http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=...8&sa=N&ndsp=18

You think google has the 2257 info for all those thumbs?

he has one, I glad nobody took me on the bet.
:)

I gotta visit "Mayflower" more often
:)

Maybe google.com should be shut down!!! :upsidedow

Not quite.

There was one thumb that linked to a site that the Danish authorities shut down. Slick said that was a trade, so it was not linking to his sponsor content (FHGs). However, hs 2257 statement claims that the thumbs come from the galleries he is linking to.

So, say you were a fed and just clicking around, you see the statement, you click the thmb, the Danish message saying they took down the gallery for cp comes up and voila, 1+1 makes 3, the thumb must be cp because it ame from a gallery that another legal authority has already labeled as cp.



.

man whatever, you're so fucking wishy washy I'm tired of dealing with it, you're just some dude hiding behind an anon nick anyways.

You're a 'type', whether you like it or not, one of those guys who gets in every political thread on the conservative side and then is shocked, SHOCKED, when someone calls you a republican. You're not original, and frankly you're not interesting either. I've already given you too many keystrokes.

I would give someone good faith on a traffic trade or some shit like that. I wouldn't take 14 year old looking content from someone and put it on my site under the persumption that the content (100% of it is) is legal. I wouldn't take ANYONE's word for it. I wouldn't touch the shit without having my own docs in hand.

It amazes me how many people put their lives on the line trusting companies they don't know. I don't give a shit how many parties through or how long they been around. I wouldn't trust my life to no one muchless some affiliate company.

http://images.google.co.uk/images?sv...ex&btnG=Search

Wonder how google got the 2257 info for the horses! lolol

fucking shit...we now have to meet on GFY...what the heck happened to our good 'ole personal moments????

How the heck are you, Rich!?

I think I'm banned from there now, dunno if it was done a while ago or just since this debacle began.

Where in the law does it require registrars to do anything other than REPORT? I don't think report and INVESTIGATE are the same thing, are they?

The biggest problem I'm facing is that my attorney is located in L.A. and the quickest way to go get something going is go get someone in New Orleans, so we're trying to find the right person there. One guy we talked to, has a partner that's out in London now, so he wanted to take the time to review it with him, so he said that he could do nothing until Monday, which as you know, is a few days away, I need action NOW.

We're working on it.

That page was last updated on May 4th, 2006.
Which begs the question, how short is "shortly"?

Slick, drop me an email to [email protected].

and lets set the record straigh Dig420........


I DONT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT HIS SITES CONTENT. I agree in principle that legal content is legal content. End of story. But unfortuneately, like most things in life, its not always that cut and dry. Many find it offensive and objectionable.. and you know what? I can understand that too. I think the final word should be the law and legal age of consent. I don't try to tell others what to think or feel or what to masturbate to.

However, the fact of the matter is that he intentionally pushed right up to the line and in some ways beyond the line as defined by law... and he bears some responsibility and fault for that. Additionally, the full facts are not known... yet you babble on and on and on as if they are. Hating authority because of your shitty, abusive childhood doesn't mean you have an automatic case everytime someone exercises authority.

Further, you made up your mind about "right and wrong" from reading the thread title of the first thread on the issue and see it as one more chance to make it a political platform and to bash Mike because of his political views and to take one more shot as you guys do and have been doing for the better part of 10 years. You can't have any discussion without talking about religion and politics. You can't have any discussion without eventually trying to make it about religion and politics. From my perspective this discussion is simply about the law and rights and obligations of both parties... not surprisingly, the most rational and logical and intelligent conversation on an issue is usually the last to be had here.

I must ask you. Ive read some posts about you here on GFY.
You did well during the goldage for porn. But winetalk.com,
2000-20006 and you have about 1000 posts?
Most likely are they yours....

Seems that it was easy back in the day with porn!

I guess google best be expecting a letter from their registrar pretty soon lol

that has nothing to do with privacy laws. thanks for playing tho

Hey Serge!! :)

Im Keeping busy! I thought you were abroad again on your travels!

300 pedos

ok obviously you are the paragon, the very epitome, of logic, rationalism and intelligence.

Now will you shut the fuck up?

What happend to the horse porn link?!

DAMNIT!!! :)

I peed myself a little. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Not quite.

They deemed the SITE in question as illegal and shut it down. They did not deem the thumb linking the site as illegal. That thumb pertains to it's corresponding gallery, and those thumb links are run by a script that skims some of the traffic and sends it out to trades. When that happens people need to realize that the thumb becomes basically a blind link.

Feds are obviously going to have to be educated about how these scripts and sites and thumbs work, and I have no doubt that it will take several court cases in order to accomplish that, sadly.

Googling an attorney in New Orleans would probably do you better good than waiting until Monday.

I know why Slick did this! He wants to win the xbox for the longest thread of the week! :1orglaugh

But it has everything to do with this case, considering that DirectNic is a REGISTRAR? ;)

Slickster, I bet you had no idea your little problem would blow up into the drama of the month for the entire industry, did you?

:D

nobody banned you,
if you can see this:
http://winetalk.com/forum/member.php?userid=18
you are OK

You just made me spit my tea god damnit :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

If you only knew Slick.

Best advice I can give you is leave the keyboard cause you got bigger things to take care of then seek justice on a site called GO FUCK YOURSELF IMHO

The drama of the year maybe?
If this guy has a lawyer Id be getting a new one.
This is a problem that will be very interesting to see the outcome I hope all the facts come out.

Winetalk do you really need to feed your ego by playing the arrogant asshole with these kids.

You might check with Joe http://www.xxxlaw.net/

I wouldn't google a dentist, much less an attorney

we were...but came back 4 days ago from Thailand and Cambodia

It's got to be better than what he's getting now. Actually a dentist might be better than the legal advice he's getting now.

yep I was trying to get into the wrong forum, lost my bookmarks :(

yeap...as a matter of fact I do.

Look what happened after we fed an elephant. He didn't complain, 'cuz he is a MAN and you are a bitch!
:)


http://nocomments.com/2/Thailand/Fun...%20tumor...JPG

Or they could take the less costly and more logical route of hiring an adult webmaster and/or a programmer to explain it to them... but that's not likely to happen.

Yes! Who is their registrar? :1orglaugh

Good luck with that especially when the 2257 statement (a legal statement) says differently.

Legal notices aren't advertisements, they have to speak truth.



.