Google uses freeones as a porn site example

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chris
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • May 2003
    • 27880

    #1

    Google uses freeones as a porn site example

    googles guidelines got leaked - http://www.leakedqualityguidelines.com/

    take a look at page 61
    [email protected]
  • cherrylula
    lol
    • Jan 2002
    • 15969

    #2
    Some queries have both non-porn and porn interpretations. For example, all of the following English (US) queries are possible porn intent queries, but they also have a non-porn intent: [girls], [gay], [thong], [breast], [sex], [spanking]. We will call these queries ?possible porn intent? queries.
    For these queries, please assume that the non-porn interpretation is dominant, even if you think users are looking for porn. For example, please assume that the dominant interpretation of [spanking], English (US) is the discipline technique used by parents on a child (the non-porn interpretation). Rate the porn interpretation as a minor interpretation, even if you think most users are looking for porn.
    ...

    Comment

    • seeandsee
      Check SIG!
      • Mar 2006
      • 50945

      #3
      google is right, i would never type sex maybe only looking for some off porn topics :D, i would type BIG ASS ANAL DP or something like that for porn... :D
      BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

      Contact here

      Comment

      • Paul&John
        Confirmed User
        • Aug 2005
        • 8643

        #4
        They use many other sites there as examples for porn sites
        Freeones was mentioned in regards of the search query "freeones". So if somebody is looking for word freeones then he should get freeones as #1 serp.

        6.2.3 Clear Porn Intent
        For very clear porn queries where no other intent is possible, assign a rating to the porn landing page using the rating scale without lowering the score. Even though there is porn intent, the page should still be assigned a Porn flag.

        Please note that you should not simply rate all porn pages for porn queries as Relevant or Useful. Even though the query is porn and the result is porn, the page must fit the query to have utility and get a high rating.

        Pages that provide a poor user experience - such as pages that try to download malicious software - should also receive low ratings, even if they have some images appropriate to the query.

        Porn stars, porn movies, names of specific porn websites, etc., can have Vital pages. Be consistent in assigning a Porn flag to all porn pages, even when the rating is Vital.

        Query | Likely User Intent | Landing Page | Rating
        [freeones], English (US) | Navigate to the Freeones homepage | http://www.freeones.com/ | Vital
        [freeones], English (US) | Navigate to the Freeones homepage | http://www.baberoad.com/ | Off-Topic or Useless
        Use coupon 'pauljohn' for a $1 discount at already super cheap NameSilo!
        Anal Webcams | Kinky Trans Cams Live | Hotwife XXX Tube | Get your Proxies here

        Comment

        • porno jew
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Nov 2006
          • 10166

          #5
          interesting as it dispels some of those myths like dazzling pushes on here like google is trying to eradicate porn results.

          Comment

          • seeric
            ..........
            • Aug 2004
            • 41917

            #6
            Originally posted by porno jew
            interesting as it dispels some of those myths like dazzling pushes on here like google is trying to eradicate porn results.
            google has no problem with porn. i've been to their campus and sat with their project teams in huge policy meetings. they treat us as they treat any other vertical. they take porn very serious, as it's a giant part of the internet, forever.

            edit: but you know that. maybe dazzzling can finally take his foil hat off.
            Last edited by seeric; 10-26-2011, 09:38 AM.

            Comment

            • Roald
              SecretFriends.com
              • May 2001
              • 27910

              #7
              Haha "leaked"


              WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME



              ClubSweethearts | ManUpFilms | SinfulXXX | HOT * AdultPrime * HOT


              Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com | telegram: roaldr

              Comment

              • Bladewire
                StraightBro
                • Aug 2003
                • 56228

                #8
                Originally posted by porno jew
                interesting as it dispels some of those myths like dazzling pushes on here like google is trying to eradicate porn results.
                I think the document proves the idea that Google has major plans for porn.

                If you search the term "flag" in that document, only three flag types exist:

                Porn
                Spam
                Malicious


                On a side note, it's interesting that Google is trusting outside companies to mold its search results.
                On page 63 you see they use leapforceathome.com and lionbridge.com employees to rate sites/pages.

                anyone looking for work
                Last edited by Bladewire; 10-26-2011, 09:45 AM.


                Skype: CallTomNow

                Comment

                • porno jew
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 10166

                  #9
                  it just means they separate porn from non-porn results, as the have always done from day one.

                  not a secret they outsourced this job. their ads have been seen on craigslist.

                  Originally posted by Squirtit
                  I think the document proves the idea that Google has major plans for porn.

                  If you search the term "flag" in that document, only three flag types exist:

                  Porn
                  Spam
                  Malicious


                  On a side note, it's interesting that Google is trusting outside companies to mold its search results.
                  On page 63 you see they use leapforceathome.com and lionbridge.com employees to rate sites/pages.

                  anyone looking for work

                  Comment

                  • alias
                    aliasx
                    • Apr 2001
                    • 19010

                    #10
                    Nice one.
                    https://porncorporation.com

                    Comment

                    • digitalfantasies
                      Confirmed User
                      • Sep 2010
                      • 2759

                      #11
                      interesting read, and even more interesting:

                      "If a page exists only to make money, the page is spam."

                      so I guess we're all fucked...

                      Comment

                      • neak
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jan 2008
                        • 168

                        #12
                        Originally posted by digitalfantasies
                        interesting read, and even more interesting:

                        "If a page exists only to make money, the page is spam."

                        so I guess we're all fucked...
                        Including every e-commerce site?

                        Comment

                        • digitalfantasies
                          Confirmed User
                          • Sep 2010
                          • 2759

                          #13
                          Originally posted by neak
                          Including every e-commerce site?
                          no but "A thin affiliate is a website that earns money from affiliate commissions. It exists only to make money. The spammer shows content from other “real” merchant sites, such as Amazon or eBay, or a good hotel or travel website. When users click on links to buy products or make reservations, they are redirected to the “real” merchant page."

                          "The thin affiliate offers no additional information and does not try to help users. This is a moneymaking spam technique."

                          Last edited by digitalfantasies; 10-26-2011, 11:56 AM.

                          Comment

                          • RyuLion
                            • Mar 2003
                            • 32369

                            #14
                            Gratz to them!

                            Adult Biz Consultant A tech head since 1995
                            Affiliate Support: Chaturbate | CCBill Live

                            Comment

                            • Bladewire
                              StraightBro
                              • Aug 2003
                              • 56228

                              #15
                              Originally posted by digitalfantasies
                              interesting read, and even more interesting:

                              "If a page exists only to make money, the page is spam."

                              so I guess we're all fucked...
                              I searched their document for that term and made a thread about how they define "thin" affiliates as spam. Now I see you posted along the same lines here a couple posts later, about 7 minutes before my thread. Nice to see someone else doing hard research and helping the community well done
                              Last edited by Bladewire; 10-26-2011, 12:36 PM.


                              Skype: CallTomNow

                              Comment

                              • Paul&John
                                Confirmed User
                                • Aug 2005
                                • 8643

                                #16
                                Originally posted by digitalfantasies
                                no but "A thin affiliate is a website that earns money from affiliate commissions. It exists only to make money. The spammer shows content from other ?real? merchant sites, such as Amazon or eBay, or a good hotel or travel website. When users click on links to buy products or make reservations, they are redirected to the ?real? merchant page."

                                "The thin affiliate offers no additional information and does not try to help users. This is a moneymaking spam technique."

                                Hm but if you offer additional info then you're good to go.. maybe they mean 1-3 page sites where the text and pictures are pure copy&paste from the original site.
                                Use coupon 'pauljohn' for a $1 discount at already super cheap NameSilo!
                                Anal Webcams | Kinky Trans Cams Live | Hotwife XXX Tube | Get your Proxies here

                                Comment

                                • digitalfantasies
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Sep 2010
                                  • 2759

                                  #17
                                  I understand that sites that mainly use promotools (banners, iframes, white labels etc) are spam...

                                  sites that actually add something to users should be ok....

                                  the problem could be...the thin red line... so in some cases you have to lucky that your site is labeled as "useful"

                                  In the meantime I see my "useful" sites drop and my "spam" sites emerge??? That doesn't make sense now does it???

                                  Comment

                                  • hateman
                                    So Fucking Banned
                                    • Jul 2003
                                    • 1623

                                    #18
                                    porn's dead

                                    Comment

                                    • InfoGuy
                                      80/20 Rule
                                      • Apr 2010
                                      • 3052

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by digitalfantasies
                                      no but "A thin affiliate is a website that earns money from affiliate commissions. It exists only to make money. The spammer shows content from other ?real? merchant sites, such as Amazon or eBay, or a good hotel or travel website. When users click on links to buy products or make reservations, they are redirected to the ?real? merchant page."

                                      "The thin affiliate offers no additional information and does not try to help users. This is a moneymaking spam technique."

                                      So by their definition, travel sites like Expedia, Orbitz and Travelocity are spammers.
                                      Support American Heroes | How Bad is My Batch? | Vaccine Deaths & Adverse Reactions | Free Speech Coalition | <WARNING> ePayService / Guerra Capital, INC / MTACC payments | Flirt4Free Fucks their Affiliates | Don't do business with piece of shit Andy Alvarez from Webmaster Central / VR3000, who said:
                                      "If it was up to me, they would have shot all 30,000 of those country loving shitheads"

                                      Comment

                                      • Paul&John
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Aug 2005
                                        • 8643

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by digitalfantasies
                                        I understand that sites that mainly use promotools (banners, iframes, white labels etc) are spam...

                                        sites that actually add something to users should be ok....

                                        the problem could be...the thin red line... so in some cases you have to lucky that your site is labeled as "useful"

                                        In the meantime I see my "useful" sites drop and my "spam" sites emerge??? That doesn't make sense now does it???
                                        Yeah there is a pretty fine line there, I totally agree.
                                        Also I got an authentic blog hit hard (5 years old) where a rss feed blog gets more traffic..
                                        Use coupon 'pauljohn' for a $1 discount at already super cheap NameSilo!
                                        Anal Webcams | Kinky Trans Cams Live | Hotwife XXX Tube | Get your Proxies here

                                        Comment

                                        • HomerSimpson
                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                          • Sep 2005
                                          • 13826

                                          #21
                                          great stuff..
                                          will have to read it carefully
                                          Make a bank with Chaturbate - the best selling webcam program
                                          Ads that can't be block with AdBlockers !!! /// Best paying popup program (Bitcoin payouts) !!!

                                          PHP, MySql, Smarty, CodeIgniter, Laravel, WordPress, NATS... fixing stuff, server migrations & optimizations... My ICQ: 27429884 | Email:

                                          Comment

                                          • tabasco
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Jul 2006
                                            • 2624

                                            #22
                                            I don't bother reading shit they put out anymore. Google is full of contradictions and if you heed everything they say you will never earn any money.
                                            "There is no other way to see a thing except to look at it" - fatfoo

                                            Comment

                                            • neak
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Jan 2008
                                              • 168

                                              #23
                                              Links pulled.

                                              Comment

                                              • INever
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Jan 2005
                                                • 4031

                                                #24
                                                Occupy google
                                                I love Camdough

                                                airvpn

                                                Comment

                                                • INever
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Jan 2005
                                                  • 4031

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by InfoGuy
                                                  So by their definition, travel sites like Expedia, Orbitz and Travelocity are spammers.
                                                  Now that googyle own ITA Software (the pricing engine that runs these sites).....

                                                  DAMM Straight.
                                                  I love Camdough

                                                  airvpn

                                                  Comment

                                                  Working...