:helpme

can you say http://www.impai.org

PimpMeNot has just validified that he believes MatrixContent sold his info. He used a particular company name with only one sponsor.. them

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=189275

Support Fight The Patent Foundation

Uh, you should probably get a clue before opening your trap.

from 07-04-2003, on this very board...

They have not responded to these new accusations and trolling up a response from 3 months ago doesn't answer questions being asked the last few days.

And I have more of a clue then you do about what's going on. Try contributing and making a possitive difference!

According to this thread it has been concluded that it was Matrix Content...

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...hreadid=189275

Thank you for the info and keeping us updated! Getting information here quickly is important.

Thanks again!

It's the same exact issue brought up back then.
you said: "These companies have remained silent on the issue of giving out affiliate information"

You were wrong.

I have asked these guys to speak up in A LOT of different forums regarding NEW ACCUSATIONS.

3 months ago nobody was getting packets from Acacia addressed with affiliate info. This is happening now.

Now people are saying CECash might be one of those sharing info. CECash has not spoken up against these new alligations.

I am not wrong.

I have no problem admiting my mistakes. If I'm proven wrong I'll admit it..no big deal. But as of yet I haven't seen CECash answer these alligations.. have you?

It's come out in this thread that TCG allegedly gave names out.

Go back and reald the old thread...
It's the same accusation.

Because it was written on GFY that makes it true?

You get a clue.

NEW INFORMATION is coming out about this old accusation.

People need answers and if they are not supplied will come to their own conclusions.

I think if these people cared about their company they would come forward and speak out now. I don't think it's that difficult for them to come forward again 3 months later and say it isn't true.

The silence of these sponsors is DEFEANING!

Guys, I keep seeing people saying that Acacia's definition of "affiliate" is not the same as our definition of "affiliate".
While this is true, it does NOT mean that companies aren't being asked for our information.

We work as independent contractors for the sponsors.
We also work as suppliers for the sponsors - we basically sell them traffic.

They can and *will* be asked for your information, because you are a supplier and a contractor doing business with the sponsors. It doesn't matter that you're an "affiliate" in adult industry terms. We are affiliated with the companies that Acacia has signed, because we do business with them.

Oh, and for the record - Platinum Dave - buying stock, signing with acacia, pumping the stock on message boards and then selling... not only is that beyond shitty, it's insider trading, and I hope the SEC puts you right up there next to Martha Stuart.
I hope whatever measly fucking amount you profited from that pump and dump isn't worth a tenth of what you're going to have to pay when the securities commission gets done with your ass.

You have the nerve to get on here and say you'd never give out affiliate info - as if you have ANY credibility left after publically admitting to violating the laws of insider trading?

Anyone doing business with you needs to have their head examined.

well said:)

Interesting logic considering the thread you're saying it in.

:Graucho

I think that is wrong. An affiliate in their language is like another site you own.

lets say I own a paysite and a content selling site.


I license for one and then write down the other sites i own that will be covered.

thats my interpretation :BangBang:



They have no business needing to know affiliates private info. That info isnt need in any way to determine the licensees income.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please remove Vivid's name from your list. We (WebQuest) run and maintain their affiliate program, along with Hustler's program. Neither of these programs have been asked for information, nor are we obligated to give this information to Acacia.

Hustler, Vivid and WebQuest will NEVER share affiliate information with Acacia. Clear enough?

Some evidence that CE is one of the companies giving away info.

http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index...=ST&f=1&t=6525


I suspect there are more then 1 company turning this information over. Funny how misspellings, or different names are clueing people into who the rats are. Kinda hard to argue with the evidence.

It is kinda strange that graphic guys are being attacked by Acacia.

It is strange isn't it? :eek7

I've plugged many of the suspects (one as far back as late 96) on sites with videos, bought pics and videos from one of the suspects, and have done design work for at least 2 of them.

Never plugged Hustler and never heard of scorescash..

Still waiting for my packet.

Yeah I'm sure they have a lot they're sending out and can take a few days to receive.

I'm amazed at the lack of response by MOST ALL of the sponsors mentioned to respond.

I personally would be very suspicious of a sponsor that knew of these aligations and didn't respond.