don't exist here, just ideas.


It is the ideas you find upsetting, me you do not know.

Your ideas seem to show you to be a sad bitter man.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by Cherry7

I do like your guesses though they are amusing. Jewish Illegal Immigrant Polish Communist
One out of five right.

Did I get the right one?
And to guess further - dark skinned immigrant?

[DeanCapture]

Originally Posted by MaxCandy

Does anyone actually take "Cherry 7" seriously?

That guy is a dick Max! I added him to my ignore list a while back - you should too

Hope you're well buddy!!!

[Cherry7]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Did I get the right one?
And to guess further - dark skinned immigrant?

Like the joke about the man on being shown ink blots only sees people fucking, that just tells us about you and your obsession.

[Cherry7]

Originally Posted by MaxCandy

Your ideas seem to show you to be a sad bitter man.

Why is saying "I think your films are badly made" make me sad and bitter?

I would be more worried if I watched a terrible movie and then lied about it.

I regret that there is no serious discussion here on real erotic film making. There does not seem to be any serious film makers here at all.

After all the technology means that cinema quality video can be shot for a reasonable cost.

Maybe it is to late, the race to the bottom has happened or more likely that people here do not have anything interesting to say about sex. Just shoot one more scene like the million they shot before, to swamp the Internet with the same banality.

I suppose it is nice, for you, that porn is a small pond, where you can pretend to be a big fish. It may make you happy but the converse is not true, it does not change my emotional state.

[AmeliaG]

Originally Posted by MaxCandy

I am curious, does anyone here on GFY actually take "Cherry 7" seriously?

I certainly do not.

He seems like a jealous child that likes to criticize me and others in content just to make himself feel better.

Sad really.

I have him on ignore. I don't need to see his misogynist unappealing unprofitable content or his delusional self-important and self-aggrandizing opinions or his lame attempts to pretend to be a woman.

You are a serious creative. He is not.

[kittykatt]

I didn't notice a "cherry7" until this post, therefore the irrelevance is irrelevant.

[marcop]

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

I have him on ignore. I don't need to see his misogynist unappealing unprofitable content or his delusional self-important and self-aggrandizing opinions or his lame attempts to pretend to be a woman.

You are a serious creative. He is not.

Amen.....

[MaxCandy]

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

I have him on ignore. I don't need to see his misogynist unappealing unprofitable content or his delusional self-important and self-aggrandizing opinions or his lame attempts to pretend to be a woman.

You are a serious creative. He is not.

Thanks, kinda what i thought, guess i was just curious if anyone at all thought otherwise.

Glad to GFY folks see the truth.

Next time he tries to "be any expert" i will just refer this thread and ignore him.

[candyflip]

Originally Posted by MaxCandy

I am curious, does anyone here on GFY actually take "Cherry 7" seriously?

I certainly do not.

He seems like a jealous child that likes to criticize me and others in content just to make himself feel better.

Sad really.

I pointed this out a week or so ago in the 4k Shooting thread. Check their post history. It's pretty much nothing but the same shit for years now.

[MaxCandy]

Originally Posted by candyflip

I pointed this out a week or so ago in the 4k Shooting thread. Check their post history. It's pretty much nothing but the same shit for years now.

Guess its overdue he gets called out on it.

[TheDA]

Just another troll, I don't think anyone takes him seriously.

[Cherry7]

This is a real film



It is well scripted, well shot, well acted, it has a trained cinematographer, character development, mis en scene, good lighting...

It has a story to tell and tells it in an important way.

To get other talentless people to rally round on a porn website and call you creative is laughable.

It is not just Max Candy's films, the Video being produced has not ambition to be more than just the same old tired formulae over and over again....

The Emperor is naked and I am just surprised that you don't all know it. Is it because you are all naked too?

Isn't it just mean that they keep such wonderful creative artists out of our mainstream cinemas.

Why aren't your films shown in festivals and cinemas?

[MaxCandy]

Originally Posted by Cherry7

This is a real film



It is well scripted, well shot, well acted, it has a trained cinematographer, character development, mis en scene, good lighting...

It has a story to tell and tells it in an important way.

To get other talentless people to rally round on a porn website and call you creative is laughable.

It is not just Max Candy's films, the Video being produced has not ambition to be more than just the same old tired formulae over and over again....

The Emperor is naked and I am just surprised that you don't all know it. Is it because you are all naked too?

Isn't it just mean that they keep such wonderful creative artists out of our mainstream cinemas.

Why aren't your films shown in festivals and cinemas?

Blue Is the Warmest Color is a great erotic film by Abdellatif Kechiche. Someone I would indeed love to hear from and truly respect.

I am no emperor, I respect my betters, Abdellatif Kechiche, along with many many others, are indeed much higher in the tower of erotica, than I.

But, that does change my main point, you sir are a troll, living in the basement, throwing stones up at people you are jealous off.

Grow up, do the work, get better at your craft and stop being so bitter.

[MaxCandy]

Originally Posted by DeanCapture

That guy is a dick Max! I added him to my ignore list a while back - you should too

Hope you're well buddy!!!

Thanks Buddy,

Yes, I know what he is.

I was just curious, as i asked, if anyone takes him seriously? Happy to see none do. Will be putting him on my ignore / irrelevant list soon.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by Cherry7

This is a real film



It is well scripted, well shot, well acted, it has a trained cinematographer, character development, mis en scene, good lighting...

It has a story to tell and tells it in an important way.

To get other talentless people to rally round on a porn website and call you creative is laughable.

It is not just Max Candy's films, the Video being produced has not ambition to be more than just the same old tired formulae over and over again....

The Emperor is naked and I am just surprised that you don't all know it. Is it because you are all naked too?

Isn't it just mean that they keep such wonderful creative artists out of our mainstream cinemas.

Why aren't your films shown in festivals and cinemas?

So you found someone better than him and what is your point? it would be valid if he claimed to be the best shooter, but he did not.
Loser.

[PR_Glen]

Originally Posted by Cherry7

This is a real film



It is well scripted, well shot, well acted, it has a trained cinematographer, character development, mis en scene, good lighting...

It has a story to tell and tells it in an important way.

To get other talentless people to rally round on a porn website and call you creative is laughable.

It is not just Max Candy's films, the Video being produced has not ambition to be more than just the same old tired formulae over and over again....

The Emperor is naked and I am just surprised that you don't all know it. Is it because you are all naked too?

Isn't it just mean that they keep such wonderful creative artists out of our mainstream cinemas.

Why aren't your films shown in festivals and cinemas?

anyone else take a look at this trailer? this isn't even porn in the least... this looks like an indie drama about 2 lesbians..

what industry do you think this is exactly?


yeah, y'all don't know how to shoot shit.. look at this, now this is true film!



see! great direction, cinematography acting.. just amazing stuff here..

[MaxCandy]

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

anyone else take a look at this trailer? this isn't even porn in the least... this looks like an indie drama about 2 lesbians..

what industry do you think this is exactly?


yeah, y'all don't know how to shoot shit.. look at this, now this is true film!



see! great direction, cinematography acting.. just amazing stuff here..

RE> Blue Is the Warmest Color

Its pretty hot actually, not porn, but very hot.

[DeanCapture]

Originally Posted by MaxCandy

RE> Blue Is the Warmest Color

Its pretty hot actually, not porn, but very hot.

I agree. Beautifully filmed too!

[MaxCandy]

Originally Posted by DeanCapture

I agree. Beautifully filmed too!

They did the whole thing for 5.4 Million $*. How nice it must be to be able to pay for actors with strong acting resumes and have 8 weeks to film. ahhh



*http://www.lemonde.fr/festival-de-ca...50_766360.html

[Cherry7]

The films "Monsters" was made for a smaller budget than you on your film.



The whole of Italian neo realist cinema was made with non professional actors.

If you still don't understand my points about lenses and resolution, when you next hire lenses for your film ask to see their test room. The will show you a lens projector which checks how the lens resolves.


QUOTE
Use a lens test projector Most camera rental houses have a lens test projector with which to test lenses for focus, sharpness and contrast across the entire lens. Take a detailed, finely printed chart and project it through the lens. This is a good way to see pure lens performance without any other variables involved.

You do have all you lenses collimated and matched before you start shooting don't you?


Don't blame budget, don't blame actors, don't blame the critic....

You have access to funds it bit more of an open mind and willingness to learn and you could make a film that would break out of the ghetto you are in.

[MaxCandy]

Originally Posted by Cherry7

The films "Monsters" was made for a smaller budget than you on your film.



The whole of Italian neo realist cinema was made with non professional actors.

If you still don't understand my points about lenses and resolution, when you next hire lenses for your film ask to see their test room. The will show you a lens projector which checks how the lens resolves.


QUOTE
Use a lens test projector Most camera rental houses have a lens test projector with which to test lenses for focus, sharpness and contrast across the entire lens. Take a detailed, finely printed chart and project it through the lens. This is a good way to see pure lens performance without any other variables involved.

You do have all you lenses collimated and matched before you start shooting don't you?


Don't blame budget, don't blame actors, don't blame the critic....

You have access to funds it bit more of an open mind and willingness to learn and you could make a film that would break out of the ghetto you are in.

Again you cite other's work, this time from Horror genre? Why don't you show / talk about your own work here?

Re Lens, Current Pro Lens can indeed handle 4K and more.
Here are a few:
K35s will cover 6k.
CP2 will cover 6k.
New CP2 Super Speeds cover 6k.
Zeiss Super Speeds will cover 5k.
Zeiss Standard Speeds cover 5k,
Super Baltars cover 5k.
RPP's cover 5K,
Cooke Pancros cover 5k, even at 18mm.
Master Primes will cover 5k at 2.4:1 Widescreen.

Yes there are lens that cannot. Is that your point? Bad lens are well, um, bad? Well, Thank you Captain Obvious.

Optics like, well every bit of tech keep getting better and better, optics for 8K+ are in the works. i have read some claims that Zeiss and Cooke have them now.

Your a sad bitter man, that like allot of critics, is also a failed artist, just getting his jollies from critiquing others and pretending to know what hell he is talking about.

[Cherry7]

What do you mean by cover?

I would understand it as producing an image over the whole of the sensor.

If that is what you mean it is nonsense as we were talking about lens resolution.

Remember you said the very funny thing ;

" A lens is a piece of glass, pretty sure it can resolve at any pixel count." MaxCandy

Hilarious.

Lens resolution the ability of a lens to reproduce detail. To which the there practical result and there is a limit due to the laws of physics, so there will not be 8K 16K 32K ad invinitum

The ability of a lens to resolve detail, just like 4k is factor in the over all quality of the motion picture image, a factor amongst many many many others.

The point about that film "Monsters" is;

It was shot with a smaller budget than your film.

It was shot with just a Sony EX 3.

It looks better than your film. Its acted better than your film. it is a better film.

Therefore? 2 + 2 =

..................

Are you saying that you can say that you are a great award making film maker but the only people who allowed to criticise are your betters?

[dyna mo]

I take cherry7 seriously.

When I want a seriously good laugh at a true dimwit, I only need to read a cherry7 post.

[CDSmith]

Originally Posted by kittykatt

I didn't notice a "cherry7" until this post, therefore the irrelevance is irrelevant.

^^ This. ^^

Beyond vague memories of crossing paths with the entity "cherry7" in a few threads over the past few years the whole issue means nothing to me.

Taking most of the crap posted here seriously has never been a profitable venture anyway. Why some do it I'll never know.

[CDSmith]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

I take cherry7 seriously.

When I want a seriously good laugh at a true dimwit, I only need to read a cherry7 post.

Or maybe this is what I've been doing. I don't know, haven't been paying serious attention enough to it to know.

[baddog]

Originally Posted by MaxCandy

I am curious, does anyone here on GFY actually take "Cherry 7" seriously?

I certainly do not.

He seems like a jealous child that likes to criticize me and others in content just to make himself feel better.

Sad really.

I thought he was a she; I guess I may have a better understanding of what a sorry person he must be now.


Thanks . . . I think.

[bushwacker]

Originally Posted by baddog

I thought he was a she; I guess I may have a better understanding of what a sorry person he must be now.


Thanks . . . I think.

Ditto, I thought cherry was a chick.

[AmeliaG]

Originally Posted by baddog

I thought he was a she; I guess I may have a better understanding of what a sorry person he must be now.


Thanks . . . I think.

Originally Posted by bushwacker

Ditto, I thought cherry was a chick.

Yeah, he tried to justify his poorly-made rape-y amateur porn by saying that he was a woman named Cherry Chapman, but he is actually a man named Maxim Ford.

[marcop]

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

Yeah, he tried to justify his poorly-made rape-y amateur porn by saying that he was a woman named Cherry Chapman, but he is actually a man named Maxim Ford.

This sounds like a textbook example of the Dunning?Kruger Effect.

[JayAllan]

Originally Posted by Cherry7

What do you mean by cover?

I would understand it as producing an image over the whole of the sensor.

If that is what you mean it is nonsense as we were talking about lens resolution.

Remember you said the very funny thing ;

" A lens is a piece of glass, pretty sure it can resolve at any pixel count." MaxCandy

Hilarious.

Lens resolution the ability of a lens to reproduce detail. To which the there practical result and there is a limit due to the laws of physics, so there will not be 8K 16K 32K ad invinitum

The ability of a lens to resolve detail, just like 4k is factor in the over all quality of the motion picture image, a factor amongst many many many others.

The point about that film "Monsters" is;

It was shot with a smaller budget than your film.

It was shot with just a Sony EX 3.

It looks better than your film. Its acted better than your film. it is a better film.

Therefore? 2 + 2 =

..................

Are you saying that you can say that you are a great award making film maker but the only people who allowed to criticise are your betters?

Oh wow.

You are an idiot. You come on here and bash people who are clearly shooting better material than you and then show other people's content to back up your claims (and not your own footage) and then talk glass resolution.

People shoot with 60 year old Nikon lenses on Red Epics at 6k all the time. Are you really that clueless? Trust me I know what I am talking about too. The image looks fine in the cinema and at the end of the day that is all that counts.

Not to mention even cheap Canon EOS kits you can buy at Best Buy shoot images that are higher than 4k. SMH

[JayAllan]

Originally Posted by marcop

This sounds like a textbook example of the Dunning?Kruger Effect.

I had to look it up but YES!

[AmeliaG]

Originally Posted by JayAllan

I had to look it up but YES!

Ha, ha, yeah, what Jay said

[MaxCandy]

Originally Posted by marcop

This sounds like a textbook example of the Dunning?Kruger Effect.

I had to look it up too.

From Wiki

The Dunning?Kruger effect is a cognitive bias manifesting in two principal ways:

Unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than is accurate. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their ineptitude.[1]
Those persons to whom a skill or set of skills come easily may find themselves with weak self-confidence, as they may falsely assume that others have an equivalent understanding. See Impostor syndrome.



Yes, that must be it.