GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   NATS makes slashdot.org. Ouch. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=794737)

quantum-x 12-25-2007 03:08 AM

NATS makes slashdot.org. Ouch.
 
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/25/0050204

Keith writes
"Tens of thousands ? or maybe more ? accounts to adult websites were recently declared compromised and apparently have been that way since some time in October 2007. The break occurred when the NATS software used to track and manage sales and affiliate revenues was accessed by an intruder. The miscreant apparently discovered a list of admin passwords residing on an unsecured office server at Too Much Media, which makes and maintains NATS installations for adult companies. It would appear that Too Much Media knew of the breach back in October, and rather than fixing the issue tried to bury it by threatening to sue anyone in the adult industry who talked about it."
The article gives suggestions for anyone who opened an account at any adult website in the last several months.
[+] security, ohnoes, theinternetisforporn (tagging beta)


Thanks minusonbit!

media 12-25-2007 03:12 AM

ouch.. thats no good.. I really hope John and TMM come out ahead in this..

Jet - BANNED FOR LIFE 12-25-2007 03:13 AM

do you think John is enjoying his Christmas?

minusonebit 12-25-2007 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x (Post 13561337)
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/25/0050204

Keith writes
"Tens of thousands ? or maybe more ? accounts to adult websites were recently declared compromised and apparently have been that way since some time in October 2007. The break occurred when the NATS software used to track and manage sales and affiliate revenues was accessed by an intruder. The miscreant apparently discovered a list of admin passwords residing on an unsecured office server at Too Much Media, which makes and maintains NATS installations for adult companies. It would appear that Too Much Media knew of the breach back in October, and rather than fixing the issue tried to bury it by threatening to sue anyone in the adult industry who talked about it."
The article gives suggestions for anyone who opened an account at any adult website in the last several months.
[+] security, ohnoes, theinternetisforporn (tagging beta)


Thanks minusonbit!

http://www.kpfk.org/pledge/catalog/i...ished_book.jpg

There is no stopping it now!

minusonebit 12-25-2007 03:21 AM

Some other coverage, which is going to be small frys now. I'll wait for CNN to call at this point.

http://www.fxpr.com/credit-cards/ide...mpromised.html
http://skirmisher.org/daily-gaggle/s...like-real-men/
http://truemors.com/?p=21395
http://webfroze.com/2007/12/23/tens-...s-compromised/
http://twitter.com/guykawasaki/

sicone 12-25-2007 03:24 AM

is this any surprise since the the owners of that sight post here?

or are you truly that clueless?

quantum-x 12-25-2007 03:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit (Post 13561357)
[IMG]
There is no stopping it now!

Here's the thing Keith.
Yep, there was a breach, and it was handled badly.

But this FUD that you're spreading on the WORLD STAGE is simply WRONG.
Your main point is that you say that members and users have likely had their CC info yanked. YOU KNOW THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE.

50% of the slashdot thread is people laughing about torrenting porn anyhow. The industry NEVER gets a fair light, and you're doing your best job to fuck it up even further.

'Punish' TMM all you want, but do it with the fucking thruth.
I can't believe the shit I'm reading / you wrote just to pump up your cock.

minusonebit 12-25-2007 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sicone (Post 13561369)
is this any surprise since the the owners of that sight post here?

or are you truly that clueless?

It is very hard to get put up on Slashdot. I don't think it would be there is they didn't think it was news worthy. And they are not going to help the adult industry whitewash this issue, nor should they.

quantum-x 12-25-2007 03:30 AM

If anyone has an account, go and post on this thread.
I'm annoyed like anyone else about TMM, but I'm more pissed at the lies and bullshit that this retard is spreading.

quantum-x 12-25-2007 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit (Post 13561392)
It is very hard to get put up on Slashdot. I don't think it would be there is they didn't think it was news worthy. And they are not going to help the adult industry whitewash this issue, nor should they.

Mmmhmm, but posting an article full of lies, now THAT'S news.

Nookster 12-25-2007 03:43 AM

Haha minusonebrain is about to get sued to hell and back now for sure. Good job moron! :1orglaugh

sicone 12-25-2007 03:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit (Post 13561392)
It is very hard to get put up on Slashdot. I don't think it would be there is they didn't think it was news worthy. And they are not going to help the adult industry whitewash this issue, nor should they.

Hard or not to get listed.. it doesnt matter

whitewash a issue... no that should never be done if the issue has merit

is it possible that this issue affects them and any pay sites they may or may not run.. well I guess that's between them and their legal council

minusonebit 12-25-2007 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sicone (Post 13561426)
Hard or not to get listed.. it doesnt matter

whitewash a issue... no that should never be done if the issue has merit

is it possible that this issue affects them and any pay sites they may or may not run.. well I guess that's between them and their legal council

The issue does have merit. All of the idiots here who don't think so can kiss my ass. ANYONE who wants to sue is welcome to do so. I am ready and I will be waiting. Anyone who needs the address to serve process at can send me an e-mail. Thats the great thing about America. With a couple of hundred bucks, anybody can head down to the courthouse and file a lawsuit.

You guys all want to come and try to rescue John from his own demise go for it. He made his bed and I am just helping him lay in it. This whole issue is a toilet and I am going to flush it. NATS may very well be gone in the next 30 days. I think this is the end of John, myself. And I couldn't be happier. Most of you don't like my tactics. I tell it how it is. I don't belive in solving things in a backroom behind closed doors. And I am cool with those who think there is a better way of doing stuff. But once this is all over, none of you will ever fuck up like this. And the industry - what is left of it - will be a better place as a direct result of what I have done here this weekend.

I need to go tend the servers now. I am tailing the logs and this is gonna be a traffic slam for sure. I need to go start getting ready for it, i.e. converting to static pages and such. I have always wanted to load test this box, now I am gonna get my chance.

minusonebit 12-25-2007 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x (Post 13561406)
Mmmhmm, but posting an article full of lies, now THAT'S news.

There are NOT lies. The evidence is all linked to and cited. But I'll get plenty of chances to address this issue in Court I think. I think I'll wait until then.

quantum-x 12-25-2007 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit (Post 13561449)
The issue does have merit. All of the idiots here who don't think so can kiss my ass. ANYONE who wants to sue is welcome to do so. I am ready and I will be waiting. Anyone who needs the address to serve process at can send me an e-mail. Thats the great thing about America. With a couple of hundred bucks, anybody can head down to the courthouse and file a lawsuit.

You guys all want to come and try to rescue John from his own demise go for it. He made his bed and I am just helping him lay in it. This whole issue is a toilet and I am going to flush it. NATS may very well be gone in the next 30 days. I think this is the end of John, myself. And I couldn't be happier. Most of you don't like my tactics. I tell it how it is. I don't belive in solving things in a backroom behind closed doors. And I am cool with those who think there is a better way of doing stuff. But once this is all over, none of you will ever fuck up like this. And the industry - what is left of it - will be a better place as a direct result of what I have done here this weekend.

I need to go tend the servers now. I am tailing the logs and this is gonna be a traffic slam for sure. I need to go start getting ready for it, i.e. converting to static pages and such. I have always wanted to load test this box, now I am gonna get my chance.

Let me spell it out for you.
Whether TMM are guilty as sin or not is now immaterial - because you've done your hardest to spread lies, mainly that CC data was compromised. Doesn't matter if you live in John's ass or if you're in I-hate-TMM land, it's a lie, and it's ONLY gonig to reflect poorly on the industry.

Congratulations, arsehole. If you were in adult, I'd say while you were tailing logs, watch your sales plummet too, but you're not, so hey.

CyberHustler 12-25-2007 03:59 AM

Minusonebrain is a dick-head, but TMM are dick-heads too if it's true about them not saying shit and threatening to sue whoever did tell...

quantum-x 12-25-2007 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit (Post 13561453)
There are NOT lies. The evidence is all linked to and cited. But I'll get plenty of chances to address this issue in Court I think. I think I'll wait until then.

Bullshit.
Show me evidence that CC Information was compromised. I don't mean some retard on GFY saying: hmm, i wonder.

Go on, show me. Show me how this hacker hacked Epoch and CCBill and GXBill at the same time.

quantum-x 12-25-2007 04:01 AM

btw, i'm off to enjoy christmas with my family.
Nurse yourself to sleep knowing you'll never know what it's like to have friends, keith.

TMM_John 12-25-2007 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyber-Hu$tler (Post 13561460)
Minusonebrain is a dick-head, but TMM are dick-heads too if it's true about them not saying shit and threatening to sue whoever did tell...

Not true. Again, shit that was made up by people with their own agendas. We asked for contact info for a law firm to send a C&D as people had said they were spreading false info. Far from trying to cover something up.

sicone 12-25-2007 04:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit (Post 13561449)
The issue does have merit. All of the idiots here who don't think so can kiss my ass. ANYONE who wants to sue is welcome to do so. I am ready and I will be waiting. Anyone who needs the address to serve process at can send me an e-mail. Thats the great thing about America. With a couple of hundred bucks, anybody can head down to the courthouse and file a lawsuit.

You guys all want to come and try to rescue John from his own demise go for it. He made his bed and I am just helping him lay in it. This whole issue is a toilet and I am going to flush it. NATS may very well be gone in the next 30 days. I think this is the end of John, myself. And I couldn't be happier. Most of you don't like my tactics. I tell it how it is. I don't belive in solving things in a backroom behind closed doors. And I am cool with those who think there is a better way of doing stuff. But once this is all over, none of you will ever fuck up like this. And the industry - what is left of it - will be a better place as a direct result of what I have done here this weekend.

I need to go tend the servers now. I am tailing the logs and this is gonna be a traffic slam for sure. I need to go start getting ready for it, i.e. converting to static pages and such. I have always wanted to load test this box, now I am gonna get my chance.

I'm not saying this issue doesnt have merit, nor am I here to kiss anyone form TMM's ass... hell Im sure albright is ready to sue me too...

the issue at hand is.. why would anyone with a heartbeat fall in line with you to go after them?

at this time I have not been affected by this issue and because I havent been affected I'm not going to jump on your wheel less bandwagon carrying torches and lighting fire to anyone and everyone.

It takes a smart man to survive the jungle... you gotta know when to hold them and know when to fold them.

Brujah 12-25-2007 04:30 AM

Did John threaten to sue this guy and then he decided to declare personal war against him for it?

StuartD 12-25-2007 05:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit (Post 13561357)
There is no stopping it now!

You're an idiot and I think it's about time you were removed from this industry, or at least this board.
You've done no one any good at all and only caused damage. Your kind isn't welcome.

AmeliaG 12-25-2007 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x (Post 13561394)
If anyone has an account, go and post on this thread.
I'm annoyed like anyone else about TMM, but I'm more pissed at the lies and bullshit that this retard is spreading.

I have done your bidding :)

No offense to John and TMM, but NATS does not have 95% market penetration. I would guess that the number of adult sites with affiliate programs of any kind, much less NATS specifically, is far less than 95%. The notion that everyone is going to think it is safer to go to a malware-ridden torrent site now than properly join a site which produces content they enjoy . . . well, I don't think that is good for the industry or the consumers.

TMM_John 12-25-2007 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 13561617)
I have done your bidding :)

No offense to John and TMM, but NATS does not have 95% market penetration. I would guess that the number of adult sites with affiliate programs of any kind, much less NATS specifically, is far less than 95%. The notion that everyone is going to think it is safer to go to a malware-ridden torrent site now than properly join a site which produces content they enjoy . . . well, I don't think that is good for the industry or the consumers.

When did I ever say NATS has 95% market penetration? Please don't attribute things to me unless you know I have said them.

commonsense 12-25-2007 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PBucksJohn (Post 13561623)
When did I ever say NATS has 95% market penetration? Please don't attribute things to me unless you know I have said them.


Pretty sure she wasn't saying that you said it, more like reaffirming that there are alot of misinformation in that post . :2 cents:

AmeliaG 12-25-2007 05:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PBucksJohn (Post 13561623)
When did I ever say NATS has 95% market penetration? Please don't attribute things to me unless you know I have said them.

Uhm, I have no knowledge that you've ever said any such thing, but it has been stated in a number of the articles about the unfortunate situation. For example, http://www.icwt.us/index.php/2007/12...s-compromised/ says, "The NATS system is deployed on an estimated 80% to 95% of all adult sites, so if someone purchased a membership to an adult site since October, 2007 . . . users should contact TMM and request that they be compensated for any losses or damages that they may have incurred and additionally, demand that TMM provide them with credit monitoring services and other identity theft recovery services at TMM?s expense." I'm assuming you don't think any of the information I just quoted there is accurate.

No need to lash out at people at random. Am I mistaken in any way there?

AmeliaG 12-25-2007 05:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by commonsense (Post 13561629)
Pretty sure she wasn't saying that you said it, more like reaffirming that there are alot of misinformation in that post . :2 cents:

Yuppers, you are correct :thumbsup

TMM_John 12-25-2007 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 13561632)
Uhm, I have no knowledge that you've ever said any such thing, but it has been stated in a number of the articles about the unfortunate situation. For example, http://www.icwt.us/index.php/2007/12...s-compromised/ says, "The NATS system is deployed on an estimated 80% to 95% of all adult sites, so if someone purchased a membership to an adult site since October, 2007 . . . users should contact TMM and request that they be compensated for any losses or damages that they may have incurred and additionally, demand that TMM provide them with credit monitoring services and other identity theft recovery services at TMM’s expense." I'm assuming you don't think any of the information I just quoted there is accurate.

No need to lash out at people at random. Am I mistaken in any way there?

Sorry, I misread it as "No offense John" and thought it was directed to me. It is almost 8am (been up way too long) and I have been dealing with some off the wall people today. I was not trying to lash out at you.

And you are correct, we do not have 80% to 95% market saturation :)

TMM_John 12-25-2007 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by commonsense (Post 13561629)
Pretty sure she wasn't saying that you said it, more like reaffirming that there are alot of misinformation in that post . :2 cents:

Yep, thats what I get for misreading it. Well, maybe for staying up until 8am on this board. I think it is time for some sleep.

minusonebit 12-25-2007 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PBucksJohn (Post 13561623)
When did I ever say NATS has 95% market penetration? Please don't attribute things to me unless you know I have said them.

I never said that YOU said that, John. It was an estimate that I gleaned from somewhere. Someone claimed it. But it was not attributed to you. I have since revised it to 35%-40% which seems to be the consensus. I do have to say I have never seen anyone bitch about someone claiming they have a lock on a market.

minusonebit 12-25-2007 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 13561530)
Did John threaten to sue this guy and then he decided to declare personal war against him for it?

Thats about the sum of it. Like I told John, dealing with people like him is a sport. I want to make sure everyone has a good game to watch.

commonsense 12-25-2007 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit (Post 13561643)
I never said that YOU said that, John. It was an estimate that I gleaned from somewhere. Someone claimed it. But it was not attributed to you. I have since revised it to 35%-40% which seems to be the consensus. I do have to say I have never seen anyone bitch about someone claiming they have a lock on a market.


35-40%? Your numbers are way off and completely off track.


So you are saying there are only about 1000 adult programs in the world?



I would say that nats market penetration in the adult site market is under 5%. See, i can pull numbers out of my ass too. :upsidedow

AmeliaG 12-25-2007 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PBucksJohn (Post 13561637)
Yep, thats what I get for misreading it. Well, maybe for staying up until 8am on this board. I think it is time for some sleep.

No worries. I just meant no offense as in I wasn't trying to call you small, but I thought all of that data was way off.

AmeliaG 12-25-2007 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit (Post 13561643)
I never said that YOU said that, John. It was an estimate that I gleaned from somewhere. Someone claimed it. But it was not attributed to you. I have since revised it to 35%-40% which seems to be the consensus. I do have to say I have never seen anyone bitch about someone claiming they have a lock on a market.

Consensus? Of who?

TMM_John 12-25-2007 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 13561678)
No worries. I just meant no offense as in I wasn't trying to call you small, but I thought all of that data was way off.

I understand what you meant now. And I guess I jumped on it because I agreed with you, LOL.

Malicious Biz 12-25-2007 06:06 AM


quantum-x 12-25-2007 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 13561617)
I have done your bidding :)

No offense to John and TMM, but NATS does not have 95% market penetration. I would guess that the number of adult sites with affiliate programs of any kind, much less NATS specifically, is far less than 95%. The notion that everyone is going to think it is safer to go to a malware-ridden torrent site now than properly join a site which produces content they enjoy . . . well, I don't think that is good for the industry or the consumers.

Thanks Amelia, I've been reading your posts there.
It's unfortunate for all the hue and cry that have been going on here, that the WMs don't care enough to go onto slashdot and bury this clown like he deserves.

He just posted, joke of jokes, in the discussion that "I care about privacy" - which each one of the 300 webmasters who had their shit posted would agree to, right?

Seriously people,. take 5 mins to defend the industry reputation against this clown.

AmeliaG 12-25-2007 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x (Post 13561756)
Thanks Amelia, I've been reading your posts there.
It's unfortunate for all the hue and cry that have been going on here, that the WMs don't care enough to go onto slashdot and bury this clown like he deserves.

He just posted, joke of jokes, in the discussion that "I care about privacy" - which each one of the 300 webmasters who had their shit posted would agree to, right?

Seriously people,. take 5 mins to defend the industry reputation against this clown.

And why are you not over there right now? :upsidedow

quantum-x 12-25-2007 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 13561764)
And why are you not over there right now? :upsidedow

I've posted about 15 posts on there so far. I just don't post over there on the same username.

minusonebit 12-25-2007 07:08 AM

Go ahead and try to white wash it, hide it or bury it. Its too late. Google already picked it up. Its on another 20 blogs. I am getting ready to go to sleep, by the time it is over with, it will be everywhere.

quantum-x 12-25-2007 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit (Post 13561783)
Go ahead and try to white wash it, hide it or bury it. Its too late. Google already picked it up. Its on another 20 blogs. I am getting ready to go to sleep, by the time it is over with, it will be everywhere.

Noone's trying to whitewash or hide anything, that's the fucking point.
We ALL AGREE that TMM fucked up in a major fashion.

What we're objecting to is YOU propogating lies and FUD about the industry and the situation about stolen credit cards etc in public.

This is no longer about TMM and the world, this is about YOU LYING and spreading bullshit.

Bury TMM if you want, I don't give a fuck. But stop making false fucking claims.

AmeliaG 12-25-2007 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x (Post 13561777)
I've posted about 15 posts on there so far. I just don't post over there on the same username.

Doh, if it were a little earlier in the evening, that probably should have been obvious :1orglaugh

AmeliaG 12-25-2007 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x (Post 13561807)
What we're objecting to is YOU propogating lies and FUD about the industry and the situation about stolen credit cards etc in public.

[snip] this is about YOU LYING and spreading bullshit.

[snip] stop making false fucking claims.

Yeah, that.

quantum-x 12-25-2007 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 13561828)
Yeah, that.

I love it that our paths always cross in 'drama' threads Amelia. Last stop was the Suicide Girls debacle, I believe. I happened to be wearing my BlueBlood tshirt today when posting this stuff...

I hope you're having a good relaxing day :)

tony286 12-25-2007 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 13561530)
Did John threaten to sue this guy and then he decided to declare personal war against him for it?

Yeppers, this shows when thinking to threaten to sue someone take the time to think what can they do back. This is a strong example.
What I dont get is where is he lying, on another forum they were showing things from October. Who knows what they got and didnt get? Does anyone have a solid answer on that?

QTbucks_Mark 12-25-2007 10:03 AM

I read the story at /. earlier today and I think quantum-x did a good job in clarifying the whole situation. Apart from the usual +5, Funny posts, anyone who reads the comments now knows that no CC info was stolen - and that's what matters for the customer IMHO.

It's the affiliates that are affected the most, as the hacker might have their SSN - for the consumer it's just an increase in spam, which they're probably used to anyway.

notoldschool 12-25-2007 10:06 AM

this guys a fool. People know who he is and hes in for a rude awakening.

Iron Fist 12-25-2007 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit (Post 13561392)
It is very hard to get put up on Slashdot. I don't think it would be there is they didn't think it was news worthy. And they are not going to help the adult industry whitewash this issue, nor should they.

If it's a slow news day then it's easy as pie...

My first submission ever to slashdot got accepted - so don't sell me on how hard it is...

maggie2007 12-25-2007 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QTbucks_Mark (Post 13562185)
I read the story at /. earlier today and I think quantum-x did a good job in clarifying the whole situation. Apart from the usual +5, Funny posts, anyone who reads the comments now knows that no CC info was stolen - and that's what matters for the customer IMHO.

It's the affiliates that are affected the most, as the hacker might have their SSN - for the consumer it's just an increase in spam, which they're probably used to anyway.

it'll increase spam, possible hijacking of other webmaster sites...
so it's no good anyway

baddog 12-25-2007 10:56 AM

Since you are already members of slashdot, (and linking to GFY) why not bring some additional attention to minusonebrain:

Income tax evasion

Stealing electricity

Am sure others can come up with more topics.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123