GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Where Is Snowden?.. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1113431)

baddog 06-25-2013 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoshGirls Josh (Post 19685338)
thats fine. i was simply making a point that people violate laws as a form of revolt against said laws. many people think federal drug laws are unjust, & violate them as a matter of protest.

do i think snowden = thomas paine? not exactly. snowden is exposing a surveillence program while paine is protesting tyranny. However a secret surveillence program certainly can be used to conduct a tyranny, depending on whos running it. & in our political system, those leaders are constantly in flux & you never know when the wrong man gets power.

And those people have been willing to go to prison or die for their belief in change. :2 cents:


Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19685464)
well, it appears that none of y'all who say snowden should get a medal can answer my question of why he should get a medal.

so i'll ask it another way-

what medal should snowden be awarded and from which country?

:1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19685486)
A lot of people have broken the law to protect our rights. It's one of the ways citizens can push back against unjust actions of a rogue govt.

They did not change anything simply by breaking the law.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.K (Post 19685509)
Give him the Nobel Peace Prize - along with Assange and Manning


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Obama Called ?Hypocrite Of The Century? In Irish Parliament

Not sure how you feel Assange, Manning or Snowden qualify. Please feel free to elaborate.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 19685603)
sorry, sometimes i do have to sleep ;)

thats why:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.n...06687162_n.jpg

Are you suggesting that wiretaps are human rights violations?

directfiesta 06-25-2013 08:40 AM

Quote:

Leaks by Snowden revealed that the US had hacked Hong Kong and Chinese institutions.

Snowden also provided documents to the Guardian newspaper that showed British spies were obtaining the contents of 600 million private communications a day by tapping the world's network of fibre-optic cables. They also passed the information to their US counterparts.

The intercepts include emails, telephone calls, Google searches and Facebook updates.
:warning

directfiesta 06-25-2013 08:42 AM

Snowden 'is in Moscow airport transit zone'
Russian President Vladimir Putin says US whistleblower was still at Moscow airport, and was free to leave.

dyna mo 06-25-2013 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 19685786)
:warning

go on...........your naivete is precious!

Quote:

To steal the designs for America's advanced weapons systems, as Chinese hackers are alleged to have done by in a confidential report prepared for the Pentagon, you don't necessarily have to break into classified Department of Defense systems.


Play VIDEO
China eyed in U.S. weapons systems hack
Many of America's military secrets can be stolen by exploiting the networks over which unclassified information is shared by military contractors and subcontractors. While these contractors, like the government, have improved their cyber-security over the past decade, many still do not have systems in place to quickly discover whether a hacker in Beijing, or elsewhere, is harvesting information off the computer of a staffer in Virginia, according to cyber-security experts interviewed for this story.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-...l-u.s-secrets/

directfiesta 06-25-2013 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19685801)
go on...........your naivete is precious!



http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-...l-u.s-secrets/

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Talking about naive...

Quote:

...alleged to have done by in a confidential report prepared for the Pentagon
from your own quote ... after all, we know how accurate intel is from those agencies/dept .... :)

TheSquealer 06-25-2013 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19685707)
i hear ya, i want the program scaled back and i am appreciative of being made more aware of it.

but again, we didn't invent the game of international intrigue.

i don't see how we would even begin to honor leakers like snowden in current conditions.

Everyone's reaction falls in line with their pre-existing opinions on government. The fact of the matter is that no one has shown anything illegally done. Just things people don't agree with and 99.9% of that is blown out of proportion because people don't understand all the details.

Its not much different to me than watching people support the PirateBay owners.

Notice no one wants to talk about the laws, what laws needs to be changed and has a clear idea of what needs to happen specifically to change current legislation. Thats how you know the reaction is emotional and not one of reason and logic. It's also how you know it will never change. Crying and whining isn't an effective rallying call to affect change.

... i mean... "I blame bush. That asshole. Fucking Patriot Act. Republican asshole dickheads"

_Richard_ 06-25-2013 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger (Post 19685119)
Guessing that the whole Ecuador thing is false bait. Probably misdirection. But not a bad country in which to live a very rich life.

The Russians have made their point, Putin is enjoying a laugh, and now, I think, they want him out of their hair. The problem is negotiating a final destination. It's looking like the Wikileaks people have developed some real sophistication at international diplomacy, and it looks from here that they are driving events.

Venezuela, Iceland, Switzerland.

The US government now seems so furious as to verge on being out of control on the issue of this man. The language they are using - concerning a man under federal indictment and supposedly in line to have a trial some day - is simply unprecedented. President Obama didn't hesitate to address it in his press conferences - the tradition, even with Nixon, was not to comment on pending criminal cases. (That seems to have gone out the window about the time that the Patriot Act became law.) They thought it was all figured out, to nail him in the wee hours of Sunday, but he'd been tipped off and flew the coop. They simply aren't used to this and they aren't used to being made to look like fools for all the world to see. There may be some desperate missteps, but one thing seems certain - that Mr. Snowden has sharply reduced the risk that he will be assassinated - he's just too high visibility for that now. Seldom in history does so much hinge on just one man.

Meanwhile, what's going on with Bradley Manning's court martial? My hunch is that what the government did to Manning is an important part of the backstory on Snowden's actions. You will recall that some of the charges against Manning were dismissed by a courageous military judge because of improper "command influence" - namely, the President commenting on this trial. That's entirely unprecedented in US military history - you will recall I served in the JAG Corps for four years.

The whole thing really is spinning out of the power of the administration to control. The usual media partners are not enough to contain the story and assassinate Snowden's character, and now they appear to be trying too hard; the criticism has become vitriolic. The expected casualty of all of this is most likely big chunks of the Patriot Act itself. I won't mourn for it!

the problem is Hastings.

i think we have the 'real powers' getting slapped around badly and why we're seeing 'unprecedented behaviours'

The way everything is progressing, we'll have a 'delidding' event shortly

dyna mo 06-25-2013 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 19685815)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Talking about naive...



from your own quote ... after all, we know how accurate intel is from those agencies/dept .... :)

umm, retard, the news report must include the word alleged. they are not the jury.

but thanks for reconfirming your lack of comprehension of complex topics.

_Richard_ 06-25-2013 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoshGirls Josh (Post 19685300)
sorry. i did not make it clear enough.

snowden is considered a hero for breaking laws he considers illegal. AKA breaking his oath to expose a surveillence program he considers illegal.

if one thinks his actions were the right thing, for exposing abuse of power, he is a hero. if you think his oath is protecting legitimate conduct, you think he is a traitor.

the american colonists were british citizens before 1776, & broke british laws they deemed to be illegal. The boston tea party was a rejection of the stamp act. this is a well known example of this revolt against a british law.

you are saying snowden broke the law. but you say nothing as to whether he was doing the right thing. By analogy, this suggests you find the propriety of a law irrelevant, & by that logic, our founding fathers are criminals for breaking british law.

basically what im saying is you are benedict arnold & you dont even know it.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

http://i.imgur.com/oTmrlVQ.gif

dyna mo 06-25-2013 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 19685823)
Everyone's reaction falls in line with their pre-existing opinions on government. The fact of the matter is that no one has shown anything illegally done. Just things people don't agree with and 99.9% of that is blown out of proportion because people don't understand all the details.

Its not much different to me than watching people support the PirateBay owners.

Notice no one wants to talk about the laws, what laws needs to be changed and has a clear idea of what needs to happen specifically to change current legislation. Thats how you know the reaction is emotional and not one of reason and logic. It's also how you know it will never change. Crying and whining isn't an effective rallying call to affect change.

... i mean... "I blame bush. That asshole. Fucking Patriot Act. Republican asshole dickheads"

exactly fuckin-a right.

the hypocrisy re: china state secrets hacking is a perfect example. they knock our shit off left and right, we have strong evidence that they have hacked into boxes and stolen plans for 12 defense systems. they knock off everything from rolls royces to apple computers yet the poster earlier globs onto the word *alleged* in a newspaper article while he points his finger at the u.s.

that makes zero sense.

All1 06-25-2013 09:00 AM

Shut up please Nsa

DWB 06-25-2013 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19685742)
Are you suggesting that wiretaps are human rights violations?

Amnesty International thinks so.

Quote:

"No one should be charged under any law for disclosing information of human rights violations by the US government. Such disclosures are protected under the rights to information and freedom of expression," said Widney Brown, Senior Director of International Law and Policy at Amnesty International.

directfiesta 06-25-2013 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19685832)
umm, retard, the news report must include the word alleged. they are not the jury.

but thanks for reconfirming your lack of comprehension of complex topics.

dope can fry your brain ...:2 cents:

DWB 06-25-2013 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19685801)

So if China breaks the law it is OK to break it in return by doing the same thing, then say the law isn't being broken because they did it first? Come on.

The USA did the exact thing that would get you and I locked in a cell for a decade. They broke the law. The fact that China did it first carries no weight whatsoever. The USA is not China. And this is just one incident. There is no telling what else they have done and on what level.

Rochard 06-25-2013 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 19685696)
Man, how could you be such a brainwashed person? Do they fed you a poisoned water or what? The things you say are out of the edge. You speak like a robot repeating the same bullshit about just everything your country related too. I do remember that insanity you told about how the USA "won the space race" and now this... Are you ok, man? Huh :eek7

You really mean to tell me that there are millions of Americans working for the various intelligence agencies and millions more working for law enforcement, and only one has the balls to come forward?

Really?

What are the odds?

As for the space race, well, if the race was to make it to space the Russians won. They were the first to launch a satellite into space, and the first to put a man in space. But the "space race" wasn't about who was first; If that was the case, the US wasn't even in the race. The space race is about space exploration, which was clearly and obviously dominated by the Americans. The US went all the way the moon - and back - multiple times! During the 1980s the US had the space shuttle program; Russia copied it and failed horribly.

Rochard 06-25-2013 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19685855)
Amnesty International thinks so.

"No one should be charged under any law for disclosing information of human rights violations by the US government. Such disclosures are protected under the rights to information and freedom of expression," said Widney Brown, Senior Director of International Law and Policy at Amnesty International.

What human rights violations? That one country spied on another? That one country hacked another country?

just a punk 06-25-2013 09:21 AM

No agreement, no extradition:

http://translate.google.com/translat... 2F560331.html

http://translate.google.com/translat...ogilevich.html

http://translate.google.com/translat...35323%2F117367

TheSquealer 06-25-2013 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19685839)
exactly fuckin-a right.

the hypocrisy re: china state secrets hacking is a perfect example. they knock our shit off left and right, we have strong evidence that they have hacked into boxes and stolen plans for 12 defense systems. they knock off everything from rolls royces to apple computers yet the poster earlier globs onto the word *alleged* in a newspaper article while he points his finger at the u.s.

that makes zero sense.

Anyone with even a vague understanding of Intelligence understands full well that he didn't randomly come out in China. This is a major diplomatic minefield in a country that is known for putting bullets in prisoners heads to sell the organs on the open market. He did not do it without the complicity of the Chinese security services and government - at least in being assured that they would not detain him or turn him over. It's also not unrealistic to suspect he was compensated by the Chinese - when you look at the timing and the fact that Obama had been attacking China for their cyber attacks, stealing secrets etc. This was a big win for China. Think about this, about who he is... a low level contractor is accessible to foreign agents. An NSA / CIA employee... not so much. A low level contractor, easy to find. Easy to access. Easy to befriend. Easy to negotiate some terms.

China did it for political currency and to fire a shot. He had high level US intel on his person. There is can be little question as to whether or not it was also given to China. The US pressed China to turn him over - China fired back a safe, diplomatic response and in that time, he split. China is off the hook and accomplished a great deal with that little spectacle. And now he's in Russia. Russia never misses a chance to take the opposite side of the US and they too, are using him for political gain.

One thing that stood out to me as he was giving interviews from China was his exaggeration - that he could spy on the president if he wanted to and so on. A lot of that stuff seemed scripted by the Chinese to me. They couldn't have asked for a better show.

At the end of the day, what is fact is that this guy stole a bunch of data from the NSA, then went to a foreign, unfriendly country to share it with the world. His life is over no matter what. He will be in prison for the rest of his life as this can NEVER be tolerated by ANY government. Debating the law and changing the laws is a secondary issue to what he has done which is quite severe in ANY nation..

:)

Hero?

Not so much.

What is the cause? What is the message? What is the solution? What is surprising about the NSA being able to access phone records to see what phones called what phones? He will always be remembered as "that guy who..." because there is no message or course of action attached to it that people can identify with and get behind. Of course, this won't stop him from getting a Nobel Prize.. Obama got one for no reason at all, terrorists get them etc.

just a punk 06-25-2013 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19685887)
You really mean to tell me that there are millions of Americans working for the various intelligence agencies and millions more working for law enforcement, and only one has the balls to come forward?

Wow!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19685887)
As for the space race, well, if the race was to make it to space the Russians won. They were the first to launch a satellite into space, and the first to put a man in space. But the "space race" wasn't about who was first; If that was the case, the US wasn't even in the race.

Ok, let's do some simple math (simile for the rest of the World but not for you of course):

1. First satellite in the space - USSR
2. First live creature in the space - USSR
3. First man in the space - USSR
4. First woman in the space - USSR
5. First man outside of star ship in the space - USSR
6. First picture of the Moon's far side - USSR
7. First successful Moon landing - USSR
8. First man on the Moon - USA
9. First successful landing to another planet - USSR
10. First space station - USSR
11. Ten longest human space flights - Russia (5), USSR (4) and USA (1)
12. First man on another planet - ...pending...

Oh yeah, that must be an epic win for you and all other brainwashed population of your country. Congrats on winning the space race :thumbsup

dyna mo 06-25-2013 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 19685866)
dope can fry your brain ...:2 cents:

i'm not the one pointing out the word alleged in a newspaper article as the be all-end all in understanding what's right and wrong here.

i'm also not the one looking at america in a vacuum and discounting the international espionage that happens globally and has since before america was even a country.

livexxx 06-25-2013 09:40 AM

LOL, if it was the Ecuadorian cars at the airport picking him up he probably is in their Moscow embassy, if not I hoped he checked the drivers ID as he could be in Lubyanka learning how to water board.

I think technically if he was in transit and hopped in an Ecuadorian diplomatic vehicle he might be deemed not on russian soil, nor crossed their border. Certainly be the case once he gets to their embassy so that might be word play by the Russians.

dyna mo 06-25-2013 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19685882)
So if China breaks the law it is OK to break it in return by doing the same thing, then say the law isn't being broken because they did it first? Come on.

The USA did the exact thing that would get you and I locked in a cell for a decade. They broke the law. The fact that China did it first carries no weight whatsoever. The USA is not China. And this is just one incident. There is no telling what else they have done and on what level.

you're smarter than this dwb. you know exactly what i am saying. and it is not, well, china started it so there.
the problem is massively complex, we live in a world where state secrets are tantamount to how shit gets done, i don't like it but it's reality.

nations exist, nations spy on each other, that's reality.

it's myopic to think that the usa should honor/award leakers in a time asa complex as this.

dyna mo 06-25-2013 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 19685918)
Anyone with even a vague understanding of Intelligence understands full well that he didn't randomly come out in China. This is a major diplomatic minefield in a country that is known for putting bullets in prisoners heads to sell the organs on the open market. He did not do it without the complicity of the Chinese security services and government - at least in being assured that they would not detain him or turn him over. It's also not unrealistic to suspect he was compensated by the Chinese - when you look at the timing and the fact that Obama had been attacking China for their cyber attacks, stealing secrets etc. This was a big win for China. Think about this, about who he is... a low level contractor is accessible to foreign agents. An NSA / CIA employee... not so much. A low level contractor, easy to find. Easy to access. Easy to befriend. Easy to negotiate some terms.

China did it for political currency and to fire a shot. He had high level US intel on his person. There is can be little question as to whether or not it was also given to China. The US pressed China to turn him over - China fired back a safe, diplomatic response and in that time, he split. China is off the hook and accomplished a great deal with that little spectacle. And now he's in Russia. Russia never misses a chance to take the opposite side of the US and they too, are using him for political gain.

One thing that stood out to me as he was giving interviews from China was his exaggeration - that he could spy on the president if he wanted to and so on. A lot of that stuff seemed scripted by the Chinese to me. They couldn't have asked for a better show.

At the end of the day, what is fact is that this guy stole a bunch of data from the NSA, then went to a foreign, unfriendly country to share it with the world. His life is over no matter what. He will be in prison for the rest of his life as this can NEVER be tolerated by ANY government. Debating the law and changing the laws is a secondary issue to what he has done which is quite severe in ANY nation..

:)

Hero?

Not so much.

What is the cause? What is the message? What is the solution? What is surprising about the NSA being able to access phone records to see what phones called what phones? He will always be remembered as "that guy who..." because there is no message or course of action attached to it that people can identify with and get behind. Of course, this won't stop him from getting a Nobel Prize.. Obama got one for no reason at all, terrorists get them etc.

it seems very clear to me now that snowden had no plan whatsoever. now he is saying he he got the job at booz to specifically access and steal these documents. that's bullshit, this guy didn't know where he was going after hong kong, and has had to hit up wikileaks and ask them wtf do i do now.

this wasn't some master plan to martyr himself for the sake of personal rights.

baddog 06-25-2013 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19685855)
Amnesty International thinks so.

With all due respect, it says that is the opinion of Widney; but even if Amnesty Intl thinks so, I give them as much credibility as the ACLU.

But for the sake of argument, what human rights violations did Snowden expose?

Rochard 06-25-2013 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 19685700)
i have not agreed that my data gets read by your government - or the UK government. they would need to have a case against me and a judge needs to agree in my specific case. and there better be evidence that supports that decision

You don't think your government does the same? Think again.

TheSquealer 06-25-2013 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19685937)
it seems very clear to me now that snowden had no plan whatsoever. now he is saying he he got the job at booz to specifically access and steal these documents. that's bullshit, this guy didn't know where he was going after hong kong, and has had to hit up wikileaks and ask them wtf do i do now.

this wasn't some master plan to martyr himself for the sake of personal rights.

Well, I would say that's unlikely given his intelligence and access to sensitive material and the nature of the work. "A plan" in the sense you are using it i believe is to change the world through a carefully calculated series of events. To me, "a plan" that is more likely is that some guy befriends him at a bar he goes to every Thursday night, builds rapport/trust and leads him into railing against the government and progressively gets him to open up more and more while that person reinforces the idea that these are outrageous abuses that must be stopped. Soon there's a mention of exposing data to the world... next thing you know, the guy announces he has a "friend" in China that can help, there is more discussion, some offer is made to him which is enticing enough that he woke up one morning and got on a plane. Once he was there, no choice was his anyway. Foreign governments like China or Russia don't really give a fuck about his personal concerns about his own government. They will use him, milk him dry and discard him when its politically convenient. This is why i say that ultimately, he will end up in a US prison. He is nothing more than political currency that everyone is trying to spend before it dries up. After that... who needs him? No one. He just becomes a thorn in the side of the host country and they'll sell him when the price is right. That price starts dropping pretty fast as the story cools.

just a punk 06-25-2013 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19685958)
You don't think your government does the same? Think again.

You mean Germans spying over all the US citizens? I don't think so.

baddog 06-25-2013 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 19685963)
You mean Germans spying over all the US citizens? I don't think so.

You think the US is spying over all the German citizens? I don't think so.

MaDalton 06-25-2013 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19685967)
You think the US is spying over all the German citizens? I don't think so.

and thats where you are wrong - see "Tempora"

dyna mo 06-25-2013 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 19685959)
Well, I would say that's unlikely given his intelligence and access to sensitive material and the nature of the work. "A plan" in the sense you are using it i believe is to change the world through a carefully calculated series of events. To me, "a plan" that is more likely is that some guy befriends him at a bar he goes to every Thursday night, builds rapport/trust and leads him into railing against the government and progressively gets him to open up more and more while that person reinforces the idea that these are outrageous abuses that must be stopped. Soon there's a mention of exposing data to the world... next thing you know, the guy announces he has a "friend" in China that can help, there is more discussion, some offer is made to him which is enticing enough that he woke up one morning and got on a plane. Once he was there, no choice was his anyway. Foreign governments like China or Russia don't really give a fuck about his personal concerns about his own government. They will use him, milk him dry and discard him when its politically convenient. This is why i say that ultimately, he will end up in a US prison. He is nothing more than political currency that everyone is trying to spend before it dries up. After that... who needs him? No one. He just becomes a thorn in the side of the host country and they'll sell him when the price is right. That price starts dropping pretty fast as the story cools.

perhaps. although he hasn't struck me as being intelligent, i pretty much concluded he's not even really thinking through his actions. maybe someone at the bar coerced him, i wouldn't rule it out but i haven't thought that out entirely.

i don't see a smart person stealing state secrets and then taking those to 2, TWO, nations we are not aligned with and then trying to play the human rights card. if he were intelligent he would have gone straight to ecuador, a quick wiki read on assange would reveal that to anyone.

MaDalton 06-25-2013 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19685958)
You don't think your government does the same? Think again.

that is not the point - i wish people would actually read my posts...

i think it's done everywhere just on different technical levels. but that doesnt make any of this right.

it's just we are currently discussing a very specific case. Once we have a russian whistleblower we can discuss him as well.

:2 cents:

just a punk 06-25-2013 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19685967)
You think the US is spying over all the German citizens? I don't think so.

Yes it is. All traffic (including the German one) which is flowing via the USA is being tracked/spied by NSA. I do think so :2 cents:

Rochard 06-25-2013 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 19685919)
Wow!



Ok, let's do some simple math (simile for the rest of the World but not for you of course):

1. First satellite in the space - USSR
2. First live creature in the space - USSR
3. First man in the space - USSR
4. First woman in the space - USSR
5. First man outside of star ship in the space - USSR
6. First picture of the Moon's far side - USSR
7. First successful Moon landing - USSR
8. First man on the Moon - USA
9. First successful landing to another planet - USSR
10. First space station - USSR
11. Ten longest human space flights - Russia (5), USSR (4) and USA (1)
12. First man on another planet - ...pending...

Oh yeah, that must be an epic win for you and all other brainwashed population of your country. Congrats on winning the space race :thumbsup

I am not brain washed at all. The vast bulk of all of this technology came from Nazi Germany.

You can argue about who was first until you are blue in the face. But you are missing a lot of other US accomplishments:

1958:
First solar powered satellite
First communications satellite

1959:
First photograph of Earth from orbit
First satellite recovered intact from orbit

1962:
First orbital solar observatory
First active communications satellite

1963:
First reusable piloted spacecraft
First geosynchronous satellite
First satellite navigation system
First Mars flyby

1965:
14-day human spaceflight record

1966:
First spacecraft docking

1968:
First human-crewed spaceflight to, and orbit of, another celestial object: the Moon

1969:
First humans on the Moon
First space launch from another celestial body

1971:
First spacecraft to orbit another planet: Mars

1972:
First human-made object sent on escape trajectory away from the Sun

1973:
84-day human-crewed space record

Oh, and we went to the moon. A lot.


http://jlmoisey.com/wp-content/uploa...k-49807-lw.jpg

Rochard 06-25-2013 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 19685980)
that is not the point - i wish people would actually read my posts...

i think it's done everywhere just on different technical levels. but that doesnt make any of this right.

it's just we are currently discussing a very specific case. Once we have a russian whistleblower we can discuss him as well.

:2 cents:

So everyone does it, but when the US does it it's bad?

TheSquealer 06-25-2013 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19685979)

i don't see a smart person stealing state secrets and then taking those to 2, TWO, nations we are not aligned with and then trying to play the human rights card. if he were intelligent he would have gone straight to ecuador, a quick wiki read on assange would reveal that to anyone.

I think my explanation explains that ;) - You don't steal state secrets from the US and run to Canada. You have to be somewhere where there is an interest in not being handed right back over or somewhere where you have those guarantees. We are not aligned with them politically which is precisely why this is important to them politically and why he has value both as a pawn and the intel he has as well has value to them. Where do you think a Russian agent is going to escape to with sensitive Russian state secrets? Ukraine? Probably he will run straight to the US or somewhere outside of their influence and somewhere where that nation has an interest in using him against his former country for political gain.

At the end of it all, he did what he was motivated to do. Motivated by who? By what? Those are the only questions that matter and most likely will come out when he is formally charged after an investigation is completed. At the end of it all, motivation is usually ego, power, fame/notoriety or money or any combination... and always disguised as some altruistic idea of justice/right and wrong.

BTW... its also insanely naive to think that China/Russia did not take any intel in his possession for analysis.

Bman 06-25-2013 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19685995)
So everyone does it, but when the US does it it's bad?

You seriously have no perspective on what the rest of the world thinks about the USA do you?lol

Bman 06-25-2013 10:29 AM

nothing can start a revolution and destroy a country more then a patriot...Snowden may be that patriot.:2 cents:

China and Russia just told the USA to go fuck themselves on the Snowden deal. The US citizens are being lied to and you fucking think the rest of the world is not gonna start standing up for themselves?

You don't think China and Russia have not analysed the situation and understand that this could be the tipping point on US imperialism?

Rochard 06-25-2013 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19685708)
The key point here is that they shouldn't have this power and having it exposed, shows just how far and extreme the patriot act has been taken.

He did the right thing. It's our govt that is out of line. Having secrets is fine but abusing a already abusive law is wrong.

But how is our government out line?

All of this is done by warrants issued by judges. Agency "x" believes that "mr x" is engaged in legal activity against the United States, gets a warrant from a judge, and then serves Google with a request for their data.

Most of this seems to have been done by local police departments for use in solving local crimes. Local police investigate a local crime - a murder, robbery, rape, disappearance - go to a local judge to a get a warrant to look at their phone records, email, Facebook, whatever. This is the way it's always been done.

There is nothing illegal so far.

_Richard_ 06-25-2013 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19686012)
But how is our government out line?

All of this is done by warrants issued by judges. Agency "x" believes that "mr x" is engaged in legal activity against the United States, gets a warrant from a judge, and then serves Google with a request for their data.

Most of this seems to have been done by local police departments for use in solving local crimes. Local police investigate a local crime - a murder, robbery, rape, disappearance - go to a local judge to a get a warrant to look at their phone records, email, Facebook, whatever. This is the way it's always been done.

There is nothing illegal so far.

Richard.

there IS NO WARRANTS

please read this. if you dispute it, find evidence and post it here

or ADMIT IT

dyna mo 06-25-2013 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 19686000)
I think my explanation explains that ;) - You don't steal state secrets from the US and run to Canada. You have to be somewhere where there is an interest in not being handed right back over or somewhere where you have those guarantees. We are not aligned with them politically which is precisely why this is important to them politically and why he has value both as a pawn and the intel he has as well has value. Where do you think a Russian agent is going to escape to with sensitive Russian state secrets? Ukraine? Probably he will run straight to the US or somewhere outside of their influence and somewhere where that nation has an interest in using him against his former country for political gain.

At the end of it all, he did what he was motivated to do. Motivated by who? By what? Those are the only questions that matter and most likely will come out when he is formally charged after an investigation is completed. At the end of it all, motivation is usually ego, power, fame/notoriety or money or any combination... and always disguised as some altruistic idea of justice/right and wrong.


well, the story was out though right? the guardian and the wp ran the story, it didn't matter where he was then, except usa or a non-aligned nation, either of those is not really thinking, you know what i mean?

here's a good blurb that better states it
Quote:

Hong Kong is not a sovereign country. It is part of China ? a country that by the libertarian standards Edward Snowden says he cares about is worse, not better, than the United States. China has even more surveillance of its citizens (it has gone very far toward ensuring that it knows the real identity of everyone using the internet); its press is thoroughly government-controlled; it has no legal theory of protection for free speech; and it doesn?t even have national elections. Hong Kong lives a time-limited separate existence, under the ?one country, two systems? principle, but in a pinch, it is part of China.
In 2006, Hong Kong passed a surveillance law that makes the programs Snowden leaked seem weak in comparison. The New York Times reported that this law gave ?broad authority to the police to conduct covert surveillance, including wiretapping phones, bugging homes and offices and monitoring e-mail.? Furthermore, the paper wrote, the law limited defense lawyers from questioning such surveillance during trials.
moreover, it seems to me that goes not only to his lack of intelligence, but to his motivation as well, his exact words in the original telegraph interview:
Quote:

Edward Snowden: 'I don't want to live in a society that does these sort of things'
so he jets to hong kong AND russia?

none of that adds up right?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123