![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
100% of the above people believed the gov/media account before reading the book. 100% of the above people disbelieved the gov/media account after reading the book. There is so much more to the book than 911 - oil politics, covert operations, corporate and financial rigging, geopolitics....prepare to understand the world at a whole new level. CROSSING THE RUBICON http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/086...lance&n=283155 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And yes, the rest are ignorant but not without hope. If you are hearing the buzz of non-existant black helicopters time for a mental health check-up. :pimp |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://physics911.net/7-pentmorris.jpg And why is that li'l ol' car there if the entire plane was burned into nonexistence? Just curious? :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
BTW, I didn't and don't endorse the theory that the USA has masterminded this attack .. I do believe tough that at a certain time they were aware of it ( there is enough evidence on that ) and decided to ignore it as it fitted their goal. Now, to come top your stupid tree example, sure if the trees are there, even if nobody saw them we could logically conclude that they fallen. Now, in the same woods, there is a house . The house ends up being sqashed. Authorities say it is those trees that fell on it, but there is no substantial remains of the tree to back that ascertion ... Get the picture ??? I hope , on your premises, that you never get accused of murder, because it will be up to you to prove, without any doubt, that you are innocent... Otherwise, under your so called logic, you ass will belong to BUBBA ... |
I was alive when the towers were built. Many of you guys weren't even born yet. I've been in the WTC, and my father had an office there once.
If you do research on how the WTC towers were designed it was actually a flimsy concept to begin with and many architects at the time questioned the viability of the building's integrity. The WTC was built with an inner core as the main support structure. The outer sides of the building were just attached to the beams but not in a way its usually done for wider building support and they were lifted in big sections. One of the advantages of this was to allow for wide open offices without as many vertical beams intersecting the floor space. If you look at the top of this pic you can see how the sides were attached during construction floor by floor. http://toweringskyscrapers.tripod.co...nstruction.jpg http://www.dfngallery.com/images/selwyn_wtc_504.gif So essentially it was like taking a tree and draping a sheet over it, thus creating a sold inside main pole and a more flexible exterior like branches extended out. The discussion back then was that this type of design would enable the buildings to flex better in the event a hurricane ever hit in the NYC area, just like a tree bends over. And they also said if the concept ever failed it would let the buildings pancake to the ground instead of toppling over onto adjacent buildings. Thus the towers collapsed exactly how they were supposed to. What caused the buildings to initiate the pancake process was the intense heat generated by the jet fuel and the office furniture and other combustible materials. One of the big fuckups in the design, and probably done back then to save time and money, was a thinner than normal fire retardent foam spray on the floor beams. Because it wasn't very thick the flames were able to breach into the steel enough to allow the floor beams to bend. This led to fuckup two in the design where the support bolts on the outer sides connect to the inner core beams were not strong enough to keep the beams attached with that significant amount of bending happening. Once the outer bolts snapped from that much pressure the top floors had no more support and the weight pancaked the entire floor at once. This created a very simple domino effect downward with each subsequent floor collapsing adding more mass, pressure and velocity to the equation. And that is the REALITY. And who knows maybe there was advanced knowledge of the plans to attack us and they deliberately ignored. The more research you do, the more you find just the usual government incompetence and blundering like always. We glorify government way too much. We think they will protect us. What the fuck is a government when you think about it?? Its just a bunch a regular people. They aren't supermen. They are just common people working in a gigantic beauracrcy and like anything that big, inevitably you will have lots of humans fucking things up. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Wings are designed to give a bit vertically, but not horizontally.. and to think that BOTH wings could fold back into the fuselage and pass completely through the hole is a bit of a stretch... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Btw make sure you wash your hands after pulling that right out your stinky conspiracy filled ass. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But as far as the wtc goes.. seems to me if it was the impact from the planes that brought em down, it wouldn't have taken as long as it did for them to drop.. And with the photos showing that a huge portion of the fuel burned outside of the buildings.. can't really see how the fule can be the cause either.. Then there's wtc7 that had no plane impact.. yet it fell in the exact same manner as the other two... Nope.. I don't have all the facts.. just some questions.. and I am more inclined to lean toward the research presented by those with the expertise, who have done the research, tests, equasions, yada yada.. I'm not hinting of a conspiracy.. not saying Bush did it.. Not saying our gov't did it.. I'm just saying that, from all I have read, and from the photos I've seen, I'm seeing a different story than what the gov't is telling... |
The WTC towers were solidly constructed with 47 steel core
columns and 240 perimeter steel beams. Of the more than 170 areas examined on 16 perimeter column panels, only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250ºC? Only two core column specimens had sufficient paint remaining to make such an analysis, and their temperatures did not reach 250 ºC. ... Using metallographic analysis, NIST determined that there was no evidence that any of the samples had reached temperatures above 600 ºC. http://www.physics911.net/stevenjones.htm Let me guess Steven E Jones is clueless. |
Quote:
There's no fucking excuse! Porn is in direct irrefutable conflict with the mores and direction of the Republican Party, the Republican ethic. Unless you're some super secret shill just posting to offset any counter viewpoints, you're a hippocrite. It's like here in Hollywood we have gay talk show hosts who are right wing. WTF? That's like some 'Fannie Dooley' shit. ( only old asses here will recall Fannie Dooley ). |
Quote:
Sticky.....look at aerial photo.... without analysis it looks like pretty massive damage to a highly reinforced structure and a big chunk of outer ring destroyed http://media.popularmechanics.com/im...911_001-lg.jpg HQ ATTACK: Taken three days after 9/11, this photo shows the extent of the damage to the Pentagon, consistent with a fiery plane crash. |
Quote:
|
VIDEO: Hannity and Colmes counterattack against Charlie Sheen:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...nitycolmes.htm |
Quote:
Here's another great page of information that is in the final report of all the government fuckups that day. Read the minute by minute responses in all the various government agencies. What a fucking joke with so many miscommunications happening. It was like a 911 call gone wild. LOL http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch1.htm Christ almighty, the scariest finding to me was that the NCA (National Command Authority) Secure Hotline Phone on Air Force One wasn't even working properly and Bush kept getting disconnected when he was trying to call Cheney in the White House Bunker and Rumsfeld at the NMCC (National Military Command Center) in the Pentagon. This is the phone and communications system used by Air Force One and the Looking Glass 747's in the event of a nuclear attack or national emergency to enable all the political leaders to conference call with the JCS generals. I've had my doubts from time to time about certain things also. But after seeing how the government responded when Katrina hit the gulf states, my conspiracy thoughts pretty much evaporated. It was all about incompetence and blunders. |
Quote:
However, I would IMPLORE you to scrutinize the government's "ommission report" a bit more closely. Not that I expect you to immediately order this book, but if you ever come across it on a vist to Barne's and Nobles, PLEASE scan through it: The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions by David Ray Griffin From Publishers Weekly The 9/11 commission report "simply cannot be trusted," concludes this retired Claremont School of Theology professor. Following up on his call for an official investigation in The New Pearl Harbor (2004), Griffin revisits the cataclysmic events and deconstructs the government's probe. He offers two mind-numbing versions of an "alternative conspiracy theory": that the Bush administration "deliberately" failed to prevent the attacks or, more chillingly, "was actively involved in the planning and execution of the attacks." Why? To spur the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and the occupation of their valuable oil and natural gas resources. Embracing the complicity theory, Griffin claims the 9/11 Commission's report, labeled the Kean-Zelikow Report here to underline the White House allegiances of its Republican chairman and director, was neither thorough nor non-partisan but rather a "cover-up" designed to back up the Bush administration's view of the day's events. Among the problems Griffin says the commissioners fail to address are discrepancies in the hijackers' identities; the behavior exhibited by President Bush and his Secret Service contingent in Florida; and the charges of obstruction by higher-ups made by FBI agent Coleen Rowley and other mid-level officials. In fact, "revisionism" was the Commission's major goal, argues the author, since the report reconstructs the timelines of the hijackings, officials' teleconferences and the plane crashes to absolve the military of mishandling jet fighters' intercepts of the doomed passenger aircraft. Supported by news media reports, government documents and readily available secondary sources, Griffin's research raises valid questions about the Commission's political aims and investigative methods. But unless future Woodwards and Bernsteins dig up evidence to the contrary, the author's theories about a government role in the 9/11 plot will remain pure speculation. Copyright ? Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Richard Falk "David Ray Griffin establishes himself, alongside Seymour Hersh, as America's number one bearer of unpleasant, yet necessary, public truths." http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/156...Fencoding=UTF8 |
Quote:
You really need to brush up on your physics if you think otherwise.. In that you like experiments.. try running through a brick framed door at 500 mph with your arms stretched out.. I'm sure they'll just fold back and pass right on through the door... Now imagine 2 55' wings just folding back and doing the same thing... oh.. and let's not forget the vertical stabilizer must have folded back too.. What an amazing aircraft that must be.. |
Generally speaking our air defences w e r e setup primarily for attacks coming from outside the country.... not within.
The capitol would be an exception to this general rule and I tend to agree with the "massive series of fuckups" theory. Caught with our panties down.:moon Fighters scrambled but too late to do any good... Then what level of command authority necessary to destroy civilian aircraft over major city and how long would that take? |
Quote:
What doesn't make sense to me is WTC 7 coming down in the same manner and that video of Silverstein saying to go ahead and "pull" it. I'm a bit confused on that part. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Them wingz be chopped and the rimz be spinnin' yo. No honky pentagram buildin' gonna shut this muthafucka down. :thumbsup |
Watch this video first and then ask questions. But watch the whole thing before coming to any conclusions http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...se+change+9-11
|
Quote:
wrong In the US alone there are 3 rivers that flow North, the ST Johns River in Florida being one of them. I've fished it many many times. |
Quote:
I laughed my ass off during that movie! |
Quote:
The Niagara river flows north from Lake Erie to Lake Ontario... Just seemed like a nice retarded comment to make at the time... :thumbsup |
Quote:
Of course it shows the bldg. after the collapse.. which didn't do so for awhile after the impact.. Makes be wonder how a 757 flying at 500 mph was able to pass over the interstate and drop fast enough to enter the first floor and not leave any crater where it went it.. That means it had to fly straight in .. oh.. and the wings and vertical stabilizer folded back too where the hole plane just vanished.. And all of this was done by a pilot that didn't know how to fly.. :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
In the past Floods, droughts were never natural disasters but 'we had angered the gods and they must be appeased' etc. Now its 'Kennedy can never have been killed by one lone weirdo' The fact that the leader of the worlds biggest democracy can be felled by a lone nut job is truly unsettling for people so we need to invent eleborate and complex theories as to 'what really happened'. It comforts people as they can rationalise better and see 'a pattern' - we need patterns - chaos and random chance are very frightening. 9/11 is no different and its no use telling people that the WTC was constructed to collapse that way, planes can find two fuck off big buildings,and that explosions are never neat and tidy - I knew of two army guys in Northern Ireland i the 80's, bomb explodes, one is killed the other has his upper clothes blown off and hardly a scratch and they were standing next to each other. Bizarre but true - or was it? Perhaps there was no bomb. Perhaps one was murdered as he had learned that the American President was part of the New World Order and his companion did the deed and tried to cover it up. Oh and the strange part was the surviving soldier's last name was Regan! Ah it's all becoming clear now etc etc.....you can fill the rest in yourselves! Its a strange world and frightened people need to find comfort. Sad but true. |
Quote:
http://usa.ural.ru/10/timeline/event...hoto/pic/2.jpg |
heres another gif of the first wtc coming down.. its big let it load.. notice where i have marked in red expplosion at least 10 floors below
http://com.webspacemania.com/dabomb/ |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123