GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   if thats a boeing 757... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=610695)

yota71 05-17-2006 07:19 PM

We will NEVER EVER EVER know the truth. The people that do will die with it...

Scootermuze 05-17-2006 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild
So you're disputing the Ground Effect then? It's your theory that a wing within a wing's length of the ground is less effecient and therefor generates less lift? Strangely enough, pilots of the world disagree.

Again, a wing within a wing's length of the ground is MORE effecient, and generates MORE lift.

If you can't even get basic scientific principles straight, what makes you so qualified to debunk 9/11?

Why is such ultra-low-level flight aerodynamically impossible? Because the reactive force of the hugely powerful downwash sheet, coupled with the compressibility effects of the tip vortices, simply will not allow the aircraft to get any lower to the ground than approximately one half the distance of its wingspan?until speed is drastically reduced, which, of course, is what happens during normal landings.

In other words, if this were a Boeing 757 as reported, the plane could not have been flown below about 60 feet above ground at 400 MPH. (Such a maneuver is entirely within the performance envelope of aircraft with high wing-loadings, such as ground-attack fighters, the B1-B bomber, and Cruise missiles?and the Global Hawk.)


Nila Sagadevan, aeronautical engineer, pilot

yota71 05-17-2006 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild
You realize the cost of war and reconstruction for outweighs the cost of simply buying the equivalent crude on the open market, right? I did the calculation a few months back in a post, but esentially of Iraq was to pump out crude at it's MAXIUM PRE Gulf War 1 levels, it would take something like 25 years to offset the cost of war in oil. Saying that this war was about "stealing oil" is just the extreme left version of the right's "WMD experience". Try not to be so simple, Simon.

Clearly the war in Iraq was mostly about getting a foot hold in the middle east. Freedom to run operations at will. It's about empire building, and the whole nine yards. Do you think an explosion at the Pentagon was necessary to lead up that war? The fact is that MOST people are stupid. Especially when you get them together in large groups. Americans, Canadians, Russians, Germans, etc etc. It's easy for the powerful to lead the masses, because the masses are stupid.

Your missile theory is simly that, a theory. No credible evidence backs it up. While experts continue to tell us that yes a plane would cause that sort of damage, etc etc, Internet retards here and there tell us differently. It should be a no brainer as to who's word to believe if like most of us you don't have a degree in advanced physics or aero dynamics.

What is creditable evidence? I don't think we have seen any from anyone yet.
You have a very good point but don't forget that gain of a major source of oil far out ways the dollar value. Also think Tactical, Iraq is in a very good location for the U.S?.

Scootermuze 05-17-2006 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CheeseFrog
What the...??? Where did you read that the engines weren't found? :1orglaugh

Show me where they found 2 engines.. the size of those on a 757......

Phoenix 05-17-2006 07:42 PM

some of these hijackers are still alive and well...lol

but hey...you got a foothold in the middle east

directfiesta 05-17-2006 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze
Show me where they found 2 engines.. the size of those on a 757......

No, it doesn't work this way anymore in AmeriKa ...

YOU have to prove that they are not there, just like the WMD ... Get on with the program .

DavieVegas 05-17-2006 07:59 PM

Ya after watching the loose change video, i started to beleive in this govt corruption shit....doesnt suprise me at all...

Scootermuze 05-17-2006 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
No, it doesn't work this way anymore in AmeriKa ...

YOU have to prove that they are not there, just like the WMD ... Get on with the program .

Oops.. my bad.. :)

Scootermuze 05-17-2006 08:31 PM

I'll throw this one in for the fun of it...

For those who say it was a 757..

The impact was on the first floor....

However..

If ya set a 757 on the ground, the nose is above the first floor level..

So the plane flying.. at any level.. would be well above the first floor..

as for the, "It hit the ground just before hitting the bld." it holds no water in that there was no impact crater on the outside.. and if it had hit the ground before entry, the engines, by design, would have broken away from the wings, and the plane would have flipped.. not consistant with the opening..

Just tooooo many arguments against a 757..

r-c-e 05-17-2006 09:13 PM

Warblog: A blog that primarily deals with war. Filled with whiny blow hards who are fixated on their stubborn ideas and conspiracy theories. For example, there are countless hours pissed away by conspiracy theorists who think the WTC towers were demolished by bombs planted by the government. These armchair engineers write endlessly about how the physics of the collapse was impossible, how the temperature wasn't hot enough to melt steel, and how the planes were carrying missiles. Of course, the one thing they don't postulate is a REASON.

My personal favorite warblog was one that had a flash animation with people who were quoted as saying "it didn't sound like a plane to me... it sounded like a missile." Thank you Joe Nobody for giving me your expert opinion on what missile sounds like, because gas station superintendents are usually the best people to ask about the sonic signature of ballistic missile thrust.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=banish

directfiesta 05-17-2006 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by r-c-e
Warblog: A blog that primarily deals with war. Filled with whiny blow hards who are fixated on their stubborn ideas and conspiracy theories. For example, there are countless hours pissed away by conspiracy theorists who think the WTC towers were demolished by bombs planted by the government. These armchair engineers write endlessly about how the physics of the collapse was impossible, how the temperature wasn't hot enough to melt steel, and how the planes were carrying missiles. Of course, the one thing they don't postulate is a REASON.

My personal favorite warblog was one that had a flash animation with people who were quoted as saying "it didn't sound like a plane to me... it sounded like a missile." Thank you Joe Nobody for giving me your expert opinion on what missile sounds like, because gas station superintendents are usually the best people to ask about the sonic signature of ballistic missile thrust.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=banish

True.

The most crazy was the one about that country in the sand that had WMD and could attack in 15 minutes ... Was very popular, mainly in Washington, but also in your country :thumbsup

r-c-e 05-17-2006 09:36 PM

I agree, quite the popular soap opera. :)

Matt 26z 05-17-2006 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CheeseFrog
Besides, the government had no motive to strike the Pentagon. The WTC was already hit.

In 1993 when the WTC was originally attacked America got over it pretty quick. They repaired the damage and life went on to the point that nobody gave a damn anymore that it even happened.

Imagine a scenario where the only 9/11 attack was on the WTC, and the WTC did not collapse. They could have repaired the upper floors and like 1993, life would have went on. It wouldn't have been enough to garner support for YEARS of war.

Assuming there was a conspiracy and that it wasn't predicted that the WTC would collapse, the Flight 93 and Pentagon attacks would have been an insurance policy that America would be in more of an outrage than they were in 1993.

CheeseFrog 05-17-2006 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z
In 1993 when the WTC was originally attacked America got over it pretty quick. They repaired the damage and life went on to the point that nobody gave a damn anymore that it even happened.

Imagine a scenario where the only 9/11 attack was on the WTC, and the WTC did not collapse. They could have repaired the upper floors and like 1993, life would have went on. It wouldn't have been enough to garner support for YEARS of war.

Assuming there was a conspiracy and that it wasn't predicted that the WTC would collapse, the Flight 93 and Pentagon attacks would have been an insurance policy that America would be in more of an outrage than they were in 1993.

The government can't even figure out a way to spend less than $500 on a pair of pliers. What makes you think they can orchestrate something as well executed as 9/11? Besides... Al Qaida has admitted to being behind it. When was the last time you heard about AQ claiming responsibility for an attack that they didn't really do? NEVER, that's when :)

reynold 05-17-2006 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yota71
We will NEVER EVER EVER know the truth. The people that do will die with it...

:( that's what breaks every americans heart.

Pleasurepays 05-17-2006 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reynold
:( that's what breaks every americans heart.

"every american" is not a conspiracy nut job. as for myself, i have not lost a moments sleep over it and never will.

stickyfingerz 05-18-2006 06:28 AM

Like a bunch of retards fucking a football. lol You guys make Mel Gibson in that movie look like a very sane person... :1orglaugh

Phoenix 05-18-2006 07:55 AM

best thread ever


dont you think Franck?

Franck? where are you man?

Dollarmansteve 05-18-2006 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix
some of these hijackers are still alive and well...lol

How do you know? are you friends with them?

stev0 05-18-2006 08:52 AM

I dont know how big the pentagon is, but in the one frame that you can see the plane in the second video it looks pretty damn small.

If it were a missle there's no way you'd even catch a frame of it, it's going way too slow to be a missle.

anarchy 05-18-2006 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dv2
Hey believer's...would the U.S. government lie about anything at all?
Have they lied in the past few years about anything?
Does 1 large modern building implode into itself when a plane crashes into it? Does antoher one?
Has any superpower ever really been wrong?
Some people can see a boeing 757 in that video somehow and some people can't.
Maybe it's Iran? Let's wait and see who the superpower tells us it is and let's roll. It's unpatriotic and down right un-american to doubt one's own superpower.

I love you whoever you are ;) Couldnt be more right


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123