If you ban the breed, where do they all go? Have you invented teleportation to the moons of Jupiter or something, Einstein you're not!

Facts are it's similarities in narrow thinking and prejudice dip shit


What fact, 4.5 million dogs and what % attacked people that were raised by responsible owners?
The assertion is not random, you're narrow minded and that seems to be very relevant as your only defense of stupidity.



I have to ask, after reading the crap you posted, do you know what the word random means?

I'm impressed

http://www.ermal.com/index_files/JW-Photosm.jpg

Just trolls that think if they keep coming up with lame reasons, they can kill off an entire breed of animal.

The reason they have never been accepted as breeds in the american or british kennel clubs isn't 'doggy racism' or the media, it's the fact that they don't use proper practices for breed selections. They are not screened for diseases or ailments, they are not screened for aggression (most dogs that are considered unstable or unsafe are put down even pure breds), in fact I think the only thing they are bred for is strength and colour which is down right irresponsible.

If they began taking responsibility and screening them for these things more the problem would solve itself. No need to exterminate any breed.

Again retard. Its irrelevant. Fact.. they attack. They kill. They attack unprovoked and murder people. Why does it matter what % were "responsible owners". We can't all have suitcase nukes just because only a few "irresponsible owners" will detonate them in a populated city. Lets just turn that one into a numbers game as well and then blame the owners when it goes bad for innocent people.


Oh... well ok then. 50,000,000 drunk drivers on the road every year in the USA. Only XX,XXX innocent people killed. Lets use your moronic reasoning and legalize drunk driving. After all, its just a numbers game and the rights of the innocent to not be senselessly murdered are irrelevant. God Bless the USA!!

Pretty sure that the vast majority of Pit Bull owners aren't intending to take them to Crufts or Westminster.

Completely false

an interesting read from a Breeder here http://www.atlkingpits.com/Articles/articles.html

sorry to say that you are wrong

Now you're comparing a dog to a nuke?

So according to you, we should ban alcohal ?


You want to kill off a dog that I see as a pet every day, you see it as a menace, This would be like Ralph Nader bashing the Corvair in the 60's when the asshole didn't have a drivers licence.

That woman and anyone owning a pit bull who attacks deserves prison.

Well the AKC (American Kennel Club) actually recognizes the Staffordshire Bull Terrier as a breed which is the actual name of the American Pit Bull Terrier before it came to America and had the name bastardized here is what the AKC says about the breed

http://www.akc.org/breeds/staffordshire_bull_terrier/
The Staffordshire Bull Terrier is extremely courageous and obedient, highly intelligent and affectionate with a sense of humor. This, coupled with its affection for its friends, and children in particular, its off-duty quietness and trustworthy stability, makes it a foremost all-purpose dog. He looks forward to daily exercise, and his powerful jaws enjoy a supply of sturdy chew toys. While he is a sweet-tempered, affectionate dog, his strength and determination require an experienced owner who can work with him in a firm, but gentle way. The Staffie?s coat is short and smooth, and needs only a quick brushing once a week.

The UKC or (United Kennel Club) recognizes both the American pit bull terrier and the Staffordshire Bull Terrier as breeds and dogs can be dual registered as well.
here is what the UKC has to say about the breed

http://www.ukcdogs.com/WebSite.nsf/B...dNovember12008
The essential characteristics of the American Pit Bull Terrier are strength, confidence, and zest for life. This breed is eager to please and brimming over with enthusiasm. APBTs make excellent family companions and have always been noted for their love of children. Because most APBTs exhibit some level of dog aggression and because of its powerful physique, the APBT requires an owner who will carefully socialize and obedience train the dog. The breed?s natural agility makes it one of the most capable canine climbers so good fencing is a must for this breed. The APBT is not the best choice for a guard dog since they are extremely friendly, even with strangers. Aggressive behavior toward humans is uncharacteristic of the breed and highly undesirable. This breed does very well in performance events because of its high level of intelligence and its willingness to work

Both clubs comment on their inherent friendliness towards people

That person is not fully educated about the breed...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Pit_Bull_Terrier
http://atts.org/breed-statistics/

:pimp

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America...errier#History

Dog fighting is only a tiny part of this breeds history. Not what they were created for, and not their best ability.

Sad and true fact.

Vendzy - You know I do not say we should KILL your dog or all PitBulls today, but to take the breed (and other fighting dog breeds) down over time via neutering and spaying. That would be the wise thing to do.

I am sure you will be able to fall just as much in love with another gentler breed that is not "made to fight" and that can be your guard dog as well if that is what you feel you need.

Well said Oy. Any breed of animal that consistently harms others should be dealt with accordingly. I know people love their dogs but no dog is worth the death or severe harm of a child and it happens far too often with pit bulls and other breeds.

dude do you even know the difference between fact and fiction?
again from the UKC website
The APBT is not the best choice for a guard dog since they are extremely friendly

even though you may not like the facts or they do not support your argument does not make them any less true, sorry for your ignorance

maybe you should go and live in a bubble...just saying :helpme

The character of the dog depends on how the owners educate him/her and also the type of attention you give. Many people can not even take of themselves so how the hell are they going to take care of a pet.

look asshat, the stats you want to ignore don't lie.
enough with your idiot statements. get back to me when you have facts and figures (a link) that can refute clear facts such as these. until then YOU are wrong:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ported_in_2011

dog attack deaths

2006-
death by pitbull- 15
all other breeds- 15

2007-
death by pitbull- 18
all other breeds- 16

2008-
death by pitbull- 15
all other breeds- 9

2009-
death by pitbull- 14
all other breeds- 15

2010-
death by pitbull- 22
all other breeds- 11
--------------------------------------------------------
get back to us when you have a clue.

exactly. look at what you're pretending is fact.

exactly. like when they pull a consumer product off the shelves when one person dies. they don't just leave it on the shelves and say "oh well, more people died in car accidents today."

banning pit bulls is just the sane logical reaction to the solution.

That could be said for most breeds. Yeah, people show dogs...but not the "vast majority".

In ANY dog attack it is almost NEVER random and almost NEVER (at least to a dog) unprovoked. When dealing with dogs we don't already realize when the things we do, our body posture, our energy, might provoke an animal because in THEIR form of communication that is a threat. Anyone who actually knows and understands dogs can see the signs, but the average person, even a dog owner, may not realize when they are threatening or challenging a dog. Something as simple as eye contact at the wrong time and the wrong state of mind or emotional sense, and it can be a reason. Kids are most often the victims of dog attacks, if their parents don't understand these things, how can kids know? And because they are lower to the ground on more on a dog's level, they are even MORE vulnerable. It's often more about the human than we care to admit.

right, humans bread a dog that has no place in a civilized society.

No offense, but that's sort of like saying we should phase out a certain race of people because their incidence of crime is statistically higher (which may or may not be true), and therefore eliminate the threat. A much better use of time is to invest it in education, maybe there should be licenses for dog ownership! I've always believed that there is not enough accountability for pet owners, and making sure people have to take lessons in pet ownership before the privledge of owning them would most certainly reduce ALL animal-related issues.

how is a little kid going to know what body posture it's not supposed to do around a dog so it doesn't get it's face ripped off?

that's insane.

I love bullies :thumbsup

Is that your program in your sig (MakingCoin)? They owe us money, just saying :2 cents:

I've been around many different breeds, many are not common , my sister loves Vizla's which is one very high strung dog, my brother loves mastiff's. Which he has a scar from on his arm when he took his bull to the beach and the dog freaked out and dragged him to the ground. My mom has a French Mastiff weighs in at over 105 pounds.

Everyone thats up in arms about Pit Bulls have never been around one thats a family pet, I have, nicest most affectionate dog ever, killing this bred off by any means because of ignorance is complete bullshit. Your being sucked in by the media machine.

The most dangerous animal in the US is NOT the Pit Bull Terrier
Deer kill over 100 people a year because of car crashes
Bees kill over 60 a year because of allergic reactions
Wanna know how many people die from Mosquito?s

But if you want to get rid of a breed, get your facts straight, most of the so called deaths caused by pit bulls are MUTT's that have Pit Bull in them, so to call for a ban on the breed is useless, unless you plan to call for a ban on MUTT'S?

Do you see how FUCKING STUPID that sounds?


So everyone that's calling for a ban on Pit Bulls, Fuck You, because if you're wanting this because a baby got mauled, what about the dumb fucking idiot that left a baby where a any dog could get near it?

I bet you're the fucking idiot that would teach there kid to pet the doggie thats on a chain, I say good, we don't need more people from your breed, too fucking stupid.

Vendzilla - how many people keep deer as pets, and treat it as human-like? Same for bees, mosquitos, or any other inane comparison?

Fact 1: Pet owners attach human-like qualities to dumb animals, and let their emotions get in the way of the fact that at the end of the day, dumb animals are dumb animals.

Fact 2: Pet owners believe pets should be afforded the exact same rights as humans.

Fact 3: Pet owners love furry, cute, or funny animals, and that out-trumps any danger they may pose.

Fact 4: All the above are facts, Fact!

So are you saying we should get rid of all the mutts too?

care to restate that in english?

Facts? Ok setting aside you're a moron, I guess you didn't know about Michael Vicks dogs do you?

http://www.parade.com/news/2010/08/1...ew-tricks.html

Consider one of Vick?s other victims, Hector. A handsome brown dog with a black snout and deep scars on his chest, he had clearly been a fighter. Yet from the start he had nothing but love for the world. After moving through a few foster homes, he was adopted by Roo Yori. The director of care and enrichment at Animal Farm Foundation in upstate New York, Yori is best known as the human companion of Wallace the Pit Bull, a national flying-disc champ.



Maybe you should like every other fucking idiot in this thread read a little and educate themselves and not jump on a bandwagon similar to those that want porn off the INTERNET

Have you nothing to say? You never do, "too fucking stupid" is now your title if you didn't understand, it's your breed!

internet porn doesn't jump over fences and kill postal workers. your comparison if illegitimate.

what the hell you talking about? english please.

Facts #1,2,3, and 4 proven :thumbsup

You are too emotionally attached to 'cute' pets to understand that humans > every other species.

Do you think every drunk driver has an accident, or kills? Of course they don't, but there are enough serious injuries & deaths that make it sane to outlaw drink driving. The only reason pitbulls haven't yet been fully outlawed in your country is because dipshits like you humanize them, and believe that the number of deaths they cause isn't yet at 'insert_magic_nember_here', and 15 or so a year is A-ok.

Guess what - laws are passed, and have been passed, every single fucking day because of the few that are too dumb to: drive sensibly; take care of themselves; act in a manner that doesn't endanger others; add your own here.

Why should pitbull owners be treated differently?

Because you're too fucking stupid to see the comparison to the level of narrow minded thinking

You're too fucking stupid to understand I guess

Laws, now you're really showing what a moron you are, in California A city ordinance states that a $500 fine will be given to anyone who detonates a nuclear device within city limits. Hows that law for you?

Judge jury and executioner, based a few bad dogs and wanting to kill off the whole breed.

Another fucking moron , I have to ask, how many of you would have sided with Hitler? He showed facts and figures.

I can't fathom how any of you can be this narrow minded, the prejudice you've shown, you actually think 4.5 million dogs are all bad, how can you look at your self and even come close to think your right?

lol, you're equating the mass genocide of humans to outlawing a statistically dangerous breed of dog?

Clown :)

Hey dipshit, you have the same mentality, sorry you're too fucking stupid to see that.
You want to kill off millions.

dont you guys have any work to do? damn lmao

Hey dipshit, of DOGS that are a danger to HUMANS. Not that anyone is even talking about culling them. Sorry you're too fucking stupid to realise that.

Roald, I have two screens and a split personality

400 dead pits!