GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   RK Media (Nasty$) Sued by Eight Recording Studios (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=977299)

SleazyDream 07-09-2010 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kristin (Post 17323735)
I think it's the quantity and well, RK isn't small.

Had it been a guy doing ten joins per day ... Might be a different story.

#1 rule in suing anyone - they must have the money to be able to pay if you win!

SleazyDream 07-09-2010 11:20 PM

the lawsuit could take years.................

Far-L 07-10-2010 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SleazyDream (Post 17324189)
#1 rule in suing anyone - they must have the money to be able to pay if you win!

Yes, totally true in most cases... but we are talking attorneys for Ascap/BMI and they don't give a damn about that when they are willing to sue teenagers for downloads... A defendant with cash is just their wet dreams come true.

Pornwolf 07-10-2010 12:59 AM

They will settle for a fraction of that amount.

Too bad they don't still have Jim Jonsin. He could have been some leverage here. lol

Far-L 07-10-2010 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSenator (Post 17323767)
FUCK YOU!

I can upload a video to YOUTUBE/REDTUBE/YOUPORN/etcTUBE with music in the background at a club that I recorded with my ANDROID and even watermark it as my own.

FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT!


calling the Pirate Bay...

You have absolutely no clue or you are being facetious and I hope that is the case. Perhaps you could add a :winkwink: to clarify...

For the record, people don't have a right to the music to publish it for personal gain when it is recorded on private property without permission no matter what you think. Time for you to go back to school and brush up on the First Amendment... and once you get up to speed on Constitutional Law then you might consider some IP remedial classes as well.

And for the record... just because you or anyone else hasn't been "caught" yet doesn't make it ok. It just makes it a liability that should not be overlooked.

Larry Walters is a great First Amendment specialist so that is why he is taking that approach in his media quote but even he knows from his first year of Law School how Copyrights work and how much Case Law there is in support of those rights. It would just look really bad if he said "my clients are in a really, really freaking difficult position and they should probably get some big IP guns in here quick to broker a manageable settlement."

Raf1 07-10-2010 01:30 AM

I was wondering when this would come. It was pretty clear to quite a lot of people that they were going to get into trouble over this.

FeelMyTube 07-10-2010 01:47 AM

sucks big time, music studios are just desperate and trying to go after anyone they can. they have an army of lwayers on the payroll that have to show up with something.

maxxtro 07-10-2010 02:31 AM

CD sales must be down a lot more this year I guess

pradaboy 07-10-2010 06:38 AM

Wow that's amazingly stupid for a big operation like RK.

Quote:

especially the type of extreme
That said, what "extreme" sites do they run exactly?

CaptainHowdy 07-10-2010 06:44 AM

I'll be dammed... they can't afford music?

Caligari 07-10-2010 07:00 AM


jockboy60 07-10-2010 07:06 AM

wow, copyright infringement is not good.... it pays to be very careful...

eRock 07-10-2010 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fris (Post 17323727)
a lot of companies add music to their videos without permission, not many companies have been caught

It's because RK Media has money. Plus, the music industry is REALLY cracking down on copyright infringement. The current industry is changing dramatically & the dinosaurs are grasping at anything to stay in business.

Fat Panda 07-10-2010 07:28 AM

I hope ND can weather this storm...

nikki99 07-10-2010 07:43 AM

once I heard my music on the bus I was traveling... was a poor bus from a fucked up town, obviously piracy, I went so mad :mad:

pornlaw 07-10-2010 08:44 AM

Just like the Florida A&M IP lawsuit that RK settled very quickly, so will this one.

Larry is a great First Amendment attorney, but this isnt going to be a First Amendment case.

I cant image that RK doesnt have the funds to settle, but this one is going to hurt. The only question I have is will the records label make an example out of RK and push this one since there is little chance of a successful defense. They would also be entitled to attorneys fees at the end.

The other question that this case raises is whether it is now hunting season on all adult sites/DVDs by labels. Why stop with RK ?

I can see more copyright infringement lawsuits in the future.

crockett 07-10-2010 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17323465)
You spoke too soon fine sire.

I am sure that gideongallery will clear up your confusion for you momentarily.

I believe a time machine, VCR and cloud will be involved.

:2 cents:

Yes it's obvious they were just time shifting..

sinclair 07-10-2010 09:03 AM

Now WTF couldn't I have seen the position listed for the person that was hired to actually watch and catalog all the scenes that infringed on the copyright?

WiredGuy 07-10-2010 10:44 AM

Which sites by RK were named in the suits?
WG

gfy1016 07-10-2010 03:21 PM

would this lawsuit explain why my ND stats suck this month?

Juilan 07-10-2010 04:52 PM

is INtheVip mentioned in the suit?

Agent 488 07-10-2010 04:54 PM

rip nasty dollars?

Pics Traffic 07-10-2010 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSenator (Post 17323452)
Most of the music from INTHEVIP comes from the club which is kinda public domain.

No its not. You cant even shoot Mardi Gras type content with music from the bars in the background.

rowan 07-10-2010 06:09 PM

With regards to club music being "public domain"

I've noticed shows on TV often replace the background music and ambience with generic music. If someone talks they quickly fade in and out with each word, so you can't pick up the beat of the real music that's playing.

No doubt they do this to avoid legal/licensing issues.

V_RocKs 07-11-2010 12:31 AM

The crazy shit is that they own a record company... So why not use your own music in the club?

LickMyBalls 07-11-2010 12:34 AM

So they didn't Dmca RK? So what's the difference here?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=CY4KqzDy3e8

crazytrini85 07-11-2010 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 17324777)
Yes it's obvious they were just time shifting..

gideongallery is the dumbest smart sounded person I've ever come across.

Time shifting. Really . . . wow.

kane 07-11-2010 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LickMyBalls (Post 17326033)
So they didn't Dmca RK? So what's the difference here?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=CY4KqzDy3e8

I think the difference is that youtube is posting that full music video and making money off of it while RK is using the music in their movies. Youtube can hide behind the DMCA because because they claim they are just a host and don't control the user uploads. RK took the music, used it as a soundtrack then sold the videos (or memberships to the sites where you can access the videos.)

Thumbnailer 07-11-2010 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 17326051)
I think the difference is that youtube is posting that full music video and making money off of it while RK is using the music in their movies. Youtube can hide behind the DMCA because because they claim they are just a host and don't control the user uploads. RK took the music, used it as a soundtrack then sold the videos (or memberships to the sites where you can access the videos.)

Youtube plays very smart here
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/ma...pyrigh t.html

Nathan 07-11-2010 01:42 AM

Until you all understand The meaning of "copyrighted" content and "infringing" content; and until you understand what creating/using yourself versus offering a service actually means, you will all never understand DMCA!

The comments in some of these posts comparing this to tube sites is just scary.

Amputate Your Head 07-11-2010 02:03 AM

This is why smart operators hire people like me to design original soundtracks and shit. A proper license wins every time. I have never understood how people can stand up for copyright protection, shoot original content, spend money on developers and programmers and the whole enchilada.... then score it with unlicensed music. Bizarre.

lazycash 07-11-2010 04:07 AM

http://http://planetmoviez.com/SiteSeizedNOTICE.JPG

punkpred 07-11-2010 04:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eRock (Post 17324622)
It's because RK Media has money. Plus, the music industry is REALLY cracking down on copyright infringement. The current industry is changing dramatically & the dinosaurs are grasping at anything to stay in business.

So motherfucking true!

D Ghost 07-11-2010 04:08 PM

Hey Doc, hit me up when you get a sec...

$5 submissions 07-11-2010 04:11 PM

Quick, get a lawyer that is versed in the art of SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS.

LickMyBalls 07-11-2010 04:23 PM

Great Exposure for the RK brand! Wonder how many people, who never knew, will check them out. Thanks TMZ! :1orglaugh

$5 submissions 07-11-2010 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fris (Post 17323727)
a lot of companies add music to their videos without permission, not many companies have been caught

It's all about how big the allegedly infringing company is.

sortie 07-11-2010 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eRock (Post 17324622)
The current industry is changing dramatically & the dinosaurs are grasping at anything to stay in business.

Do you find it ironic that the "dinosaurs" have the product that people are looking to use?

Maybe a dinosaur is someone that actually creates something useful that
"new jacks" with no fucking talent want to steal to "create a business".

When the "dinosaurs" are gone then who will the new jacks steal from?

Themselves? :1orglaugh

baddog 07-11-2010 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSenator (Post 17323452)
Most of the music from INTHEVIP comes from the club which is kinda public domain.

Is kinda public domain like kinda pregnant?

Quote:

Originally Posted by LickMyBalls (Post 17326033)
So they didn't Dmca RK? So what's the difference here?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=CY4KqzDy3e8

Some music is licensed to be used on YT. :2 cents:

sortie 07-11-2010 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LickMyBalls (Post 17327332)
Great Exposure for the RK brand! Wonder how many people, who never knew, will check them out. Thanks TMZ! :1orglaugh

Damn! Are you really this fucking stupid? :1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123