Their parent compagnise in teh coporation make so much from the wars ...

my BAD it is Marvin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_fa...spiracy_theory

im going to go with franck on this one

id give up if i didnt actually care about people in general

Aint that amazing .... You go to renew your driver license and you will be " captured " by at least 20 cameras ....

No cameras on top of the building looking out ...

But Frank has an answer: the painted landing gear destroyed them all ....

People believed that Iraq had WMD and could launch a biological attack within 15 minutes .... Didn't you believe that ?

So ...

Yeah..but it's getting pretty hard to give a damn about that 29%

Okay, now that I have your attention, just where is your proof that there were ever dog sniffing dogs at the WTC, much less that Marvin had them removed?

Along that line, are you suggesting that airliners did not crash into the WTC? Are you suggesting that Marvin had them (the bomb sniffing dogs) removed so they would not be harmed when the airliners crashed into the WTC?

What exactly is your point? Do they have really good drugs where you live? How do space aliens fit into your scenario?

Between 1993 and 2000, Marvin Bush, President Bush's brother was a principal in a company that provided security for both The World Trade Center and United Airlines. According to an article by David Ray Griffin "from 1999 to January of 2002 their cousin Wirt Walker III was the CEO "[126] . According to its president CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center "up to the day the buildings fell down". This last statement has been used by some conspiracy theorists to say that the contract "expired" on September 11, 2001. Barbara Bush confirmed this theory in her book 'Reflections' also stating 9/11 was the day the contract expired. Mr. Bush was also a former director and now is an advisor to the board of directors to a firm HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc that had what it called a small participation in the World Trade Center property insurance coverage and some of the surrounding buildings. [127] Marvin Bush was on a subway under Wall Street when the attacks happened.

moving the gold out...i saw this movie..die hard 3

you are becoming more then annoying..im not going to do research for you.

no bomb sniffing dogs at the WTC? are you fuckin for real?
the planes sure as shit hit the WTC

well there is no way in hell they wouldnt have the film backed up somewhere. i mean there had to be at least 100 cameras all around the pentagon at a single time, i mean it has to be a compound of some sorts, cameras would be everywhere.

What extra they actually released yesterday ???????


http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/pentagon/video.html

Franck is quite willing to believe that video shows a passenger jet and that some landing gear or something else (but oh no not a missile) caused the other hole yet he refuses to believe that KRL can communicate telepathically with his pets.

I love it. carry on... please carry on. :thumbsup :1orglaugh :thumbsup :1orglaugh :thumbsup :1orglaugh

I totally agree.

That video proves nothing.

Bush wasn't working for the WTC at that point, not since 2000. The person that was doing that job died in the attack. Also:
25. Claim: Bomb sniffing dogs were removed from the World Trade Center only days before the attack.

Truth: Security was actually increased for a couple of weeks; this ?removal? was just security returning to normal.

if you think that is a damn boeing 757... I can sell you the moon for $199 No s & h

ICQ254-460-615

Proof that it was a 757

I haven't seen a single conspiracy theorist who has any sort of idea how logic and critical scientific theory work. There is no point in debating people who don't understand rules of logic and evidence. You'll never change their minds, it's like trying to tell a savage from the Congo that the sun isn't a demon, it ain't going to work.

logic, critical scientific theory, and religion... :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

LOL\.....

Yes, it would have been so awfull for the survivors to hear the take over of the pilots and maybe the scream of god of the terrorists ...

Obviously, the Flight 93 families don't deserve the same regards ....

Wow, they can orchestrate all this... and yet they can't even get the date-stamp right on the video. And they can't even plant the correct airplane parts at the scene of the missile impact. And they can't even remember to leave explosive residue all over the place.

thtat doesnt sound so unrealistic franck , cept they didnt plant the pieces.

they made the missile appear to be a plane.

Personally , the evidence to me is so inconslusive its laughable. it doesnt really point to anything at all..

A few things need closer attention though .. like i havent seen anyone come forward to i.d. the engines in the pentagon rubble as the ngines from the aircraft it was supposed to be on. On the contrary every report i have heard suggests the gnines were from a completely different type of aircraft..

But those details are so strange/misrepresented that its unclear of what to believe and what not to believe..

Some things are alot easier to understand.. like . EVERY 7-11 in the country has better camera surveilance than the pentagon appears to have..

Where are the other videos?

Then the excuse about not releasing the video . the video is like 2 more frames of the same video we have already seen. So why exactly haven't we been alowed to see it ? Oh i forgot it might influence the jurors in that 9/11 terrorists trials .. LOL cmon now who is being naive

The most entertaining part of this whole discussion is this irony:

The people who truly believe the conspiracy 'dogma' (thats what it is..) think they THEY are the ones who are thinking critically.

When in fact, it is the very LACK of critical thought that gives rise to the dogma :)

wtf....??? :disgust

You are out of your element here in regard to the "mechanics" of flying, how a missle is launched and propelled, why the two don't have much in common.

So wait...you believe the missile theory.

Uhm so 1: the missile exploded and caused huge damage to the building but at the same time you are saying it left the building through that hole? Wait..im confused. Tell me what that hole is then.

all the drama

Ok you fucking idiots, stop all your BS for a minute and simply answer this:

HOW did the plane parts get in and around the building. Please before you continue your idiot theories about missiles answer that first.

Fucking retards.

And the lightpoles on either side of the street that got knocked over.

Answer simple stuff like that.

Again... Why was no explosive residue found?

So basically what you're saying is a 757 is not capable of taking off from a runway, because when it hits 10 ft it freefalls back to the ground? Logical.

I agree, this conspiracy theory is just plain bullshit, but maybe...
http://www.25frames.org/media/screens/1094.jpg

Phoenix and other idiots:

How did the plane leftovers get in and around the building?

Why are you even bothering to argue with somebody that thinks a 757 doesn't have enough lift at 10ft to hold its self up off the ground?

Let's get MythBusters on the case.

Well i know hes full of shit but im trying to get him to realize that as well.

Why no WMD were found ??? They did exist, didn't they ????

Answer: because there was none .

Warchild, you are way smarter than that ...

Are you flirting with Frank by saying stupid things like him ????

If I go with your " logic " , the plane, at take off, could level off when reaching 10 feet ... and FLY ...

Please ....

Oh but he wasn't... He did a little bit on flight simulators, which in no way can prepare you for flying a plane that size.. let alone being able to drop down from whatever altitude, cruising til passing over the interstate then drop to an altitude that would put it into the first floor.. at great speed...
Even the most seasoned pilots said they couldn't do it...

How did pieces of the plane get there. Please explain. Stop all your other bs and answer it.