![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So I'd have no clue which content providers would or wouldn't get me in trouble if I used their stuff. |
I don't see Jezebel Content on the list, what's their status. And no I'm not in any way affiliated with them, but have been to their site many times and was thinking of buying some stuff from them.
|
I put my grandmom's address down. That usually slows the feds down enough for me to skip town.:thumbsup
|
Quote:
Great minds and all that shit.......:thumbsup |
AasronM is right...he is ALWAYS right...all bow before AaronM!
|
Quote:
I still can't believe all the threads about this. What the hell? He posts to the people just to give them a heads up about who they're doing business with and whether or not there's legal risk there and suddenly he's the bad guy? The only thing I can think of for those complainers is.... "those who are guilty complain the loudest" I mean... it seems to me that people who are compliant, or are willing to fix what ever they need to be compliant are being real civil about it. Those who aren't just want to bitch and complain and blame someone else for something to draw attention away from their own screw ups. |
Quote:
No attorney worth a damn will advise you to let someone else protect your business and your freedom. Especially if that guy is overseas and definately if the guy you bought the content from is between him and you. The only thing they will tell you is be your own document holder, examine each and everyone to authenticate it. Of course Dave Clark knows 4 or was it 5 attorneys who say trust someone else. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
300 any time soon?
|
Quote:
Frankie was NOT prosecuted by the Federal court system per se. Frankie was targetted, along with several others, by a woman from Michigan who happened to be running for elected office, had no concept of the law or how it worked, and was not actually prosecuted, but threatened at a point in a campaign where being able to publicize these threats was a primary point in the campaigning. Saying that Attorney General was after him is like saying that Bobby Kennedy was after the KKK back in the 60s, and it's just not true in this case. |
Aaron, could you add us to the list here?
Our 2257 info is linked on the bottom right of every page throughout the site and is compliant even though we are based in the UK: http://www.adultcontent.co.uk/ http://www.adultcontent.co.uk/info/18usc2257.phtml Cheers :-) BTW - your "contacts" e-mail address is bouncing :-( |
Quote:
:thumbsup |
Quote:
|
Aaron I asked about Jezebel Content, they aren't on your list and I was considering buying from them at some point so can you tell me what you think of their status?
|
Quote:
|
I'm a little teapot....
|
300... i figured it was time i show up on the longest thread of the week
|
Quote:
|
Was FalconFoto compliant ?
http://www.falconfoto.net |
Quote:
This is from their FAQ's page: "Are the girls over 18: Yes we only shoot girls over the age of 18. We require 2 forms of identification from the girls as proof of age. We keep all records on file. You should post a ?custodian Of Records? notice on your site which gives our contact details incase a government agency wishes to check any documents. This notice is listed in the license." Of course they have no such link on their site but hey.....Their info is listed in the sample of their license. I will add them to the list with the next update. |
:thumbsup
|
Hey Aaaaaaaaaaron can you check www.adultczechcontent.com
in menu on the left "2257 info" also - put a link to www.adultczechcontent.com/main.htm under my button and keep it till May the 1st - I will wire you 100 bucks |
Quote:
Do you honestly think that you can buy my sig space for $100 per week? Think again. My sig space is a hell of a lot more valuable than that. The various things offered in my sig are either somthing that I have a vested interest in or, in the case of ISPrime, somebody who has earned the additional exposure by providding the abusolute best service possible. You can pay me for the exposure from this thread and my list by sending some money to a charity...I don't need it. |
Thank you Aaron for fixing my list status so promptly. It sucks to be wrong, It sucks even more to be wrong and noted so on the web.
|
AaronM,
I believe this was an excellent attempt to bring light to 18US2257, but you obviously were not "backed by legal counsel" reason I know this is what attorney in thier right mind would ever advise you to POST a list like this. In my honest opinion you should remove it. Secondly there is no case law to effectively understand the law and how it would be enforced, to this extent who would want to "go down that path to find out?" Since we shoot some of our material in countries where "hardcore" porn is forbidden and also travel around to other countries we don't have to comply with 18USC2257. But since we sell to pussy magazines and also U.S. based customers we included / maintained all documentation and records in accordance with the law as advised by our attorney which we have been doing for over 10 years (most of those years to pussy magazines). And in each "zip" file was the proper 18USC2257 text file with the name of the person who is tasked as the custodian of record and address to his place of business. As for your list which we believe serves a good purpose just the wrong approach we have updated our site to point to the same text file that is in each zip file we send to our customers. As you can see in the post on 02/06/2003 use the link below we were asked about the same 18USC2257 by a potential customer and the user "Carrie" was nice enough to post the text file that was inside the content zip file so this is nothing new our customers have always been compliant and protection of not only ourselves but our customers has been our number one priority. http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=105330 (close to bottom of first page.) Anyways you should really remove the list or at least reword the list to cover your ass. IMHO |
Quote:
This was sent to me by Lawrence Walters Weston, Garrou & DeWitt www.FirstAmendment.com 407.788.7337 |
AaronM. How can you decide who is compliant and who is not. We provide our customers both with model's ID and Models Releases. You did not work with us, so you can not know if we are comliant or not.
Please change your information. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
so seriously no , I still hope that its just a good joke from you.I would never offer you some 100 dirty bucks for your sig - man now I see that you are defenitely not an idiot - You know some charity which accepts CCs ?- its problem to send out money from here.Just give me a link to and I wll do it :thumbsup |
I didnt see Cloud9Content up on that page....
the records required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Û2257 and C.F.R. 75 are kept by the custodian of records, ben mizrahi, c/o the law offices of Jeffery Sklan, 18840 Ventura Blvd Suite 216, Tarzana, Ca 91356 link to 2257 Info can be found right on the front page.. Media |
Quote:
I am not removing the list. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have added your listing. |
Quote:
Do yourself a favor and do not question me about this law. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123