Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherry7
What do you mean by cover?
I would understand it as producing an image over the whole of the sensor.
If that is what you mean it is nonsense as we were talking about lens resolution.
Remember you said the very funny thing ;
" A lens is a piece of glass, pretty sure it can resolve at any pixel count." MaxCandy
Hilarious.
Lens resolution the ability of a lens to reproduce detail. To which the there practical result and there is a limit due to the laws of physics, so there will not be 8K 16K 32K ad invinitum
The ability of a lens to resolve detail, just like 4k is factor in the over all quality of the motion picture image, a factor amongst many many many others.
The point about that film "Monsters" is;
It was shot with a smaller budget than your film.
It was shot with just a Sony EX 3.
It looks better than your film. Its acted better than your film. it is a better film.
Therefore? 2 + 2 =
..................
Are you saying that you can say that you are a great award making film maker but the only people who allowed to criticise are your betters?
|
Oh wow.
You are an idiot. You come on here and bash people who are clearly shooting better material than you and then show other people's content to back up your claims (and not your own footage) and then talk glass resolution.
People shoot with 60 year old Nikon lenses on Red Epics at 6k all the time. Are you really that clueless? Trust me I know what I am talking about too. The image looks fine in the cinema and at the end of the day that is all that counts.
Not to mention even cheap Canon EOS kits you can buy at Best Buy shoot images that are higher than 4k. SMH