I'd like to take this opportunity to than Ronald Reagan
 

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/01/wo...ge&oref=slogin

The country?s missile defense system passed a crucial test today as an interceptor missile launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California picked off a target missile over the Pacific Ocean, the Pentagon announced.
?I?m pleased to announce that the test that we executed today was a total success,? General Obering, the director of the Missile Defense Agency, said at a news briefing. ?In fact, it exceeded even our primary objective on the test. And we also met all the secondary objectives of the test.?
------------------------------------------------------------------
Over the objections of the liberal trash of his generation, Ronald Reagan instituted the "star wars" missle defense system. It was soundly ridiculed by the liberal trash.
Considering the UN will not keep ANYONE from obtaining nuclear technology or long range missle capability, we're given another example of Reagan's keen understanding of the world. Thank god he had the vision to begin this program 20 some years ago.

I guess you dont know how fake that shit is. They know when where how and have tracking on the missle and everything else. and it is still luck if its true.

no, no, you're right. It's all fake.:1orglaugh

Republicans suck

they sure do!:1orglaugh

12clicks you are the perfect news propaganda consumer.

Than is spelled "Tan".

If you want to tan Ronald Reagan here is a sunbed for you.

http://www.webvert.co.uk/cityspa/lon...unbed_girl.jpg

But it's going to be hard to tan a corpse. Especially an ex-president. But good luck.

Sure right.. Let's see a real test, try to destroy a hundred warheads with like.. 50 decoys.. Which ones to destroy? That if they are going to able to destroy even one..

Isn't it amazing how some people manage to shit in any thread that isn't outright sucking Hillary's dick?

Something tells me that Mr Reagan won't be reading this thank you note.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh good one!

hahaha, as opposed to you who probably have a shelf full of michael moore books.:1orglaugh

yeah, 'cause this one was fake.

oh, and you know when they first tested space flight, it wasn't real test and never lead to anything further.:1orglaugh

12Clicks - It is wasted energy posting anything like this on this board. This board is so blindly liberal it is sickening.

Pass the joint, man... and hand me a daisy.

man, they're LYING. How many times do they have to be shown as LIARS about this project before you get it thru your thick head? I bet you $100.00 that within a month an article comes out explaining exactly why this particular test is either a: misleading or b: insignificant.

Queue the old man...

And where will your source of this information be from? Dan Rather or the NYT?? Or Both??

Old enough to remember Reagan fucking up this country's economy by taking out short term, high interest loans to prop up the economy until he was out of office. Old enough to remember Ollie North starting a shadow war and lying to congress about it. Old enough to remember Republicans trying to name every street and building in the country after Reagan to rehab his rep and all you idiots buying it, just like you will when they start to do it for Bush.

Old enough to know that conservatives are totally un-american and that's true no matter how many flags they attach their bumper.

The fact that this has happened at least a dozen times before.

btw, if you think the NYT is an unreliable source of information, you're a complete fucking idiot and you'll swallow any propaganda they see fit to give you.

Hillary is just as bad as the rest of them. And Ronald Regan was probably the worst president we have ever had, second only to Lincoln and the Bushes.

You mean to get the country out of the disaster Jimmy Carter got is in... right?

I knew just by the title of this thread it would pull the morons out of the woodwork.

Ollie - This country has had a failed foreign policy since the dawn of time. Except for how Reagan dealt with the Soviet Union.

So you are not disputing Dan Rather is an unreliable source?

Why Lincoln? I don't know much about him so I'm just curious what was so bad. Though I do know he gets way too much credit for the abolition of slavery.

yeah, of that I have no doubt.
written by michael moore:winkwink:

He was a republican so he is automagically bad in the eyes of the toddlers on here.

Reagan didn't deal with the soviet union at all, he just continued the same policy we had had with them since WWII and happened to be in office when the whole situation came to a head. GOD you're so STUPID!!!

wow I guess the military rags have a liberal bias now too!
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51777
Just how dumb are you people, to eat this shit up the way you do?

OH, the media is SOOOOOOO liberal!!

"Note: This was written before September 11th, so don't
write to explain that Barbara Olson is dead, OK?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Myth of the "liberal" media

Let's do a "what if" so I can make a point. I think it's a good one.
I think it's so good, I'd like to hear from anyone who disagrees.

What if a show like Dateline did a "hatchet job" on George W. Bush?
It wouldn't have to really be a hatchet job, but any honest appraisal of that idiot's
qualifications would prove he's a non-thinking rich man's boy - and that's all.
But what would happen if Dateline did an unflattering portrait of Bush?

I'll tell you what would happen:

The vulgar Pigboy would spend at least three hours saying it wasn't true
and he'd offer hours of rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Bill O'Reilly would spend at least an hour on his show saying
it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Sean Hannity would walk all over Alan Colmes for an hour that night,
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Eva Von Zahn would spend at least an hour that night saying it wasn't true
and she'd offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

The Beltway Boys would spend at least an hour that night saying it
wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Brit Hume and Tony Snow would spend at least an hour on Sunday
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Juan Williams and Mara Liason would spend their entire allotted time
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

John McLaughlin would spend at least an hour on his syndicated show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Chris the Screamer would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

G. Gordon Liddy would spend at least three hours on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Laura the Whore would spend at least an hour on her radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Michael Medved would spend at least an hour on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Sam and Cokie would spend at least an hour on This Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

George (Judas Maximus) Steffi and George (dumb as a chimp) Will
would spend their entire allotted time swearing that it wasn't true.

Bob Scheiffer would spend at least an hour on Face the Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Tim the Catholic would spend at least an hour on Meet the Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

John Hockenberry would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Ollie North would spend at least an hour on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Robert Novak would spend at least an hour on his cable TV show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Paul Weyrich would spend at least an hour on his cable TV show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Still with me? We're close to the end...

BSNBC's Brian Williams would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Wolf the Whore would spend at least an hour on his show saying
it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Bill Schneider and Candy Crowley would do an hour special on CCN
(Clinton Cock Network) saying it wasn't true, and offering rebuttal.

John Stossel would have a special on ABC: Is lying OK for liberals?

Then Howie Kurtz would spend 30 minutes on Reliable Sources asking
if the media wasn't being too hard on a developmently-disabled child.

Barbara Olson would write a book condemning Dateline.
Ann Coulter would write a book condemning Dateline.
Laura Ingraham would write a book condemning Dateline.
Peggy Noonan would write a book condemning Dateline.
Andrew Sullivan would write a book condemning Dateline.
William Safire would write a book condemning Dateline.

OK, we're going to call the above "Exhibit A."

Now, everyone on that list has done at least a dozen hit pieces on Clinton.

My question is, Where is "Exhibit B?"

When those 38 people attack Clinton and his cock, who does the rebuttal?

Even you ditto-sheep have to admit that nobody on that list
has EVER defended a fabricated lie against the president.

There is no "Exhibit B," because there are so few liberal voices on television.
The closest you can get is Eleanor on McLaughlin or Geraldo, but there is barely
a liberal whisper on television, even though there are DOZENS of right-wing,
Smirk-apologist shows whose livelyhood is lying about liberals.

I don't think you ditto-heads can offer an answer."

http://www.bartcop.com/libmedia.htm

Do yourself and this great nation a big favor: Educate yourself or stop voting.

I will let you re-read the above post... ponder it... and then let you consult the facts.

You also have a bad habit of not addressing all of my rebuttals. I will assume you agree fully with my comment on Jimmy Carter and Dan Rather. It is becoming easier and easier knocking down your points with facts.

Using your statement you must also agree that Bill Clinton was in office during the Internet revolution so the economic windfall that took place during this time can not be attributed to him.

Now read the above, if you are able, and compare the Clinton situation to the swift boating of John Kerry and the rumors McCain and his black baby and his supposed collapse under torture and all the other vile shit that conservative politicians get up to. Conservatives are lying, hypocritical assholes. Why do you think supporting them while they fuck you and every other person in this business is something to be proud of?

Do yourself and this great nation a big favor: Educate yourself and stop smoking weed. The paranoia is out of control.

Wow, you have a tendency to drift all over the place. Put the bong down for a second and stay on topic. We are talking about outcomes of presidential terms. Last I checked John Kerry and McCain have not become president.

Business - I have thrived under Republican presidents. This is not my first rodeo...

Please answer my original question.

These thread all ways interest me thanks 12clicks.

:)

You have no rebuttal. You just say the name Dan Rather in a smartass way, whose only crime was in focusing attention on the fact that Bush went AWOL during vietnam.

You can make any excuse you want regarding the fact that Clinton presided over a very prosperous economy. The fact is he did, and Bush has fucked it up, and that's that.

And the main reason we didn't get the hostages back with Carter is because Reagan-Bush were in contact with the hostage takers and worked out a deal not to release them until Ronnie stepped into office.

Nice post about the "Liberal Media" Dig. It's very true.

No, because you're a tool and you have no interest in anything anyone says that doesn't agree with what you already believe. You're a typical conservatard and a waste of keystrokes. I just like posting that bartcop article in these threads because it makes you dumb fucks foam at the mouth and it's comical watching you try to ignore it.

Hahahahahahahaha


Okay, so you are saying that Reagan-Bush road blocked Jimmy Carter for 444 days knowing they would get into office? They additionally drove this country (head first) into the highest rates of inflation this country has ever seen? The highest rates of unemployment?

Dan Rather - So the ends justify the means? A news reporter should create documents because they know they are right? Stay on topic on this one, as I you will warp this into some paranoid rant.

Economy - I have made more money in the past 6 years, than at anytime in my life. Everyone around me is thriving... Clinton was in the right place at the right time. Post-Cold War (a la Reagan/Bush), Internet Explosion, etc.

Translation - "Every time I go toe to toe with you I lose. So it is easier to call you names and detract from the truth you are typing"

-dig420

The article - Actually made me laugh... You guys can try, but the facts are all that are needed to show the way.

yeah. You always beat me up, just like theking used to hahahahahahaha

hey has it EVER rang a suspicious bell with you that the hostages were released just moments after Reagan was inaugurated? That doesn't seem a little.... fishy?

oh of course not, the movie actor just scared the bejesus out of ayatollah khomeini and the suicide bomber types who took the hostages. Just had them shaking in their little boots. It's just a coincidence :1orglaugh

hey davidd, your president is a chicken hawk draft-dodging deserter and a spoiled rich boy with a fetish for cowboy clothes. Why do you like sucking his dick so much?

idiot. scumbag. traitor. anti-american. fool. pinhead. wannabe. broke-ass loser. sycophant.

So it appears you agree with Jimmy Carter driving the country into the ground economically. Good, case closed.

As for the Iranians... Yes, the Iranians knew Jimmy Carter as a pussy and that Ronald Reagan (as stated countless times in his run for the presidency) would have handled Iran differently. Did you forget the speeches leading up to the election??

I just did a search and found no reference to me stating Bush was 'my president'. This thread is about Ronald Reagan... who was my President.

As I have said for years, I am a Federalist. So currently I am not represented.

There is a lot more to that story than most people know

oh yeah, the religious fanatics were REALLY intimidated :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

how can you be so STUPID and still breathe?

idiot. fuckup. happily brainwashed moron. propaganda lover. conservatard. repugnican.

It is okay, I understand your inferiority complex. What is next... threats of violence? That is usually the final step when you have lost a debate.

"I am ghetto fabulous and I will kick your ass"
-dig420

I'm not violent as long as nobody gets violent with me. We're not having a debate, there's no point in debating someone like you. I'm just calling you names for my own personal enjoyment because you're a conservatard and you deserve it.

See I am already modifying your thinking process.

My work is done here...

This thread isn't near as entertaining as I thought it would be.

oh don't be so haughty