BoyAlley, were you ABUSED as a child?
 

Almost a certain fact inside the scientific community is that homosexual
behavior start to build up after an abuse as a child.

This is particularly true among men, so im curious to hear what's your origin. Abuse dont necessarily means physical, as in a rape, but can also be an overwhelming mother cutting your relations with other persons of the same sex, etc.

I know you probably have it deep buried into your conscience... I dont blame you, traumatic moments end there. It's our brain self-preservation mechanism.

But Im confident we can get you to talk about it.

:)

I thought it had something to do with priests?!?

#1 BoyAlley probably isnt really homosexual its a board personality
#2 Most homosexuals would never admit the fact that you are probably right
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Nah, he makes a better homo than Chio does a pirate, so I believe he is gay.

Reading his last post about Jesus and Easter, calling him a prick with delusions of grandeur, im betting his abuse had something to do with a priest... lol

i could be wrong though.

I see so you were born gay. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I knew you would never admit it.

Besides, i couldnt care less about those Christian groups you mention. Im agnostic myself.

But the good thing about our conscience, as Freud said, is that we can never lie to us 100%... deep inside, no matter how much we try to hide it, we know it.

Besides, im not passing a judgment.

And you, by your reply, are taking a defensive stand. That's so typical from a Christian education... the origin of an act defines the "good" or "bad" of it.

So, you are making the logic that if your sexual choice came from birth (ie nature) its good, no sin attached. But if it originated from a bad act (ie a physical abuse) then its a sin.

If you dont care about christianism, you need to brake that logic.

SteppenWolf, have you been hanging out with these peeps:

http://break.com/index/most_hated_fa...n_america.html

Would that be a bad thing? Gay acts are inherently bad?

* NOTE: im following your logic *

Now you replied to the hetero man defying you, with an implication that he is gay too, or has hidden gay feelings. As you want to avoid the question and discredit me, you imply homosexuality. Thus you, in your subconscience, still relate your homosexuality as a sin.

Thus, it was originated from a sin, thus you were abused.

well they say its hereditary ...

Lol if that was the case we would all be gay, and dead because we couldnt procreate without committing heterosexual acts. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

you weren't the smartest one right?

You guys are nuts, lmao!

:1orglaugh

Why is people always trying to hit on you alley? there most be a good reason for that. Maybe they feel envy for the way you are. nobody is 100% sure if you're gay or not and you don't even fucking care what they think! My message to them "Get out of the closet"
http://shockmedialab.com/pictures/boyalley.jpg

Haha you cant be using "nature" as a basis for an argument saying that homosexuality is "natural" can you? You are a freak of nature, you do realize that homosexuality goes against the basic principles of nature dont you? You cant procreate with another male silly. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Ok, let gets this straight.

1. I never passed a judgment about homosexuality itself. By your defensive stand, you are asuming im taking homos as bad people or a bad thing.

2. I started the thread cause i believe the logic (homosexuality = child + abuse) and I was interested in hear your opinion (and i was sure you were going to reply like you did)

3. I believe christian fanatics are psychos. Religion NEVER goes along with science.

4. I never defyied you. I implied you understood that. But, your joke about me, like you said was to make me look like i have gay tendencies.

5. So... my logic still stands: You joke with me as im gay -> Thus you, in your subconscience, still relate your homosexuality as a sin -> Thus, it was originated from a sin -> thus you were abused.

lol and chio is quite the pirate
so that would make boyalley gay x10

The only purpose of sex is procreation?

And you have a business in which profession?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

The only "natural" purpose of sex according to "nature" is procreation yes. I dont personally care who is or who isnt homosexual or what anyone does lol its just funny to me when they use excuses like oh its "natural" and that they were "born gay". I have no real ill feeling towards homosexuals. :1orglaugh

What purpose in nature would homosexuality achieve I wonder ?

Don't GFY rules ban attacking people personally?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

One "purpose" of homosexuality may be to keep the "homosexual gene" (if there is one) from being inherited.

Why do people have such a problem with gays? I have many friends who are gay and they are terrific people. They don't bother anyone.

where do i attacked him? Please show.
And you should read everything before posting BS.

This thread has to be making someone's elbow itch.

It's really pathetic when the "wannabes" come on the board and decide to post something that they hope will hit people's hot buttons.

Steppenwolf..you say you are not attacking, yet in your first post in this thread you said: "Almost a certain fact inside the scientific community is that homosexual behavior start to build up after an abuse as a child."

That is such bullshit with no scientific backing..yet you throw it out as a fact and try to stir things up.

Don't act like you're not being negative about homsexuality, because you are.

Do you have any links to further information about this as I've never come accross this theory before ?

Whoa dude - I wasn't looking to bash BA, it's just that I found his statement somwhat perplexing.

so if boy alley fucked a woman....and they had a son....would he be gay?

its one of lifes most difficult questions.

Im going to bother to reply you first... i dont know what you mean by wannabes. I already am... oh, I see your point now, im sorry, i have less than 1000 posts, i must be broke then.

And regarding scientific evidence, let me start by building the nurture case with this:

Studies performed over the last several decades have found that gay men tend to have a greater number of older male siblings than do straight men. In a recent analysis of data from 14 studies involving 10,000 individuals, a group led by Ray Blanchard, a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, determined that a large number of older brothers is a significant predictor of male homosexuality [24][25].

24 - Blanchard, R. 2004. Quantitative and theoretical analyses of the relation between older brothers and homosexuality in men. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 230: 173-87.

25 - Blanchard, R. and L. Ellis. 2001. Birth weight, sexual orientation, and the sex of preceding siblings. Journal of Biosocial Science. 33: 451-67.

From the Council for Responsible Genetics

most fags have been. abuse at a young age tends to mutate the genetics.

how the hell would that work?

amen- gay men, who cares. I agree with you both. People should leave it be. 2 Mens for boyalley. :) how THUUUPER is that?

"Nurture" is not what the Scientist involved in those studies concluded. What they actually concluded is that nurture cannot be the cause of this as it only works when the older brothers are of the same mother. With older step brothers, we dont see these results.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...26/ixnews.html

You are a fucking idiot