NATS makes slashdot.org. Ouch. - GoFuckYourself.com

quantum-x · 12-25-2007, 03:08 AM

http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/25/0050204

Keith writes
"Tens of thousands ? or maybe more ? accounts to adult websites were recently declared compromised and apparently have been that way since some time in October 2007. The break occurred when the NATS software used to track and manage sales and affiliate revenues was accessed by an intruder. The miscreant apparently discovered a list of admin passwords residing on an unsecured office server at Too Much Media, which makes and maintains NATS installations for adult companies. It would appear that Too Much Media knew of the breach back in October, and rather than fixing the issue tried to bury it by threatening to sue anyone in the adult industry who talked about it."
The article gives suggestions for anyone who opened an account at any adult website in the last several months.
[+] security, ohnoes, theinternetisforporn (tagging beta)

Thanks minusonbit!

media · 12-25-2007, 03:12 AM

ouch.. thats no good.. I really hope John and TMM come out ahead in this..

Jet - BANNED FOR LIFE · 12-25-2007, 03:13 AM

do you think John is enjoying his Christmas?

minusonebit · 12-25-2007, 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x

http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/25/0050204

Keith writes
"Tens of thousands ? or maybe more ? accounts to adult websites were recently declared compromised and apparently have been that way since some time in October 2007. The break occurred when the NATS software used to track and manage sales and affiliate revenues was accessed by an intruder. The miscreant apparently discovered a list of admin passwords residing on an unsecured office server at Too Much Media, which makes and maintains NATS installations for adult companies. It would appear that Too Much Media knew of the breach back in October, and rather than fixing the issue tried to bury it by threatening to sue anyone in the adult industry who talked about it."
The article gives suggestions for anyone who opened an account at any adult website in the last several months.
[+] security, ohnoes, theinternetisforporn (tagging beta)

Thanks minusonbit!

There is no stopping it now!

minusonebit · 12-25-2007, 03:21 AM

Some other coverage, which is going to be small frys now. I'll wait for CNN to call at this point.

http://www.fxpr.com/credit-cards/ide...mpromised.html
http://skirmisher.org/daily-gaggle/s...like-real-men/
http://truemors.com/?p=21395
http://webfroze.com/2007/12/23/tens-...s-compromised/
http://twitter.com/guykawasaki/

sicone · 12-25-2007, 03:24 AM

is this any surprise since the the owners of that sight post here?

or are you truly that clueless?

quantum-x · 12-25-2007, 03:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit

[IMG]
There is no stopping it now!

Here's the thing Keith.
Yep, there was a breach, and it was handled badly.

But this FUD that you're spreading on the WORLD STAGE is simply WRONG.
Your main point is that you say that members and users have likely had their CC info yanked. YOU KNOW THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE.

50% of the slashdot thread is people laughing about torrenting porn anyhow. The industry NEVER gets a fair light, and you're doing your best job to fuck it up even further.

'Punish' TMM all you want, but do it with the fucking thruth.
I can't believe the shit I'm reading / you wrote just to pump up your cock.

minusonebit · 12-25-2007, 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sicone

is this any surprise since the the owners of that sight post here?

or are you truly that clueless?

It is very hard to get put up on Slashdot. I don't think it would be there is they didn't think it was news worthy. And they are not going to help the adult industry whitewash this issue, nor should they.

quantum-x · 12-25-2007, 03:30 AM

If anyone has an account, go and post on this thread.
I'm annoyed like anyone else about TMM, but I'm more pissed at the lies and bullshit that this retard is spreading.

quantum-x · 12-25-2007, 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit

It is very hard to get put up on Slashdot. I don't think it would be there is they didn't think it was news worthy. And they are not going to help the adult industry whitewash this issue, nor should they.

Mmmhmm, but posting an article full of lies, now THAT'S news.

Nookster · 12-25-2007, 03:43 AM

Haha minusonebrain is about to get sued to hell and back now for sure. Good job moron!

sicone · 12-25-2007, 03:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit

It is very hard to get put up on Slashdot. I don't think it would be there is they didn't think it was news worthy. And they are not going to help the adult industry whitewash this issue, nor should they.

Hard or not to get listed.. it doesnt matter

whitewash a issue... no that should never be done if the issue has merit

is it possible that this issue affects them and any pay sites they may or may not run.. well I guess that's between them and their legal council

minusonebit · 12-25-2007, 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sicone

Hard or not to get listed.. it doesnt matter

whitewash a issue... no that should never be done if the issue has merit

is it possible that this issue affects them and any pay sites they may or may not run.. well I guess that's between them and their legal council

The issue does have merit. All of the idiots here who don't think so can kiss my ass. ANYONE who wants to sue is welcome to do so. I am ready and I will be waiting. Anyone who needs the address to serve process at can send me an e-mail. Thats the great thing about America. With a couple of hundred bucks, anybody can head down to the courthouse and file a lawsuit.

You guys all want to come and try to rescue John from his own demise go for it. He made his bed and I am just helping him lay in it. This whole issue is a toilet and I am going to flush it. NATS may very well be gone in the next 30 days. I think this is the end of John, myself. And I couldn't be happier. Most of you don't like my tactics. I tell it how it is. I don't belive in solving things in a backroom behind closed doors. And I am cool with those who think there is a better way of doing stuff. But once this is all over, none of you will ever fuck up like this. And the industry - what is left of it - will be a better place as a direct result of what I have done here this weekend.

I need to go tend the servers now. I am tailing the logs and this is gonna be a traffic slam for sure. I need to go start getting ready for it, i.e. converting to static pages and such. I have always wanted to load test this box, now I am gonna get my chance.

minusonebit · 12-25-2007, 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x

Mmmhmm, but posting an article full of lies, now THAT'S news.

There are NOT lies. The evidence is all linked to and cited. But I'll get plenty of chances to address this issue in Court I think. I think I'll wait until then.

quantum-x · 12-25-2007, 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit

The issue does have merit. All of the idiots here who don't think so can kiss my ass. ANYONE who wants to sue is welcome to do so. I am ready and I will be waiting. Anyone who needs the address to serve process at can send me an e-mail. Thats the great thing about America. With a couple of hundred bucks, anybody can head down to the courthouse and file a lawsuit.

You guys all want to come and try to rescue John from his own demise go for it. He made his bed and I am just helping him lay in it. This whole issue is a toilet and I am going to flush it. NATS may very well be gone in the next 30 days. I think this is the end of John, myself. And I couldn't be happier. Most of you don't like my tactics. I tell it how it is. I don't belive in solving things in a backroom behind closed doors. And I am cool with those who think there is a better way of doing stuff. But once this is all over, none of you will ever fuck up like this. And the industry - what is left of it - will be a better place as a direct result of what I have done here this weekend.

I need to go tend the servers now. I am tailing the logs and this is gonna be a traffic slam for sure. I need to go start getting ready for it, i.e. converting to static pages and such. I have always wanted to load test this box, now I am gonna get my chance.

Let me spell it out for you.
Whether TMM are guilty as sin or not is now immaterial - because you've done your hardest to spread lies, mainly that CC data was compromised. Doesn't matter if you live in John's ass or if you're in I-hate-TMM land, it's a lie, and it's ONLY gonig to reflect poorly on the industry.

Congratulations, arsehole. If you were in adult, I'd say while you were tailing logs, watch your sales plummet too, but you're not, so hey.

CyberHustler · 12-25-2007, 03:59 AM

Minusonebrain is a dick-head, but TMM are dick-heads too if it's true about them not saying shit and threatening to sue whoever did tell...

quantum-x · 12-25-2007, 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit

There are NOT lies. The evidence is all linked to and cited. But I'll get plenty of chances to address this issue in Court I think. I think I'll wait until then.

Bullshit.
Show me evidence that CC Information was compromised. I don't mean some retard on GFY saying: hmm, i wonder.

Go on, show me. Show me how this hacker hacked Epoch and CCBill and GXBill at the same time.

quantum-x · 12-25-2007, 04:01 AM

btw, i'm off to enjoy christmas with my family.
Nurse yourself to sleep knowing you'll never know what it's like to have friends, keith.

TMM_John · 12-25-2007, 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyber-Hu$tler

Minusonebrain is a dick-head, but TMM are dick-heads too if it's true about them not saying shit and threatening to sue whoever did tell...

Not true. Again, shit that was made up by people with their own agendas. We asked for contact info for a law firm to send a C&D as people had said they were spreading false info. Far from trying to cover something up.

sicone · 12-25-2007, 04:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit

The issue does have merit. All of the idiots here who don't think so can kiss my ass. ANYONE who wants to sue is welcome to do so. I am ready and I will be waiting. Anyone who needs the address to serve process at can send me an e-mail. Thats the great thing about America. With a couple of hundred bucks, anybody can head down to the courthouse and file a lawsuit.

You guys all want to come and try to rescue John from his own demise go for it. He made his bed and I am just helping him lay in it. This whole issue is a toilet and I am going to flush it. NATS may very well be gone in the next 30 days. I think this is the end of John, myself. And I couldn't be happier. Most of you don't like my tactics. I tell it how it is. I don't belive in solving things in a backroom behind closed doors. And I am cool with those who think there is a better way of doing stuff. But once this is all over, none of you will ever fuck up like this. And the industry - what is left of it - will be a better place as a direct result of what I have done here this weekend.

I need to go tend the servers now. I am tailing the logs and this is gonna be a traffic slam for sure. I need to go start getting ready for it, i.e. converting to static pages and such. I have always wanted to load test this box, now I am gonna get my chance.

I'm not saying this issue doesnt have merit, nor am I here to kiss anyone form TMM's ass... hell Im sure albright is ready to sue me too...

the issue at hand is.. why would anyone with a heartbeat fall in line with you to go after them?

at this time I have not been affected by this issue and because I havent been affected I'm not going to jump on your wheel less bandwagon carrying torches and lighting fire to anyone and everyone.

It takes a smart man to survive the jungle... you gotta know when to hold them and know when to fold them.

Brujah · 12-25-2007, 04:30 AM

Did John threaten to sue this guy and then he decided to declare personal war against him for it?

StuartD · 12-25-2007, 05:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit

There is no stopping it now!

You're an idiot and I think it's about time you were removed from this industry, or at least this board.
You've done no one any good at all and only caused damage. Your kind isn't welcome.

AmeliaG · 12-25-2007, 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x

If anyone has an account, go and post on this thread.
I'm annoyed like anyone else about TMM, but I'm more pissed at the lies and bullshit that this retard is spreading.

I have done your bidding

No offense to John and TMM, but NATS does not have 95% market penetration. I would guess that the number of adult sites with affiliate programs of any kind, much less NATS specifically, is far less than 95%. The notion that everyone is going to think it is safer to go to a malware-ridden torrent site now than properly join a site which produces content they enjoy . . . well, I don't think that is good for the industry or the consumers.

TMM_John · 12-25-2007, 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

I have done your bidding

No offense to John and TMM, but NATS does not have 95% market penetration. I would guess that the number of adult sites with affiliate programs of any kind, much less NATS specifically, is far less than 95%. The notion that everyone is going to think it is safer to go to a malware-ridden torrent site now than properly join a site which produces content they enjoy . . . well, I don't think that is good for the industry or the consumers.

When did I ever say NATS has 95% market penetration? Please don't attribute things to me unless you know I have said them.

commonsense · 12-25-2007, 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PBucksJohn

When did I ever say NATS has 95% market penetration? Please don't attribute things to me unless you know I have said them.

Pretty sure she wasn't saying that you said it, more like reaffirming that there are alot of misinformation in that post .

AmeliaG · 12-25-2007, 05:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PBucksJohn

When did I ever say NATS has 95% market penetration? Please don't attribute things to me unless you know I have said them.

Uhm, I have no knowledge that you've ever said any such thing, but it has been stated in a number of the articles about the unfortunate situation. For example, http://www.icwt.us/index.php/2007/12...s-compromised/ says, "The NATS system is deployed on an estimated 80% to 95% of all adult sites, so if someone purchased a membership to an adult site since October, 2007 . . . users should contact TMM and request that they be compensated for any losses or damages that they may have incurred and additionally, demand that TMM provide them with credit monitoring services and other identity theft recovery services at TMM?s expense." I'm assuming you don't think any of the information I just quoted there is accurate.

No need to lash out at people at random. Am I mistaken in any way there?

AmeliaG · 12-25-2007, 05:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by commonsense

Pretty sure she wasn't saying that you said it, more like reaffirming that there are alot of misinformation in that post .

Yuppers, you are correct

TMM_John · 12-25-2007, 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

Uhm, I have no knowledge that you've ever said any such thing, but it has been stated in a number of the articles about the unfortunate situation. For example, http://www.icwt.us/index.php/2007/12...s-compromised/ says, "The NATS system is deployed on an estimated 80% to 95% of all adult sites, so if someone purchased a membership to an adult site since October, 2007 . . . users should contact TMM and request that they be compensated for any losses or damages that they may have incurred and additionally, demand that TMM provide them with credit monitoring services and other identity theft recovery services at TMM’s expense." I'm assuming you don't think any of the information I just quoted there is accurate.

No need to lash out at people at random. Am I mistaken in any way there?

Sorry, I misread it as "No offense John" and thought it was directed to me. It is almost 8am (been up way too long) and I have been dealing with some off the wall people today. I was not trying to lash out at you.

And you are correct, we do not have 80% to 95% market saturation

TMM_John · 12-25-2007, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by commonsense

Pretty sure she wasn't saying that you said it, more like reaffirming that there are alot of misinformation in that post .

Yep, thats what I get for misreading it. Well, maybe for staying up until 8am on this board. I think it is time for some sleep.

minusonebit · 12-25-2007, 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PBucksJohn

When did I ever say NATS has 95% market penetration? Please don't attribute things to me unless you know I have said them.

I never said that YOU said that, John. It was an estimate that I gleaned from somewhere. Someone claimed it. But it was not attributed to you. I have since revised it to 35%-40% which seems to be the consensus. I do have to say I have never seen anyone bitch about someone claiming they have a lock on a market.

minusonebit · 12-25-2007, 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah

Did John threaten to sue this guy and then he decided to declare personal war against him for it?

Thats about the sum of it. Like I told John, dealing with people like him is a sport. I want to make sure everyone has a good game to watch.

commonsense · 12-25-2007, 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit

I never said that YOU said that, John. It was an estimate that I gleaned from somewhere. Someone claimed it. But it was not attributed to you. I have since revised it to 35%-40% which seems to be the consensus. I do have to say I have never seen anyone bitch about someone claiming they have a lock on a market.

35-40%? Your numbers are way off and completely off track.

So you are saying there are only about 1000 adult programs in the world?

I would say that nats market penetration in the adult site market is under 5%. See, i can pull numbers out of my ass too.

AmeliaG · 12-25-2007, 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PBucksJohn

Yep, thats what I get for misreading it. Well, maybe for staying up until 8am on this board. I think it is time for some sleep.

No worries. I just meant no offense as in I wasn't trying to call you small, but I thought all of that data was way off.

AmeliaG · 12-25-2007, 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit

I never said that YOU said that, John. It was an estimate that I gleaned from somewhere. Someone claimed it. But it was not attributed to you. I have since revised it to 35%-40% which seems to be the consensus. I do have to say I have never seen anyone bitch about someone claiming they have a lock on a market.

Consensus? Of who?

TMM_John · 12-25-2007, 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

No worries. I just meant no offense as in I wasn't trying to call you small, but I thought all of that data was way off.

I understand what you meant now. And I guess I jumped on it because I agreed with you, LOL.

Malicious Biz · 12-25-2007, 06:06 AM

quantum-x · 12-25-2007, 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

I have done your bidding

No offense to John and TMM, but NATS does not have 95% market penetration. I would guess that the number of adult sites with affiliate programs of any kind, much less NATS specifically, is far less than 95%. The notion that everyone is going to think it is safer to go to a malware-ridden torrent site now than properly join a site which produces content they enjoy . . . well, I don't think that is good for the industry or the consumers.

Thanks Amelia, I've been reading your posts there.
It's unfortunate for all the hue and cry that have been going on here, that the WMs don't care enough to go onto slashdot and bury this clown like he deserves.

He just posted, joke of jokes, in the discussion that "I care about privacy" - which each one of the 300 webmasters who had their shit posted would agree to, right?

Seriously people,. take 5 mins to defend the industry reputation against this clown.

AmeliaG · 12-25-2007, 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x

Thanks Amelia, I've been reading your posts there.
It's unfortunate for all the hue and cry that have been going on here, that the WMs don't care enough to go onto slashdot and bury this clown like he deserves.

He just posted, joke of jokes, in the discussion that "I care about privacy" - which each one of the 300 webmasters who had their shit posted would agree to, right?

Seriously people,. take 5 mins to defend the industry reputation against this clown.

And why are you not over there right now?

quantum-x · 12-25-2007, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

And why are you not over there right now?

I've posted about 15 posts on there so far. I just don't post over there on the same username.

minusonebit · 12-25-2007, 07:08 AM

Go ahead and try to white wash it, hide it or bury it. Its too late. Google already picked it up. Its on another 20 blogs. I am getting ready to go to sleep, by the time it is over with, it will be everywhere.

quantum-x · 12-25-2007, 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit

Go ahead and try to white wash it, hide it or bury it. Its too late. Google already picked it up. Its on another 20 blogs. I am getting ready to go to sleep, by the time it is over with, it will be everywhere.

Noone's trying to whitewash or hide anything, that's the fucking point.
We ALL AGREE that TMM fucked up in a major fashion.

What we're objecting to is YOU propogating lies and FUD about the industry and the situation about stolen credit cards etc in public.

This is no longer about TMM and the world, this is about YOU LYING and spreading bullshit.

Bury TMM if you want, I don't give a fuck. But stop making false fucking claims.

AmeliaG · 12-25-2007, 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x

I've posted about 15 posts on there so far. I just don't post over there on the same username.

Doh, if it were a little earlier in the evening, that probably should have been obvious

AmeliaG · 12-25-2007, 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x

What we're objecting to is YOU propogating lies and FUD about the industry and the situation about stolen credit cards etc in public.

[snip] this is about YOU LYING and spreading bullshit.

[snip] stop making false fucking claims.

Yeah, that.

quantum-x · 12-25-2007, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

Yeah, that.

I love it that our paths always cross in 'drama' threads Amelia. Last stop was the Suicide Girls debacle, I believe. I happened to be wearing my BlueBlood tshirt today when posting this stuff...

I hope you're having a good relaxing day

tony286 · 12-25-2007, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah

Did John threaten to sue this guy and then he decided to declare personal war against him for it?

Yeppers, this shows when thinking to threaten to sue someone take the time to think what can they do back. This is a strong example.
What I dont get is where is he lying, on another forum they were showing things from October. Who knows what they got and didnt get? Does anyone have a solid answer on that?

QTbucks_Mark · 12-25-2007, 10:03 AM

I read the story at /. earlier today and I think quantum-x did a good job in clarifying the whole situation. Apart from the usual +5, Funny posts, anyone who reads the comments now knows that no CC info was stolen - and that's what matters for the customer IMHO.

It's the affiliates that are affected the most, as the hacker might have their SSN - for the consumer it's just an increase in spam, which they're probably used to anyway.

notoldschool · 12-25-2007, 10:06 AM

this guys a fool. People know who he is and hes in for a rude awakening.

Iron Fist · 12-25-2007, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit

It is very hard to get put up on Slashdot. I don't think it would be there is they didn't think it was news worthy. And they are not going to help the adult industry whitewash this issue, nor should they.

If it's a slow news day then it's easy as pie...

My first submission ever to slashdot got accepted - so don't sell me on how hard it is...

maggie2007 · 12-25-2007, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QTbucks_Mark

I read the story at /. earlier today and I think quantum-x did a good job in clarifying the whole situation. Apart from the usual +5, Funny posts, anyone who reads the comments now knows that no CC info was stolen - and that's what matters for the customer IMHO.

It's the affiliates that are affected the most, as the hacker might have their SSN - for the consumer it's just an increase in spam, which they're probably used to anyway.

it'll increase spam, possible hijacking of other webmaster sites...
so it's no good anyway

baddog · 12-25-2007, 10:56 AM

Since you are already members of slashdot, (and linking to GFY) why not bring some additional attention to minusonebrain:

Income tax evasion

Stealing electricity

Am sure others can come up with more topics.

12-25-2007, 03:08 AM	#1
quantum-x Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca Posts: 6,863	NATS makes slashdot.org. Ouch. http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/25/0050204 Keith writes "Tens of thousands ? or maybe more ? accounts to adult websites were recently declared compromised and apparently have been that way since some time in October 2007. The break occurred when the NATS software used to track and manage sales and affiliate revenues was accessed by an intruder. The miscreant apparently discovered a list of admin passwords residing on an unsecured office server at Too Much Media, which makes and maintains NATS installations for adult companies. It would appear that Too Much Media knew of the breach back in October, and rather than fixing the issue tried to bury it by threatening to sue anyone in the adult industry who talked about it." The article gives suggestions for anyone who opened an account at any adult website in the last several months. [+] security, ohnoes, theinternetisforporn (tagging beta) Thanks minusonbit!

12-25-2007, 03:12 AM	#2
media Confirmed Moneymaker Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Eugene, OR It's Like Jail, Only with Trees! Posts: 9,852	ouch.. thats no good.. I really hope John and TMM come out ahead in this.. __________________ I'm here for the violence!

12-25-2007, 03:24 AM	#6
sicone Retired Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Sac Posts: 18,453	is this any surprise since the the owners of that sight post here? or are you truly that clueless? __________________

12-25-2007, 03:43 AM	#11
Nookster Confirmed IT Professional Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Hollywood, CA Posts: 3,744	Haha minusonebrain is about to get sued to hell and back now for sure. Good job moron! __________________ The Best Affiliate Software, Ever.

12-25-2007, 04:30 AM	#21
Brujah Beer Money Baron Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: brujah / gmail Posts: 22,157	Did John threaten to sue this guy and then he decided to declare personal war against him for it? __________________ Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com For Sale: Obscenity.com

12-25-2007, 03:13 AM	#3
Jet - BANNED FOR LIFE So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 7,515	do you think John is enjoying his Christmas?

12-25-2007, 03:21 AM	#5
minusonebit So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: [email protected] Posts: 7,391	Some other coverage, which is going to be small frys now. I'll wait for CNN to call at this point. http://www.fxpr.com/credit-cards/ide...mpromised.html http://skirmisher.org/daily-gaggle/s...like-real-men/ http://truemors.com/?p=21395 http://webfroze.com/2007/12/23/tens-...s-compromised/ http://twitter.com/guykawasaki/

12-25-2007, 03:30 AM	#9
quantum-x Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca Posts: 6,863	If anyone has an account, go and post on this thread. I'm annoyed like anyone else about TMM, but I'm more pissed at the lies and bullshit that this retard is spreading.

12-25-2007, 03:59 AM	#16
CyberHustler Masterbaiter Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 26,554	Minusonebrain is a dick-head, but TMM are dick-heads too if it's true about them not saying shit and threatening to sue whoever did tell...

12-25-2007, 04:01 AM	#18
quantum-x Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca Posts: 6,863	btw, i'm off to enjoy christmas with my family. Nurse yourself to sleep knowing you'll never know what it's like to have friends, keith.

12-25-2007, 06:06 AM	#36
Malicious Biz So Fucking Banned Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Put Shoe On Head Plz Posts: 4,575

12-25-2007, 07:08 AM	#40
minusonebit So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: [email protected] Posts: 7,391	Go ahead and try to white wash it, hide it or bury it. Its too late. Google already picked it up. Its on another 20 blogs. I am getting ready to go to sleep, by the time it is over with, it will be everywhere.

12-25-2007, 10:03 AM	#46
QTbucks_Mark Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe Posts: 254	I read the story at /. earlier today and I think quantum-x did a good job in clarifying the whole situation. Apart from the usual +5, Funny posts, anyone who reads the comments now knows that no CC info was stolen - and that's what matters for the customer IMHO. It's the affiliates that are affected the most, as the hacker might have their SSN - for the consumer it's just an increase in spam, which they're probably used to anyway. __________________ QTbucks : featuring cherrywinters.com - sweetcarry.com - cutecaroline.com [email protected] :: ICQ 26505638

12-25-2007, 10:06 AM	#47
notoldschool Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 5,687	this guys a fool. People know who he is and hes in for a rude awakening. __________________ No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture. -- Learned Hand http://www.bjpenn.com

12-25-2007, 10:56 AM	#50
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	Since you are already members of slashdot, (and linking to GFY) why not bring some additional attention to minusonebrain: Income tax evasion Stealing electricity Am sure others can come up with more topics.