It wasn't a plane, it was a missile that hit the Pentagon. Get it right!:1orglaugh

ROFL I love these dumbass conspiracy theorists. First they were all "It was a missile, it was a missile, it was a missile!" Then when evidence starts propogating, such as airplane parts, lack of explosive residue, eye witness reports... they start to change their tune to "Ok, it wasn't a missile, but it wasn't a 757!" :1orglaugh

Please quote .... Obviously, your name calling makes you a very smart person ... :2 cents:
I again ask you or Warchild to post a quote of me saying it was a missile ... don't be shy... you are smart enough, aren't you?

PLEASE read this one...

too many sheeps in here. the gov't says something, so it must me true

"if you wish to".... interesting choice of words.

if you were the one who hijacked the plane and flew it into the pentagon yourself, your last words would be "bush lied, the government is lying... its all a conspiracy, don't believe everyone when they say i really did this and bush is a prick"

the fact is... no matter what anyone says, your mind was made up BEFORE it even happened. everything else is just theater for you to affirm your anger.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

and the only way a small military plane could make it through all rings of heavily fortified building like the pentagon is if it was traveling at mach 1 and made of depleted uranium. it does not have the mass and cannot produce the kenetic energy necessary to make it.

Regardless of one's views on the matter - The Pentagon Building Performance Report sure is an interesting read.

:eek2

A bit like Americans wanted revenge by invading the responsable culprit of 9/11:

SADDAM ... :winkwink:

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh


http://69.57.144.30/ats/pentagon757/camera1b.gif

no, americans on average just agreed that upity muslims needed a smack down.

Dicksniff, you like to post links that support your argument like this one you posted earlier:

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/pentagon/video.html

Go to that page and it supports your missile theory. If you don't want people to think that you support the missile theory, hmm here's an idea: Howabout you don't post links about it trying to support your argument? Wow, what a concept! :1orglaugh

i can't talk anymore... too busy reading all this "non-evidence"

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

damn physics departments at the nations top universities are in on the "cover up" too. :(

http://www.innovations-report.de/htm...cht-12739.html

Government didn't have to say anything. The pictures themselves told the story. Besides, the government had no motive to strike the Pentagon. The WTC was already hit... If the govt were behind the Pentagon attack, are you saying that they heard about the WTC attack and within the span of a few short minutes they came up with the brilliant idea to also hit the Pentagon too? So the planned out the entire coverup and sent in a missile or some other military plane to kamikaze into the Pentagon and coordinated with local law enforcement and fire departments to make it seem like a 757 struck? Honestly, they put all that shit together on the morning of 9/11 as soon as they heard of the WTC attack?

:thumbsup for letting go the name calling ... :1orglaugh

That link that I posted was asking : what new frames did we get yesterday.... since those were posted a while ago .... 5 frames ...

I also posted a link to a military plane .... Contrary to you, I am opened to all possibilities ...

But this explanation of this admin " doesn't fly " ( no pun intended ).

How do you know if the gov't didn't have a motive? Just because you don't know doesn't mean it doesnt exist.

It was me

Read that whole thread... take note of johnlear
point...

Now, in which way that thread has more value then this one ?

Conspiracy. That was a missile.

some idiot phsicist from Purdue Universities point of view who studied the crash:

"In layman's terms the crash dynamics worked like so: A large hollow tube, with a belly full of luggage, a passenger bay with 60 people, and wings full of fuel smashed into the side of an almost solid object while moving at a tremendous speed (somewhere around 350-400mph). When the 225,000lb+ plane hit, it smashed apart with such force from the crash that it became like one massive column of liquid (no, the plane didn't melt or turn into liquid, it just acted like one physically - mountainslides act the same way, a million tons of rock acts like a large field of liquid during a landslide even if no water is present). All the small parts, luggage, people, seats, and all the tens of thousands of pounds of fuel acting like a massive river came crashing into the wall of the Pentagon. This force burst through the outside wall and flowed through the inside to the next wall, and momentum carried this mass until it finally ran out of inertia at the 3rd ring."

Gov's never have an agenda ... They work for the people !!!!

Come on ... next, you are going to tell me that Iraq has WMD !!!!!

:1orglaugh

Exactly! And they're also organized enough to orchestrate one of the largest coverups in history -- all within the span of a few minutes! :1orglaugh I think you're finally coming to your senses :)

you're objective and balanced and are open to any explanation as usual.... as long as the explanation is that bush is an idiot and america is full of retards.

god forbid, facts might get in the way. go worry about global warming... canada is melting.

There are so many "facts" from both sides that the details don't add up either way you go.

If it was a jet lots of things don't make sense and if it wasn't then the scale and complexity of the cover up/conspiracy seems hard to pull off.

From the video and hole, a missile seems much likelier sizewize than a passenger jet anyhow.

We were, till Harper got elected ...

But global warming is not the doing of a single country ...

Wait, there is other countries .... shit.

Except for the fact that no explosive residue was ever found. And the fact that the passengers were talking on phones to their loved ones right before the crash telling them what was transpiring. Kinda hard to stuff passengers into a missile, isn't it? :)

it was a missile...why cry...your governement did it for you.
they needed to go to war, they need the oil

thank them...but just be aware

right after the 'attack' there were witnesses saying that it wasnt a plane.

days after the attack these witnesses were nowhere to be found.

You realize the cost of war and reconstruction for outweighs the cost of simply buying the equivalent crude on the open market, right? I did the calculation a few months back in a post, but esentially of Iraq was to pump out crude at it's MAXIUM PRE Gulf War 1 levels, it would take something like 25 years to offset the cost of war in oil. Saying that this war was about "stealing oil" is just the extreme left version of the right's "WMD experience". Try not to be so simple, Simon.

Clearly the war in Iraq was mostly about getting a foot hold in the middle east. Freedom to run operations at will. It's about empire building, and the whole nine yards. Do you think an explosion at the Pentagon was necessary to lead up that war? The fact is that MOST people are stupid. Especially when you get them together in large groups. Americans, Canadians, Russians, Germans, etc etc. It's easy for the powerful to lead the masses, because the masses are stupid.

Your missile theory is simly that, a theory. No credible evidence backs it up. While experts continue to tell us that yes a plane would cause that sort of damage, etc etc, Internet retards here and there tell us differently. It should be a no brainer as to who's word to believe if like most of us you don't have a degree in advanced physics or aero dynamics.

Did they check for that. If so, you are a brilliant person, so you could post a link to backup your educated statement ...

Who said geniuses were running the USA ?

No, I hear you on that, but at the same time I was just making a point that there is so much dis-information out there, that the real truth is buried in the bullshit.

The stories being passed off as the truth are only partially true, its like any other 'news' story. There is always a spin. And I don't mean about whether or not planes slammed into buildings and killed many innocent people. I mean about who knew what before hand and who is covering their ass now because they didn't do their job.

Twas a missile

This just in... anit-porn activists have identified what the actual object was, and are planning to take action.....

http://www.steamywindows.co.uk/images/200/31120FC.gif

I'm not 100% sure on the Pentagon and if it was a plan/missile or whatever and nobody is, not even infowars.com.

There is a really cool video of a F15 slamming into a concreate wall at huge speed, they were testing the protective exterior wall of a Nuke power plant. To test they flew the plane into a test concreate similar to that of the nuke power plant. I can tell you that Plane disappeared into tiny tiny pieces.

I find it very disturbing all the shit that is going on with the US govenment though. They are certainly capable of doing anything they freaking want too these days. And after 9/11 its amazing how fast people just freely gave away there rights and protections under the law.

I didn't say it wasn't a plane...

Gee.. I wonder what planet these guys are from...:

Wings that should have been sheared off by the impact are entirely absent. There is also substantial evidence of debris from a much smaller jet-powered aircraft inside the building. We conclude with a high degree of certainty that no Boeing 757 struck the building. We also conclude with a substantial degree of certainty that a smaller, single-engined aircraft, roughly the size and shape of an F-16, did, in fact, strike the building.

A. K. Dewdney, mathematician and computer scientist..
G. W. Longspaugh, aerospace engineer..

Your little speel about a plane the size of a 757 totally disintegrating is a bit exaggerated.. Even if it could disintegrate, you don't think a plane that size would do more damage on impact than a 16' hole? After all.. you said it was traveling at 500 mph... Take a 6 ton engine and slam it into a building at 500 mph and see if it just disintegrates without any damage to the building it hit...

I'll make it easy for ya.. Put this plane through a 2 car garage door..

http://physics911.net/c-pentagon_montage.jpg

Hey believer's...would the U.S. government lie about anything at all?
Have they lied in the past few years about anything?
Does 1 large modern building implode into itself when a plane crashes into it? Does antoher one?
Has any superpower ever really been wrong?
Some people can see a boeing 757 in that video somehow and some people can't.
Maybe it's Iran? Let's wait and see who the superpower tells us it is and let's roll. It's unpatriotic and down right un-american to doubt one's own superpower.

of course it was a rocket....only americans belive that it was a plane!!