I am by no means a lawyer, but there is no fucking way that a court would say that sonofsam did a copyright violation, IMO.

He took the images down when asked.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact the infringer

The first step is to make the infringer aware of your objection and put forward a reasonable settlement and time scale to reach the settlement.

In your letter you should include:

* The name of the work(s) you are objecting to.
* The reason why this is an infringement, i.e. an unauthorised copy, adaptation etc.
* State that you believe this act constitutes an infringement. That your work is protected under law and that this constitutes a breach of your legal rights.
* State that this is unacceptable and must stop.
* State what action is required to resolve the dispute, usually you would request the withdrawal of all copies of the work, (and any other encroaching materials).
* Specify a deadline for your conditions to be met [28 days is the normal period].
* State that you are seeking legal advice and that the case will be pursued if they do not comply with your request within the time period.

It is normal to simply request the withdrawal of all infringing work as the first course of action, if however you believe that you are entitled to financial remuneration, such as damages or royalties, then contact a solicitor immediately.

yes i suffer from short term memory loss, now please enlighten me and answer those questions instead of dodging them...

and pr0 is phoning you is supposed to scare me why?

Hey Mark...I have another question for you.

Is there an enemy of mine who's dick you won't suck to try to get under my skin?

You're nothing, you have never been nothing, and you will always be nothing.

Chew on the facts.





Ah...Phone is ringing now...It's pr0.

c ya. :321GFY

Am gonna put your name right next to Dave Stodgil dude...
Right smack next to it where it belongs.

Your opinion about Aaron, however, is quite bias.

You two have your own issues.

Aaron we get it, pr0 is calling you.. maybe you should make a seperate thread to brag that fellow gfyers call you ? mentioning it 3 times isn't accomplishing anything...

man,,, this drama still goin on?????? i thought it was done with.... guess i was wrong.

GFY is not the place to resolve matters like this. even though some drama makes the board fun... but the same shit over and over gets old.. u guys need to give it a rest.

whatever happend... happened... shit happens

:playboy

It is easier to go have gay phone sex with pr0 then to answer a few questions :2 cents:

i'm curious just how butt ugly these girls you speak of are, i missed the original postings, someone hook me up.

He lets Party Goat talk for a few seconds

isn't everything? :1orglaugh

Damn...pr0's phone is fucked up.

Who the fuck are you?

Those questions have been answered.

Eat a dick troll. :)

Son, what is it you are trying to accomplish with posts like this? I honestly don't get you. If Aaron doesn't post for a while or post answers on the spot, someone jumps on here and cocks off about him avoiding the issue. If he says he's taking a phone call a few times so that people know why he's not posting, then he takes flack for that.

Unreal, you people.



And yes, I can confirm that those two questions were both answered in that other thread you posted many weeks ago. I can't say with any accuracy the exact answers given, but they were answered. It had something to do with it being a bulk content package, so a few pregger sets and other niche sets were included on that basis.

As to the pics count, I think Aaron had said the actual count on that CD was BETWEEN 60k and 65k, and not as you claim 5k short.

No search function so it's hard to go find that thread, but that's the way I remember it.

Am I missing something here? Who the fuck is pr0? :helpme

I was allowing him through a verbal agreement to use the content to design the site so that once the content was paid off, he could launch right after receiving the license.

His claims of me allowing him to use the content then pay me is pure bullshit. His intention was to launch his solo girl site and use the money from that to pay off the balance owed to me.

He's just playing games here....As usual.

right, but aaronM claims he broke it down and explained everything that was included, so then why did he offer to refund the bald sets?


please let aaron reply to these questions...

Lets just say your surfers were 90% drunk night surfers would these butt ugly girls fly or are they really that ugly?

hahahahah BULLSHIT, i will take a fucking polygraph test... you have friends in vancouver.... let one of them accompany me to a polygraph test, you liar.

i would gladly post samples, but aaron would get sue happy again, lol... looks like hes scared to have the pics posted

pr0 is a guy who's been here long enough to say "who the fuck is Danny Dukes?" :1orglaugh

Maybe these ugly sluts have some personal connection to said individual?

Because I come here to be entertained, not to have to justify my actiuons to a bunch of fucking mornons who hav ebeen lied to and told half truths by sonofsam.

Your input means fuck all to me except that in one of your posts you said that this issue with sos will keep people from doing business with me.

That's a pretty strong statement that will build my case. I may need an address for you so that I can have you testify that he did this to e.

Thank you for your support.

I have much the same problemo. I send AarinM 5.000 pesos and he say he is wanting USD! this is mucho dinero for me. 55.000 pesos is more money than I will ever no

Son Of Sam, there is no way in hell that you deserve this kinda shit.

You buy content ya spend money and ya just got it stolen from you.

Thats the bottom line.

YOU WERE ROBBED.

The scrum in between is just smoke screen and bullshit dude...
FACT IS YOU GAVE EM MONEY AND GET NOTHING IN RETURN.

0 NADA.

AaronM is a fuckin thief.

Let's see some of these pics ,

Now this is gettin good.

this is an example of aaronm's immaturity.... his fake nicks to poke fun at the situation...

ask aaronM, if he has nothing to hide, there shouldn't be a problem in posting the pics

Let's summarize this thread:

1. Customer is unhappy with content purchased and expresses it in private with provider.

2. Provider doesn't meet customer's needs.

3. Provider puts customer on ignore on ICQ and doesn't return phone messages.

4. Dares customer to bring it to GFY.

5. Once brought to GFY, provider of content tells customer to post examples of content.

6. Once examples are posted, provider of content feels he caught customer in a trap and threatens to sue.

7. After this point, the original issue of crappy content which customer didnt want to begin with is ignored as provider capitalizes on new issue of using unlicensed content, even though he had told him to do so.

8. Along the way, most of the original issues are ignored so content provider can feel justified in stealing 3600 dollars from customer.

This is the LAST time I will answer this.

There is a pregnant set because sos did a bulk purchase from me which included 140 models and spanned various niches. This was all covered in another thread.

Also there were 60k images because that's what he was told he was getting...Not 65k.

Now..Craw back under your bridge.

bingo :thumbsup

AaronM your shit does not matter.

Your a thief at this point...

Plane and simple, black and white.

aaron

why was there a pregnant set?

1.) then WHY did you offer a refund for the BALD content? if it was a bulk deal and everything was okay?

2.) you said 65k liar.

3.) he is FAR from a troll, believe me.

You're dead wrong about that.

I've seen people sued because they called another GFYer a wigger on a message board.

I'm done cutting this prick any slack.

by his reasoning, it was a BULK DEAL....

but somehow BALD content deserves refunds.... but pregnant set + Gothic + BBW sets don't?

does this make sense to anyone?

You're right...You're not a lawyer..Nor have you consulted with one on this issue.

I have....And he happens to specialize in Intellectual Property issues.

sos was specifically told on this very board that he did not have the right to publish the images. In that very same thread he later published them anyway.

Not only is that copyright infringement, but it was blatantly done in my face to provoke a reaction.

Now he's crying because he got one. :1orglaugh

that actually went to court?

not doubting you but details?