Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherry7
The films "Monsters" was made for a smaller budget than you on your film.
The whole of Italian neo realist cinema was made with non professional actors.
If you still don't understand my points about lenses and resolution, when you next hire lenses for your film ask to see their test room. The will show you a lens projector which checks how the lens resolves.
QUOTE
Use a lens test projector Most camera rental houses have a lens test projector with which to test lenses for focus, sharpness and contrast across the entire lens. Take a detailed, finely printed chart and project it through the lens. This is a good way to see pure lens performance without any other variables involved.
You do have all you lenses collimated and matched before you start shooting don't you?
Don't blame budget, don't blame actors, don't blame the critic....
You have access to funds it bit more of an open mind and willingness to learn and you could make a film that would break out of the ghetto you are in.
|
Again you cite other's work, this time from Horror genre? Why don't you show / talk about your own work here?
Re Lens, Current Pro Lens can indeed handle 4K and more.
Here are a few:
K35s will cover 6k.
CP2 will cover 6k.
New CP2 Super Speeds cover 6k.
Zeiss Super Speeds will cover 5k.
Zeiss Standard Speeds cover 5k,
Super Baltars cover 5k.
RPP's cover 5K,
Cooke Pancros cover 5k, even at 18mm.
Master Primes will cover 5k at 2.4:1 Widescreen.
Yes there are lens that cannot. Is that your point? Bad lens are well, um, bad? Well, Thank you Captain Obvious.
Optics like, well every bit of tech keep getting better and better, optics for 8K+ are in the works. i have read some claims that Zeiss and Cooke have them now.
Your a sad bitter man, that like allot of critics, is also a failed artist, just getting his jollies from critiquing others and pretending to know what hell he is talking about.