![]() |
What the Fuck is going on with CCBill Sales?
1 sale yesterday and 1 today, when I usually get about 10 a day.
anyone else seeing this problem? |
All I see is more "rebill failed" and "decline" emails.
|
Scrub a dub dub.
|
Yesterday was good, today started slow, but my ccbill sales are just as good/bad as any other sales this month.
|
why do people say ccbill sales. ccbill has paysites? :upsidedow
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And I am not noticing any difference between ccbill and other processors approval rates. |
CCbill is sucking ass as well as other non ccbill sponsors.
CCBill Ratio : 1 to 5 March 1:1400 6 to 10 March 1:5000 Very bad sales since last 5 days or so. Month started OK but tanked all of a sudden. I was going to post a thread about this :( |
same in here...
|
i blame global warming
|
Quote:
Tube site and the recession.... but they have been around for awhile and we have been doing ok but this is new, just been going on for a few weeks and its a dramatic, a major reduction in sales for us, like we have never seen before. |
did the slowdown happen all of a sudden, or was it gradual?
|
Quote:
Some get billed by the Segpay Cascade. |
what the fuck happened to the webmaster that started a ccbull thread within the past 45 days ABOUT 200 FUCKING PASSWORDS being added to his site by ccbull, when he was not seeing the credited joins in his own admin!
He further mentioned that from his personal investigation he discovered they were passwords from a VARIETY of other ccbull sites!! A webmaster is adamant about there being a 200 user descrepancy from his server logs and his ccbill joins in his admin. He comes into gfy creates a thread that really implicated ccbill. I remember vividly how he did not accept the story ccbull was giving him about the added passwords. All I want to know is was it ever resolved. nobody seems to want to touch the question with a 10 foot pole...aww screw it nobody cares |
I think it's gettng time for me to move over to nats and add more CC and Direct Debit billers.
|
some serious statement indeed. quoted to be sure everyone read it
Quote:
|
Let me just add that the 200 passwords added to this guys website were from a VARIETY of other ccbill sites that were NOT his.
Let that burn in real good. In case it is not registering...200 password discrepancy at 29.95 = about $6,000.00 Does anyone not find it curious that a $6,000 discrepancy in passwords could have something to do with the rampant drop in submission form percentages for many of us. Again I am just looking for an explanation...could be a glitch, could be something more sinister.... we won't know if we don't ask the hard questions |
I noticed a significant drop in new sales in the last several days. It happened all at once. I thought it was more to do with my website or just a crappy week instead of ccbill having anything to do with it. As I do not yet have a secondary credit card processor there is nothing to compare their approvals to. I will say that when I moved from ibill to ccbill some years about 5 years ago, the approval rating went way down.
Cheyenne |
Quote:
|
Our sales have almost ground to a halt this week as well.
We do have Verotel as a secondary processor to CCBill so I'm not sure we could blame CCBill? |
I found the thread after searching gfy... I think you will find it interesting to say the least...
http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=...ghlight=avstgp |
Someone posted that Visa is clamping down on high risk transactions. Not sure if there is any validity to that statement, but if it's true it would certainly suck.
In other words, when a person chooses to join an adult site (a high risk transaction) with a perfectly good card, the sale can be scrubbed, just because it is considered "high risk". If that's true it sounds like serious corporate hanky panky, but I doubt any elected officials would go to bat for the adult industry, so I just hope it's not true. |
people use the term ccbill when they are referring to general internet billing, imo
|
why don't you try with NATS and see the difference ?
|
It really is fucked... and unpredictable, if we have a crap ccbill day our cascade to Epoch is excellent, excellent meaning ALOT better than when we have a normal ccbill day - that suggests to me users are Un-Able to signup through ccbill and have no choice but to hit the epoch link... everytime i bring it up 'sorry, we have no problems at the moment'... people dont use our epoch link unless they have to, its not even that easy to find, so they must be pretty damn desperate to signup after ccbill declines / fails...
I'm starting to think it must be time to switch to NATS too... i dont have a problem with a slight variation - certain days slow, certain weeks slow and so on, but the figures im talking about are making cashflow impossible to predict |
Quote:
|
yep same problem here
|
...yeah, March sucks..
|
Quote:
Looks like you are just trying to stir up shit again. :2 cents: |
ive noticed this more and more over the past few weeks. sales are 1/3 to 1/4 of what they were over a month ago, and im sending the same type of traffic that i have been for months now wiht no problems :Oh crap
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Russians ate all your cookies... plain and simple.
|
Quote:
(I'll jump to a summary now: CCBill has never cheated me, but their system is imperfect, has bugs, and "features" I may not care for. These are different complaints than outright fraud.) 1. The OP confused reservation numbers in the logs with subscription numbers. Apparently that caused confusion and made a CCBill rep think a username from another site's join had been added to his site. OP admitted to the misunderstanding, so this part of the mystery is a non-issue. 2. CCBill mentioned a few times about usernames being reserved in the htpasswd file upon unsuccessful (declined) signup. In my experience, the reserved username can stay there for a while (could be minutes to hours). It is eventually removed. The OP and CCBill came to a conclusion regarding this, too. 3. The process of reserved usernames is apparent if you have STORED usernames, as I do. Because my users are given a username from a prepared list, and the list is alphabetical, I can match up any and all usernames applied by CCBill with my master list. Though this very thing once perplexed me, now that I know what's going on it makes sense. I can also see that at no time has CCBill ever given someone a pass to my site without my being credited for it. 4. CCBill's system is NOT always good at removed expired usernames. Not sure they ever claim to be 100% accurate here, and there are many uncontrollable variables here anyway. Every once in a while it's a good idea to make a compare list of your htpasswd file and the active members list from CCBill. You can then manually go through and remove the expired usernames that are still there. I do this every month or so, and usually there's one or two stragglers. On a few occasions they've realized this and have continued to access my site. For free of course. 5. I use Strongbox so I can see who logs in. On a few occasions I'd see logins for a username that I did not receive an e-mail confirmation for. The username was from my list, so I knew CCBill generated it. What this turned out to be: CCBill allows expired members to rejoin for a particular amount of time after the expiration of a subscription. In my case, I have lower cost for subsequent months, so some customers take advantage of this. Costs less than rejoining all over again. When they do, they're given a *new* username from the list, but no new subscription e-mail is generated. These usernames are "ghosts" and they appear connected to the wrong subscriptions. But there's no fraud going on here, just bad software design. CCBill's admin does not keep a history of usernames given out to a single subscription. Change a customer's username, and the old username can no longer be looked up. This makes trying to confirm signups with e-mail subscriptions very difficult. I'll repeat: my system of STORED usernames, Strongbox, and manual compares have never shown CCBill to be cheating. At times there system may not be 100% reliable, though, so it's a good idea to do some manual maintenance every once in a while. |
On sales levels: there seems to be MUCH higher variability in sales on a day-to-day basis. I only have historical data to 2004, but definitely things took a turn mid-2008, where sales could drop 50-75% one or two days. Before that, I could count on fairly regular sales numbers, and of course higher sales.
Every site is different, but for me, mid-week is nearly always slow. So is Saturday afternoon to Sunday afternoon. Things pick up right before and during the first and 15th of the month. Fridays tend to be good, as do Mondays. Again, that's just my site and traffic. Could be the reverse for someone else. All this points to people - at least my traffic - spending closer to their paydays. If before they used their credit cards for the float, they're not now using their debit cards for it. They have to wait until there's some money in there. I get decline e-mails and I've seen only a slight increase in "Pre-Auth SC" (scrub) and "Pre-Auth BC" (I believe disallowed country origin). I'm seeing more declines from Insufficient Funds and bank declines. Neither of these would be the fault of CCBill. |
Quote:
|
I use CCBill as a processer and the sales are continuing to flow in just fine for my site. No problems here. :)
|
Quote:
My CCBill ratio 6 to 10 March, 1:1096 So, meh. |
Quote:
|
LiveCamNetwork.com Sales Stats with CCBill:
Visits / # of Buys / Conversion Rate Jan 2010: 17213 / 398 / 1:43 Feb 2010: 13612 / 414 / 1:32 And so far for the first 10 days in March: March 10 2010: 4897 / 104 / 1:47 Promote us and give us a try! http://www.lcncash.com |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123