Google uses freeones as a porn site example
 

googles guidelines got leaked - http://www.leakedqualityguidelines.com/

take a look at page 61

:helpme ...

google is right, i would never type sex maybe only looking for some off porn topics :D, i would type BIG ASS ANAL DP or something like that for porn... :D

They use many other sites there as examples for porn sites :)
Freeones was mentioned in regards of the search query "freeones". So if somebody is looking for word freeones then he should get freeones as #1 serp.

interesting as it dispels some of those myths like dazzling pushes on here like google is trying to eradicate porn results.

google has no problem with porn. i've been to their campus and sat with their project teams in huge policy meetings. they treat us as they treat any other vertical. they take porn very serious, as it's a giant part of the internet, forever.

edit: but you know that. maybe dazzzling can finally take his foil hat off.

Haha "leaked"

I think the document proves the idea that Google has major plans for porn.

If you search the term "flag" in that document, only three flag types exist:

Porn
Spam
Malicious


:warning On a side note, it's interesting that Google is trusting outside companies to mold its search results.
On page 63 you see they use leapforceathome.com and lionbridge.com employees to rate sites/pages. :warning

anyone looking for work :winkwink:

it just means they separate porn from non-porn results, as the have always done from day one.

not a secret they outsourced this job. their ads have been seen on craigslist.

Nice one.

interesting read, and even more interesting:

"If a page exists only to make money, the page is spam."

so I guess we're all fucked...

Including every e-commerce site?

no but "A thin affiliate is a website that earns money from affiliate commissions. It exists only to make money. The spammer shows content from other “real” merchant sites, such as Amazon or eBay, or a good hotel or travel website. When users click on links to buy products or make reservations, they are redirected to the “real” merchant page."

"The thin affiliate offers no additional information and does not try to help users. This is a moneymaking spam technique."

:disgust

Gratz to them!

I searched their document for that term and made a thread about how they define "thin" affiliates as spam. Now I see you posted along the same lines here a couple posts later, about 7 minutes before my thread. Nice to see someone else doing hard research and helping the community well done :thumbsup

Hm but if you offer additional info then you're good to go.. maybe they mean 1-3 page sites where the text and pictures are pure copy&paste from the original site.

I understand that sites that mainly use promotools (banners, iframes, white labels etc) are spam...

sites that actually add something to users should be ok....

the problem could be...the thin red line... so in some cases you have to lucky that your site is labeled as "useful"

In the meantime I see my "useful" sites drop and my "spam" sites emerge??? That doesn't make sense now does it???

porn's dead

So by their definition, travel sites like Expedia, Orbitz and Travelocity are spammers.

Yeah there is a pretty fine line there, I totally agree.
Also I got an authentic blog hit hard (5 years old) where a rss feed blog gets more traffic.. :error

great stuff..
will have to read it carefully

I don't bother reading shit they put out anymore. Google is full of contradictions and if you heed everything they say you will never earn any money.

Links pulled.

Occupy google

Now that googyle own ITA Software (the pricing engine that runs these sites).....

DAMM Straight.