![]() |
RK Media (Nasty$) Sued by Eight Recording Studios
http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/07/09/28701.htm
Claiming 500 violations at $150k per violation before punitive damages. |
LOS ANGELES (CN) - Major recording studios sued pay-to-see Internet website operators, claiming they violate copyright by synchronizing pornographic videos to songs by major artists. The studios claim that Miami-based RK Netmedia and Realitykings.com "are engaged in copyright infringement of the most blatant and offensive kind." They want the websites shut down, and punitive damages.
Warner Bros. and others claim the unlicensed use of their recordings in pornographic videos "tarnishes" the songs and "diminishes their value." "In no uncertain terms, defendants are engaged in copyright infringement of the most blatant and offensive kind," the complaint states. "Defendants know that major record labels, recording artists, and music publishers do not license their works for use in such pornographic content, especially the type of extreme, sexually explicit videos that defendants produce and distribute. So, defendants simply stole these sound recordings and musical compositions, synchronizing plaintiffs' works more that 500 times into the soundtrack of their pornographic video without license or consent from plaintiffs, apparently hoping that their conduct would go unnoticed." The defendants own and operate "no fewer than 28" for-profit websites that sell and distribute pornography, according to the complaint. The complaint includes an 18-page list of violated copyrights, and claims that "defendants not only incorporated plaintiffs' works into their videos, but then used them to draw an audience to their Web site and to advertise and promote the videos, including by naming the videos after popular songs." Besides lead plaintiff Warner Bros. plaintiffs include Elektra, Atlantic, and eight other studios. In addition to disgorgement, punitive damages and an injunction, the studios demand maximum statutory damages of $150,000 per copyright violation. The studios are represented by David Steinberg with Mitchell Silberberg. |
can we get a smart assed snide off the cuff comment from pipecrew please?
|
Yep...NEVER use other people's music for your stuff. I can't believe that they are dumb enough to do that.
|
SHIT....I bet they are focusing on INTHEVIP.com with club music in the background.
FUCK Warner Bros. |
Nevermind
|
Quote:
|
i was wondering when that would happen. they use mainstream music in their videos all the time
|
Quote:
people should do their research before posting in this thread. |
Quote:
Night clubs have to pay a fee every year for the music that DJ's, cover bands, and jukebox's play. They didn't use to be real bad about enforcing it...but in recent years with piracy killing the music industry, they are looking to pick up any and all money left on the table |
Quote:
I am sure that gideongallery will clear up your confusion for you momentarily. I believe a time machine, VCR and cloud will be involved. :2 cents: |
I have often wondered why this doesn't happen more often. You see porn with copyrighted music in it all the time and these are big, well known artists so you know the studios didn't pay the licensing fees.
|
Quote:
|
Yeah i talked to a lady once about her having music in her retail store. she was sent a bill for broadcasting it.
those music guys are cut throat |
Quote:
|
Fair use since the music sucks.
|
Quote:
and judging by all your negative posts. You could use a http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_agHXcORx9e.../group-hug.jpg |
Ouch!....
|
http://www.xbiz.com/news/122621
?As a copyright holder, RK greatly respects the need to enforce one?s intellectual property rights,? RK Netmedia attorney Lawrence Walters told XBIZ. ?That being said, there are some important fair use and 1st Amendment issues inherent in this action. It is RK?s hope that we can achieve a resolution to this matter that protects both the plaintiff?s copyright interests and RK?s right to free expression and commentary on popular culture.? |
yikes ... 75m buckaroos :Oh crap
|
they are dumb enuff to use MOV format galleries, so what ya expect? brains?
|
Only a dumbass didn't see this coming eventually. If they are calling businesses specifically to try and hear music playing in the background that they can then sue the business for publicly playing, then yea, they'll have no qualms suing some porn company for playing unlicensed music in their vids.
|
Interesting. I wonder how this one will pan out?
|
Quote:
Sorry but this gets those guys a great big "I TOLD YOU SO!!!" |
Giddeon must be in court today to not hear from him yet.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Well done Kristin. |
a lot of companies add music to their videos without permission, not many companies have been caught
|
and i wonder why nothing
|
Quote:
Had it been a guy doing ten joins per day ... Might be a different story. |
FUCK YOU!
I can upload a video to YOUTUBE/REDTUBE/YOUPORN/etcTUBE with music in the background at a club that I recorded with my ANDROID and even watermark it as my own. FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT! calling the Pirate Bay... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Robert and Kevin...goodluck! :1orglaugh
Hope you didn't spend that few mil on Shaq's mansion. :1orglaugh |
|
i dunno - you learn in first recording lesson not to use copyrighted music in the background.. not sure what went wrong here
|
Quote:
|
whats ever funnier is they own their own record label.
:winkwink: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You just scored again |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123