GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   I'd like to take this opportunity to than Ronald Reagan (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=651233)

germ 09-02-2006 01:22 PM

if politicians would stop playing politics and actually try to work together to get things done, the world would be a much better place.

im tired of people making decisions based solely on party lines, and not whats in the best interest of the country and their constituants. get off your liberal and conservative high horses and realize that there are some serious issues that only get complicated and made worse by these idiots that cant see beyond their party lines.

fuck the far right....fuck the far left....i find the middle ground to be the intelligent choice.



edit: 50 stereotypical gfy political posts.

dig420 09-02-2006 01:24 PM

there is no middle ground in this debate. The conservatives are totally corrupt. Either you're a brownshirt or you're not, stop thinking you're smarter than everyone else. You're not.

stickyfingerz 09-02-2006 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
yeah. You always beat me up, just like theking used to hahahahahahaha

hey has it EVER rang a suspicious bell with you that the hostages were released just moments after Reagan was inaugurated? That doesn't seem a little.... fishy?

oh of course not, the movie actor just scared the bejesus out of ayatollah khomeini and the suicide bomber types who took the hostages. Just had them shaking in their little boots. It's just a coincidence :1orglaugh

And I wonder what would of happend to them if the hostages hadnt been released? :winkwink:

Webby 09-02-2006 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/01/wo...ge&oref=slogin

The country?s missile defense system passed a crucial test today as an interceptor missile launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California picked off a target missile over the Pacific Ocean, the Pentagon announced.
?I?m pleased to announce that the test that we executed today was a total success,? General Obering, the director of the Missile Defense Agency, said at a news briefing. ?In fact, it exceeded even our primary objective on the test. And we also met all the secondary objectives of the test.?

Far be it for me to be to have any desire to correct your errors dear chap - but could you are least get the spelling/typos correct in your thread titles??

"I'd like to take this opportunity to than Ronald Reagan"

Can you also give CNN a call and tell them how to spell Pentagon? Much appreciated!

Quote:

Penatagon: Interceptor missile hits test target over Pacific
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/US/09/01....ap/index.html

Back to the subject - good news dear boy! It's nice to know the bunker hatches can be battened down and the seige mentality is embedded :winkwink:

To make real progress - try doing ten tests/day at a cost of $750mill. Sure, it means more taxes, but hey - it's in a good cause. Should take less than a year for the nation to reach the poverty line :thumbsup

12clicks 09-02-2006 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby
Far be it for me to be to have any desire to correct your errors dear chap - but could you are least get the spelling/typos correct in your thread titles??

"I'd like to take this opportunity to than Ronald Reagan"

Can you also give CNN a call and tell them how to spell Pentagon? Much appreciated!



http://edition.cnn.com/2006/US/09/01....ap/index.html

Back to the subject - good news dear boy! It's nice to know the bunker hatches can be battened down and the seige mentality is embedded :winkwink:

To make real progress - try doing ten tests/day at a cost of $750mill. Sure, it means more taxes, but hey - it's in a good cause. Should take less than a year for the nation to reach the poverty line :thumbsup

you know what they say about the intellect of people who want to point out typos don't you?

Temp1 09-02-2006 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidd
Translation - "Every time I go toe to toe with you I lose. So it is easier to call you names and detract from the truth you are typing"

-dig420

The article - Actually made me laugh... You guys can try, but the facts are all that are needed to show the way.

Why don't you offer a reasonable rebuttal to his post rather than the pathetic attempt at the evasive 'you made me laugh' response? C'mon now, you can resort to personal attacks to divert attention from the real issue but it doesn't mean everyone doesn't see it.

12clicks 09-02-2006 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Temp1
Why don't you offer a reasonable rebuttal to his post rather

you mean a post like this?

"""The conservatives are totally corrupt. Either you're a brownshirt or you're not""""





because you know, its such a reasoned argument to rebutt:winkwink:

Webby 09-02-2006 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks
you know what they say about the intellect of people who want to point out typos don't you?

Always wondered who "they" were. Never met a "they" yet dear chap. "They" were always used as an excuse.

12clicks 09-02-2006 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby
Always wondered who "they" were. Never met a "they" yet dear chap. "They" were always used as an excuse.

they would be we. We find children who point out typos insufferable. When the adults are speaking, we'd rather not be interrupted by children trying to show us how smart they are by shouting,"you forgot the e"

Webby 09-02-2006 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks
they would be we. We find children who point out typos insufferable. When the adults are speaking, we'd rather not be interrupted by children trying to show us how smart they are by shouting,"you forgot the e"

Ah.. so "they" is "we"?? Now.... I never knew that.

Damn.. I still just can't grasp who "we" are chap, but thanks for trying to help.

So, you are speaking for "we"? Does this take some form of collective voting to reach this high status? Is it another self-assuming status?



PS BTW... It was not the "e" that you missed. It was the "k" in "thank".

dig420 09-02-2006 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks
you mean a post like this?

"""The conservatives are totally corrupt. Either you're a brownshirt or you're not""""





because you know, its such a reasoned argument to rebutt:winkwink:

if more people had stood up in 1930's Germany and said that there are NOT two sides to the argument; that the National Socialist Party was a pure and untempered evil and a harm to the nation and the world; if they hadn't listened to the weak milksops who thought both sides had a valid point ~ we wouldn't had to kill all those hottie German and Japanese women.

The conservative element in our society right now are classic facists, in the correct and accurate definition of the word. Their voice needs to be drowned out by disgusted and more perceptive citizens. They should be forced back in the closet and under the sheet. They are traitors to the ideals our country was founded on, and they're willing to say anything and pander to anybody to get enough votes to enact their vile and rotten agenda. Republitard sheep need to be told that they're sheep. They may not understand right off the bat, but it might sink in the 10th time they're told the same lie. Or maybe not. How many times has the myth of the 'liberal media' been disproved? The 'out of control trial lawyers' myth exposed as a creation of the insurance industry? it doesn't seem to matter.

You believe whatever your Marlboro Man macho dude self-image demands you believe, regardless of what the obvious and objective truth is. The thing that sucks is that you empower some truly frightening people with your undeserved vote.

Webby 09-02-2006 03:09 PM

Just wanted to say thanks for contacting CNN and pointing out their spelling error chap - they have now corrected this:

Quote:

Pentagon: Interceptor missile hits test target over Pacific
Just as well - else we'd have the President referring to the Pentagon as the "Penatagon". He's got enough problems with speech without adding to them :thumbsup

dig420 09-02-2006 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby
Just wanted to say thanks for contacting CNN and pointing out their spelling error chap - they have now corrected this:



Just as well - else we'd have the President referring to the Pentagon as the "Penatagon". He's got enough problems with speech without adding to them :thumbsup

his reading preferences are epileptic indeed :1orglaugh

pocketkangaroo 09-02-2006 03:20 PM

Democrats and Republicans. Two people that wake up in the morning and have to grab a memo to tell them what they should believe.

dig420 09-02-2006 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo
Democrats and Republicans. Two people that wake up in the morning and have to grab a memo to tell them what they should believe.

you're exactly the type of person I'm talking about above. So convinced you're smarter than everyone else, so 'above the fray', that it makes you an idiot.

pocketkangaroo 09-02-2006 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
you're exactly the type of person I'm talking about above. So convinced you're smarter than everyone else, so 'above the fray', that it makes you an idiot.

Nothing I stated is false. What human beings believe exactly the same things as everyone else? You are lambasted for going against even one belief of the party. Just watch TV and see all the Democrats and Republicans argue, they have a hard time figuring out what they are supposed to believe on a given day.

Political parties are bad either way you look at it.

escorpio 09-02-2006 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
So convinced you're smarter than everyone else, so 'above the fray', that it makes you an idiot.

That's funny, that's exactly how I view your posts. It amuses me when you use terms like "sheep" and republitards". Congrats to the Dems for having done such a good job selling themselves to you as "The Party of Intelligence and Cool". Being a Democrat is like a religion to you. You are so in denail you as a pornographer have stated "they would never come after me!" Wake the fuck up.

escorpio 09-02-2006 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
there is no middle ground in this debate. The conservatives are totally corrupt. Either you're a brownshirt or you're not,

How is this statment any different than a republican saying "If you're against the Patriot Act, you're with the terrorists. You're either for us or against us!"?

tony286 09-02-2006 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
wow I guess the military rags have a liberal bias now too!
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51777
Just how dumb are you people, to eat this shit up the way you do?

OH, the media is SOOOOOOO liberal!!

"Note: This was written before September 11th, so don't
write to explain that Barbara Olson is dead, OK?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Myth of the "liberal" media

Let's do a "what if" so I can make a point. I think it's a good one.
I think it's so good, I'd like to hear from anyone who disagrees.

What if a show like Dateline did a "hatchet job" on George W. Bush?
It wouldn't have to really be a hatchet job, but any honest appraisal of that idiot's
qualifications would prove he's a non-thinking rich man's boy - and that's all.
But what would happen if Dateline did an unflattering portrait of Bush?

I'll tell you what would happen:

The vulgar Pigboy would spend at least three hours saying it wasn't true
and he'd offer hours of rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Bill O'Reilly would spend at least an hour on his show saying
it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Sean Hannity would walk all over Alan Colmes for an hour that night,
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Eva Von Zahn would spend at least an hour that night saying it wasn't true
and she'd offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

The Beltway Boys would spend at least an hour that night saying it
wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Brit Hume and Tony Snow would spend at least an hour on Sunday
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Juan Williams and Mara Liason would spend their entire allotted time
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

John McLaughlin would spend at least an hour on his syndicated show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Chris the Screamer would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

G. Gordon Liddy would spend at least three hours on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Laura the Whore would spend at least an hour on her radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Michael Medved would spend at least an hour on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Sam and Cokie would spend at least an hour on This Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

George (Judas Maximus) Steffi and George (dumb as a chimp) Will
would spend their entire allotted time swearing that it wasn't true.

Bob Scheiffer would spend at least an hour on Face the Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Tim the Catholic would spend at least an hour on Meet the Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

John Hockenberry would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Ollie North would spend at least an hour on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Robert Novak would spend at least an hour on his cable TV show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Paul Weyrich would spend at least an hour on his cable TV show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Still with me? We're close to the end...

BSNBC's Brian Williams would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Wolf the Whore would spend at least an hour on his show saying
it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Bill Schneider and Candy Crowley would do an hour special on CCN
(Clinton Cock Network) saying it wasn't true, and offering rebuttal.

John Stossel would have a special on ABC: Is lying OK for liberals?

Then Howie Kurtz would spend 30 minutes on Reliable Sources asking
if the media wasn't being too hard on a developmently-disabled child.

Barbara Olson would write a book condemning Dateline.
Ann Coulter would write a book condemning Dateline.
Laura Ingraham would write a book condemning Dateline.
Peggy Noonan would write a book condemning Dateline.
Andrew Sullivan would write a book condemning Dateline.
William Safire would write a book condemning Dateline.

OK, we're going to call the above "Exhibit A."

Now, everyone on that list has done at least a dozen hit pieces on Clinton.

My question is, Where is "Exhibit B?"

When those 38 people attack Clinton and his cock, who does the rebuttal?

Even you ditto-sheep have to admit that nobody on that list
has EVER defended a fabricated lie against the president.

There is no "Exhibit B," because there are so few liberal voices on television.
The closest you can get is Eleanor on McLaughlin or Geraldo, but there is barely
a liberal whisper on television, even though there are DOZENS of right-wing,
Smirk-apologist shows whose livelyhood is lying about liberals.

I don't think you ditto-heads can offer an answer."

http://www.bartcop.com/libmedia.htm
Do yourself and this great nation a big favor: Educate yourself or stop voting.


That is so true and I cant believe the sheep dont see it? How they talk about Michael Moore, when there is at least 40 hrs of right wing crap on every fucking week.Ann Coulter says some of the most irresponsible fucked up shit and its no big deal. If Al Franken said the same thing about the 911 widows their would of been calls for his head. Also if the media was so liberal the national enquirer wouldn't of broke the Rush Limbaugh drug story, the so called liberal media would of jumped all over it. If the Clinton admin given a gay whore press credentials under a fake name during a time of so called increased security who only threw the president soft ball questions, it would of been months of talk, a few books and senate review.

Pleasurepays 09-02-2006 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by devilspost
I guess you dont know how fake that shit is. They know when where how and have tracking on the missle and everything else. and it is still luck if its true.

there have been many tests, the last major ones were world news and the subject of much debate... this was not the first.

you not only need to get back on your meds... you need to up the dosage.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Pleasurepays 09-02-2006 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
you're exactly the type of person I'm talking about above. So convinced you're smarter than everyone else, so 'above the fray', that it makes you an idiot.

And your posts are objective, enlightening and design to help teach others through the encouragment of open debate and objective discussion on the issues.







haha.. sorry.. just saw who i was talking to.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Pleasurepays 09-02-2006 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404
That is so true and I cant believe the sheep dont see it? How they talk about Michael Moore, when there is at least 40 hrs of right wing crap on every fucking week.Ann Coulter says some of the most irresponsible fucked up shit and its no big deal. If Al Franken said the same thing about the 911 widows their would of been calls for his head. Also if the media was so liberal the national enquirer wouldn't of broke the Rush Limbaugh drug story, the so called liberal media would of jumped all over it. If the Clinton admin given a gay whore press credentials under a fake name during a time of so called increased security who only threw the president soft ball questions, it would of been months of talk, a few books and senate review.

welcome to politics... both sides arguing about why the other is fucked up.... and both being absolutely positive they are right about everything.

wisdom is knowing that both views are opposite sides of the same coin and neither is more correct more often than the other... hence their existence and balance they bring to each other.

Jman 09-02-2006 05:24 PM

Ask Larry, he will tell you the TRUTH

http://www.booksrevisited.com/booksr...0758204833.jpg

Brujah 09-02-2006 05:30 PM

http://www.abietto.net/pics/post/fawkes.jpg

devilspost 09-02-2006 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
there have been many tests, the last major ones were world news and the subject of much debate... this was not the first.

you not only need to get back on your meds... you need to up the dosage.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Thanks for the reminder, I will get back to my boondoggle.. whoops I mean bong.

minusonebit 09-02-2006 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly
Why Lincoln? I don't know much about him so I'm just curious what was so bad. Though I do know he gets way too much credit for the abolition of slavery.

Lincoln fought the civil war not to free the slaves (as most people would like to kid themselves into beliving) but to destory states rights. He did a damn good job of it, too. Look where we are today.

dig420 09-02-2006 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by escorpio
How is this statment any different than a republican saying "If you're against the Patriot Act, you're with the terrorists. You're either for us or against us!"?

because the Patriot Act TAKES AWAY YOUR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS YOU FUCKING REPUBLITARD!!! Of course, being a republitard, you're too goddam stupid to see the difference between someone TAKING AWAY your rights and someone defending them. Hence you are too stupid to vote. So stop.

dig420 09-02-2006 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
welcome to politics... both sides arguing about why the other is fucked up.... and both being absolutely positive they are right about everything.

wisdom is knowing that both views are opposite sides of the same coin and neither is more correct more often than the other... hence their existence and balance they bring to each other.

no dumbass. Saying they're both the same doesn't make you wise, it makes you a moron. They are NOT the same, and you are NOT wise. You are a sheep.

badmin 09-02-2006 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly
This thread isn't near as entertaining as I thought it would be.

I dunno...this asshat dig420 owning himself is pretty fucking funny.

mikeyddddd 09-02-2006 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks
I'd like to take this opportunity to than(sic) Ronald Reagan

I think you may be just a wee bit too late.

Don't forget to tell him when you get to Republican heaven where all the congressional districts are jerrymandered, all ballots come equipped with hanging chads, individual rights are not recognized and the liberal media have neither tongues to speak nor hands to write.

stickyfingerz 09-02-2006 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
because the Patriot Act TAKES AWAY YOUR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS YOU FUCKING REPUBLITARD!!! Of course, being a republitard, you're too goddam stupid to see the difference between someone TAKING AWAY your rights and someone defending them. Hence you are too stupid to vote. So stop.

Name one right you have lost.

escorpio 09-02-2006 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
because the Patriot Act TAKES AWAY YOUR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS YOU FUCKING REPUBLITARD!!! Of course, being a republitard, you're too goddam stupid to see the difference between someone TAKING AWAY your rights and someone defending them. Hence you are too stupid to vote. So stop.

Democrats defending your rights? :1orglaugh There are many democrats that would love to take away your rights, especially when it comes to pornography.

P.S. I am not a Republican, you Demoron.

escorpio 09-02-2006 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
because the Patriot Act TAKES AWAY YOUR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS YOU FUCKING REPUBLITARD!!! Of course, being a republitard, you're too goddam stupid to see the difference between someone TAKING AWAY your rights and someone defending them. Hence you are too stupid to vote. So stop.

I think you missed the point in your hysterical rush to namecall like a good liberal. My point was that you are no different than a republican when you make absolute statements that say anyone that dares to question you is siding with the enemy.

Thomas N 09-02-2006 08:47 PM

As much as 12clicks sticks to his views, I have never seen as much of a one-sided, toe the line of ANYTHING my party tells me sheep as Dig420. Jesus, if liberals told you air was conservative, you'd stop breathing and die instantly.

You are a decent businessman but you really aren't cut out for this political stuff. You are 100% convinced 1 side is 100% right on every issue and you make an ass of yourself every time you try to prove it in every thread.

dig420 09-02-2006 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
Name one right you have lost.

how about you look up the Patriot Act bright guy?

fucking conservatards

stickyfingerz 09-02-2006 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
how about you look up the Patriot Act bright guy?

fucking conservatards

Ive read it. Now answer the question.

Name one you have lost. Shouldnt be hard.

dig420 09-02-2006 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
Ive read it. Now answer the question.

Name one you have lost. Shouldnt be hard.

the right to make a phone call without the govt. listening in without a warrant. The right for american citizens to a speedy trial, to know the charges against them and to have the services of an attorney. Took me about 2 seconds to list a reason after reading your post. If I go research it I could probably give you 50. But it wouldn't matter, because you're a conservatard and you just can't wait to have a president for life GWB.

because dems and repubs are just the same right? sure, the dems would have had a gitmo.

Fucking conservatards.

stickyfingerz 09-02-2006 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
the right to make a phone call without the govt. listening in without a warrant. The right for american citizens to a speedy trial, to know the charges against them and to have the services of an attorney. Took me about 2 seconds to list a reason after reading your post. If I go research it I could probably give you 50. But it wouldn't matter, because you're a conservatard and you just can't wait to have a president for life GWB.

because dems and repubs are just the same right? sure, the dems would have had a gitmo.

Fucking conservatards.

Let me repeat.

What right have YOU lost.

Unless you are speaking to a terror suspect I think your phone calls are safe.

List the citizens you know of that are currently being held without a trial date.

What is considered speedy to you? Cause there are lots of criminals that are awaiting trial several years.

Not getting into this though. Just a short few questions is all. :winkwink:

minusonebit 09-02-2006 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
Ive read it. Now answer the question.

Name one you have lost. Shouldnt be hard.

How about the right not to have my local public school invaded with military recruiters looking to enlist...er...enslave some young men to die for Hitler's little toy army?

I'd much rather that BoyAlley find them and make porn stars out of them.

stickyfingerz 09-02-2006 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit
How about the right not to have my local public school invaded with military recruiters looking to enlist...er...enslave some young men to die for Hitler's little toy army?

I'd much rather that BoyAlley find them and make porn stars out of them.

Thats possibly the stupidest thing ever said. By this though Ive deduced that you are probably in highschool? lol All makes sense now lol

minusonebit 09-02-2006 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
Thats possibly the stupidest thing ever said. By this though Ive deduced that you are probably in highschool? lol All makes sense now lol

I'm glad to see you think its funny. No, I am 24 and have been out of HS for some time. Not that I miss it any, I resisted attempts to be programmed and turned into sheep powered by mush brains.

But after being arrested for tresspassing (on the grounds of a school that my tax dollars built, imagine that, so much for public property) handing out flyers on this topic, I dont find it too funny anymore. It ought to be unconsitutional.

Pleasurepays 09-02-2006 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
no dumbass. Saying they're both the same doesn't make you wise, it makes you a moron. They are NOT the same, and you are NOT wise. You are a sheep.

You hate that i am right. I did not say they are "the same" i said they are two sides of the same coin... i.e. two sets of idiots arguing one side of a two sided argument as if there is only one side.

Ron is better than you because he is honest about what he is. You, on the other hand are in denial about what you are you think their is only one blanket answer to every complex political question and issue and can't be honest enough with yourself to accept that both sides could be right, or you could be wrong on any particular issue.

proof positive that Berkley does this country a great disservice in turning out tunnel visioned poly-sci majors.

but yeah... i'm "sheep" because ... uhm... why again? i never said you are wrong about anything here. i just said you are one sided and biased and pretending you're not.





and all the bullshit you are babbling about Dig in the patriot act is a little foolish. As you seem to have forgotten, 90% of more of the Patriot Act was the brain child of the Clinton administration... OOOPS! wait a minute... isn't he your hero who can do no wrong and will be remembered as the greatest president ever? Bush passed it and is stealing your right to breath?

hahaha... the irony and sillyness of your arguments makes my head hurt.

stickyfingerz 09-02-2006 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit
I'm glad to see you think its funny. No, I am 24 and have been out of HS for some time. Not that I miss it any, I resisted attempts to be programmed and turned into sheep powered by mush brains.

But after being arrested for tresspassing (on the grounds of a school that my tax dollars built, imagine that, so much for public property) handing out flyers on this topic, I dont find it too funny anymore. It ought to be unconsitutional.

Did you get a permit to hand out the fliers? Did you follow the laws? Nope didnt think so. So you you were an adult handing out fliers to children without permission of the school........ ya nice one. :1orglaugh

dig420 09-02-2006 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
Let me repeat.

What right have YOU lost.

Unless you are speaking to a terror suspect I think your phone calls are safe.

List the citizens you know of that are currently being held without a trial date.

What is considered speedy to you? Cause there are lots of criminals that are awaiting trial several years.

Not getting into this though. Just a short few questions is all. :winkwink:

oh I see, if it doesn't happen to me PERSONALLY then it's not happening and it never COULD happen to me, simply because it hasn't happened yet. I'd repost that thing about 'I stayed quiet because I was not a jew' but there's no point. Conservatards are ignorant. Some of them are even deliberately ignorant, and really there's no helping you. Either you grow up or you don't.

Jose Padilla was held for THREE fucking years without being charged adn would still not be charged if it was up to the Bush administration. Why don't you read something instead of simple, stupid questions that you should already know the answer to if you're going to yap off in this discussion like you think you actually have something to contribute?

dig420 09-02-2006 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
You hate that i am right. I did not say they are "the same" i said they are two sides of the same coin... i.e. two sets of idiots arguing one side of a two sided argument as if there is only one side.

Ron is better than you because he is honest about what he is. You, on the other hand are in denial about what you are you think their is only one blanket answer to every complex political question and issue and can't be honest enough with yourself to accept that both sides could be right, or you could be wrong on any particular issue.

proof positive that Berkley does this country a great disservice in turning out tunnel visioned poly-sci majors.

but yeah... i'm "sheep" because ... uhm... why again? i never said you are wrong about anything here. i just said you are one sided and biased and pretending you're not.





and all the bullshit you are babbling about Dig in the patriot act is a little foolish. As you seem to have forgotten, 90% of more of the Patriot Act was the brain child of the Clinton administration... OOOPS! wait a minute... isn't he your hero who can do no wrong and will be remembered as the greatest president ever? Bush passed it and is stealing your right to breath?

hahaha... the irony and sillyness of your arguments makes my head hurt.

All you people that try to seem so sophisticated, who think they're 'all the same'.. you're just stupid. You've tried to stay so open minded that your brain has fallen out. Except you're not really open minded at all, because you have to be a goddam idiot not to object when the govt. tries to take away your civil rights.

minusonebit 09-02-2006 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
Did you get a permit to hand out the fliers? Did you follow the laws? Nope didnt think so. So you you were an adult handing out fliers to children without permission of the school........ ya nice one. :1orglaugh

Yep, I had a permit:

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bill of Rights
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

And they arent "children". If they are old enough to go to war and die, they're old enough to know that the schools are being made to sell thier directory information to recruiters so they can be nagged 24/7 about it.

stickyfingerz 09-02-2006 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
oh I see, if it doesn't happen to me PERSONALLY then it's not happening and it never COULD happen to me, simply because it hasn't happened yet. I'd repost that thing about 'I stayed quiet because I was not a jew' but there's no point. Conservatards are ignorant. Some of them are even deliberately ignorant, and really there's no helping you. Either you grow up or you don't.

Jose Padilla was held for THREE fucking years without being charged adn would still not be charged if it was up to the Bush administration. Why don't you read something instead of simple, stupid questions that you should already know the answer to if you're going to yap off in this discussion like you think you actually have something to contribute?

Oh so you are saying he was innocent then right? Or does it make sense that once its a court case information is made public? Information that was being used to track down others involved.


Quote:

The Brooklyn-born Padilla, a former gang member twice imprisoned in the United States, was arrested in May 2002 at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago, Illinois.

A convert to Islam, he took the name Abdullah al-Muhajir when he moved to Egypt in 1998. He allegedly trained at al Qaeda's military camps in Afghanistan in 2000 after being recruited by a Yemeni man he met on a pilgrimage to Mecca, according to the government.

The Justice Department said last year that Padilla has told interrogators that before the September 11 terror attacks he met with al Qaeda's late military chief, Mohamed Atef, about the apartment bombing plot, and Abu Zubaydah, the terror group's accused operations chief who is now in custody, about stealing radioactive material to be used in a crude explosive device.
You're right lets let him go. Give him a nice parting gift, and a business loan to get back on his feet. :thumbsup

stickyfingerz 09-02-2006 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit
Yep, I had a permit:



And they arent "children". If they are old enough to go to war and die, they're old enough to know that the schools are being made to sell thier directory information to recruiters so they can be nagged 24/7 about it.

I call bullshit. You had a permit, yet got arrested.... Want to try again? What reason did you get arrested for?

Wouldnt be the first time you posted bullshit on these forums. :1orglaugh

DateDoc 09-02-2006 10:07 PM

We need another Reagan as president and don't mean his liberal son just someone that thinks like him.

minusonebit 09-02-2006 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
I call bullshit. You had a permit, yet got arrested.... Want to try again? What reason did you get arrested for?

Wouldnt be the first time you posted bullshit on these forums. :1orglaugh

My permit was applied for by the revoultionary war, and granted when the consitution was enacted. Like I said, trespassing (on public property, property and buildings that I pay to maintain.)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123