To those that wonder why the towers fell
 

Watch the force of this video. Watch the ferocity of the following explosion. Frankly its amazing the stood as long as they did.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/31999/rare_sep_11_clip/

Those who talk about demolition watch this clip.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/134744...loor_explodes/

Notice where the fall begins. At the break point where the plane hit. The top just starts to come down. This is so obvious that its amazing there is still debate going on.

the force/heat of the planes caused the buildings to collapse. if you "think" or "believe" otherwise i would love to hear it...

wont get many responses here........

Ill bump it again tommorow see if anyone has something witty to say.

the only way to figure out what truely caused it is to do it again.

I think the government has a lot of explaining to do to prove they are right

People arent actually argueing there was a bomb or anything of the kind, are they???? :helpme

We had people saying that a missle hit the Pentagon, then they planted plane parts in there before hand, spattered them across the lawn, landed the real Flight 77 somewhere else, killed the people on board, then spread their body parts in the Pentagon.

With that said, I have no doubt that someone will be in here soon telling us that the towers are still standing and it's just a halogram.

No no...it wasnt hot enough for the steel to melt. And we all know steel has to completely melt before a building can collapse. The fact that a huge plane destroyed several floors doesnt really matter.

lololololol that made me think of:

http://www.toyarchive.com/Automan/Au...igureMOC1a.jpg

hahaha, idiot

http://www.raptureready.com/photo/tulsa2/55.jpg

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/134744...loor_explodes/

Seriously, if you still talk or even think about bombs after watching this clip then you simply are the biggest retard in the world.

That plane almost detroyed everything on those levels but supposedly left the bombs that were planted intact, the wires that connected them and they also managed to detonate exactly the bombs at that level right in the middle of a huge hole.

Here is another view. First tower getting hit.


http://www.metacafe.com/watch/52908/wtc_11_09/

and second too.

People just dont understand the kind of force those planes hitting the building caused. Just silly there is even a debate.

Ok, thats it. No more discussing anymore. After these video i think everything is clear to anyone with an IQ above 80.

If people still come up with bombs crap and god knows what i will simply call them retard and nothing more. Thats all they deserve.

built in USA, nough said

parthenon was bombed by germans and stood up like pac on roid

I agree with you. There's no bombs/funky stuff here. None of that tinhat stuff.

Whats funny is that clip is supposed to prove to us there were explosives. ROFL!! :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh

Believe me Sticky - you are wonderful at establishing the truth on any subject and totally without bias of any kind. Your analysis of science and technology is awesome. Congrats.

Just two tiny questions - Does this also prove the Whitehouse never lied about the air quality? And second question, - and I'm sure you know the answer, - Why were Mossad agents jumping up and down with joy when the towers were hit??

What is it about you wacko nutjob liberal tree huggers?

So you admit then that there were no explosive charges and this is as they say a spade? I really dont know why you post. You aint all there. That is quite obvious to me.

Id guess you are one of those people that sit and tell stories to a group of people and no one really knows wtf you are talking about.

Did you not comprehend the two questions??? So sorry, I'll repeat them

dey ave nofin ew do wit es read.. ew do undarstan ah ords oming out ov ma mouf?

Ah... so basically the braincell is lost at the moment. That's fine, someone may find it for you - just stay calm and don't try to talk :thumbsup

Na.. na Sticky - posting nice little pictures does not help find your braincell :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

oh boy... ok.. i am not saying i disagree with you ryan, but why did the building fall at free fall speed?

my only problem is that all the debris was gotten rid of?

and, if it was that much destruction, why was atta's passport found intact?

why did the fireman say that the fire could be contained?

why are there reports that there was an empty truck found in the basement where the gold reserves were found?

why was most of the silver found, but very limited amounts of gold found?

these are just questions that i think need to be answered....

and many more....

Let me put it in english. THIS THREAD HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT YOU ARE YAPPING ABOUT.


Now following your modus operandi, you'll come in and make some down your nose looking comment that makes you appear to have the inside information on something. Maybe a quip about someone from GQ...

Unless you have something pertaining to what the thread is discussing, (that is we are discussing why it is very very stupid to say there were bombs, or missles or any other stupid conspiracy theory involved in the attacks on 911) then shut the fuck up, or maybe it would help you to hear it from someone who in circles talks.

http://www.deathclan.com/fun/up_the_shut_fuck.jpg

The buildings fell in such a manner due to the way they were constructed. Simple answer pancaking. Ill give a more thourough answer tommorow, for now its almost 4am and I should of been asleep 2 hours ago. Night all.

so what happened to tower 7? .. it was never hit or damaged by heavy fallout from the collapse of either of the twins... according to the government, small fires leveled this building, but fires have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper...

That is clearly a large airplane traveling at high velocity. But what gets me is that the tower does not itself give a shudder or anything... sure there is a great big explosion, and the force of the impact has conducted some of the plane's mass through to the other side of the building... but, the effect is one of ABSORPTION. The building remains very much as it was, the plane is obliterated. The tower won.

2hp

That's good news - someone obviously found your braincell and put it back. Don't forget to thank them :thumbsup

Now... about these Mossad agents gloating over the hit to the towers? Smells like something you would have a complete explanation for - not to forget the lying from your "leader" on the air quality.

BTW... What were the reasons for Iraq again???? Do enlighten :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

So.. you have it all worked out - and don't agree with the constuction analysis?

GFY is such an education - more on the human species than much else.

Franck and Stickyfingerz have won this thread, cheered on all the way by jumping Mossad agents.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

It didnt. Look at the debris, it falls faster than the building.

And how is a building supposed to collaps with TONS AND TONS of cement and steel coming down? Should it stop at each level for 10 secs? You think 1 level can hold the weight of 20 coming down?

SOMEONE'S NEVER PLAYED DONKEY KONG!

http://www.imagepup.com/up/Bgcu_1158055519_dknes.gif

Nice post

Thank you for closing this subject...

this shit was really starting to get annoying.

I will try to refer to this post as the #2 in every post that comes with stupid motherfucking braindead assumptions.

Haha, it is a FACT that GWB himself was even riding the missiles - Texas style! Yeeeehaw! :P

I heard that's happen beacuse towers was not good builded.

some sheer force
the builsding takes it well, until the end of course

It's well known that a massive chunk of one of the bottom 20 floors of the building were wiped out by the collapse of one of the towers. There is video of it too.

Errr .. it was already done twice.

The commision, NIST & FEMA have not been able to explain WTC 7 falling yet.

Meanwhile, insurance has paid up and the WTC owner apparently made out like a bandit.
Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties' estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. So: This building's collapse resulted in a profit of about $500 million.

Some of the tenants of WTC7:
IRS
CIA
US Secret Service
Departement of Defense
SEC

Conveniently destroyed: thousands of sensitive files relating to some of the biggest financial scams in history - including Enron and WorldCom -- were stored in the offices of some of the building's tenants.

I think you just like to try to keep things stirred up..

Explain this in that you seem to have the answers..

One of the buildings is hit on one side only.. with a large portion of the fuel expoding outside of the building, and no fire or intense heat on the other side, yet that side starts crumbing at the same time the damaged side did..

Fires burned for about an hour.. Not enough time to cause enough steel to melt to the extent of collapse.. (If you want to believe kerosene can melt hardened steel)

The buildings were designed to take 2 plane impacts from planes in that size range, yet both buildings failed.

The buildings fell at a speed and in a manner that has never happened other than from controlled demolition.

So you have 2 buildings designed to take multiple impacts, that were hit in different places, and had fires that burned for a very short period, yet they both fall in the exact same manner, at a rate only acheived through controlled demolition..

One building collapsing in that manner is unlikely enough, but two side by side collapsing in such a manner is a bit more than coincidence.

No.. I don't have the answers.. nor do you..

I just have questions, like a growing number of people in this country..

This is why it collapsed

Kinda funny they were able to do a controlled demo within a short period of time on wtc 7, which fell exactly as the 2 towers, yet it is oh so obsurd to think it could happen to them..

The majority of the fuel DID NOT burn off in the fireball - why do people keeping saying it did.

wow.. I did not know that about the Mossad agents
where did ya hear that from? Just curious.. though why they'd do it. No idea

why do y ou care what anyone else thinks?

im quite sure the truth will come out in 2-3 years

All of these firemen had to be on crack when they talked about explosions..
dang those conspiracy guys anyway... ROFL!!