UnifiedStats... 100% secure? - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

Va2k · 07-31-2005, 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOKEREMPIRE

You get what you pay for...

Thanx for the heads up J B.

Oh and John... this attitude and the namecalling just made you look quite unprofessional to be honest.

Maybe part of the reason UnifiedStats didnt work as a paid service?!

More power to you J B, as always professional manners and attitude.

What people fail to see is that a stats-program handles a lot of sensitive data and personally I would never trust this data to any free program out there especially if the owner had such an attitude and made so obvious mistakes as transmitting sensitive data (username & password) via unsecured links.

Just my

Steve

You're an IDIOT!! Crawl back into your hole.. Wasn't it like a few weeks ago somone slammed you on here? Something like MONEY OWED?

Now John I hate to admit this but your program um.... Sir It is AWESOME!! Free or not I like it.. If you were to ever start charging * which would suck * I would have to buy.. Support is good the program rocks and you listen to us webmasters. Jb I think the way you handled things sucked, I can understand though. Not slamming you kinda of feel sorry for ya in a way! Jb all I will say sir, is good luck.

John awesome program keep up the good job mate.

Tom

Nylz · 07-31-2005, 12:20 PM

I tried Unifiedstats.. think it sucks

Statsremote is MUCH better and easier to use imho

jwerd · 07-31-2005, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nylz

I tried Unifiedstats.. think it sucks

Statsremote is MUCH better and easier to use imho

Nylz · 07-31-2005, 12:24 PM

Think the only reason why everyone is loving unifiedstats all of a sudden is because it's free

candyflip · 07-31-2005, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nylz

Think the only reason why everyone is loving unifiedstats all of a sudden is because it's free

I'm sure that has been a big part of it, but at the same time it seems that a lot of people actually like it. Free or not.

I initally started using it because it was less expensive and had all the programs I needed to track. If I had to pay for it, I'd still be using it.

Please tell John what it was that you thought sucked so that he can make it better for the rest of us using it.

UnifiedStats_John · 07-31-2005, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Va2k

You're an IDIOT!! Crawl back into your hole.. Wasn't it like a few weeks ago somone slammed you on here? Something like MONEY OWED?

Now John I hate to admit this but your program um.... Sir It is AWESOME!! Free or not I like it.. If you were to ever start charging * which would suck * I would have to buy.. Support is good the program rocks and you listen to us webmasters. Jb I think the way you handled things sucked, I can understand though. Not slamming you kinda of feel sorry for ya in a way! Jb all I will say sir, is good luck.

John awesome program keep up the good job mate.

Tom

Thanks for the support Tom

Rui · 07-31-2005, 01:20 PM

UnifiedStats_John - make US paid like $10-$15/month and move more resources into it, that would be my bet

JOKER · 07-31-2005, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip

^^^^^^ did this idiot even bother to read the thread?

Yes, fully.

Did you?!

JOKER · 07-31-2005, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Va2k

You're an IDIOT!! Crawl back into your hole.. Wasn't it like a few weeks ago somone slammed you on here? Something like MONEY OWED?

Tom

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=491163

Read up before you talk.

And if you think everyone's an idiot for speaking his mind... oh well

infecto · 07-31-2005, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nylz

Think the only reason why everyone is loving unifiedstats all of a sudden is because it's free

suuuuurrrreeeeeee.

Alky · 07-31-2005, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOKEREMPIRE

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=491163

Read up before you talk.

And if you think everyone's an idiot for speaking his mind... oh well

do you realize that when you log into a sponsors affiliate area that they could get your password then?

UnifiedStats_John · 07-31-2005, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rui

UnifiedStats_John - make US paid like $10-$15/month and move more resources into it, that would be my bet

The references in this thread so far to people willing to pay for the service, I take as a huge compliment...thank you

...but it will remain free, you can be assured of this...

JOKER · 07-31-2005, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nylz

Think the only reason why everyone is loving unifiedstats all of a sudden is because it's free

Same feeling here...

Guess maybe it serves a different group of people.

infecto · 07-31-2005, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOKEREMPIRE

Yes, fully.

Did you?!

Must be the english thats hard for you then.

JOKER · 07-31-2005, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alky

do you realize that when you log into a sponsors affiliate area that they could get your password then?

Which password are you talking about?

The UnifiedStats Username / Pass (with that my email if they bother to log into the US site with my user/pass)

Or the password to the affiliate-area I log in to? (Which doesnt matter, as it's their program anyway?!)

Please specify.

sandman! · 07-31-2005, 01:35 PM

i dont see anyone that makes $$$$ that uses stats remote spending the time to switch over to save $30 a month i do see everyone thats to cheap to spend $30 a month using unified stats.

that being said both programs are going after 2 diffrent markets i dont see unified stats taking much market from stats remote just making it a bigger market

fuzebox · 07-31-2005, 01:39 PM

I love StatsRemote and won't be cancelling it just because of this thread, but come on.

This was handled extremely poorly by JB.

sheldonjuan · 07-31-2005, 01:51 PM

Unified-

You should start selling banners and ad space in the admin area!

Rui · 07-31-2005, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandman!

i dont see anyone that makes $$$$ that uses stats remote spending the time to switch over to save $30 a month i do see everyone thats to cheap to spend $30 a month using unified stats.

damm so basicly all people using US are some poor stupid dumb webmasters because they decide not to pay $30 for SR?

sandman! · 07-31-2005, 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rui

damm so basicly all people using US are some poor stupid dumb webmasters because they decide not to pay $30 for SR?

not all but 95% are too cheap to pay for stats remote im sure.

i would bet 95% of US users did not switch from stats remote also

Alky · 07-31-2005, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOKEREMPIRE

Which password are you talking about?

The UnifiedStats Username / Pass (with that my email if they bother to log into the US site with my user/pass)

Or the password to the affiliate-area I log in to? (Which doesnt matter, as it's their program anyway?!)

Please specify.

obviousley you missed the point of the thread then.

JB's argument is that sponsors can look at their refer logs and get your Unified Stats pass. Well... if a sponsor was that dishonest it wouldn't be hard for them to get your pass anyways and try using it in other places.

BVF · 07-31-2005, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandman!

not all but 95% are too cheap to pay for stats remote im sure.

i would bet 95% of US users did not switch from stats remote also

It has nothing to do with "cheap"...If you can get the EXACT same functionality for free that you could get for $30, it would be stupid NOT to do it...That's like a corporation choosing to pay somebody $30 an hour to pull a switch all day when they can pay a chinaman $30 a MONTH...If you get the same thing cheaper, you'll take it...Ever heard of the saying "Better/cheaper"?...Try using your argument on somebody like Warren Buffet who wears a cheap watch and flies coach and he would laugh at you.

Since 90% of my money comes from my own site and I rarely check all of my sponsors stats anyway, I saw no need to get a stats program of ANY kind...But since this one came along free, I tried it and I'm glad I did.

Now US hasn't reached that stage yet but they could and if they reach the same functionality for free then it would be dumb to still pay $30 a month for the same thing just so you can say that you aren't "cheap".

Jamie · 07-31-2005, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alvaro

i started using unified stats and its really great

thanks john for this really great free product

thanks JB for pointing it out to me

hahaha, marketing at its finest

Meloman · 07-31-2005, 04:21 PM

Wow this thread is amazing.

I use BOTH SR & US. I've always said both programs have there pro's and cons. But I've always tried to keep a fair and impartial review of each. I never did any mud slinging just for the sake of it. I've always stuck to comparing FEATURES that each one offers. I've never tried to find a "mistake" with SR and then mud sling making the "mistake" sound bigger than it is. I'm sure when your program first launched you found errors and bugs along the way. But errors and bugs get cleaned up quickly. True comparisons should be about each products features.

JB, this post has made me loose all repsect for you. It is obvious your intentions in making this thread. It shows no class and makes very transparent how terrified you are of this new competition. I was not impressed in a previous thread where you tried to attack Johns intgrity the first time. It shows your class and ethics. And here u are at it again.

JB as John pointed out in his quote of you... You do have very poor class in the way you handle certain things. That quote, the way u attacked John the first time, this thread and other places you've shown that mud slinging is part of how u handle things.

Maybe a better idea would have been to have a real webmaster post this info? You posting this just shows such a transparant lack of class AND a trasparent worryness of your new competition. How sad. You actually have a good product. Why not let the products and webmasters speak for themselves?

I have to admit though.. I am a bit disappointed to see John stoop down and do some name calling of his own. Can't say I really blame him cause JB deserved it...especially since it's the second time JB has done this and in round 1 John kept it clean.

But as this thread prooves...webmasters are loving Unified Stats and when dealing with John they are finding he's super honest and straightforward.

JB why not just work on improving your product rather than starting fake drama?

sandman! · 07-31-2005, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BVF

It has nothing to do with "cheap"...If you can get the EXACT same functionality for free that you could get for $30, it would be stupid NOT to do it...That's like a corporation choosing to pay somebody $30 an hour to pull a switch all day when they can pay a chinaman $30 a MONTH...If you get the same thing cheaper, you'll take it...Ever heard of the saying "Better/cheaper"?...Try using your argument on somebody like Warren Buffet who wears a cheap watch and flies coach and he would laugh at you.

Since 90% of my money comes from my own site and I rarely check all of my sponsors stats anyway, I saw no need to get a stats program of ANY kind...But since this one came along free, I tried it and I'm glad I did.

Now US hasn't reached that stage yet but they could and if they reach the same functionality for free then it would be dumb to still pay $30 a month for the same thing just so you can say that you aren't "cheap".

if it aint broke dont fix it i like my stats remote and im sure US is a nice program but i see no need to change, for me $30 a month is not a big deal

Its like the people that hop around to diffrent hosts every 3 months looking for a better deal

Like i said in my post i think alot of the US users are like you would not spend $30 on stats remote because they dont need it or are too cheap.

If your case you dont need it if most of your traffic is to your own program

Rui · 07-31-2005, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandman!

not all but 95% are too cheap to pay for stats remote im sure.

i would bet 95% of US users did not switch from stats remote also

There is a study that shows that 65.4% of statistics numbers made on-the-fly aren't worth shit

davidd · 07-31-2005, 08:50 PM

This sounds remarkably familiar.... Like when Microsoft puts F.U.D. out about anything that is open source (free).

If fear is your only selling point, then your shit sucks...

Series · 07-31-2005, 09:25 PM

I will stay with / switch to who ever can show me my online poker winnings

07-31-2005, 12:20 PM	#102
Nylz Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Rotterdam Posts: 8,285	I tried Unifiedstats.. think it sucks Statsremote is MUCH better and easier to use imho __________________ No sig.

07-31-2005, 12:24 PM	#104
Nylz Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Rotterdam Posts: 8,285	Think the only reason why everyone is loving unifiedstats all of a sudden is because it's free __________________ No sig.

07-31-2005, 01:51 PM	#118
sheldonjuan Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 875	Unified- You should start selling banners and ad space in the admin area! __________________ fuck it, I dont need a sig!

07-31-2005, 04:21 PM	#124
Meloman Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Sacramento,CA Posts: 1,540	Wow this thread is amazing. I use BOTH SR & US. I've always said both programs have there pro's and cons. But I've always tried to keep a fair and impartial review of each. I never did any mud slinging just for the sake of it. I've always stuck to comparing FEATURES that each one offers. I've never tried to find a "mistake" with SR and then mud sling making the "mistake" sound bigger than it is. I'm sure when your program first launched you found errors and bugs along the way. But errors and bugs get cleaned up quickly. True comparisons should be about each products features. JB, this post has made me loose all repsect for you. It is obvious your intentions in making this thread. It shows no class and makes very transparent how terrified you are of this new competition. I was not impressed in a previous thread where you tried to attack Johns intgrity the first time. It shows your class and ethics. And here u are at it again. JB as John pointed out in his quote of you... You do have very poor class in the way you handle certain things. That quote, the way u attacked John the first time, this thread and other places you've shown that mud slinging is part of how u handle things. Maybe a better idea would have been to have a real webmaster post this info? You posting this just shows such a transparant lack of class AND a trasparent worryness of your new competition. How sad. You actually have a good product. Why not let the products and webmasters speak for themselves? I have to admit though.. I am a bit disappointed to see John stoop down and do some name calling of his own. Can't say I really blame him cause JB deserved it...especially since it's the second time JB has done this and in round 1 John kept it clean. But as this thread prooves...webmasters are loving Unified Stats and when dealing with John they are finding he's super honest and straightforward. JB why not just work on improving your product rather than starting fake drama? Last edited by Meloman; 07-31-2005 at 04:23 PM..

07-31-2005, 01:20 PM	#107
Rui web Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: On icq: 85-483-060 Posts: 9,533	UnifiedStats_John - make US paid like $10-$15/month and move more resources into it, that would be my bet

07-31-2005, 01:35 PM	#116
sandman! Icq: 14420613 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: chicago Posts: 15,432	i dont see anyone that makes $$$$ that uses stats remote spending the time to switch over to save $30 a month i do see everyone thats to cheap to spend $30 a month using unified stats. that being said both programs are going after 2 diffrent markets i dont see unified stats taking much market from stats remote just making it a bigger market

07-31-2005, 01:39 PM	#117
fuzebox making it rain Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: seattle Posts: 22,140	I love StatsRemote and won't be cancelling it just because of this thread, but come on. This was handled extremely poorly by JB.

07-31-2005, 08:50 PM	#127
davidd Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 1,076	This sounds remarkably familiar.... Like when Microsoft puts F.U.D. out about anything that is open source (free). If fear is your only selling point, then your shit sucks...

07-31-2005, 09:25 PM	#128
Series Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 946	I will stay with / switch to who ever can show me my online poker winnings