It may break the internet but new bill might finally end illegal tubes (in the USA?) - GoFuckYourself.com

stocktrader23 · 10-27-2011, 06:32 PM

http://act.demandprogress.org/letter...1boDy&rd=1&t=3

[QUOTE]The rumors were true: The new Blacklist Bill could effectively destroy YouTube, Twitter, and other sites that rely on user-generated content by making the sites' owners legally responsible for content their users post.

It also includes provisions that would make it a felony to stream unlicensed content -- including cover band performances, karaoke videos, video game play-throughs, and more.

Time for a few here to hire some lobbyists. No idea what kind of support this has, just saw it.

alias · 10-27-2011, 06:38 PM

Best to have permission before you stream anything.

bronco67 · 10-27-2011, 06:41 PM

So this means they're going to arrest millions of people?

DBS.US · 10-27-2011, 06:43 PM

Never happen

FlexxAeon · 10-27-2011, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

So this means they're going to arrest millions of people?

no they just put the law in place and arrest a few as an example, to get everyone else scared. ex: 2257

blackmonsters · 10-27-2011, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

So this means they're going to arrest millions of people?

Did they arrest 60 million drugs users in America?

No.

Are people getting arrested and convicted for drugs?

Yes.

Did 100 million speeders get tickets?

...........

L-Pink · 10-27-2011, 07:11 PM

Should have been that way since day one.

hateman · 10-27-2011, 07:26 PM

nothing gonna happen

Viewfinder · 10-27-2011, 07:26 PM

Quote:

The new Blacklist Bill could effectively destroy YouTube, Twitter, and other sites that rely on user-generated content...

The president won't ever sign a law that would destroy Twitter

Barry-xlovecam · 10-27-2011, 07:28 PM

It's unconstitutionally overreaching -- if it passes as is the courts will strike it down.

It preempts lawful free speech e.g.; the twitter feeds ...

If it is narrowly constructed to prohibit the streaming of "copyrighted speech" and repealing the DMCA on copyrighted works -- it would fly -- the government has a responsibility to protect intellectual property rights.

L-Pink · 10-27-2011, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

If it is narrowly constructed to prohibit the streaming of "copyrighted speech" and repealing the DMCA on copyrighted works -- it would fly -- the government has a responsibility to protect intellectual property rights.

Not to mention the huge amount in taxes that is not collected on stolen content.

.

Kelli58 · 10-27-2011, 07:49 PM

They tried that before many years ago and it didn't work. I think they'll find to many legal loop holes and some judge will like last time find the law unconstitutional and move on.

oscer · 10-27-2011, 07:57 PM

They need to waste time somehow what better way then do something that doesn't help the country at all

L-Pink · 10-27-2011, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oscer

They need to waste time somehow what better way then do something that doesn't help the country at all

Protecting intellectual property, the hundreds of millions in lost US profits and the taxes off those profits isn't important?

.

blackmonsters · 10-27-2011, 08:11 PM

[QUOTE=stocktrader23;18520442]http://act.demandprogress.org/letter...1boDy&rd=1&t=3

Quote:

The rumors were true: The new Blacklist Bill could effectively destroy YouTube, Twitter, and other sites that rely on user-generated content by making the sites' owners legally responsible for content their users post.

It also includes provisions that would make it a felony to stream unlicensed content -- including cover band performances, karaoke videos, video game play-throughs, and more.

Time for a few here to hire some lobbyists. No idea what kind of support this has, just saw it.

The only thing on that page is someone screaming "unfair unfair".

Why should it be legal for a cover band to put up youtube videos playing someone
else's music without permission? The original band can allow it if they want it.
Just ask. The cover band spends a week learning each song but they won't spend
5 minutes to make a form letter and mail it out for permission. Why?

It's wild how the same webmasters, who think they can broadcast anybody's music
and video they want for freedom of speech, will shit a brick if they think somebody
copied their website design. Why isn't that freedom of speech?
When's the last time someone filed a copyright for an HTML layout?

bronco67 · 10-27-2011, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

It's unconstitutionally overreaching -- if it passes as is the courts will strike it down.

It preempts lawful free speech e.g.; the twitter feeds ...

If it is narrowly constructed to prohibit the streaming of "copyrighted speech" and repealing the DMCA on copyrighted works -- it would fly -- the government has a responsibility to protect intellectual property rights.

I'm all for making an attempt to eliminate piracy, but it's so overreaching its not even funny. It's almost like cutting off your head to cure a runny nose. It's not even hyperbole to say it would destroy the internet.

L-Pink · 10-27-2011, 08:18 PM

[QUOTE=blackmonsters;18520556]

Quote:

Originally Posted by stocktrader23

http://act.demandprogress.org/letter...1boDy&rd=1&t=3

The only thing on that page is someone screaming "unfair unfair".

Why should it be legal for a cover band to put up youtube videos playing someone
else's music without permission? The original band can allow it if they want it.
Just ask. The cover band spends a week learning each song but they won't spend
5 minutes to make a form letter and mail it out for permission. Why?

It's wild how the same webmasters, who think they can broadcast anybody's music
and video they want for freedom of speech, will shit a brick if they think somebody
copied their website design. Why isn't that freedom of speech?
When's the last time someone filed a copyright for an HTML layout?

And who gives a fuck if youtube loses most of their content and disappears. Someone will take their place and do so legally.

.

zagi · 10-27-2011, 08:28 PM

http://savehosting.org/ a worthy cause

BIGTYMER · 10-27-2011, 08:32 PM

Google owns Obama. This bill doesn't have a chance in hell.

CyberHustler · 10-27-2011, 08:33 PM

JohnRingo · 10-27-2011, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBS.US

Never happen

bull shit

i found a site that last year was streaming a lot of live sports games... went to it this year and it had the confiscated by fbi jpg on the homepage just like the poker sites did...

you really think that you can fuck with biz business for very long before they cut your balls off?

if these porn producers get their shit together illegal tubes will vanish... only to be replaced by legal tubes run by the porn producers

Fob · 10-27-2011, 09:09 PM

omg, the tubes are going to be replaced with irc and newsgroups!

Phoenix · 10-27-2011, 09:44 PM

[QUOTE=L-Pink;18520569]

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

And who gives a fuck if youtube loses most of their content and disappears. Someone will take their place and do so legally.

.

that is what im saying

we made a mainstream business to do just that...although not to compete with youtube, but you know get my slice of the pie

L-Pink · 10-27-2011, 09:47 PM

Hey thieves ... Adapt or die. Simple.

.

BIGTYMER · 10-27-2011, 09:53 PM

P2P, File Lockers, Tor. Free content is not going anywhere.

10-27-2011, 06:32 PM	#1
stocktrader23 Let's do some business. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: The dirty south. Posts: 18,781	It may break the internet but new bill might finally end illegal tubes (in the USA?) http://act.demandprogress.org/letter...1boDy&rd=1&t=3 [QUOTE]The rumors were true: The new Blacklist Bill could effectively destroy YouTube, Twitter, and other sites that rely on user-generated content by making the sites' owners legally responsible for content their users post. It also includes provisions that would make it a felony to stream unlicensed content -- including cover band performances, karaoke videos, video game play-throughs, and more. Time for a few here to hire some lobbyists. No idea what kind of support this has, just saw it. __________________ Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life "I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."

10-27-2011, 06:38 PM	#2
alias aliasx Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 19,010	Best to have permission before you stream anything. __________________ https://porncorporation.com

10-27-2011, 06:41 PM	#3
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,032	So this means they're going to arrest millions of people? __________________

10-27-2011, 06:43 PM	#4
DBS.US Geo Cities Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA Posts: 11,835	Never happen __________________ Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight

10-27-2011, 07:28 PM	#10
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	It's unconstitutionally overreaching -- if it passes as is the courts will strike it down. It preempts lawful free speech e.g.; the twitter feeds ... If it is narrowly constructed to prohibit the streaming of "copyrighted speech" and repealing the DMCA on copyrighted works -- it would fly -- the government has a responsibility to protect intellectual property rights.

10-27-2011, 07:11 PM	#7
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,151	Should have been that way since day one.

10-27-2011, 07:26 PM	#8
hateman So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 1,623	nothing gonna happen

10-27-2011, 07:49 PM	#12
Kelli58 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Texas Posts: 2,142	They tried that before many years ago and it didn't work. I think they'll find to many legal loop holes and some judge will like last time find the law unconstitutional and move on. __________________ Kandy AI 🍭🍬 Find yourself a sweet Internet girlfriend 🍭🍬

10-27-2011, 07:57 PM	#13
oscer Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Baltimore Posts: 2,834	They need to waste time somehow what better way then do something that doesn't help the country at all __________________ XR Networks Dedicated \| VPS \| Shared Hosting ICQ 42602565

10-27-2011, 08:28 PM	#18
zagi Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 1,238	http://savehosting.org/ a worthy cause __________________ Managed US/NL Hosting [ [Reality Check Network ] Dell XEON Servers + 1/2/3 TB Packages ICQ: 4-930-562

10-27-2011, 08:32 PM	#19
BIGTYMER Junior Achiever Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Walled Garden Posts: 17,066	Google owns Obama. This bill doesn't have a chance in hell.

10-27-2011, 08:33 PM	#20
CyberHustler Masterbaiter Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 26,489

10-27-2011, 09:09 PM	#22
Fob Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 520	omg, the tubes are going to be replaced with irc and newsgroups! __________________ Asian Camgirls \| Filipina Cam Sponsor \| Jap Cam Sponsor \| Asian Cam Sponsor

10-27-2011, 09:47 PM	#24
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,151	Hey thieves ... Adapt or die. Simple. .

10-27-2011, 09:53 PM	#25
BIGTYMER Junior Achiever Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Walled Garden Posts: 17,066	P2P, File Lockers, Tor. Free content is not going anywhere.