Google uses freeones as a porn site example - GoFuckYourself.com

Chris · 10-26-2011, 10:08 AM

googles guidelines got leaked - http://www.leakedqualityguidelines.com/

take a look at page 61

cherrylula · 10-26-2011, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Some queries have both non-porn and porn interpretations. For example, all of the following English (US) queries are possible porn intent queries, but they also have a non-porn intent: [girls], [gay], [thong], [breast], [sex], [spanking]. We will call these queries ?possible porn intent? queries.
For these queries, please assume that the non-porn interpretation is dominant, even if you think users are looking for porn. For example, please assume that the dominant interpretation of [spanking], English (US) is the discipline technique used by parents on a child (the non-porn interpretation). Rate the porn interpretation as a minor interpretation, even if you think most users are looking for porn.

...

seeandsee · 10-26-2011, 10:19 AM

google is right, i would never type sex maybe only looking for some off porn topics :D, i would type BIG ASS ANAL DP or something like that for porn... :D

Paul&John · 10-26-2011, 10:21 AM

They use many other sites there as examples for porn sites

Freeones was mentioned in regards of the search query "freeones". So if somebody is looking for word freeones then he should get freeones as #1 serp.

Quote:

6.2.3 Clear Porn Intent
For very clear porn queries where no other intent is possible, assign a rating to the porn landing page using the rating scale without lowering the score. Even though there is porn intent, the page should still be assigned a Porn flag.

Please note that you should not simply rate all porn pages for porn queries as Relevant or Useful. Even though the query is porn and the result is porn, the page must fit the query to have utility and get a high rating.

Pages that provide a poor user experience - such as pages that try to download malicious software - should also receive low ratings, even if they have some images appropriate to the query.

Porn stars, porn movies, names of specific porn websites, etc., can have Vital pages. Be consistent in assigning a Porn flag to all porn pages, even when the rating is Vital.

Query | Likely User Intent | Landing Page | Rating
[freeones], English (US) | Navigate to the Freeones homepage | http://www.freeones.com/ | Vital
[freeones], English (US) | Navigate to the Freeones homepage | http://www.baberoad.com/ | Off-Topic or Useless

porno jew · 10-26-2011, 10:24 AM

interesting as it dispels some of those myths like dazzling pushes on here like google is trying to eradicate porn results.

seeric · 10-26-2011, 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew

interesting as it dispels some of those myths like dazzling pushes on here like google is trying to eradicate porn results.

google has no problem with porn. i've been to their campus and sat with their project teams in huge policy meetings. they treat us as they treat any other vertical. they take porn very serious, as it's a giant part of the internet, forever.

edit: but you know that. maybe dazzzling can finally take his foil hat off.

Roald · 10-26-2011, 10:37 AM

Haha "leaked"

Bladewire · 10-26-2011, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew

interesting as it dispels some of those myths like dazzling pushes on here like google is trying to eradicate porn results.

I think the document proves the idea that Google has major plans for porn.

If you search the term "flag" in that document, only three flag types exist:

Porn
Spam
Malicious

On a side note, it's interesting that Google is trusting outside companies to mold its search results.
On page 63 you see they use leapforceathome.com and lionbridge.com employees to rate sites/pages.

anyone looking for work

porno jew · 10-26-2011, 11:02 AM

it just means they separate porn from non-porn results, as the have always done from day one.

not a secret they outsourced this job. their ads have been seen on craigslist.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squirtit

I think the document proves the idea that Google has major plans for porn.

If you search the term "flag" in that document, only three flag types exist:

Porn
Spam
Malicious

On a side note, it's interesting that Google is trusting outside companies to mold its search results.
On page 63 you see they use leapforceathome.com and lionbridge.com employees to rate sites/pages.

anyone looking for work

alias · 10-26-2011, 11:07 AM

Nice one.

digitalfantasies · 10-26-2011, 11:44 AM

interesting read, and even more interesting:

"If a page exists only to make money, the page is spam."

so I guess we're all fucked...

neak · 10-26-2011, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digitalfantasies

interesting read, and even more interesting:

"If a page exists only to make money, the page is spam."

so I guess we're all fucked...

Including every e-commerce site?

digitalfantasies · 10-26-2011, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neak

Including every e-commerce site?

no but "A thin affiliate is a website that earns money from affiliate commissions. It exists only to make money. The spammer shows content from other “real” merchant sites, such as Amazon or eBay, or a good hotel or travel website. When users click on links to buy products or make reservations, they are redirected to the “real” merchant page."

"The thin affiliate offers no additional information and does not try to help users. This is a moneymaking spam technique."

RyuLion · 10-26-2011, 01:18 PM

Gratz to them!

Bladewire · 10-26-2011, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digitalfantasies

interesting read, and even more interesting:

"If a page exists only to make money, the page is spam."

so I guess we're all fucked...

I searched their document for that term and made a thread about how they define "thin" affiliates as spam. Now I see you posted along the same lines here a couple posts later, about 7 minutes before my thread. Nice to see someone else doing hard research and helping the community well done

Paul&John · 10-26-2011, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digitalfantasies

no but "A thin affiliate is a website that earns money from affiliate commissions. It exists only to make money. The spammer shows content from other ?real? merchant sites, such as Amazon or eBay, or a good hotel or travel website. When users click on links to buy products or make reservations, they are redirected to the ?real? merchant page."

"The thin affiliate offers no additional information and does not try to help users. This is a moneymaking spam technique."

Hm but if you offer additional info then you're good to go.. maybe they mean 1-3 page sites where the text and pictures are pure copy&paste from the original site.

digitalfantasies · 10-26-2011, 01:52 PM

I understand that sites that mainly use promotools (banners, iframes, white labels etc) are spam...

sites that actually add something to users should be ok....

the problem could be...the thin red line... so in some cases you have to lucky that your site is labeled as "useful"

In the meantime I see my "useful" sites drop and my "spam" sites emerge??? That doesn't make sense now does it???

hateman · 10-26-2011, 02:39 PM

porn's dead

InfoGuy · 10-26-2011, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digitalfantasies

no but "A thin affiliate is a website that earns money from affiliate commissions. It exists only to make money. The spammer shows content from other ?real? merchant sites, such as Amazon or eBay, or a good hotel or travel website. When users click on links to buy products or make reservations, they are redirected to the ?real? merchant page."

"The thin affiliate offers no additional information and does not try to help users. This is a moneymaking spam technique."

So by their definition, travel sites like Expedia, Orbitz and Travelocity are spammers.

Paul&John · 10-26-2011, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digitalfantasies

I understand that sites that mainly use promotools (banners, iframes, white labels etc) are spam...

sites that actually add something to users should be ok....

the problem could be...the thin red line... so in some cases you have to lucky that your site is labeled as "useful"

In the meantime I see my "useful" sites drop and my "spam" sites emerge??? That doesn't make sense now does it???

Yeah there is a pretty fine line there, I totally agree.
Also I got an authentic blog hit hard (5 years old) where a rss feed blog gets more traffic..

HomerSimpson · 10-26-2011, 03:32 PM

great stuff..
will have to read it carefully

tabasco · 10-26-2011, 04:07 PM

I don't bother reading shit they put out anymore. Google is full of contradictions and if you heed everything they say you will never earn any money.

neak · 10-26-2011, 04:12 PM

Links pulled.

INever · 10-26-2011, 04:41 PM

Occupy google

INever · 10-26-2011, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InfoGuy

So by their definition, travel sites like Expedia, Orbitz and Travelocity are spammers.

Now that googyle own ITA Software (the pricing engine that runs these sites).....

DAMM Straight.

10-26-2011, 10:19 AM	#3
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	google is right, i would never type sex maybe only looking for some off porn topics :D, i would type BIG ASS ANAL DP or something like that for porn... :D __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

10-26-2011, 10:37 AM	#7
Roald SecretFriends.com Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: IMC Headquarters Posts: 27,882	Haha "leaked" __________________ WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME ClubSweethearts \| ManUpFilms \| SinfulXXX \| HOT * AdultPrime * HOT Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com \| telegram: roaldr

10-26-2011, 11:07 AM	#10
alias aliasx Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 19,010	Nice one. __________________ https://porncorporation.com

10-26-2011, 11:44 AM	#11
digitalfantasies Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Caribbean Posts: 2,692	interesting read, and even more interesting: "If a page exists only to make money, the page is spam." so I guess we're all fucked... __________________

10-26-2011, 01:18 PM	#14
RyuLion ClubDomCash.com Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: San Diego Posts: 32,219	Gratz to them! __________________ Adult Biz Consultant A tech head since 1995

10-26-2011, 10:08 AM	#1
Chris Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: icq: 71462500 Skype: Jupzchris Posts: 27,880	Google uses freeones as a porn site example googles guidelines got leaked - http://www.leakedqualityguidelines.com/ take a look at page 61 __________________ [email protected]

10-26-2011, 10:24 AM	#5
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166	interesting as it dispels some of those myths like dazzling pushes on here like google is trying to eradicate porn results.

10-26-2011, 01:52 PM	#17
digitalfantasies Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Caribbean Posts: 2,692	I understand that sites that mainly use promotools (banners, iframes, white labels etc) are spam... sites that actually add something to users should be ok.... the problem could be...the thin red line... so in some cases you have to lucky that your site is labeled as "useful" In the meantime I see my "useful" sites drop and my "spam" sites emerge??? That doesn't make sense now does it??? __________________

10-26-2011, 02:39 PM	#18
hateman So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 1,623	porn's dead

10-26-2011, 03:32 PM	#21
HomerSimpson Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Springfield Posts: 13,826	great stuff.. will have to read it carefully __________________ Make a bank with Chaturbate - the best selling webcam program Ads that can't be block with AdBlockers !!! /// Best paying popup program (Bitcoin payouts) !!! PHP, MySql, Smarty, CodeIgniter, Laravel, WordPress, NATS... fixing stuff, server migrations & optimizations... My ICQ: 27429884 \| Email:

10-26-2011, 04:07 PM	#22
tabasco Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: In a van down by the river Posts: 2,624	I don't bother reading shit they put out anymore. Google is full of contradictions and if you heed everything they say you will never earn any money. __________________ "There is no other way to see a thing except to look at it" - fatfoo

10-26-2011, 04:12 PM	#23
neak Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 168	Links pulled.

10-26-2011, 04:41 PM	#24
INever Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: .......in a niche, in orbit...... Posts: 3,539	Occupy google __________________ I love Camdough