GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   AaronM (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=470799)

comeplay 05-22-2005 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
by his reasoning, it was a BULK DEAL....

but somehow BALD content deserves refunds.... but pregnant set + Gothic + BBW sets don't?

does this make sense to anyone?

Next time specify to him you want the unrealistic girl next door content and that if you wanted the normal ugly hobags and fatties you could get a camera and shoot some of your own girls from next door

jonesy 05-22-2005 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
by his reasoning, it was a BULK DEAL....

but somehow BALD content deserves refunds.... but pregnant set + Gothic + BBW sets don't?

does this make sense to anyone?

sorry dude i was fucking with you - i know he bought bulk.

i was responding to your statement "This is the LAST time I will answer this."
regarding the prego set.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 05-22-2005 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM
You're right...You're not a lawyer..Nor have you consulted with one on this issue.

I have....And he happens to specialize in Intellectual Property issues.

sos was specifically told on this very board that he did not have the right to publish the images. In that very same thread he later published them anyway.

Not only is that copyright infringement, but it was blatantly done in my face to provoke a reaction.

Now he's crying because he got one. :1orglaugh

Thats all bullshit...
Ya stole from em dumb ass.
He should post the pictures anyways and hope you take em to court so he can show that your a fucken thief and get his money back.

sonofsam 05-22-2005 10:58 PM

why don't you tell them the full story regarding the how i posted the pictures aaron...

we were argueing back and forth about if it was cute teen, girl next door content or not... and i said... can i post pictures to let GFY decide if it is or not...

and you responded with

"post as many pics as you have licenses for"

which is basically entrapment...

entrapment, in law, the instigation of a crime in the attempt to obtain cause for a criminal prosecution.

Slam 05-22-2005 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
by his reasoning, it was a BULK DEAL....

but somehow BALD content deserves refunds.... but pregnant set + Gothic + BBW sets don't?

does this make sense to anyone?


thought it was for 100% Next Door??? :helpme

seems like the story keeps changing :Oh crap

Spunky 05-22-2005 10:59 PM

Nobody wins in these types of threads..people will make their own judgments and realistically you are only making your attorneys some more pocket change

AaronM 05-22-2005 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
yes i suffer from short term memory loss.

I thought so. Perhaps that is part of why you can't keep things straight and keep fucking up your business?

In all seriousness, I'm sorry to hear you confirm this. Maybe I should take more pity on you now.


Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
and pr0 is phoning you is supposed to scare me why?

Hmmm...Why do you think that just because I mention that pr0 is calling me that I am trying to scare you? I was simply trying to say that I would be away from GFY and that's why you would not be getting replies from me.

This is one more example of you claiming that I am threatening you when I'm not.

Yes, I did say that your final words to me would be said face to face. That's not a threat. That's me allowing you the chance to be a man and discuss things in person.

Why must you keep thinking the worst? Were you abused and repeatedly fucked over as a child or something?

sonofsam 05-22-2005 11:00 PM

it was cute teens , girl next door content.... girl next door content to me is CUTE TEENS, daddy's girl kind of girls... and i made that clear to him when we made the deal...

and the numerous samples he showed me when i was buying, were exactly that... cute teens

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 05-22-2005 11:00 PM

Welps I know what I am going to do...
I am gonna be callin AaronM a thief for quite while until this is resolved.

Everything here proves he is a fucken thief and a conman.

CDSmith 05-22-2005 11:01 PM

This case should go before Judge Judy.

Damn that would be a good half hour. :D

sonofsam 05-22-2005 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM
Yes, I did say that your final words to me would be said face to face. That's not a threat. That's me allowing you the chance to be a man and discuss things in person.

Why must you keep thinking the worst? Were you abused and repeatedly fucked over as a child or something?

i'm more of a man then you'll ever be aaron, i stick to my word.

dropped9 05-22-2005 11:05 PM

Few things I have learned while reading this thread:

1. Sign contracts or send invoices with proper disclosure. Be sure to get such documents while in deal mode before sending over or receiving funds.

2. The lawyer clause is still alive and well.

3. Some canadians are really fucking dumb

4. Trolls are alive tonight.

5. Some issues will never be resolved.

AaronM 05-22-2005 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
right, but aaronM claims he broke it down and explained everything that was included, so then why did he offer to refund the bald sets?


please let aaron reply to these questions...


This thread has gone on long enough...I'm still reading page 4 and it's onto page 5.

This question was also answer in the other thread.

I'm done with you now.

Have fun with your thread and I hope you and Alien chock on each others cocks.


Once again..You wanted attention and you got it.

I hope you're happy now that you got your ego stroked by a few people who would jump on any band wagon against me.

Just remember they are not supporting you...They are opposing me. :1orglaugh

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 05-22-2005 11:07 PM

Aint no band wagon AaronM.


Your right up there with Stodgil for this scam.

wallst 05-22-2005 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Headless
Few things I have learned while reading this thread:

1. Sign contracts or send invoices with proper disclosure. Be sure to get such documents while in deal mode before sending over or receiving funds.

2. The lawyer clause is still alive and well.

3. Some canadians are really fucking dumb

4. Trolls are alive tonight.

5. Some issues will never be resolved.

very good cliff notes. thank u. :1orglaugh

Clicky_Bucks 05-22-2005 11:11 PM

So Aaron, are you telling GFY collectively that if they are your customer in the future, this is the level of responsiveness you will show to their needs? Catching them on technicalities and stealing their money?

Ricardo_Maltoban 05-22-2005 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
this is an example of aaronm's immaturity.... his fake nicks to poke fun at the situation...


sonofsam. I am on side with you. I am not AairM. you can see my ip address, no?

Brujah 05-22-2005 11:12 PM

Alien knock it off. SonofSam is a fucking idiot for posting several times that he doesn't want his $3600 back, and that Aaron can keep it. What does that mean ? It means Aaron can keep it, and doesn't have to give him ANYTHING for it. It constitutes a contract, and is valid. You on the other hand continuing to call him a thief after that is breaking a law or two. I would knock it off, if I were you.

riddler 05-22-2005 11:13 PM

Ahhh, So funny how Aaron seems to think a "verbal" agreement sticks anywhere in the court of law, Sorry but if either of you took this to court the judge would probably dismiss it for the point of no PAPER WORK! Sonofsam your cool and all but take this as is, NO JOHN HANDCOCK SIGNED ON PAPER SO THAT MEANS NO LAWSUIT ON EITHER PARTIES

sonofsam 05-22-2005 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah
Alien knock it off. SonofSam is a fucking idiot for posting several times that he doesn't want his $3600 back, and that Aaron can keep it. What does that mean ? It means Aaron can keep it, and doesn't have to give him ANYTHING for it. It constitutes a contract, and is valid. You on the other hand continuing to call him a thief after that is breaking a law or two. I would knock it off, if I were you.

i don't want my 3600, to prove i have nothing to gain by lying...

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 05-22-2005 11:14 PM

Does'nt matter.

SOS was still hustled, conned and intimidated.

Funny thing is today AaronM asked if I was unstable or if I took Med's in ICQ...
However...

Cut through the shit AaronM a thief.

Clicky_Bucks 05-22-2005 11:14 PM

I bet SOS would take the licenses that he already paid for.

jonesy 05-22-2005 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clicky_Bucks
So Aaron, are you telling GFY collectively that if they are your customer in the future, this is the level of responsiveness you will show to their needs? Catching them on technicalities and stealing their money?

its more involved than that.
too bad the search isnt working, you could find the original thread.

aaron is making SOS sweat. SOS basically handled shit like a kid in the begining due too his noobness.

my bet is SOS will get his license/releases soon.

Brujah 05-22-2005 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
i don't want my 3600, to prove i have nothing to gain by lying...

Doesn't matter anymore. You gave it away, and verified it again multiple times. You don't want it. It's a done deal. Move on.

jonesy 05-22-2005 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrC
Ahhh, So funny how Aaron seems to think a "verbal" agreement sticks anywhere in the court of law, Sorry but if either of you took this to court the judge would probably dismiss it for the point of no PAPER WORK! Sonofsam your cool and all but take this as is, NO JOHN HANDCOCK SIGNED ON PAPER SO THAT MEANS NO LAWSUIT ON EITHER PARTIES

verbal agreements have stuck in court cases when theyre substantied which means proven or supported.

baddog 05-22-2005 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
YOU KEEP DODGING MY QUESTION...

if you CLAIM that you showed me EXACTLY what i was getting, then why in the other thread did you offer to refund the BALD sets?!

also... why is there a pregnant set?

also... why is there 60k images instead of the said 65k


these questions are valid questions, and deserve to be answered


This was a bulk content deal . . . 60-65k can only be a bulk content deal as I have never heard of anyone shooting that many pics of one person. Now, you would expect to see each picture? All 60k?

We are talking $.07 a pic . . . and you think it is all going to be hot babes?

riddler 05-22-2005 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonesy
verbal agreements have stuck in court cases when theyre substantied which means proven or supported.

It's SoS's word against Aaron and Aarons word against SoS there is no other parties to verify any agreement so its null.

sonofsam 05-22-2005 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah
Doesn't matter anymore. You gave it away, and verified it again multiple times. You don't want it. It's a done deal. Move on.

i have moved on, thats why i don't want the money... this post is just here, just so people KNOW, because future customers should know someones backround... regardless if i am right, or aaron is right.. they have the right to see this shit before dealing with someone... they can make their own educated opinion based on everything...

sonofsam 05-22-2005 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
This was a bulk content deal . . . 60-65k can only be a bulk content deal as I have never heard of anyone shooting that many pics of one person. Now, you would expect to see each picture? All 60k?

We are talking $.07 a pic . . . and you think it is all going to be hot babes?

why did aaron offer to refund the bald sets then? when he has posted so many times that "he told me EXACTLY what i was recieving"

AdultMovies.bz 05-22-2005 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah
Doesn't matter anymore. You gave it away, and verified it again multiple times. You don't want it. It's a done deal. Move on.

It doesnt mean he doesnt want what he paid for... :2 cents:

Brujah 05-22-2005 11:23 PM

As a potential customer, I'm unphased because the fact you don't want your money back leaves me with doubts that you know you've done something wrong somewhere and acknowledge that. I don't buy your story anymore.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 05-22-2005 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultMovies.bz
It doesnt mean he doesnt want what he paid for... :2 cents:

Its all shit anyways...
Why in the fuck would he want it. The producer hustled em, intimidated and ultimatly conned em.

He deserves his money back.

sonofsam 05-22-2005 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah
As a potential customer, I'm unphased because the fact you don't want your money back leaves me with doubts that you know you've done something wrong somewhere and acknowledge that. I don't buy your story anymore.

aaronM has been around a lot longer then me, so people naturally assume hes telling the truth... however... if i'm not after any money, there is no reason for me to lie..

Brujah 05-22-2005 11:26 PM

The motivation seems to be over the $3600 whether you want it back or not.

baddog 05-22-2005 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clicky_Bucks
5. Once brought to GFY, provider of content tells customer to post examples of content.


Sorry, I watched it happen . . . he was told to go ahead and post samples of content he had the license for.

As he did not have the license . . . .

CDSmith 05-22-2005 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
why did aaron offer to refund the bald sets then? when he has posted so many times that "he told me EXACTLY what i was recieving"

Maybe he was "throwing you a fricken bone"..... like that guy on Austen Powers.

Aaron is Dr Evil!!

sonofsam 05-22-2005 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Sorry, I watched it happen . . . he was told to go ahead and post samples of content he had the license for.

As he did not have the license . . . .

which is entrapment, if i'm not mistaken... aaron could you please call your lawyer and verify for me? :1orglaugh

baddog 05-22-2005 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
by his reasoning, it was a BULK DEAL....

but somehow BALD content deserves refunds.... but pregnant set + Gothic + BBW sets don't?

does this make sense to anyone?


You are absolutely correct . . . . he never should have offered you any slack

Cavello 05-22-2005 11:35 PM

I do not think that girl next door = girl next traler over !

.07 a pic is damn cheep though, any resonable person would expect some crap in there.

to sit there bit cry like a fucking baby that sam is talking bad about you is just lame ass shit. Just refund the damn money don't give him the right to use the pic's and be done with the hole fucking mess, that would be pro !

sonofsam 05-22-2005 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith
Maybe he was "throwing you a fricken bone"..... like that guy on Austen Powers.

Aaron is Dr Evil!!

okay now you are standing up for him for the sake of standing up for him....

he was offering to refund the bald sets, because CONTRARY to what he said, he didn't tell me he was sending that crap.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123