Why PitBulls should be banned as a race in itself - Page 12 - GoFuckYourself.com

ottopottomouse · 08-29-2011, 01:28 PM

550 cuddly pets that wouldn't hurt a fly.

Vendzilla · 08-29-2011, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

I don't think any dogs should be killed. I don't think any breed should be killed. I never said anything like that. I was simply pointing out there is a legitimate problem. Rather than confront that like a mature adult and propose workable solutions like a mature adult, you spend your time saying "everyone wants to murder our dogs", which is retarded.

You have to be a woman. I can't think of another man that i've seen on this board that was so irrational and that made so little sense.

Does the guy in the middle of that picture to the left look like a woman, are you that gender confused?

You can't even answer the question I posed about your statement, even thoguh I asked several times, you just kept insulting me, and you think I have problems? Banning of any breed is killing, call a dog shelter, they will tell you exactly that, but again, you won't listen, you're too fucking stupid to do that

Vendzilla · 08-29-2011, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RebelR

Hey ... don't count out poodles, they were originally bred to hunt wild boar, and I've seen a few do aggression work. Hell I once saw an Afgan Hound doing aggression work, It was rather funny, but it is capable of doing the job. But that having been said, I think the Pit Bull represents to many what it was originally bred to do. Until you can get that out of the minds of the many Assholes that own/breed them, and that don't adequately know how to train/control them, you are going to have continued reports of attacks, and the breed is going to suffer the consequences. I think that the key here is that the breed has more potential to go wrong than many others.

The OG Poodles are great hunting dogs, then the french got a hold of them and well, we have the toy poodles.

I give up because the mob rules, doesn't matter if they are right or wrong. Thats what's wrong with our government, everyone is so set on left and right, they fail to see neither is the answer.

TheSquealer · 08-29-2011, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

Does the guy in the middle of that picture to the left look like a woman, are you that gender confused?

You can't even answer the question I posed about your statement, even thoguh I asked several times, you just kept insulting me, and you think I have problems? Banning of any breed is killing, call a dog shelter, they will tell you exactly that, but again, you won't listen, you're too fucking stupid to do that

I didn't realize how much like Paul Markham you are. Someone poses facts, you respond with questions which are irrelevant to those facts, then pose an analogy or comparison or rhetorical question which is neither relevant to the facts or questions but intended to deflect attention away from your ignorance and the fact that you were beaten. Then you keep harping on and on about "that question" as if you don't look stupid every time you type something.

porno jew · 08-31-2011, 12:47 PM

more pit bull horror today.

http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews...30-081228.html

Vendzilla · 08-31-2011, 12:51 PM

I wonder how long it will be till porno jew realizes I put him on ignore?

12clicks · 08-31-2011, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

I came out with facts, but you listened to the media, go figure

your facts were,"my dog is friendly"
my facts where actual reports of deaths by pitbull.

Vendzilla · 08-31-2011, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

I didn't realize how much like Paul Markham you are. Someone poses facts, you respond with questions which are irrelevant to those facts, then pose an analogy or comparison or rhetorical question which is neither relevant to the facts or questions but intended to deflect attention away from your ignorance and the fact that you were beaten. Then you keep harping on and on about "that question" as if you don't look stupid every time you type something.

LOL, ignorance? I have a pit bull in my house, do you? So you're an expert? Not very bright are you!

CyberHustler · 08-31-2011, 01:00 PM

One thing is for sure, Pit Bulls will never be banned as a race in itself... so we win.

RebelR · 08-31-2011, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew

more pit bull horror today.

http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews...30-081228.html

Nice name, I'd say either stage name, or Drag Queen.

Quote:

Elli Beautiful, a woman in her 20s walking her chihuahua in the area, said she was saddened by the mauling.

WarChild · 08-31-2011, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

your facts were,"my dog is friendly"
my facts where actual reports of deaths by pitbull.

I'm curious why you're more interested in stopping people from being hurt by Pittbulls than you are in stopping people from being hurt by dogs? Some sort of emotional bias? Trolling? Maybe you can fill us in.

ffnK.O. · 08-31-2011, 03:33 PM

some of y'all need to make a personal call to Michael Vick. OFF SEASON though.

TheSquealer · 08-31-2011, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

LOL, ignorance? I have a pit bull in my house, do you? So you're an expert? Not very bright are you!

Using your example of what we'll generously characterize as "reasoning"... every douchebag owner that is responsible for pitbulls eating children could be saying the exact same thing you are.

Vendzilla · 08-31-2011, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Using your example of what we'll generously characterize as "reasoning"... every douchebag owner that is responsible for pitbulls eating children could be saying the exact same thing you are.

So you're the one that left their kid on the ground for a pit bull to eat?

Anthony · 08-31-2011, 04:06 PM

Pitbulls. Of all things to pontificate about. Pitbulls.

Quote:

Odds of dying from a dog bite: 1 in 20 million
Odds of becoming a saint: 1 in 20 million

Odds of becoming president: 1 in 10,000,000
Odds of dying from parts falling off an airplane: 1 in 10,000,000

Odds you will be injured by a toilet this year: 1 in 10,000
Odds of finding a four-leaf clover on the first try: 1 in 10,000

Odds of spotting a UFO today: 1 in 3,000,000
Odds of dying from food poisoning: 1 in 3,000,000

Odds of dying from a shark attack: 1 in 300,000,000
Odds of dying from Measles: 1 in 300,000,000

Odds of a child being in a fatal automobile accident: 1 in 23,000
Odds of being wrongly declared dead by a Social Security data entry mistake: 1 in 23,483

Odds of writing a New York Times best seller: 1 in 220
Odds of dating a millionaire: 1 in 215

Odds of getting AIDS from heterosexual sex without using a condom: 1 in 5,000,000
Odds of dying from contact with hot tap water: 1 in 5,005,564

Odds of winning an Academy Award: 1 in 11,500
Odds of bowling a 300 game: 1 in 11,500

You anti pitbull people have a better chance of dating a millionaire.

Can't wait for all of you to become President, too.

But we wll know you all will probably get hurt on the shitter.

WarChild · 08-31-2011, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Using your example of what we'll generously characterize as "reasoning"... every douchebag owner that is responsible for pitbulls eating children could be saying the exact same thing you are.

I know you aren't really interested in the facts, but did you know that children are primarily the victims of all dog attacks and don't factor in any higher in to attacks by just Pittbulls?

There's a lot of reasons for this, including size and the behavior of children in general. They're much more likely to confuse a dog in to thinking they're prey or to make a dog feel like they need to defend themselves or their territory.

WarChild · 08-31-2011, 04:12 PM

The city of Winnipeg Manitoba was among the first to try a breed specific ban in regards to Pittbulls in 1990. The number of injuries and deaths by Pittbulls did indeed drop after that time. The number of injuries and deaths caused by dogs in general not only didn't go down, it went up.

In 2000 they changed their legislation to be breed-neutral dangerous dog laws. The number of attacks and deaths caused by Pittbulls remained very low, and the number of injuries and deaths caused by dogs in general has been on the decline ever since.

Once again proving what all the professionals are saying. Breed specific banning does not work to protect people and children from dog bites. Breed-neutral laws do.

So I have to ask again: Why would anybody be FOR breed specific laws when all the evidence points towards it being ineffective? Shouldn't we want to protect people in general from all kinds of dog attacks? Isn't lowering the number of injuries and fatalities from all dogs in general a much better goal?

Vendzilla · 08-31-2011, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony

But we wll know you all will probably get hurt on the shitter.

probably got their head stuck in it

TheSquealer · 08-31-2011, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

I know you aren't really interested in the facts, but did you know that children are primarily the victims of all dog attacks and don't factor in any higher in to attacks by just Pittbulls?

There's a lot of reasons for this, including size and the behavior of children in general. They're much more likely to confuse a dog in to thinking they're prey or to make a dog feel like they need to defend themselves or their territory.

As has been said many times, it's not "attacks" or "bites" that is the problem and why there is breed specific legislation. Certain dogs cause more deaths, higher medical bills etc. That is the issue. It's pretty pointless to compare how many chihuahuas nip children in the finger and totally murder a child and compare them as the same thing/same problem.

I'm not saying breed specific legislation is the solution. Just saying the issue of "dog biting people" and "dogs killing people" with respect to breeds is comparing apples to oranges.

TheSquealer · 08-31-2011, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

There's a lot of reasons for this, including size and the behavior of children in general. They're much more likely to confuse a dog in to thinking they're prey or to make a dog feel like they need to defend themselves or their territory.

Of course i agree with that.. but think about what you just said and consider that people like Vendzilla argue endlessly that this is not true. Pitbulls according to him, attack ONLY because they have bad owners. Hence, the absurd back and forth.

WarChild · 08-31-2011, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

As has been said many times, it's not "attacks" or "bites" that is the problem and why there is breed specific legislation. Certain dogs cause more deaths, higher medical bills etc. That is the issue. It's pretty pointless to compare how many chihuahuas nip children in the finger and totally murder a child and compare them as the same thing/same problem.

I'm not saying breed specific legislation is the solution. Just saying the issue of "dog biting people" and "dogs killing people" with respect to breeds is comparing apples to oranges.

Ay sufficiently large dog can easily kill a child. Mostly because children are much smaller than adults and have virtually no hope of fending off a large dog until help arrives. I could name, easily, at least 20 breeds of dog large enough to easily kill a child.

Again, if we want to stop people, and especially children, from being killed by dogs it simply makes sense to approach it from a breed-neutral point of view. Arguing that "Pittbulls should be banned" is not addressing the underlying issue which is aggressive dogs in general.

WarChild · 08-31-2011, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Of course i agree with that.. but think about what you just said and consider that people like Vendzilla argue endlessly that this is not true. Pitbulls according to him, attack ONLY because they have bad owners. Hence, the absurd back and forth.

Agreed and for the most part I try to ignore Vendzilla AND 12clicks because they're like two peas in a pod.

I don't support breed ban legislation, but probably not for the same reasons Venzilla doesn't.

TheSquealer · 08-31-2011, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

Agreed and for the most part I try to ignore Vendzilla AND 12clicks because they're like two peas in a pod.

I don't support breed ban legislation, but probably not for the same reasons Venzilla doesn't.

Well, we always knew 12clicks was a lunatic. Although he did provide some comic relief when he debunked Einstein while eating a bowl of ice cream. I have only recently realized what a weird, irrational character Vendzilla is.

I'm now adding him to my Fantasy Pornographer team of:
Paul Markham
Robbie
Arsewithclass
Alienq

We'll see how the season goes.

xholly · 08-31-2011, 07:16 PM

new laws being passed here after the death of a 4 year old last week.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/mor...-1226124880997

MiaLelani_SocalCamCash · 09-13-2011, 04:35 PM

Pits are very intelligent & high energy dogs. They need to be exercised daily or they get bored and their pent up energy turns into aggression. Too many people get dogs for the nostalgic of having a dog, but aren't responsible owners who provide their dog with exercise, constant rules & socializing them which transitions into love. Dogs are like children in that they need a structured schedule or they act out...tough love is still love.

Joshua G · 03-28-2013, 09:45 PM

hey look. todder killed by dogs. guess what breed

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013...k-of-dogs?lite

if only casey anthony had owned some pitbulls. she would never have been tried.

OneHungLo · 03-28-2013, 10:45 PM

Here comes 12 more pages of 'it's not the breed.'

08-29-2011, 01:28 PM	#551
ottopottomouse She is ugly, bad luck. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 13,177	550 cuddly pets that wouldn't hurt a fly. __________________ ↑ see post ↑ 13101

08-31-2011, 12:51 PM	#556
Vendzilla Biker Gnome Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: cell#324 Posts: 23,200	I wonder how long it will be till porno jew realizes I put him on ignore? __________________ Webair died? Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants think about that

08-31-2011, 03:33 PM	#562
ffnK.O. Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Sunny, CA Posts: 104	some of y'all need to make a personal call to Michael Vick. OFF SEASON though. __________________ Adult Friend Finder Affiliate Program ICQ#: 613097148 Skype: ffnKoichi

08-31-2011, 04:12 PM	#567
WarChild Let slip the dogs of war. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bermuda Posts: 17,263	The city of Winnipeg Manitoba was among the first to try a breed specific ban in regards to Pittbulls in 1990. The number of injuries and deaths by Pittbulls did indeed drop after that time. The number of injuries and deaths caused by dogs in general not only didn't go down, it went up. In 2000 they changed their legislation to be breed-neutral dangerous dog laws. The number of attacks and deaths caused by Pittbulls remained very low, and the number of injuries and deaths caused by dogs in general has been on the decline ever since. Once again proving what all the professionals are saying. Breed specific banning does not work to protect people and children from dog bites. Breed-neutral laws do. So I have to ask again: Why would anybody be FOR breed specific laws when all the evidence points towards it being ineffective? Shouldn't we want to protect people in general from all kinds of dog attacks? Isn't lowering the number of injuries and fatalities from all dogs in general a much better goal? __________________ .

09-13-2011, 04:35 PM	#575
MiaLelani_SocalCamCash Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: SoCal Posts: 62	Pits are very intelligent & high energy dogs. They need to be exercised daily or they get bored and their pent up energy turns into aggression. Too many people get dogs for the nostalgic of having a dog, but aren't responsible owners who provide their dog with exercise, constant rules & socializing them which transitions into love. Dogs are like children in that they need a structured schedule or they act out...tough love is still love. __________________ MiaLelani_SocalCamCash ICQ: 616135964 [email protected]

08-31-2011, 12:47 PM	#555
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166	more pit bull horror today. http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews...30-081228.html

08-31-2011, 01:00 PM	#559
CyberHustler Unregistered Abuser Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 25,395	One thing is for sure, Pit Bulls will never be banned as a race in itself... so we win.

08-31-2011, 07:16 PM	#574
xholly Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 817	new laws being passed here after the death of a 4 year old last week. http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/mor...-1226124880997

03-28-2013, 09:45 PM	#576
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	hey look. todder killed by dogs. guess what breed http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013...k-of-dogs?lite if only casey anthony had owned some pitbulls. she would never have been tried.

03-28-2013, 10:45 PM	#577
OneHungLo So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: Your mom's front hole Posts: 40,906	Here comes 12 more pages of 'it's not the breed.'