![]() |
We will NEVER EVER EVER know the truth. The people that do will die with it...
|
Quote:
In other words, if this were a Boeing 757 as reported, the plane could not have been flown below about 60 feet above ground at 400 MPH. (Such a maneuver is entirely within the performance envelope of aircraft with high wing-loadings, such as ground-attack fighters, the B1-B bomber, and Cruise missiles?and the Global Hawk.) Nila Sagadevan, aeronautical engineer, pilot |
Quote:
You have a very good point but don't forget that gain of a major source of oil far out ways the dollar value. Also think Tactical, Iraq is in a very good location for the U.S?. |
Quote:
|
some of these hijackers are still alive and well...lol
but hey...you got a foothold in the middle east |
Quote:
YOU have to prove that they are not there, just like the WMD ... Get on with the program . |
Ya after watching the loose change video, i started to beleive in this govt corruption shit....doesnt suprise me at all...
|
Quote:
|
I'll throw this one in for the fun of it...
For those who say it was a 757.. The impact was on the first floor.... However.. If ya set a 757 on the ground, the nose is above the first floor level.. So the plane flying.. at any level.. would be well above the first floor.. as for the, "It hit the ground just before hitting the bld." it holds no water in that there was no impact crater on the outside.. and if it had hit the ground before entry, the engines, by design, would have broken away from the wings, and the plane would have flipped.. not consistant with the opening.. Just tooooo many arguments against a 757.. |
Warblog: A blog that primarily deals with war. Filled with whiny blow hards who are fixated on their stubborn ideas and conspiracy theories. For example, there are countless hours pissed away by conspiracy theorists who think the WTC towers were demolished by bombs planted by the government. These armchair engineers write endlessly about how the physics of the collapse was impossible, how the temperature wasn't hot enough to melt steel, and how the planes were carrying missiles. Of course, the one thing they don't postulate is a REASON.
My personal favorite warblog was one that had a flash animation with people who were quoted as saying "it didn't sound like a plane to me... it sounded like a missile." Thank you Joe Nobody for giving me your expert opinion on what missile sounds like, because gas station superintendents are usually the best people to ask about the sonic signature of ballistic missile thrust. http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=banish |
Quote:
The most crazy was the one about that country in the sand that had WMD and could attack in 15 minutes ... Was very popular, mainly in Washington, but also in your country :thumbsup |
I agree, quite the popular soap opera. :)
|
Quote:
Imagine a scenario where the only 9/11 attack was on the WTC, and the WTC did not collapse. They could have repaired the upper floors and like 1993, life would have went on. It wouldn't have been enough to garner support for YEARS of war. Assuming there was a conspiracy and that it wasn't predicted that the WTC would collapse, the Flight 93 and Pentagon attacks would have been an insurance policy that America would be in more of an outrage than they were in 1993. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Like a bunch of retards fucking a football. lol You guys make Mel Gibson in that movie look like a very sane person... :1orglaugh
|
best thread ever
dont you think Franck? Franck? where are you man? |
Quote:
|
I dont know how big the pentagon is, but in the one frame that you can see the plane in the second video it looks pretty damn small.
If it were a missle there's no way you'd even catch a frame of it, it's going way too slow to be a missle. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123