Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 07-10-2003, 07:55 PM   #1
fantasyman
Let's do some business together
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 973
A Statement from CECASH - Processing Free Sign Ups

I have spoken with the owners of Trade News Corp/CECash and they have asked me to post the following statement.

CECASH will continue their Free Trial Sign Ups. Free Trial Sign Ups have never been a problem when they?re handled with the proper disclosure. CECASH has always used the proper disclosure and their chargeback rates are right in line with the current new processing parameters.

Here is a little explanation of why Free Trials ?help? keep chargebacks down when properly disclosed.

If you have 100 Free Trial sign ups, 60% cancel, you only put 40% of monthly members thru the banking system, or 40 transactions.

If you have 100 Paid Trial sign ups, 60% cancel, you process at total of 140% of transactions for trials and monthly members thru the banking system, or 140 transactions.

That?s 78% more transactions for paid trials than free trials put thru the banking system in a given month. This highly increases your exposure for chargebacks from the bank.

Another reason that CECash does not have a chargeback problem is because their are real cancel links in all members sections which make it very easy to cancel a membership, this has always been like this.

CECASH will not reduce their payouts.

Pay It Forward (PIF) continues to pay $20 for every free trial sign up with no deductions. It further pays $5 per recurring member, this pays you like an annuity. PIF also pays 40% of all dialer revenue.

Follow Me Free (FMF) continues to pay $55 for every active member sign up. FMF also pays 40% of all dialer revenue.

Follow Me Free Partners (FMFP) continues to pay 60% or $25.47 for every sign up and $25.47 for every recurring monthly member. This is a very lofty payout. If a member stays for 3 months you make $76.41!!!!

CEMag and XXXAllAccessPass continue to pay the highest payout available for any email program!!

CEMag pays $1.50 per confirmed email, $15 per upsell, $5 per outside upsell, and 50% of all dialer revenue!!

XXXAllAccessPass pays $1.30 per confirmed email, no deductions, $15 per upsell and 50% of all dialer revenue!!

During this time of transition in the industry, it?s nice to know CECash can maintain the same payouts as always!!

peace out!
fantasyman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 07:57 PM   #2
bigdog
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,964
nice to hear but dont you think it will be hard to keep the payouts on your email program the same. Many sponsors you would send traffic to our lowering payouts won't that put a dent on your bottom line
bigdog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 07:59 PM   #3
candyflip
Carpe Visio
 
candyflip's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 43,064
My ears are surely open.
__________________

Spend you some brain.
Email Me
candyflip is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:00 PM   #4
fantasyman
Let's do some business together
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally posted by bigdog
nice to hear but dont you think it will be hard to keep the payouts on your email program the same. Many sponsors you would send traffic to our lowering payouts won't that put a dent on your bottom line
Almost 75% of all sign ups generated by the email programs are from CECash paysites, the other 25% should be pretty insignificant. So this shouldn't impact the mailer program's payout at all.
fantasyman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:04 PM   #5
Snake Doctor
I'm Lenny2 Bitch
 
Snake Doctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: On top of my soapbox
Posts: 13,449
I just went to the CE board looking for a statement from you FM.

Thanks for coming here to post this.
__________________
sig too big
Snake Doctor is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:05 PM   #6
Hooper
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: A Free America
Posts: 2,210
That is the most ridiculous nonsense I have ever heard ron. (is this really you? or did somebody hack your posting account?)

Chargebacks are based 100% on the number of transactions that charge back.

More transactions result in a lower chargeback level. Not a higher one.

100 Free trials. 60% cancel. Just ONE of the members charges back. You only have 40 actual transactions. So you're now over 2%.

100 $1 Trials. 60% cancel. 40 rebill. You now have 140 transactions. Just ONE of the members charges back. You now have a .6% cb ratio.
__________________
<a href="http://www.adultplatinum.com/"><img src="http://www.adult.com/wmbanners/10dcash-468x60.gif"></a>

Last edited by Hooper; 07-10-2003 at 08:08 PM..
Hooper is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:08 PM   #7
fantasyman
Let's do some business together
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally posted by Hooper
That is the most ridiculous nonsense I have ever heard ron.

Chargebacks are based 100% on the number of transactions that charge back.

More transactions result in a lower chargeback level. Not a higher one.

100 Free trials. 60% cancel. Just ONE of the members charges back. You only have 40 actual transactions. So you're now over 2%.

100 $1 Trials. 60% cancel. 40 rebill. You now have 140 transactions. Just ONE of the members charges back. You now have a .6% cb ratio.
Hooper - it's not nonsense, it's a fact!! The more transactions you do, the more exposure in shear numbers of potential chargebacks!!
fantasyman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:09 PM   #8
Marc De
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 632
ROFLMAO
Marc De is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:13 PM   #9
Shap
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 8,313
Let's see if CE still processes free trials come Dec 31st. Then I'll shut my yap
Shap is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:17 PM   #10
Mutt
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Mutt's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 34,431
0wned by Hooper!
__________________
I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!
Mutt is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:18 PM   #11
Brown Bear
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,982
Hrmmm
__________________
Surrender all your independent thinking and Click Here for re-programming.
Brown Bear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:20 PM   #12
Platinum Dave
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,441
FM are you processing through your own merchant accounts?

Must be.

ok Hooper you are correct and FM is correct I can see boths views

When a trial comes in and converts that is 2 transactions. Usually a charge back surfer will charge back BOTH of these, hence having 2 transactions.

However

Free Trials are only 1 transaction charging back and MUCH lower total transaction count. So the ratio will be MUCH higher indeed.

The kicker here is the fact that surfers who signup to a TRIAL membership actually are putting down money right away, THUS less likely to charge back. If you are doing a FREE trial and FORGET your membership or as many surfers are "just dumb" and dont read the terms, they dont know that after the trial period you get charged $40

THUS MORE LIKELY TO charge back.

So Free Trials in the end are definately going to result to a higher charge back ratio. Just common sence here.
__________________


Check out Adult Rental - Only Pay Per Signup VOD!
Platinum Dave is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:24 PM   #13
Spunky
I need a beer
 
Spunky's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠
Posts: 133,944
No matter what,we are getting fucked by the man..Its discrimination...
__________________
Spunky is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:24 PM   #14
Marc De
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 632
Every processor can come to this board with loads of statistical data to back up that free trials cause a higher rate of chargebacks that paid trials.

Better yet, it will be nice when this industry can see a day when trials as a whole are just GONE!!! I remember when $14.99 monthly memberships were worth well over $100 and now $39.99 monthlys from trials aren't even worth 1/2 of that

Unfortunately 'we' (and we is the key word) did this to ourselves.
Marc De is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:25 PM   #15
fantasyman
Let's do some business together
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally posted by Platinum Dave
FM are you processing through your own merchant accounts?

Must be.

ok Hooper you are correct and FM is correct I can see boths views

When a trial comes in and converts that is 2 transactions. Usually a charge back surfer will charge back BOTH of these, hence having 2 transactions.

However

Free Trials are only 1 transaction charging back and MUCH lower total transaction count. So the ratio will be MUCH higher indeed.

The kicker here is the fact that surfers who signup to a TRIAL membership actually are putting down money right away, THUS less likely to charge back. If you are doing a FREE trial and FORGET your membership or as many surfers are "just dumb" and dont read the terms, they dont know that after the trial period you get charged $40

THUS MORE LIKELY TO charge back.

So Free Trials in the end are definately going to result to a higher charge back ratio. Just common sence here.
Platinum Dave, everyone is entitles to their own opinion. We have done Free Trials since the beginnig in 1996, so I don't share your opinion. But then again if you try to cancel one of CECash's sites online it's easy. Have you ever tried to cancel with some of the other processors, it's next to impossible, that leads to high chargebacks more than anything. It's the #1 factor for chargebacks, tough cancellation procedures that make people fill out a bunch of goobly gook, CECash never did that.
fantasyman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:30 PM   #16
Platinum Dave
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,441
Quote:
Originally posted by fantasyman


Platinum Dave, everyone is entitles to their own opinion. We have done Free Trials since the beginnig in 1996, so I don't share your opinion. But then again if you try to cancel one of CECash's sites online it's easy. Have you ever tried to cancel with some of the other processors, it's next to impossible, that leads to high chargebacks more than anything. It's the #1 factor for chargebacks, tough cancellation procedures that make people fill out a bunch of goobly gook, CECash never did that.
All I know is my business, we are going to have to impliment about a dozen new changes to the way we do business to maintain a 1% charge back ratio over the long term. Its not only one thing like Customer support or easy quiting for the surfer that will maintain me under 1%.

and that is with us never touching a FREE TRIAL signup.

You must know a few tricks the rest of us dont to be able to keep up free trials for the time being I am going to bet.
__________________


Check out Adult Rental - Only Pay Per Signup VOD!
Platinum Dave is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:31 PM   #17
fantasyman
Let's do some business together
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally posted by Marc De
Every processor can come to this board with loads of statistical data to back up that free trials cause a higher rate of chargebacks that paid trials.

Better yet, it will be nice when this industry can see a day when trials as a whole are just GONE!!! I remember when $14.99 monthly memberships were worth well over $100 and now $39.99 monthlys from trials aren't even worth 1/2 of that

Unfortunately 'we' (and we is the key word) did this to ourselves.
Marc De you know better than anyone how difficult online cancellations are with 'some' processors, this is the #1 contributing factor to chargebacks.

If you don't believe me, try to cancel with them, you might be enlightened. So that statistical data you speak of is created by their own cancellation widgets, and I call them widgets because I've tried them myself, very frustrating.

If you advertise and disclose a Free Trial properly and make online cancellation easy, they do not increase chargebacks, they decrease them.

A paid trial which converts to a monthly membership creates 2 potential chargebacks instead of 1 - that's simple math!! Add to that the initial Paid sign up is exposure in itself, the probabiltiy increased dramatically.
fantasyman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:34 PM   #18
fantasyman
Let's do some business together
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally posted by Platinum Dave


All I know is my business, we are going to have to impliment about a dozen new changes to the way we do business to maintain a 1% charge back ratio over the long term. Its not only one thing like Customer support or easy quiting for the surfer that will maintain me under 1%.

and that is with us never touching a FREE TRIAL signup.

You must know a few tricks the rest of us dont to be able to keep up free trials for the time being I am going to bet.
PD - Visa and MC never said anything about getting rid of the free trial. In fact many mainstream companies have based their entire marketing structure around Free Trials including AOL.

If you're interested in processing shoot me an email at fm at ceash dot com
fantasyman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:35 PM   #19
fantasyman
Let's do some business together
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally posted by Mutt
0wned by Hooper!
Think you spoke too soon, stay around and watch!!
fantasyman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:49 PM   #20
docjohnson
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 173
Good luck fantasyman. If you can keep the free trials and still have your CB under 1%, I give you props! You must be running a hell of a tight ship over there.
__________________
Do you need SERIOUS SEO done for competitive keywords? See if one of my three plans will fit your needs today! You may qualify for my TOP10 Guarantee! Skype me @ mrclean78
docjohnson is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:52 PM   #21
Drake
Hello world!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,508
Interesting perspectives. There is good logic in both arguments. I suppose that if the nature of the free trial is completely disclosed in a simple and easy-to-view manner (as is the 'cancel' button), it's completely possible for chargeback levels to remain low. It would also depend upon I suppose, the quality of the site too whether the user eventually decides to chargeback. A good site usually only warrants/gets a cancellation rather than a chargeback.
Drake is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 08:54 PM   #22
SetTheWorldonFire
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: California
Posts: 7,444
DOWN WITH FREE TRIALS!!
__________________
www.STWOFDesign.com
hit me up on icq 154206276 or Skype: JaimeGizzle
SetTheWorldonFire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:00 PM   #23
fantasyman
Let's do some business together
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
Interesting perspectives. There is good logic in both arguments. I suppose that if the nature of the free trial is completely disclosed in a simple and easy-to-view manner (as is the 'cancel' button), it's completely possible for chargeback levels to remain low. It would also depend upon I suppose, the quality of the site too whether the user eventually decides to chargeback. A good site usually only warrants/gets a cancellation rather than a chargeback.
Mike33 you are correct!! Bingo!!!

CECash has full disclosure that pops up before a consumer can join, they must click 'yes' or 'no' and then a follow up email is sent.

CECash makes cancellations very easy.

Each CECash paysite has it's own unique member's section with niche content and spins out more broadly to include tons of content, the consumer gets value.

The chargeback problems have come from the following attributes.....

Poor disclosure

Multiple clicked box upsells, or hidden upsells

Non- user friendly cancellation procedures

Paysites with virtually no content, or thin content
fantasyman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:00 PM   #24
scoreman
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,491
Quote:
Originally posted by fantasyman

If you have 100 Free Trial sign ups, 60% cancel, you only put 40% of monthly members thru the banking system, or 40 transactions.
Wait a minute. Are you seriously telling us that the free trial client for your program converts at 40% from free to $39.99? (or whatever price point your using, I havent looked). The freeloading trial guy right? riiiiiiighht .Cmon man, some of us have been around doing the paysite gig for a while. Come back with numbers that are for real.
__________________
scoreman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:02 PM   #25
Marc De
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 632
FM - I agree... I do believe that a free trial that is properly disclosed and no 'games' are played can keep chargebacks under 1%

For those of us who have been infected with other issues we have to play the 'percentages' ...

The biggest problem I have with free trials is we continually teach our customer base that there is something for nothing. I hope to all hell you don't give your free trial members access to all your goodies and at least wait to unlock the really good stuff until they pay
Marc De is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:04 PM   #26
Snake Doctor
I'm Lenny2 Bitch
 
Snake Doctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: On top of my soapbox
Posts: 13,449
David they actually rebill at $50 a month.

40% does seem awfully high to me, its hard to do that with paid trials.
__________________
sig too big
Snake Doctor is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:07 PM   #27
completetosser
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,419
Quote:
Originally posted by Marc De
FM - I agree... I do believe that a free trial that is properly disclosed and no 'games' are played can keep chargebacks under 1%
And that's the crux of the problem really - too many people have been playing games for too long, and now it's coming back to bite us all in the butt.
completetosser is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:11 PM   #28
fantasyman
Let's do some business together
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally posted by shap
Let's see if CE still processes free trials come Dec 31st. Then I'll shut my yap
Shap

Free Trials are not something that Visa or MC have ruled against. The processors are making these decisions. Other mainstream companies use the free trial as the key to their marketing model. A small company called AOL comes to mind, they've been blessed by the FTC after an investigation.

For that matter nobody told Paysites to lower their monthly subscription fees. Those doing that are doing it on their own accord because they probably don't have enough content to warrant their high prices.

The only reason others are lowering their Webmaster payouts is because they are no longer allowed to do 3 upsells!!!

Wake up and smell the coffee. You're not reading these threads to well. Read carefully, see what the processors are doing and see what the paysites are doing on their own.
fantasyman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:20 PM   #29
NETbilling
Confirmed User
 
NETbilling's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 8,584
Ron and Hooper,

You both have valid points. I have never been insdie one oh Hopoper's members area but I have in Rons' and I can tell you that there is more content than most sites could ever dream of having.

I never encourage the free trial model to any of our merchants unless they have extremely niche type sites with dedicated client bases. We have several that successfully offer free tirls and keep their chargebacks low and we have others that do not. A big factor as well is to steadily increase traffic/signups to offset chargebacks from a growing recurring database. This is very important.

I applaud both of your companies and programs.

Mitch
__________________


Mitch Farber
CEO - NETbilling, Inc.
Email / Phone: 888-357-8166 / 661-252-2456
Transaction processing & 24/7 call center services with exceptional rates and flexibility, since 1998!
NETbilling is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:23 PM   #30
Shap
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 8,313
I'm smelling the coffee Ron. Don't take this personal. This isn't a personal attack. Everybody has to fight for their own survival. Especially when they haven't made their millions yet. This is our livelihood and I'm commenting on what i'm seeing. I do my homework. I watch what everyone is doing, who's processing with who etc.

If everybody was so squeeky clean there wouldn't be any need for any changes right? The fact they are making changes means there is a problem.
Shap is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:23 PM   #31
fantasyman
Let's do some business together
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally posted by Marc De
FM - I agree... I do believe that a free trial that is properly disclosed and no 'games' are played can keep chargebacks under 1%

For those of us who have been infected with other issues we have to play the 'percentages' ...

The biggest problem I have with free trials is we continually teach our customer base that there is something for nothing. I hope to all hell you don't give your free trial members access to all your goodies and at least wait to unlock the really good stuff until they pay
Marc thanx for agreeing

Let me tell you the biggest problem with Paid Trials, Webmaster Fraud!! I'm sure you know this. Anytime someone can sign up for $2.95 and get paid $30 to $40 there is huge chance that you will experience Webmaster Fraud. There is a ring of Webmasters that do this, they charge the Webmaster an additional $5 plus the price of each paid trial. They cancel but allow the paid trial to go thru. When their cancel isn't picked up in time by the processor and they get billed for a month, they chargeback. When a Webmaster enlists these folks and adds his own regular traffic to an account it's virtually impossible to pick up the fraud. That's why CECash will never do a paid trial program, can't track that type of fraud.
fantasyman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:25 PM   #32
fantasyman
Let's do some business together
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally posted by scoreman


Wait a minute. Are you seriously telling us that the free trial client for your program converts at 40% from free to $39.99? (or whatever price point your using, I havent looked). The freeloading trial guy right? riiiiiiighht .Cmon man, some of us have been around doing the paysite gig for a while. Come back with numbers that are for real.
I was using those conversion rates as an example. CECash free trials convert as well as any paid trial.

If you use Pay It Forward it doesn't matter how many convert - you get paid $20 for EVERY free trial and $5 per recurring and 40% of all dialer revenue, so that's a moot point.
fantasyman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:32 PM   #33
fantasyman
Let's do some business together
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally posted by shap
I'm smelling the coffee Ron. Don't take this personal. This isn't a personal attack. Everybody has to fight for their own survival. Especially when they haven't made their millions yet. This is our livelihood and I'm commenting on what i'm seeing. I do my homework. I watch what everyone is doing, who's processing with who etc.

If everybody was so squeeky clean there wouldn't be any need for any changes right? The fact they are making changes means there is a problem.
Shap here is your post in another thread - if this isn't a personal attack I'd hate to see one from you - you accuse of scams, shitty business models and say that's why everyone is screwed.

************************************************** *
posted by Shap
Nobdoy else will say but I will. CyberErotica, ARS, CEN, Silvercash and others have been running scams and questionable business practises for the past 6 years. They've done it to keep up and keep paying the top dollar to their partners. It was a shitty business model to begin with. All marketing no substance. Not one of these companies has a site worth what they charge. That's why we are all screwed right now.
************************************************** *

We haven't changed our Free Trial since 1996 and it's not a scam, nor a shitty business model and we haven't screwed anyone.

And - we're sqeaky clean and are not making any changes - so go attack someone else!
fantasyman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:37 PM   #34
Fletch XXX
GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
 
Fletch XXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: that 504
Posts: 60,840
the word 'thru' always makes me think of college and my Literature professor going off on this girl about using the word 'thru' - I can remember her continuing on about it.

cheers.

hahaha
__________________

Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me
Fletch XXX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:40 PM   #35
Shap
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 8,313
I know you haven't changed a thing Ron. I'm not saying you did. I'm referring to the others when I said they are changing things. I, like many others on this thread, am very surprised you are going ahead with Free Trials. The fact you don't have to change a thing in your business model makes CE look pretty damn good.


btw in that post i was attacking CE. Not Ron Levi. So as I said it's not a personal attack on you. I thought you sold CE?
Shap is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:44 PM   #36
fantasyman
Let's do some business together
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally posted by shap
I know you haven't changed a thing Ron. I'm not saying you did. I'm referring to the others when I said they are changing things. I, like many others on this thread, am very surprised you are going ahead with Free Trials. The fact you don't have to change a thing in your business model makes CE look pretty damn good.


btw in that post i was attacking CE. Not Ron Levi. So as I said it's not a personal attack on you. I thought you sold CE?
Whenver you attack CE you attack me, I created it.

I did sell it and this is my last month as a consultant for them. But I'm sure they'll want me to do odds and ends from them. Also, CE is still my baby, even though I sold it, there will always be an allegiance I feel for it.
fantasyman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:46 PM   #37
Shap
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 8,313
Understood.
Shap is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:48 PM   #38
kris242
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 139
Fantasy man, your da bomb bitch!, Great payouts for free trials and free lobster on xmas!!! what the fuck more do you want!?!?
kris242 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:48 PM   #39
goBigtime
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,761
Quote:
Originally posted by Hooper
That is the most ridiculous nonsense I have ever heard ron. (is this really you? or did somebody hack your posting account?)

Chargebacks are based 100% on the number of transactions that charge back.

More transactions result in a lower chargeback level. Not a higher one.

Example 1: 100 Free trials. 60% cancel. Just ONE of the members charges back. You only have 40 actual transactions. So you're now over 2%.

Example 2: 100 $1 Trials. 60% cancel. 40 rebill. You now have 140 transactions. Just ONE of the members charges back. You now have a .6% cb ratio.

Your examples are flawed there Hooper...

In Example 2, you are actually charging EVERYONE $1.... so right off the bat you have a chance of more chargebacks than in example one.

Also in Example 2, If Joe Deadbeat decides hes going to chargeback, he'll attempt to say he didn't authorize EITHER charge -- the $1 trial OR the rebill - thats 2 chargebacks for the price of one


[edit]... yet another example of why I should read the complete thread first no matter how tempted I am to quickly reply to a single post

Last edited by goBigtime; 07-10-2003 at 10:00 PM..
goBigtime is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 09:55 PM   #40
scoreman
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,491
Quote:
Originally posted by fantasyman


I was using those conversion rates as an example. CECash free trials convert as well as any paid trial.
Ok even if those numbers were hypothetical and wishful your premise that free trials convert as well as a paid trial is not the same statistic that we saw when we tried it.

Just on a common sense premise alone, I cannot see how an enduser who started at FREE and ended up with a $50.00 charge (not even considering whether the was a higher bill from cross sells) would not be a greater likelihood of a chargeback than a no trial or a paid trial client.

The payouts on your program combined with free trials and cross sells would seem to encourage the exact problem that got us here to begin with. If VISA were looking at your portfolio by dollar amount as well as transaction count and chargeback percentage, would you still be doing all of this?

SCORE doesnt have a chargeback problem, but that doesnt mean i wont be tempted to run some $1.95/2 day non recurring trials spread out during the month to give me insurance in the event of some calamity such as a hosting outage that cranks up the disgruntlement of the clientele. There will be abuse of the fact that VISA is just taking a transaction count and dividing chargebacks to get a %, its a loophole that I expect to be closed by VISA.
__________________

Last edited by scoreman; 07-10-2003 at 09:57 PM..
scoreman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 10:04 PM   #41
fantasyman
Let's do some business together
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally posted by scoreman


Ok even if those numbers were hypothetical and wishful your premise that free trials convert as well as a paid trial is not the same statistic that we saw when we tried it.

Just on a common sense premise alone, I cannot see how an enduser who started at FREE and ended up with a $50.00 charge (not even considering whether the was a higher bill from cross sells) would not be a greater likelihood of a chargeback than a no trial or a paid trial client.

The payouts on your program combined with free trials and cross sells would seem to encourage the exact problem that got us here to begin with. If VISA were looking at your portfolio by dollar amount as well as transaction count and chargeback percentage, would you still be doing all of this?

SCORE doesnt have a chargeback problem, but that doesnt mean i wont be tempted to run some $1.95/2 day non recurring trials spread out during the month to give me insurance in the event of some calamity such as a hosting outage that cranks up the disgruntlement of the clientele. There will be abuse of the fact that VISA is just taking a transaction count and dividing chargebacks to get a %, its a loophole that I expect to be closed by VISA.
Our cross sale is handled completely different than others

....ask Billy about us
fantasyman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 10:06 PM   #42
KC
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 1995
Posts: 2,417
Look at the trends with CC processing over the past 7 years... Chargeback rate requirements have gone from 5% or less down to 1% for Visa/MC come Oct. 1st.

Is this the level that Visa/MC really want for "high risk" transactions?

How long until the CB rate requirements reach 0.5%?

The days of recurring transactions have been numbered since Visa/MC started tightening the screws.. How long until Visa/MC don't allow "high risk" recurring transactions?
__________________

Jupiter Hosting, Inc.
Vice President, Business Development
kc (AT) jupiterhosting.com
KC is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 10:06 PM   #43
Mr.Fiction
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
This announcement is good news for those who have traffic and want to see the big players continue to be aggressive about competing for that traffic. With the big changes coming, whoever can figure out how to offer the most money is going to get the most traffic, just like it always has been.

Thanks CECash.
Mr.Fiction is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 10:31 PM   #44
FabianC
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,616
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
This announcement is good news for those who have traffic and want to see the big players continue to be aggressive about competing for that traffic. With the big changes coming, whoever can figure out how to offer the most money is going to get the most traffic, just like it always has been.

Thanks CECash.
Mr. Fiction,

Shoot me over an email, lets discuss some business

fabian @ cecash dot com
FabianC is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 10:32 PM   #45
psyko514
See sig. Join Epic Cash.
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec. ICQ: 214702014
Posts: 22,366
Quote:
Originally posted by goBigtime



Your examples are flawed there Hooper...

In Example 2, you are actually charging EVERYONE $1.... so right off the bat you have a chance of more chargebacks than in example one.

Also in Example 2, If Joe Deadbeat decides hes going to chargeback, he'll attempt to say he didn't authorize EITHER charge -- the $1 trial OR the rebill - thats 2 chargebacks for the price of one


[edit]... yet another example of why I should read the complete thread first no matter how tempted I am to quickly reply to a single post
A good majority of banks will not do a chargeback for $1. It'll cost them a lot less to simply write-off the charge.
__________________

Bad Girl Bucks
- 50% Revshare through CCBill.
Promote BrandyDDD, Pixie's Pillows, Action Allie and more!

Phoenix Forum Pics | Webmaster Access Montreal pics
email: psyko514(a)gmail.com | icq: 214-702-014
psyko514 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 10:39 PM   #46
oldtimer
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 250
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
This announcement is good news for those who have traffic and want to see the big players continue to be aggressive about competing for that traffic. With the big changes coming, whoever can figure out how to offer the most money is going to get the most traffic, just like it always has been.

Thanks CECash.
Who else is NOT lowering payouts? I want to know where to move my traffic.
__________________
Im here to help surfers find relevant content
oldtimer is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 10:41 PM   #47
FabianC
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,616
Quote:
Originally posted by oldtimer


Who else is NOT lowering payouts? I want to know where to move my traffic.
Oldtimer, hit me up on ICQ 99523787 .. lets talk
FabianC is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 10:41 PM   #48
MattO
The O is for Oohhh
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AUSTIN TEJAS
Posts: 10,861
'bout time for some real hard thread
MattO is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 11:05 PM   #49
D-man
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Respect the join date noob!
Posts: 1,291
what I think is cool is Ron can come in with a 468x60 banner as a sig and none of you pussies will even mention it

fucking momo's

Ron great job!

All my respect!
D-man is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 11:07 PM   #50
Lensman
GFY Chaperone
 
Lensman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Adult.com
Posts: 9,846
Quote:
Originally posted by D-man
what I think is cool is Ron can come in with a 468x60 banner as a sig and none of you pussies will even mention it

fucking momo's

Ron great job!

All my respect!
Top sponsors can have 468x80's. They pay the bills around here.
Lensman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.