As promised, THE BRIDGE - Merry XMAS - :) - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

adultchica · 12-18-2005, 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

I do. DIVISION.

2hp

You can't really dispute those findings

2HousePlague · 12-18-2005, 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhesus

May I also add that your site is so poorly designed that it took me about 10 minutes to find the actual 'content'?

"Poor little woggie -- you've had a tough spell, eh --

Don't be scared, it's yummmmeeeee...."

2hp

MikeHawk · 12-18-2005, 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhesus

This is incredible. You sound like a prime example of someone who covers his lack of knowledge, insight and skills with a blanket of sales and marketing talk. I'm sorry to say, but you sound like a nitwit.

The things you describe in your blog are so basic that a 4 year old could come up with them. You have nothing to do with innovation.

Why why why....spoil good things?

Damn, you know what the rabbit hole goes much deeper than you can see there fore who is the one that is not really seeing the light?

Shift gears and let the mind expand....lol

oh and name calling is not allowed...on this information playground....

2HousePlague · 12-18-2005, 10:45 AM

If you take none of the technical details away from the article, take this:

"Most adult webmasters have it in their heads that they should shoot for the moon in terms of page rank for every site they operate. This approach inevitably leads to the temptation of 'shortcuts,' such as linking to your new sites from your established sites in an attempt to boost their page rank or engaging in any of a number of practices that attempt to gain Google page rank by making something look better than it is."

Not all your blogs can be 4-star generals, you have to have some grunt privates in there, and be prepared to sacrifice them on the "front lines" -- here's one of my most valued gruntblogs -- MYFASHIONGIRL

2hp

2HousePlague · 12-18-2005, 12:22 PM

Somewhat related to the idea above, is being prepared to "let go" of a blog that's holding you back. For example, my main "porn blog" at blog.impoverishednoobs.com is being prepared for "archival mode" -- this is what I am calling it when you stop actively posting to a blog, and shift into a mode where you are taking complete advantage of all the content and links in an "old but good" blog and making that the basis on which to create a new blog. Right now I am making a new blog in another subdomain of impoverishednoobs.com. Although this is a wholly separate blog (not even sharing a SQL DB), it will be very tightly integrated into the old workhorse. The result will be a macro-blog, with an established, thoroughly Google-Indexed content warehouse, and a shiny new front end with all the latest whistles, as well as all the ideas that I could not execute on the old blog. In this manner, you can keep adding new front ends, building onto the content/link "asset" and never lose PR, in fact, probably gain -- ALL ON A SINGLE DOMAIN --

2hp

2HousePlague · 12-18-2005, 01:01 PM

Since the whole idea here is that you are using several blogs together to achieve an effect, you might wonder how exactly the links are made between them -- I'll go into that later. But, I just wanted to say that it's much easier if you post to all of the blogs at the same time. This way you can track through the link sequence (just like the Spider is going to) and make sure you are #1) adhering to the rules about linking up and #2) adding a little something to the page that came before, in terms of descriptive value. One way to do this without too much thought and no extra text is to create two parallel paths between, let's say your "ad" and your pre-sign-up page gallery. Parallel paths would be link sequences that anchor from the same folder location. For example two pages of text in the same folder each linking to two thumbnail galleries in the same folder would be considered parallel paths. The spider likes this because it gets two different perspectives of the same content. The Parallel path concept can be scaled to make the anchor points the same sub.domain, or the same domain, or the same IP, when you are working with larger networks.

2hp

12-18-2005, 01:07 PM

more hot air than came out of my ass two days ago when i had food poisoning

2HousePlague · 12-18-2005, 01:27 PM

Here's a great blog:

2hp

Ace_luffy · 12-18-2005, 02:30 PM

nice the way of thinking guys

2HousePlague · 12-18-2005, 02:57 PM

Well, at least the Trolls & Detractors whose flamed corpses litter the fore-thread had the good sense to drop their sigs for link fodder and go. But what of the Admirers in the GFY-Lurking ranks?

Some of you are sitting on personal asset bases you're understandably not eager to link to "pornography". But others of you, I'll wager, are not quite so "definitively organized" in your wealth or professional houses to pass up an oppurtunity to grow wealth and enlarge your businesses via -- fame

You think Paul or Marc or Rick objected to this -- not a bit --

The time is right the Media are hungry for images and stories with a tinge of controversy. Or haven't you noticed the total polarization of stories covered in the press to Surrealized Horror and Surrealized Sex.

Step up.

Watch MikeHawk become the most visible "pornographer" at Internext with this. No fool, Mike. No, sir --

Tell ya what, if any body from the Executive/Managerial/Owner ranks wants to give me a stably-hosted image I can hotlink to under the name porn_STAR.png with a width of 400 pixels, I'll do nice things with it. We can even do it private-wise, if you like: 196-767-065

2hp

MikeHawk · 12-18-2005, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

Well, at least the Trolls & Detractors whose flamed corpses litter the fore-thread had the good sense to drop their sigs for link fodder and go. But what of the Admirers in the GFY-Lurking ranks?

Step up.

Watch MikeHawk become the most visible "pornographer" at Internext with this. No fool, Mike. No, sir --

2hp

Right fucking on....ramping up for the super kick ass year! Out of the way and fasten your seat belts....coming fast and hard.

Thanks Jack!

2HousePlague · 12-18-2005, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeHawk

Right fucking on....ramping up for the super kick ass year! Out of the way and fasten your seat belts....coming fast and hard.

Thanks Jack!

The site's looking good, Mike. Tell us about some of the special features and how they'll support your marketing objectives at Internext --

2hp

MikeHawk · 12-18-2005, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

The site's looking good, Mike. Tell us about some of the special features and how they'll support your marketing objectives at Internext --

2hp

Well Jack, if you really must know....lol.....ok here we go, here is a nice sound bite or quote for ya!

"I want to let the world have a look at porn, say 'Here we are' -- the market is interested in us, in our expertise converting traffic and in our innovative companies. I want smashbucks to be on that list"

2HousePlague · 12-18-2005, 07:47 PM

Here's a little trick you can do just about anywhere. I call it the Sweetheart Pass:

PORNSTARS OF A DIFFERENT CLOTH

This joins the source blog to the attributing blog, via an alternative parallel path of a very macro sort, and joins both posts to a larger context of pages, terms and links --

This is particularly sweet in this example, because the story being cited on Mike's blog is about Mike's blog.

2hp

OzMan · 12-18-2005, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

I missed this razor-sharp interpretation before, old boy -- apologies, I should have bourne you aloft sooner than now --

-- how are you? Vegas -- ? -- lol

2hp

All is good in Vegas thanks, we even had freezing rain today.

I have been spending a lot of time lately playing with my privates so I can relate to some of your ideas.

I trust you are getting closer to securing a room for the show.

2HousePlague · 12-18-2005, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan

All is good in Vegas thanks, we even had freezing rain today.

I have been spending a lot of time lately playing with my privates so I can relate to some of your ideas.

I trust you are getting closer to securing a room for the show.

Alas, no.

2hp

2HousePlague · 12-18-2005, 10:00 PM

"Translation" is also an important area of opportunity. Things, which to us are obviously related, may not be to the blind...

HENDRIX PURPLE HAZE

HENDRIX PURPLE HAZE

SPIDERESE

2hp

reed_4 · 12-19-2005, 02:08 AM

nice bridge pic.

2HousePlague · 12-19-2005, 02:44 AM

After I made such a big fuss about it, you should have expected that RSS has a role in this whole Bridge Scheme thing. Now that you have begun to appreciate the signficance of blog-to-blog links within a bigger picture of Google treatment and macro-scale traffic flow management, you should easily understand that the use of RSS feeds is subject to the same rules and principles. If blog B would link to Blog A, then blog B could also or instead tap blog A's feed.

This has implications for both senders of traffic (Syndicators) and Sponsor Programs (Feed Publishers).

While it is already commonly understood and expected that sponsor programs will give you tools and content to help you promote them, the tipping point in that relationship is definitely shifting in favor of the traffic sender...more

2hp

gecko · 12-19-2005, 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

2hp

I love this pic

2HousePlague · 12-19-2005, 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gecko

I love this pic

1,000 words, baby.

2hp

2HousePlague · 12-19-2005, 01:33 PM

damn nuke fans... they're EVERYWHERE --

2hp

bangman · 12-19-2005, 05:15 PM

Bump it up!!

2HousePlague · 12-19-2005, 05:32 PM

Anybody think I'm full of shit?

2hp

baddog · 12-19-2005, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

Anybody think I'm full of shit?

2hp

Looks like we may have to send you an overage rate chart pretty soon.

xmas13 · 12-19-2005, 06:41 PM

Merry Xmas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

toddler · 12-19-2005, 07:15 PM

Bunch of haters around here. Fucking monkeys.

thanks 2HP

2HousePlague · 12-19-2005, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Looks like we may have to send you an overage rate chart pretty soon.

overage --

Tx, bd -- it's no hyperbole to say that http://www.gotwebhost.com shares in this success. If your webmastering at all considers Spiderese, you'll find exceptional support at every level from goodgirl and baddog. The best part is they never once made me feel special -- meaning, it's obvious the service they gave me is the same as the service they give all their customers. --

2hp

baddog · 12-20-2005, 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spacedog

Google never has ever gotten their shit right.
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q...&sr ch_type=0

T3Report beats them all.

baddog · 12-20-2005, 05:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

This is particularly sweet in this example, because the story being cited on Mike's blog is about Mike's blog.

2hp

ummm, it's late, I am tired . . . are you saying a trackback to himself or something else?

2HousePlague · 12-20-2005, 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

ummm, it's late, I am tired . . . are you saying a trackback to himself or something else?

Well, the protocol is the attributed blog should be the more senior, which in this case is mine, so that is fine. Mike, would normally link to me, having excerpted me. And I would not be able to link to Mike. I might not even know Mike, he might have just found my blog and liked the story. But, when you have a friend named Mike with a blog, or just two blogs, you can arrange it so the subject of the article is the bloogging blog, and (THEREFORE) also being blogged -- make sense. This throws the spider for a tizzy. I guess this is a good time to say that just making the spider have to look at something really hard, becasue it's never seen anytrhing like that is a good thing --

2hp

2HousePlague · 12-20-2005, 06:16 AM

It should be no secret to anyone at this point that there IS a difference between blogroll links and link in posts.

Google is EXTREMELY familiar with the structure of vBulletin. There are tens of thousands of well-indexed vB boards out there. When it comes in here, it already knows what a sig is -- and think about, just logically -- if there is this wad of code in the same place every time you post, and the spider sees it is there whenever "you" are there, it simply integrates into You. Like If I am a doctor, I know what a hand is, I have studied-up on hands real good in anatomy class. When I new patient comes into my office, I don't run to him in amazement and wonder what those 5-pointed things are at the ends of his arms. I presume to look for DIFFERENCE -- "How is this specimen NOT like the rest?" The doctor thus forms his diagnosis, the spider its place for you in its heart.

Links in posts are where a blogger would indicate his INTENTIONS, his ACTIVE VOLITION AND PREJUDICES would be in evidence there. Those are the things that blogsbyhumans have plenty of. Now, the blogroll on that there blog, is not link any blogroll you've ever seen --

2hp

baddog · 12-20-2005, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

Well, the protocol is the attributed blog should be the more senior, which in this case is mine, so that is fine. Mike, would normally link to me, having excerpted me. And I would not be able to link to Mike. I might not even know Mike, he might have just found my blog and liked the story. But, when you have a friend named Mike with a blog, or just two blogs, you can arrange it so the subject of the article is the bloogging blog, and (THEREFORE) also being blogged -- make sense. This throws the spider for a tizzy. I guess this is a good time to say that just making the spider have to look at something really hard, becasue it's never seen anytrhing like that is a good thing --

2hp

Well, you have completely succeeded in confusing me

2HousePlague · 12-21-2005, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Well, you have completely succeeded in confusing me

Whoops, sorry about that. Let's try that again.

Long before blogs and blogging had reached the staggering popularity they have today, there

was an understanding of Reciprocal Linking in the Adult Biz. Simple "You gimme a link, I'll

give ya a link" evolved into complex scripts that balance not only for volume but for

converting "quality", developed by some of the most talented innovators in all of e-marketing,

people who post right here on this board. Later, a greater awareness of SEO principles

introduced relative PR into the list of issues you had to consider when you recipped with

another site. The impact of linking relationships between blogs, both to their respective

Page Rankings AND the WAYS in which the SE's will index them is built on the principles of

Relevancy (an arithmetical calculus), BUT also begin to integrate some of the new principles

of TRUST. TRUST IS REPLACING RELEVANCY, FYI, as the basis of Page Rank. See PDF linked

above.

To continue with the example of my blog (*******************.com) and Mike's new blog

(internextlive.com), we have an imbalance of PR, an imbalance of "maturity" (DB size/# of

posts) and an imbalance of age (inception date).

Normally, all that would be recommended is the now conventional "blogging it" link, which

happens when a blogger wants to excerpt another blogger's post on his site. As I describe in

the article, you should always link up, never down (save for the loophole 5:1). Google

rewards this when done right, because #1) you have proven yourself capable of identifying

"quality" (as determined by the Spider's opinion of the site you choose to link to), and #2)

because you are adding descriptive value to a pre-existing item in the index. You do this

with a "more" link on the basic end of the spectrum, or more complexly, via careful selection

of anchor text for the link to the single-post permalink of the article you are blogging.

That would be as illustrated by link 1. in the sketch below.

However (and I can already here my Uber-rationalist friends from across the pond and up north begin

to froth at the mouth), something rather trippy happens when two blogs recip as

illustrated in link 2. Remember, blogs are not expected to be in a (let's call it) "tight" recip

with other blogs. By tight recip I mean post-to-post. A "loose" recip would be

[blogA/post5]>[blogB/post33]:[blogB/post40]>[blogA/post7], for example. There is a formula in

the PDF above that lets you resolve a hard value for TrustRank from such a relationship. But

the beauty of TrustRank is it's intuitive, assuming you have any familiarity with trust or

bein trusted -- lol.

Look at at this way: The senior blog has conferred "trustability" upon the junior blog by

linking to it from an ORIGINAL post (that's KEY), which the junior blog has blogged. If the

senior blog just blogged one of the junior blogs posts, that would (under most circumstances)

violate TrustRank and hurt the Senior blog, and do nothing for the junior blog. This gets

around that --

2hp

baddog · 12-21-2005, 12:43 AM

Let's make this simple.

The ultimate reciprocal link in blogging is called the trackback.

You can not trackback to yourself. In this post ( http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...6&postcount=64 ) it appeared to me that was what you were trying to accomplish.

That is where you lost me.

2HousePlague · 12-21-2005, 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Let's make this simple.

The ultimate reciprocal link in blogging is called the trackback.

You can not trackback to yourself. In this post ( http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...6&postcount=64 ) it appeared to me that was what you were trying to accomplish.

That is where you lost me.

No, that's completely different. What I did above was, essentially force a liason between elements by bringing them together inside a "content unit" (a blog post, a BBS post, etc.) and other elements which would add definition to that liason for being indexed.

It's like if I don't know Harry and I know Joe and I know that Joe has a friend Sam who speaks French, and I see Harry and Joe and Sam in a room, speaking French, it tells me something about all of them that I did not know.

2hp

baddog · 12-21-2005, 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

.

It's like if I don't know Harry and I know Joe and I know that Joe has a friend Sam who speaks French, and I see Harry and Joe and Sam in a room, speaking French, it tells me something about all of them that I did not know.

2hp

Well, to be precise, unless one is signing, and you can sign in French, you can't really see anyone speaking French. So, if you hear Harry speaking French you know that about him no matter what Joe or Sam are doing, no matter their relationship.

I guess I just don't get it . . . but would not be the first time.

2HousePlague · 12-21-2005, 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Well, to be precise, unless one is signing, and you can sign in French, you can't really see anyone speaking French. So, if you hear Harry speaking French you know that about him no matter what Joe or Sam are doing, no matter their relationship.

I guess I just don't get it . . . but would not be the first time.

Oh, you know what I mean, silly.

2hp

2HousePlague · 12-22-2005, 01:38 PM

Hi,

I've just made some changes that will at least double the traffic to this site:

Within 5 days.

Watch --

2hp

2HousePlague · 12-27-2005, 10:56 AM

"DivisionTrust"

Line-making and Line-tending in Light of Trustrank

"
The classification systems we use everyday and all over the world are based almost entirely on arbitrary and subjective diferences between things. That two people can disagree on whether Object A belongs in Category 1 or Category 2 begins to illuminate an important problem faced by the Google Spider, as it is today. If two persons, with all five senses in good working order, can disagree on fundamental classification, how can the Spider, which is blind, serve them both...more

2HousePlague · 02-14-2006, 01:07 AM

Keys are for "doors".

To cross a bridge, all you need is to pay the toll --

je_rome · 02-15-2006, 07:12 PM

hi! nice read... you hvae established good arguments and i must agree with some of them.

Deej · 02-15-2006, 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

Keys are for "doors".

To cross a bridge, all you need is to pay the toll --

Dont be a troll Jack ! only trolls want a fee to cross the bridge

nico-t · 02-15-2006, 07:35 PM

i am the bridge

nico-t · 02-15-2006, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by je_rome

hi! nice read... you hvae established good arguments and i must agree with some of them.

aha you bumped this old thread... thats surprising

Spider Ninja · 02-15-2006, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

No. Find the time. It's important.

2hp

always a little bit of time left out there

Spider Ninja · 02-15-2006, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t

i am the bridge

me too...another bridge

SmutSwitch · 02-16-2006, 02:22 AM

You sir are insane. Coming from someone that is trying to make sense of it all thanks.

Spider Ninja · 02-16-2006, 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmutSwitch

You sir are insane. Coming from someone that is trying to make sense of it all thanks.

but, of couse, totally insane in a good way

Spider Ninja · 02-16-2006, 02:26 AM

100.....

12-18-2005, 10:45 AM	#54
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	If you take none of the technical details away from the article, take this: "Most adult webmasters have it in their heads that they should shoot for the moon in terms of page rank for every site they operate. This approach inevitably leads to the temptation of 'shortcuts,' such as linking to your new sites from your established sites in an attempt to boost their page rank or engaging in any of a number of practices that attempt to gain Google page rank by making something look better than it is." Not all your blogs can be 4-star generals, you have to have some grunt privates in there, and be prepared to sacrifice them on the "front lines" -- here's one of my most valued *gruntblogs* -- MYFASHIONGIRL 2hp __________________ tada!

12-18-2005, 12:22 PM	#55
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	Somewhat related to the idea above, is being prepared to "let go" of a blog that's holding you back. For example, my main "porn blog" at blog.impoverishednoobs.com is being prepared for "archival mode" -- this is what I am calling it when you stop actively posting to a blog, and shift into a mode where you are taking complete advantage of all the content and links in an "old but good" blog and making that the basis on which to create a new blog. Right now I am making a new blog in another subdomain of impoverishednoobs.com. Although this is a wholly separate blog (not even sharing a SQL DB), it will be very tightly integrated into the old workhorse. The result will be a macro-blog, with an established, thoroughly Google-Indexed content warehouse, and a shiny new front end with all the latest whistles, as well as all the ideas that I could not execute on the old blog. In this manner, you can keep adding new front ends, building onto the content/link "asset" and never lose PR, in fact, probably gain -- ALL ON A SINGLE DOMAIN -- 2hp __________________ tada!

12-18-2005, 01:01 PM	#56
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	Since the whole idea here is that you are using several blogs together to achieve an effect, you might wonder how exactly the links are made between them -- I'll go into that later. But, I just wanted to say that it's much easier if you post to all of the blogs at the same time. This way you can track through the link sequence (just like the Spider is going to) and make sure you are #1) adhering to the rules about linking up and #2) adding a little something to the page that came before, in terms of descriptive value. One way to do this without too much thought and no extra text is to create two parallel paths between, let's say your "ad" and your pre-sign-up page gallery. Parallel paths would be link sequences that anchor from the same folder location. For example two pages of text in the same folder each linking to two thumbnail galleries in the same folder would be considered parallel paths. The spider likes this because it gets two different perspectives of the same content. The Parallel path concept can be scaled to make the anchor points the same sub.domain, or the same domain, or the same IP, when you are working with larger networks. 2hp __________________ tada!

12-18-2005, 01:27 PM	#58
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	Here's a great blog: 2hp __________________ tada!

12-18-2005, 02:30 PM	#59
Ace_luffy www.creationcrew.com Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM Posts: 12,111	nice the way of thinking guys __________________ ++ Adult and Mainstream Websites Designs \| 10 banners for only $50 \| html5 Banners ++ email : [email protected] Telegram : https://t.me/creationcrew \| HTML5/Responsive Site - Div/CSS - ElevatedX - NATs - Wordpress

12-18-2005, 01:07 PM	#57
X37375787 Guest Posts: n/a	more hot air than came out of my ass two days ago when i had food poisoning

12-18-2005, 02:57 PM	#60
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	Well, at least the Trolls & Detractors whose flamed corpses litter the fore-thread had the good sense to drop their sigs for link fodder and go. But what of the Admirers in the GFY-Lurking ranks? Some of you are sitting on personal asset bases you're understandably not eager to link to "pornography". But others of you, I'll wager, are not quite so "definitively organized" in your wealth or professional houses to pass up an oppurtunity to grow wealth and enlarge your businesses via -- *fame* You think Paul or Marc or Rick objected to this -- not a bit -- The time is right the Media are hungry for images and stories with a tinge of controversy. Or haven't you noticed the total polarization of stories covered in the press to Surrealized Horror and Surrealized Sex. Step up. Watch MikeHawk become the most visible "pornographer" at Internext with this. No fool, Mike. No, sir -- Tell ya what, if any body from the Executive/Managerial/Owner ranks wants to give me a stably-hosted image I can hotlink to under the name porn_STAR.png with a width of 400 pixels, I'll do nice things with it. We can even do it private-wise, if you like: 196-767-065 2hp __________________ tada!

12-18-2005, 07:47 PM	#64
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	Here's a little trick you can do just about anywhere. I call it the Sweetheart Pass: PORNSTARS OF A DIFFERENT CLOTH PORNSTARS OF A DIFFERENT CLOTH This joins the source blog to the attributing blog, via an alternative parallel path of a very macro sort, and joins both posts to a larger context of pages, terms and links -- This is particularly sweet in this example, because the story being cited on Mike's blog is about Mike's blog. 2hp __________________ tada! Last edited by 2HousePlague; 12-18-2005 at 07:49 PM..

12-18-2005, 10:00 PM	#67
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	"Translation" is also an important area of opportunity. Things, which to us are obviously related, may not be to the blind... HENDRIX PURPLE HAZE HENDRIX PURPLE HAZE SPIDERESE 2hp __________________ tada!

12-19-2005, 02:08 AM	#68
reed_4 Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 9,640	nice bridge pic. __________________

12-19-2005, 02:44 AM	#69
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	After I made such a big fuss about it, you should have expected that RSS has a role in this whole Bridge Scheme thing. Now that you have begun to appreciate the signficance of blog-to-blog links within a bigger picture of Google treatment and macro-scale traffic flow management, you should easily understand that the use of RSS feeds is subject to the same rules and principles. If blog B would link to Blog A, then blog B could also or instead tap blog A's feed. This has implications for both senders of traffic (Syndicators) and Sponsor Programs (Feed Publishers). While it is already commonly understood and expected that sponsor programs will give you tools and content to help you promote them, the tipping point in that relationship is definitely shifting in favor of the traffic sender...more 2hp __________________ tada!

12-19-2005, 01:33 PM	#72
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	damn nuke fans... they're EVERYWHERE -- 2hp __________________ tada!

12-19-2005, 05:15 PM	#73
bangman Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: PA, USA Posts: 5,283	Bump it up!! __________________ - David Hall ICQ: 312744199

12-19-2005, 05:32 PM	#74
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	Anybody think I'm full of shit? 2hp __________________ tada!

12-19-2005, 06:41 PM	#76
xmas13 Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: GFY Posts: 5,176	Merry Xmas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

12-19-2005, 07:15 PM	#77
toddler Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: austin, tx Posts: 1,911	Bunch of haters around here. Fucking monkeys. thanks 2HP __________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/zoddler/

12-20-2005, 06:16 AM	#82
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	It should be no secret to anyone at this point that there IS a difference between blogroll links and link in posts. Google is EXTREMELY familiar with the structure of vBulletin. There are tens of thousands of well-indexed vB boards out there. When it comes in here, it already knows what a sig is -- and think about, just logically -- if there is this wad of code in the same place every time you post, and the spider sees it is there whenever "you" are there, it simply integrates into You. Like If I am a doctor, I know what a hand is, I have studied-up on hands real good in anatomy class. When I new patient comes into my office, I don't run to him in amazement and wonder what those 5-pointed things are at the ends of his arms. I presume to look for DIFFERENCE -- "How is this specimen NOT like the rest?" The doctor thus forms his diagnosis, the spider its place for you in its heart. Links in posts are where a blogger would indicate his INTENTIONS, his ACTIVE VOLITION AND PREJUDICES would be in evidence there. Those are the things that blogsbyhumans have plenty of. Now, the blogroll on that there blog, is not link any blogroll you've ever seen -- 2hp __________________ tada! Last edited by 2HousePlague; 12-20-2005 at 06:17 AM..

12-21-2005, 12:43 AM	#85
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	Let's make this simple. The ultimate reciprocal link in blogging is called the trackback. You can not trackback to yourself. In this post ( http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...6&postcount=64 ) it appeared to me that was what you were trying to accomplish. That is where you lost me.

12-22-2005, 01:38 PM	#89
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	Hi, I've just made some changes that will at least double the traffic to this site: Within 5 days. Watch -- 2hp __________________ tada!

12-27-2005, 10:56 AM	#90
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	"DivisionTrust" Line-making and Line-tending in Light of Trustrank " The classification systems we use everyday and all over the world are based almost entirely on arbitrary and subjective diferences between things. That two people can disagree on whether Object A belongs in Category 1 or Category 2 begins to illuminate an important problem faced by the Google Spider, as it is today. If two persons, with all five senses in good working order, can disagree on fundamental classification, how can the Spider, which is blind, serve them both...more __________________ tada!

02-14-2006, 01:07 AM	#91
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	Keys are for "doors". To cross a bridge, all you need is to pay the toll -- __________________ tada!

02-15-2006, 07:12 PM	#92
je_rome Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 6,846	hi! nice read... you hvae established good arguments and i must agree with some of them. __________________ Make money on any traffic. Join KlikRevenue.com Today!

02-15-2006, 07:35 PM	#94
nico-t emperor of my world Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: nethalands Posts: 29,903	i am the bridge

02-16-2006, 02:22 AM	#98
SmutSwitch Registered User Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 1	You sir are insane. Coming from someone that is trying to make sense of it all thanks.

02-16-2006, 02:26 AM	#100
Spider Ninja Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: NYC ICQ: 320970274 Posts: 2,051	100.....