Any feedback o this lighting from my latest photo shoot? - GoFuckYourself.com

TCLGirls · 12-09-2011, 10:45 PM

Do you like this kind of lighting?

behind the scenes:

Pseudonymous · 12-09-2011, 10:47 PM

Behind the scenes pic is cool and decently done because it's just that, a behind the scenes pic. First pic is too overexposed for me. And in that first pic, i think it'd be better if the light was even from all directions instead of a hotspot caused by too much light hitting the right side of her head

The shadow on her boob isn't great either.

I would have to say the lighting in the behind the scenes photo is better and would have continued shooting from that angle as you get the more dramatic lighting on her face and body, not washing everything out

JustJ · 12-09-2011, 11:08 PM

The 1st one hurt my eyes

2MuchMark · 12-09-2011, 11:12 PM

I like the first picture. It might look over exposed by some but sometimes I can see where lots of light looks great, and that is one of those photos.

I lucked out with this photo I took:

I had my lights bouncing off of the backdrop but moved her to just the right place so a little of that light would hit her. I discovered it by accident and LOVED how it turned out.

garce · 12-09-2011, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustJ

The 1st one hurt my eyes

I like it, but it does hurt my eyes.

raymor · 12-09-2011, 11:35 PM

It would be good for some purposes, but it lisa a little hot to me, possibly because of the stark white reflecting the light upward as well as from the rear sides. It leaves little shadow. The only noticeable shadow seems to be on top of the curves, which is unnatural and therefore uncomfortable.

Maybe it's just that it's overexposed though, and with less exposure the same lighting configuration would work.

The overall effect looks to me like it might work in an ad, but not for fapping to.

SmutHammer · 12-09-2011, 11:56 PM

I like it, and also like the "behind the scenes" thing. I wouldn't dare shoot all my content like this, but think it's a nice change once in a while.

CurrentlySober · 12-10-2011, 03:23 AM

i just like poo... FUCK THE LIGHTING.. as long as she defecates all over the bright white background,... Thats good or me....

So long as can SEE IT... In HD...

adendreams · 12-10-2011, 03:44 AM

Paul Markham · 12-10-2011, 03:54 AM

No I don't.

Chosen · 12-10-2011, 03:54 AM

I like it

djroof · 12-10-2011, 04:51 AM

too much light... btw the blonde is hot!

BIGTYMER · 12-10-2011, 04:58 AM

Dim the light a bit.

V_RocKs · 12-10-2011, 06:59 AM

not that great

iSpyCams · 12-10-2011, 07:56 AM

It's a good idea but its a tad overdone. My eyes keep trying to adjust. Dial it back about 15% and you should be fine.

The blonde is real hot!

TCLGirls · 12-10-2011, 05:45 PM

that's me with the ring flash

Spunky · 12-10-2011, 06:18 PM

It's too bright for me

xNetworx · 12-10-2011, 07:00 PM

way too fucking bright

beerptrol · 12-10-2011, 07:07 PM

didn't even notice the lighting

2MuchMark · 12-11-2011, 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls

that's me with the ring flash

Do you happen to have any photos taken with only (or mostly) the ring flash? I want to buy one to shoot photos like this one

but I'm not sure which one I should buy. I've seen some with a defuser like yours, and I've seen others that are really narrow. Do you have a suggestion as to which I should use?

TCLGirls · 12-11-2011, 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Do you happen to have any photos taken with only (or mostly) the ring flash? I want to buy one to shoot photos like this one

but I'm not sure which one I should buy. I've seen some with a defuser like yours, and I've seen others that are really narrow. Do you have a suggestion as to which I should use?

Yeah here's a shot I took today with the same Alien Bees ring flash and 30 inch diffuser. I like it personally, bit I need to get more practice.

Caligari · 12-11-2011, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls

Do you like this kind of lighting?

I like it, just pushing the exposure boundary but it's appealing and that girl is sweeeeeeeeet.

.

scuba steve · 12-11-2011, 10:26 PM

too much light, white, girl gets washed out

DamageX · 12-11-2011, 11:14 PM

Poor girl must be blind by now.

shimmy2 · 12-12-2011, 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scuba steve

too much light, white, girl gets washed out

too much light for the white girl, excellent lighting setup for darkies

Cherry7 · 12-12-2011, 05:07 AM

If you are talking about porn, you will get the above criticisms about too much light etc etc, Porn is a very very conservative industry run by business men not artists.

They want the same picture / style over and over again. One little change and your breaking the rules.

These rules are unwritten, untested and utter bollocks. just read some of Paul Markhams comments on photography to see.

Your photograph is a good starting point. High Key photography is a well trodden path. I though the light from the left over did it. It would be good to see some close ups and interesting angles and compositions all done in the same high key. May be think of some very black elements to add contrast. look at how good her dark eyes shine.

The only rule is to look at the picture as if for the first time , through the eyes of a child, to read it fresh and for the first time. Without the cultural baggage of what is a "good" or "bad" picture.

2MuchMark · 12-12-2011, 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls

Yeah here's a shot I took today with the same Alien Bees ring flash and 30 inch diffuser. I like it personally, bit I need to get more practice.

Yes thats pretty cool... my only critique would be that the picture is too warm. I tend to prefer cool colours and less saturation when it comes to photos taken with that kind of light but thats just me.

How much did that lighting rig cost?

TCLGirls · 12-14-2011, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Yes thats pretty cool... my only critique would be that the picture is too warm. I tend to prefer cool colours and less saturation when it comes to photos taken with that kind of light but thats just me.

How much did that lighting rig cost?

The ring light you mean? Got it for $200

Did some post processing on the same series...does this version work in your opinion?

justinsain · 12-14-2011, 08:41 PM

For me personally, I don't think photography with this type of lighting is appropriate for shooting nudes. I prefer lighting that sets a mood that is sexy and erotic and not something that resembles a forensic lab. There is a reason people dim the lights or burn candles or build a fire. I can't imagine bringing a girl into a bedroom and turning on all the lights and tipping the lamp shades to direct the light before getting busy

It might be cool for someone that wants to see a nice bright clear shot of a naked girl but it does nothing to create a mood or stir feelings. For years Playboy set the bar for the kind of photography that I'm talking about. You would never see this type of lighting in a Playboy pictorial however it is very common in the fashion world.

The fundamental difference between Fashion and Glamour photography is the lighting. In Fashion the light is usually bright to highlight the clothes and in Glamour its more subdued to create mood and hide the model's flaws.

The bottom line is any photograph is a success if it came out the way you wanted it to.
A photograph becomes a commercial success if you can create it and sell it.

ArsewithClass · 12-14-2011, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StripperCash

way too fucking bright

Yeah definitely

TCLgirls, I've been messing about with lighting & the av on the camera recently... Ended up putting the av back to zero & keeping the shutter speed fast. I think darker can be more sophisticated, like my avatar bro

...

Here's the same photo as my avatar from a photo before with av up... it's a completely different photo & both photos inc.. the avatar are untouched on photo shop, just as I took them

ArsewithClass · 12-14-2011, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls

The ring light you mean? Got it for $200

Did some post processing on the same series...does this version work in your opinion?

Just seen this photo after I posted, my bad for posting again... but needed to say, you got my thumbsup... great model btw

venus · 12-14-2011, 09:33 PM

damn...thats like 5 times the size of my profoto ring light

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls

that's me with the ring flash

venus · 12-14-2011, 09:34 PM

I did, I even noticed those little Alien Bee's

Quote:

Originally Posted by StripperCash

way too fucking bright

venus · 12-14-2011, 09:37 PM

over exposed, all those lights and a white background...washes the model out

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls

Do you like this kind of lighting?

behind the scenes:

epitome · 12-15-2011, 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

No I don't.

Finally a subject you should actually know something about this and that's all you have?

What would you do differently?

ruff · 12-15-2011, 04:41 AM

Depends on the effect you are trying to achieve. This kind of lighting definitely has it's place, but too much is not interesting.

CaptainHowdy · 12-15-2011, 05:30 AM

I dig the ethereal look ...

Jay-Rock · 12-15-2011, 06:28 AM

You have good equipment you just need to learn to use it LOL. Hit me up on ICQ Im always down to help and give advice although you can watch tutorials on youtube and learn anything now days.

12-09-2011, 10:45 PM	#1
TCLGirls Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: California Posts: 3,068	Any feedback o this lighting from my latest photo shoot? Do you like this kind of lighting? behind the scenes:

12-09-2011, 10:47 PM	#2
Pseudonymous Photographer/Owner Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Vancouver, Canada Posts: 2,661	Behind the scenes pic is cool and decently done because it's just that, a behind the scenes pic. First pic is too overexposed for me. And in that first pic, i think it'd be better if the light was even from all directions instead of a hotspot caused by too much light hitting the right side of her head The shadow on her boob isn't great either. I would have to say the lighting in the behind the scenes photo is better and would have continued shooting from that angle as you get the more dramatic lighting on her face and body, not washing everything out __________________ Previous owner of SoloRevenue Previous product manager @ Modelcentro.com/MCProfits.com, IsMyGirl.com, SMRevenue.com Last edited by Pseudonymous; 12-09-2011 at 10:55 PM..

12-09-2011, 11:08 PM	#3
JustJ Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 280	The 1st one hurt my eyes __________________ SMS BILLING / PHONE BILLING / EU DIRECT DEBIT Get Paid For UK Giveaway Entries! START MAKING MORE MONEY TODAY! SKYPE: JUSTJSMS - ICQ: 152263851 - YMSG: JUSTJSMS - EMAIL: jason at p2e dot com

12-09-2011, 11:12 PM	#4
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 49,412	I like the first picture. It might look over exposed by some but sometimes I can see where lots of light looks great, and that is one of those photos. I lucked out with this photo I took: I had my lights bouncing off of the backdrop but moved her to just the right place so a little of that light would hit her. I discovered it by accident and LOVED how it turned out. __________________ Custom Coding \| Videochat Solutions \| Age Verification \| IT Help & Support www.2Much.net

12-09-2011, 11:35 PM	#6
raymor Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 3,745	It would be good for some purposes, but it lisa a little hot to me, possibly because of the stark white reflecting the light upward as well as from the rear sides. It leaves little shadow. The only noticeable shadow seems to be on top of the curves, which is unnatural and therefore uncomfortable. Maybe it's just that it's overexposed though, and with less exposure the same lighting configuration would work. The overall effect looks to me like it might work in an ad, but not for fapping to. Last edited by raymor; 12-09-2011 at 11:36 PM..

12-09-2011, 11:56 PM	#7
SmutHammer Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 4,266	I like it, and also like the "behind the scenes" thing. I wouldn't dare shoot all my content like this, but think it's a nice change once in a while.

12-10-2011, 03:23 AM	#8
CurrentlySober Too lazy to wipe my ass Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: A Public Bathroom Posts: 38,673	i just like poo... FUCK THE LIGHTING.. as long as she defecates all over the bright white background,... Thats good or me.... So long as can SEE IT... In HD... __________________ My AI Handywork... My Dream Gal... XXX 👁️ 👍️ 💩

12-10-2011, 03:44 AM	#9
adendreams Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: LA and Florida Posts: 1,887	__________________ Aden - Your Content Shooter Superfreak ADEN CONTENT · HD Video · Ex-GF · Am Content · Pro Content · PHP Programming · Package Deals • Skype or ICQ available on request •

12-10-2011, 03:54 AM	#10
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	No I don't. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

12-10-2011, 03:54 AM	#11
Chosen VIPPay.com \| AdultWebSponsors.com Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 63,151	I like it

12-10-2011, 04:51 AM	#12
djroof JuicyDevils.gr Owner Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Greece Posts: 25,413	too much light... btw the blonde is hot!

12-10-2011, 04:58 AM	#13
BIGTYMER Junior Achiever Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Walled Garden Posts: 17,066	Dim the light a bit.

12-10-2011, 06:59 AM	#14
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,413	not that great

12-10-2011, 07:56 AM	#15
iSpyCams Amateur Gynecologist Industry Role: Join Date: May 2009 Location: Medellin Posts: 4,436	It's a good idea but its a tad overdone. My eyes keep trying to adjust. Dial it back about 15% and you should be fine. The blonde is real hot!

12-10-2011, 05:45 PM	#16
TCLGirls Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: California Posts: 3,068	that's me with the ring flash

12-10-2011, 06:18 PM	#17
Spunky I need a beer Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠ Posts: 133,947	It's too bright for me __________________ *YOUR INFORMATION HERE*

12-10-2011, 07:00 PM	#18
xNetworx So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Whore Island Posts: 14,445	way too fucking bright

12-10-2011, 07:07 PM	#19
beerptrol Confirmed Asshole Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Half way between sobriety and fubar. Posts: 12,722	didn't even notice the lighting __________________ “If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.” -- Ulysses S. Grant

12-11-2011, 10:26 PM	#23
scuba steve Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: i'm in miami bitch Posts: 1,888	too much light, white, girl gets washed out __________________

12-11-2011, 11:14 PM	#24
DamageX Marketing & Strategy Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Former nomad Posts: 14,293	Poor girl must be blind by now. __________________ Whitehat is for chumps If you don't do it, somebody else will - true story!

12-12-2011, 05:07 AM	#26
Cherry7 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: UK Posts: 3,564	If you are talking about porn, you will get the above criticisms about too much light etc etc, Porn is a very very conservative industry run by business men not artists. They want the same picture / style over and over again. One little change and your breaking the rules. These rules are unwritten, untested and utter bollocks. just read some of Paul Markhams comments on photography to see. Your photograph is a good starting point. High Key photography is a well trodden path. I though the light from the left over did it. It would be good to see some close ups and interesting angles and compositions all done in the same high key. May be think of some very black elements to add contrast. look at how good her dark eyes shine. The only rule is to look at the picture as if for the first time , through the eyes of a child, to read it fresh and for the first time. Without the cultural baggage of what is a "good" or "bad" picture. __________________ My Neighbour Butterfly PORN-The Musical The Long Goodbye Cinema Erotique

12-14-2011, 08:41 PM	#29
justinsain Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 3,374	For me personally, I don't think photography with this type of lighting is appropriate for shooting nudes. I prefer lighting that sets a mood that is sexy and erotic and not something that resembles a forensic lab. There is a reason people dim the lights or burn candles or build a fire. I can't imagine bringing a girl into a bedroom and turning on all the lights and tipping the lamp shades to direct the light before getting busy It might be cool for someone that wants to see a nice bright clear shot of a naked girl but it does nothing to create a mood or stir feelings. For years Playboy set the bar for the kind of photography that I'm talking about. You would never see this type of lighting in a Playboy pictorial however it is very common in the fashion world. The fundamental difference between Fashion and Glamour photography is the lighting. In Fashion the light is usually bright to highlight the clothes and in Glamour its more subdued to create mood and hide the model's flaws. The bottom line is any photograph is a success if it came out the way you wanted it to. A photograph becomes a commercial success if you can create it and sell it. Last edited by justinsain; 12-14-2011 at 08:42 PM..

12-15-2011, 04:41 AM	#36
ruff I have a plan B Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Seattle - Miami - St Kitts Posts: 5,505	Depends on the effect you are trying to achieve. This kind of lighting definitely has it's place, but too much is not interesting. __________________ CryptoFeeds Last edited by ruff; 12-15-2011 at 04:43 AM..

12-15-2011, 05:30 AM	#37
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 93,633	I dig the ethereal look ... __________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted Windows VPS now available Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.

12-15-2011, 06:28 AM	#38
Jay-Rock Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Porn Valley Posts: 2,779	You have good equipment you just need to learn to use it LOL. Hit me up on ICQ Im always down to help and give advice although you can watch tutorials on youtube and learn anything now days. __________________ HD and 4k Content Production by JayRock http://jayspov.net http://blackforwife.com http://cospimps.com SKYPE JAYROCKCONTENT [email protected] Twitter @jayrockcontent