Hmmm. You do know that the iraq war was AGAINST UN law? Going to war under agression is one of the biggest war crimes there is.

YES.....

has already done so :2 cents:

So can someone explain to me what the hell a yeast infection that lasted for a week when this broad was a kid has anything to do with her being denied at age 30? Also, can someone explain how this is relevant to this discussion?


You're right idiots like you and this buzzy guy are fucked...there's no shakin' the idiot off you once it's on. Tough shit for you 2 I guess...:Oh crap

are you fucking retarded? the point of the discussion is about insurance companies denieing people for the stupidest reasons, and an example in the movie sicko was a girl who had a yeast infection as a kid was denied health treatment at age 30 because of that

Alright, it's obvious I'm the only one here that isn't such a complete anti-American maniac who can't see more than 1 side. I'll admit that this didn't go the way it should of and that there are a lot of things wrong with what America has done, but don't for a minute think that I'll believe that there isn't some right in the middle of this wrong. I'm sorry none of you are able to comprehend anything but the negative, maybe one of these days you'll learn that everything isn't black and white. Have fun bashing America you fucking lemmings.

Translation: I concede, im wrong.

You really are dumb .... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Explanation : The insurrance company, after pocketing years of premium, denied a valid claim based on " pre-existent" condition ... the infection when she was a kid ...

Are you serious when you say you didnt see the point .... ???? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh



whatever....

i love when people get proven wrong they pull the "your anti american card"

well no fucking shit

There you go that was coherent...good job! To that I give you a Silver Star of Achievement!! :thumbsup


This one down here...not sooo much. Do me a favor, read this down here out loud and see if you can help yourself from slapping your ownself in the face for typing this pathetic excuse for a sentence. Please, it should only take a few secs...well hopefully. I don't know you so I won't make any guarantees.

stop your fucking " anti-american " shit ... it is anti-insurance monopoly shit ...


... when will it it be " anti-semite " ....

Same fucking pattern .... :mad:

I see what the words mean that he put together and it does not make sense...the arrangement of the words he used needs some fine tuning to make it coherent, coherent, coherent, coherent, coherent, coherent,. Look it up if you need to (dictionary.com).


This by the way...probably the best response ever. I give you the almighty Gold Star for that!! :thumbsup

That's not what I meant. What I meant was that it's difficult to have a conversation with a broken record. I see what your thoughts on the situation are, but you can't see mine. You feel that attacking me and what my country does is a more effective way to communicate.

So translation: I don't argue with jackasses.

No. you said that do you honestly think the usa would strike someone against international law

and i said yes they done it, its called iraq

there is no possible way of coming back to that so you went in a hissy fit.

i get called a jackass and anti american for giving you some cold hard facts you cant accept

grow the fuck up

If you went back and changed all the "America's" to some other country, let's say Canada, would you call this turned into an Anti-Canadian thread? And denying somebody healthcare for a pre-existing condition that was never fixed is not even along the same lines as anti-semitism. Thats a big leap.

I said nuclear war, not strike against international law. Read it again.

I come to this country to play basketball.

well they have broken international law already, whats stopping them from doing it again?

please enlighten me.

Pass me the rock coach.

Edit: 7 pages of jackassery!!

Seriously? Alright, settle down with this train of thought. Just because the whole of the UN didn't agree with this war doesn't mean that we would use nuclear weapons. That's like saying just because someone speeds that means they are going to commit murder too. This is a stupid argument.

No you didnt awnser my question. i said you have broke international law already, whats stopping you from doing it again?

ALSO 100k people have died in iraq because if your ILLEGAL war, innocent people.

Now that is probally on the scale of a nuclear attack or even a nuclear attack would kill less so that proves that yes you would use nukes while defying international law

I kind of feel left out here...all this hate and I'm not getting any of it? What the fuck do I gotta do? Here goes...Your statement above is ridiculous...so getting in there before the WMD's get used and accepting the fact there will be casualties, is the same thing as dropping a nuke on the place that will have lasting effects to not only the people but the earth? Bit of a stretch don't you think? And 100K of innocent people? Probably a eighth of that are actually innocent...fucking guy.

The Bush administration is planning to use nuclear weapons against Iran, to prevent it acquiring its own atomic warheads, claims an investigative writer with high-level Pentagon and intelligence contacts.

So, in your way of thinking, as per with Iraq possibly using wmd ( ??? ) justifying the pre-emptive invasion , the USA should also be subject to pre-emptive strikes against it ....

If, on top of it, you take in consideration the number of conflicts the USA has created, in respect to the ones of Iran and/or Iraq, this is a no-brainer ...

Your whole so-called logic is flawed.

Well, I'm not sure how "innocent" every person that has died in this war has been. Like I said before, arguing with you is like arguing with a broken record. You see your opinions and "facts" as the only way possible instead of thinking about a point the person you are arguing has made. I did answer your question. You are comparing one thing to another that is completely different. Seeing a threat and attacking it conventionaly is completely different than a nuclear war. If you aren't able to have a conversation, i.e. see more than just your opinion, then you should say that and save everyone a lot of time.

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0411/S00025.htm
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/20352/

and guess what? that was in 2004, and with the increased violence i wouldnt be surprised if the number was around 400k now.

and getting in there Before wmd gets used? there were no fucking WMD's. The only WMD's hussein had was in the 90's when he invaded iran and they WERE SUPPLIED TO HIM BY AMERICA.

http://www.teesmybody.com/images/t-s...ot-t-shirt.gif

I didn't notice the june 2007 join date ... my bad ...

School will never start fast enough ....

What about the conflicts that the US has had to come in to in order to save another country? What about the times where the US was asked to help? Jesus! I'm sure whatever country you from has been helped by the US as well. My points have been completely overrun by single minded people in this thread that I've had to say the same things over and over. I see all the points you have made, I do and I can't say I disagree with some of them. I can do that because I know how to have an intelligent conversation.

Wow...cleverly deducted there buddy...Can you explain to me what someone's join date has to do with whether or not they are in school? I must have missed that class/thread/whatever...please learns me something.

Edit: I start 5th grade at the end of August...high FIVE!

............

you did ...

Whether or not the study about how many civilians died is even a completely legitmate study, the fact that this many civilians died is still skewed. A good majority of civilians died because the "bad guys" in Iraq use them as cover. Like storying missles and bombs in a hospital or a school. They are scumbags and are lucky to have people like you defending them.

I think I did miss that one now that you mention it...I chose to skip Asanine 101. Just so you know you're not right about that either...you do seem to know everything or that's what you would say but got a tidbit of news for you...you don't know shit. I'm taking back any stars previously handed out in this thread and I am going to issue 30 min detentions to those of you who choose to disagree with anything I say. During said detention you will be writing on the chalkboard 1000 times "I am the idiot on GFY".

It's not skewed, its official.

So your saying the majority of people died because the "bad guys" use them as cover? so are you suggesting over 50 thousand innocent people where used as shields? Also you have the wrong end of the stick, the muslims dont use innocent people as shields, that is the israeli's, even worse, they used kids as shields.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=rXq57XK2L0A

Who are scumbags, the innocent people who died? One day karma is going to get to you because ii dont know what kind of sick person would support the reigeme of an illegal war that defies international law and over 100 thousand innocent people dead

but i guess, they are muslims right? their blood isnt as valuable as you americans.

you fucking sicken me

And you're at head dumbass

Wow, it's like you know me or something? I didn't say anything along those lines, not even close. Your fucking imagination is incredible. You take one part of a conversation and play out the way you think I would go and then believe it. Amazing. And Iraq did have missles stored in a hospital. At no point in any of the post's have I said anything remotely negative towards muslims. My honest opinion is that I don't hold stock in any organized religion, but I don't object to other people's beliefs. And the people we are fighting are not the muslims, but the jihads, the radical muslims. The average muslims are peaceful people, but like every religion, there are radicals.

Nope, but you support the war. so you must support the deaths of over 100k innocent people, but shitty response though its a shame you could only respond to one bit of my post.

I also said that I don't agree with the way the war was managed (hint hint, that's agreeing with your thought) and if you were intelligent enough to stop attacking me because I'm not agreeing with every thought you have and just listen, this might of been a good discussion. Instead, you have to make this some kind of personal soapbox to show how "understanding" you are to the poor Iraqi people. Sorry I don't agree with 100% percent of what you say, I guess I'm smarter than the people you normally talk with.

Head of what the English class cause you sure the fuck aren't! :1orglaugh

Edit: Hate, Hate, Hate, Hate, Hate, Hate...

Just because Americans do "nice" things in parts of the world, doesn't give them any "naughty credits" to do bad stuff too, mmmmkay?

Remember that the "radical muslims" aren't attacking because Americans have nice lives, drive fancy cars, or live in big houses. They don't really care. What they care about is the US foreign policy over the past 50 years. Kind of hard to argue with the chronological timeline of events where the US has interfered with their countries, people, and internal matters. The US would have you all believe it's just because they hate you, but that's completely untrue. They're just fighting any way they can, it's called Guerilla War, and the US are the masters of this. Probably taught them.

usa and the uk got themselves into it they created israel which is basically a 51st state in the middle east so america has authority there and they funded saddam to invade iran

and america wonders why the whole middle east hates it

Oh please point out my mistakes.