![]() |
I use CCbill as well (and believe they are solid), but where there is smoke, there is usually a fire.
With all the threads popping up about them, I find it hard to believe everything is OK over there. I also don't believe if there were massive problems going on that they would alert everyone about it, as that possibly would cause a panic situation and many would drop them. There are simply too many complaints about them right now for everything to be business as usual. Whatever the case, I do hope they fix it soon. |
Quote:
Another thing I've never understood is, the "Visa Rules" some of the 3rd party billers hide behind. They say you can't do this, you can't do that, can't say this, can't say that, all "Visa rules" they claim, not theirs. Yet, if you get your own merchant account you still have to get approved by Visa, yet you can get away with 95% of the things you were told were against Visa rules. |
Interesting post :)
Quote:
Very interesting thread so far :) |
Quote:
THERE IS SOMETHING DRASTICALLY WRONG WITH CCBILL!!!!!!!!!!!!:Oh crap |
Quote:
:D |
Quote:
So the big downside to all of this is that you cannot plan your business effectively. You never know how a processor performs until you are sending them volume, and by then if it isn't what you had expected you are in deep trouble. I would like to see a little more leeway put into making expected numbers happen. For example if I have a rebill probability of .55 at processor x, I want to know why that isn't happening at processor y and how it can be fixed. It shouldn't just be a black box that traffic goes into. Anyway, that's my issue. It's not necessarily a CCBill issue but I think it is a large part of what people are complaining about here. |
Quote:
What I need from you is some specific urls my content as your using it so I can give those to Charles and have them investigate what this issue is. Minds are wondering. |
spooky i have been promoting latexangel and laylaextreme as well
and noticed the same thing i believe the problem might be tracking? maybe the sales are still being made but just not getting the proper credit for them? btw can you email me 200x300 banner or a 250x250 for your site featuring fisting and big toys ? to webmaster at meltingimages dot com I will send you more traffic to compare instead of these other ccb sites |
Quote:
And please, no BS about not responding here. No processor in its right mind is going to reveal in public their security policies. Your account is between you and them. Your account may have been under review because of some patterns their system picked up. Who knows. Since they are working for you, you have the right to ask them questions so you know where your money is going. They may not be willing to reveal the exact metrics they use, but I've never found them to not tell be upfront about an issue. It could turn out your scrub was set high because of a glitch. Theirs is an almost completely automated system, and like I said in my first post in the thread, it's imperfect and has bugs. While they process for you, each of us has a responsibility to monitor our accounts. No self-respecting business just "goes along" with what a vendor or bank says. |
Quote:
First to do - if you haven't already - is get subscription confirmation and denial e-mails sent to you. The denial e-mails will indicate why a transaction was not approved. If you have a question regarding what a denial explanation means, ask them. There's really only about 5-6 that regularly come up anyway. Log into your admin and send yourself a test signup. Their help explains how to do it. This checks that your form is correctly set up - and in fact that that subaccount is still active. It seems to me that if you don't get even denial emails but people are hitting your forms then they're just not deciding to buy, or there is something wrong with your subaccount. Even if CCBill scrubs a customer out you'll get an email about it. I'm no CCBill expert, but if I had no sales for even one day I'd be on the phone with them asking why. I'd ask them to do a system check, independently verify my forms, and look at my banking rules. I'm not in this for the fun of it, and I expect them to earn their 15%. (And so far I've never had them decline to help me, so I'm fine for now.) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
will send some traffic soon btw you can try our sites too, we use nats and only ccb as a backup also you might want to fix the link in your sig http://www.cheatingxxxwife.com/extremecash.htm is an invalid url |
Quote:
We all know that CCBills new WMS is fucked, hell they came here and admitted it was a mess basically. Has anyone at CCBill ever thought that maybe that maybe their scrub was just as screwed? It is so up and down, one day sales are good the next they fall off completely, CCBill sales are like a freakin' rollercoaster. So much of a roller coaster that I stopped pushing sites that have CCBill as their only processor almost 6 months ago. I have been in this business twelve very long years and I have NEVER seen such a roller coaster in sales as I do with CCBill. Predicably my traffic produces x number of sales a day give or take 1 or 2 with every other processor out there, with CCBill it is a freakin crap shoot. So CCBill how many of these threads are you guys going to blow off and just look at individual accounts before you take a look at the BIG PICTURE, your overall scrub and see what where the error lies? Or are you going to just ignore it and scrub yourself out of business? |
Quote:
This is now day 3 with almost extinct sales on my end. Very, very unusual. It is not just this dry spell as you mentioned, but more of a crap shoot is likely the best analogy. I have an email in to markg and am awaiting answers. I suggest everyone do the same... obviously tomorrow or the next day after I get my answers |
Quote:
There is such a thing as a business being to big for the brains behind it and my personal opinion is CCBIll is there. There is also a lot of credence in "Where there is smoke there is fire", accept I am not seeing smoke anymore I am seeing flames shooting out the freaking windows! |
GOLDFISH YOU ROCK!!!! Very well said, you are not alone in heavily editing your posts either...
|
Golfish, we keep a close eye on our entire account. That?s akin to a webmaster watching sales stats. All I can respond with is this, we do everything we can to try to maximize throughput while mitigating risk. Over the years we have only gone down in our decline rates.
Its as frustrating to me as it is to you to see these threads. Ive been at CCBill 11 years and for most of it was the point man (as well as in charge of the risk department) for these sort of issues. We do everything we can to determine ways we can increase throughput/client revenue or find problems that we can fix to make things better, and when we see complaints like this, we run tons of reports to break things down and try to find something. That said, you see patterns emerge, such as early jan breaking records, fluctuations around spring break (now), tax time, mid-may, etc... And again, my offer stands to do tests with my personal card on a link or signup page to test from a real-world perspective...and if anyone would like to send us information to look at, please send to [email protected] |
Quote:
Of the couple of declines I've had in this dry spell/roller coaster/whatever, none have indicated they were declined because of scrub. The reasons were because of bank declines, such as Insufficient Funds. You see that a lot these days. If, like Sara, you see a lot of scrubs the natural thing to do is ask them why. They have the ability to make individual changes to global settings. My account has a longer posting time than most, for example, because I asked for it. It allows me to have a bit longer time to identify fraudulent transactions and void them, rather than having to refund them. (Voids always are better than refunds.) If you're an affiliate of a program that uses CCBill you can't see the decline reasons, but you can always send off an email to the site and ask if they've noticed a change. Hopefully they can inquire on your behalf. I may be wrong but my assumption has been that RonC would like for his company to continue to make money. Would be hard if they were simply ignoring a problem such as unnecessarily high fraud scrubbing. I'm pretty sure Ron wants to make as much money as he can, but I could be mistaken about that. |
Corvette, you can't have this many ppl saying something is wrong and pull the old tech support routiune saying it is not our fault, hit us up and we will look into it, there are to many ppl saying something is wrong!
CCbills system was built many many years ago, yes, it is an ever changing structure, but that brings a few questions to mind. Was it ever meant to accommodate the volume of processing it does, the number of affiliate transaction it handles daily, the number of sites it manages? No. No one could have ever imagined that CCBill would become as big as it has. Which brings us too what happens when you change something to accommodate an ever growing "population" that the system was never developed for in the first place? Well, it is just like an old computer, there are bits and pieces left behind that muck up the system, slow it down, make things go wrong and in the end make the system unusable. In my opinion that is where CCBill is at. The best programmers in the world can't keep that from happening, just ask Microsoft. Why do you think they keep coming up with new OS's? Your going to site scalable here, but I'm sorry nothing is scalable to this size, the size that CCbill has become. Now I understand that was probably the purpose (partially anyways) of CCBills new WMS but it failed miserably. A system can only be reworked so many times before it is time to scrap it and start from square one. It just isn't possible to make a system that was never designed for the amount of owners, affiliates and consumers that CCBill has scalable and not have issues. Issues are going to show up and in my opinion they are starting to now. But honestly how many times can you say "we keep a close eye on our entire account" or "I'll do test with my own personal card" before you or someone at CCBill realizes that you are spending all your time tracking down the same issue? |
the truth of the matter is that end is near...of all porn pay sites and that of ccbill. once they are gone there will be hardly any processors left standing
make hay while the sun sets... |
OK VGeorgie, I will rephrase then.
There is something wrong at CCBill, whether it is the scrub or a system that was never meant to handle the sheer volume of consumer, affiliates and sites, or whatever, but with this many ppl saying something is screwed there has to be something going on. |
Quote:
What would you classify this as?... You are receiving this email to let you know that xxx xxxxx attempted to subscribe to account 935699-0000 and was declined due to We are unable to process your transaction at this time. Please try again at a later time.. Customer Name: xxx xxxxx E-mail address: [email protected] ************************************************** ******** Billing services provided by CCBILL,LLC [email protected] ************************************************** ******** Something is wrong!!! |
Quote:
|
The past 3 days have been totally fucked for me but it's not just CCBill.
|
Quote:
mmcfadden ICQ me the url to the site that gyou got that email for I will try it. That is if CCBill won't have a hissy fit.... |
Quote:
When I do a test signup on my Verotel sites I never get rejected!!!:) Corvette, TURN DOWN THE SCRUBOMETER!!!!!!!!!:helpme |
Quote:
AGREED. We have been with CCBill for 6-7 years now. Sales are good and support is perfect. Even better, our end users trust CCBill so repeat sales are a snap. Any newbies bitching at CCBill would do justice to their own business to look for other reasons why sales may be slower than expected. |
Quote:
Another thing are all these ppl that are complaining sending traffic through NATs or whatever or are they using the CCBill links and non refferer links. If it is the latter then the answer is obvious, if that isn't the case then you are back at square one. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
STFU |
Quote:
Second, I also have a mainstream business where I take credit cards. I have a telephone terminal for manually processing the cards. I'd say 1 in 5 or so times the call doesn't go through. The computer just doesn't pick up. About 1 in 10 I'll get other responses, like "unable to reach host" or "Service busy," or a bunch of other things. (Note that my merchant account is not processed through CCBill. I use an outfit called Elavon, used to be Nova.) When a processor authorizes a credit card there are a lot of organizations involved, including the cardholder's bank. If any one of these outfitrs is temporarily unavailable then the charge won't go through. I have the benefit of trying again in 10-15 minutes, but CCBill does not. Either that or it's the effects of Nibiru, which is coming in 2012. So you really only have to keep your Web site going until then. Prepare a sacrifice to Marduk. It might help. |
Quote:
No one complained about CCBill then because people were still buying things. I regularly had $800-900 days, and once a week had $1500 days. Not bad for a one-person site and only internal organic traffic. Maybe CCBill has turned up a scrub setting, though I'm not getting that in the denial emails I review. I DO believe they are processing the same or even fewer sites than two years ago. That leaves two things: 1. Consumers aren't spending because they don't have the money. That's MY situation, so why wouldn't it be for other people too? I'm eating in tonight because I can't afford McDonald's. 2. The banks are tightening up. This worry keeps me awake at night. Wife and I tried to get a few thousand additional credit line so we could redo a bathroom. Got turned down, despite never being late on a payment, and having the card for some 20 years. Bank rep apologized, and said it was the result of the current economy. Banks are being more careful. BUT... I do agree we shouldn't blindly assume everything is okay at CCBill. My first post on this talked about manually reviewing data and inspecting our accounts. That only makes sense, and I think we should all be mindful of watching over out respective castles. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Since you have a merchant account, and you appear to be doing volume, why not ask that they carry your high risk business? I don't do enough volume to justify it, but you could be saving yourself a ton of money, and cut out CCBill altogether. |
Quote:
As for having my own high risk account, Sterling won't do high risk, I have asked. But on the same token, when have your own high risk internet merchant account there is a ton of stuff you have to do that doesn't ever come up with a mainstream brick and mortar account. To much hassle. But seriously, I would look at a new merchant processor if you are having these kind of issues, I have never heard of that many problems with getting transactions thru. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Flurry of activity for anyone else today, after a catastrophic week?
|
Quote:
|
yep... lots of rebills today! wierd.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123