![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 886
|
2257 post election opinions
1. Will the control of both houses by the democrats effect 2257 and the level of priority it will take?
Also as a side question: 2. Did being a member of the Free Speech Coalition help out when an inspection was done on a guy that was a secondary producer? |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,280
|
1 - No. The inspections are a function of the DOJ and FBI, neither of whom take their marching orders from Congress.
2 - I'd say yes, it did 'help' them, even though an inspection did take place. The FBI conducted the inspection in what appears to be a clear violation of the preliminary injunction obtained by the FSC in FSC v. Gonzales. The FBI and DOJ have been getting an earful about that one from Jeffrey Douglas (board chair of the FSC and attorney for the company in question) ever since that inspection went down, and can expect the same from the judge in the case, I'd wager. - Q.
__________________
Q. Boyer |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Choice is an Illusion
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Obama
Posts: 42,635
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 6,720
|
I think the rules won't be lessened, but they won't get worse.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 13,076
|
which secondary producer got inspected?
__________________
Refer Cam Girls and Take Home 10% of Everything They Make For Life |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: StarlightBucks !
Posts: 5,404
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 886
|
I think TT Boy's company was a secondary producer. Sounds like the secondary producer protection was "worthless" as far as the inspectors were concerned. Getting an earful? Let's hope it has more teeth than that.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 886
|
Quote:
The Supreme Court on May 13, 2002, issued a decision on Congress's latest attempt to censor the Internet. The Court did not decide any of the core legal questions, but ordered a lower court to decide the case on a wider range of First Amendment issues. Meanwhile, a majority of justices appeared to have grave doubts about the law's ultimate constitutionality, and the Court left in place an injunction barring enforcement of the law. The case has to do with a law passed by Congress in 1998 called the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), a broad censorship law that severely restricts any speech on the Web that is "harmful to minors," and imposes steep fines and prison terms for violators. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
I'm Lenny2 Bitch
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: On top of my soapbox
Posts: 13,449
|
It was Legend Video.
They don't shoot their own stuff, they just make compilation titles out of other people's shoots, so that makes them a secondary producer.
__________________
sig too big |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 886
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |