Quote:
Originally Posted by AmeliaG
Uhm, I have no knowledge that you've ever said any such thing, but it has been stated in a number of the articles about the unfortunate situation. For example, http://www.icwt.us/index.php/2007/12...s-compromised/ says, " The NATS system is deployed on an estimated 80% to 95% of all adult sites, so if someone purchased a membership to an adult site since October, 2007 . . . users should contact TMM and request that they be compensated for any losses or damages that they may have incurred and additionally, demand that TMM provide them with credit monitoring services and other identity theft recovery services at TMM’s expense." I'm assuming you don't think any of the information I just quoted there is accurate.
No need to lash out at people at random. Am I mistaken in any way there? |
Sorry, I misread it as "No offense John" and thought it was directed to me. It is almost 8am (been up way too long) and I have been dealing with some off the wall people today. I was not trying to lash out at you.
And you are correct, we do not have 80% to 95% market saturation
