Obama's new START treaty - GoFuckYourself.com

Vendzilla · 11-22-2010, 01:36 PM

I'm all for getting the level of the stock pile down on nukes, they scared the hell out me when I handled them then, knowing that so many countries have them doesn't help me at all, but reading this article makes me wonder if Obama is trying to pass yet another piece of bad legislation on the American public, people hear what he says and say yes, but don't read the fine print.

Quote:

The New START treaty with Russia that President Obama is eager to have the Senate ratify is a bad idea for a lot of reasons. We can start with the details of the treaty itself.

While the treaty claims to achieve nuclear parity with Russia?s arsenal, these reductions apply only to strategic nuclear weapons. Russia will maintain a 10-1 advantage in tactical weapons. Limits on delivery vehicles count U.S. conventional weapons vehicles, a provision that doesn?t factor in this country?s greater global deterrent responsibilities that require conventional weapons. And no mention is made of Russia?s previous START treaty violations, raising the question of how compliance will be assured this time around. And these are just a few of the provisions that make the treaty a bad deal for the U.S.

Worse yet, the Russians have put a diplomatic gun to America?s head. Several Russian officials have made it clear in a statement from the office of the Russian president that the treaty ?can operate and be viable only if the United States of America refrains from developing its missile defense capabilities quantitatively or qualitatively.?

In other words, the treaty is really about limiting our missile defense, which serves Russia?s interests since it cannot compete with America?s economic and technological advantages in new weapons development. This threat by Russia?s leaders suggests that they believed the Obama administration was so eager for an agreement that it could be taken to the diplomatic cleaners.

the whole article is here
http://www.rightnetwork.com/posts/1001642392

IllTestYourGirls · 11-22-2010, 01:49 PM

Maybe you didnt hear, Obama is spending 50% more than Bush on Nuclear weapon DEVELOPMENT. Smoke and mirrors.

Slutboat · 11-22-2010, 01:57 PM

Welcome to another colossally moronic right-wing-spam thread.

_Richard_ · 11-22-2010, 02:06 PM

speechless.

baddog · 11-22-2010, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slutboat

Welcome to another colossally moronic right-wing-spam thread.

I understand that you may be mentally challenged, but where was the spam?

_Richard_ · 11-22-2010, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls

Maybe you didnt hear, Obama is spending 50% more than Bush on Nuclear weapon DEVELOPMENT. Smoke and mirrors.

i looked this up.. i'd say something that was a good thing, especially if they're scaling other budgets back anyway.

The Demon · 11-22-2010, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slutboat

Welcome to another colossally moronic right-wing-spam thread.

Seeing as how the only "spam" threads are from left wing morons such as yourself, I find your comments humorous. I'm surprised they let mental patients on the computer as long as you're usually on.

MaDalton · 11-22-2010, 02:27 PM

i wondered when this will come up and what way it will be twisted to "nuke" a treaty that was negotiated for years and finally agreed on.

btw - Russia might join NATO and also join in on the missile defense. and the nuclear arsenal on both sides can destroy life on this planet multiple times anyways - also after START 2.

the only reason to target this now is to avoid any small chance of positive news for Obama. any. welcome to the powerless States of America

IllTestYourGirls · 11-22-2010, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

i wondered when this will come up and what way it will be twisted to "nuke" a treaty that was negotiated for years and finally agreed on.

btw - Russia might join NATO and also join in on the missile defense. and the nuclear arsenal on both sides can destroy life on this planet multiple times anyways - also after START 2.

the only reason to target this now is to avoid any small chance of positive news for Obama. any. welcome to the powerless States of America

Who are all these people in NATO, and Russia if they join, protecting themselves from with the missile defense system? Aren't NATO countries about the only countries who have the capabilities of long range missiles?

PornMD · 11-22-2010, 02:35 PM

Seems like our president plays checkers when everyone else plays chess.

marketsmart · 11-22-2010, 02:39 PM

people dont realize that our nuclear weapons are thousands of times more powerful than they were when they were used on japan..

we have enough nukes just on subs to wipe out the entire world...

when one country decides to use nukes, that will be the day the world comes to an end...

or at least we become a road warrior movie...

this whole treaty business is nothing but a play to try to get the smaller countries to limit their nukes..

.

MaDalton · 11-22-2010, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls

Who are all these people in NATO, and Russia if they join, protecting themselves from with the missile defense system? Aren't NATO countries about the only countries who have the capabilities of long range missiles?

it is claimed this would protect us against Iran and North Korea - but it is neither clear if they have long range missiles, are about to develop them or will be ever able to build them. but the sense (or non-sense) of that thing is not the point here - it's about lowering nuclear warheads to 1500 each for the US and Russia - a number you would think that is far more than enough anyways

tony286 · 11-22-2010, 02:56 PM

They were for it before now their agenda dictates they have to be against it

Vendzilla · 11-22-2010, 03:00 PM

It's funny that Obama is pushing hard to get it done now in lame duck, instead of waiting, but then he likes to appoint people during recess a lot too

tony286 · 11-22-2010, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

It's funny that Obama is pushing hard to get it done now in lame duck, instead of waiting, but then he likes to appoint people during recess a lot too

Well the right kept gumming up the works so recess appointments have to happen. Their goal is to have him fail they dont give fuck about how this country is suffering and Obama unfortunately was born without a spine.

IllTestYourGirls · 11-22-2010, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286

Well the right kept gumming up the works so recess appointments have to happen. Their goal is to have him fail they dont give fuck about how this country is suffering and Obama unfortunately was born without a spine.

Obama failed enough by himself.

Vendzilla · 11-22-2010, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286

Well the right kept gumming up the works so recess appointments have to happen. Their goal is to have him fail they dont give fuck about how this country is suffering and Obama unfortunately was born without a spine.

Naming the head of medicare during a recess is spineless.

He did that by him self, you can't blame the right,

stocktrader23 · 11-22-2010, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286

Well the right kept gumming up the works so recess appointments have to happen. Their goal is to have him fail they dont give fuck about how this country is suffering and Obama unfortunately was born without a spine.

True, but seems most in this thread were born without a brain which is much worse.

Kiopa_Matt · 11-22-2010, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

It's funny that Obama is pushing hard to get it done now in lame duck, instead of waiting

Oh, geez. It's because the current START treaty expires December 5th, at which time US inspectors are no longer allowed in Russia military installations. Right now the US knows the extent of Russia's military arsenal, but come Dec 5th that will change unless this new treaty gets signed. You even have the head of the Russian military saying in public that come Dec 5th, Russia will begin deploying new missile technology throughout the country, because they'll no longer be under any obligation to allow the US to see what their arsenal is.

Geez, FOX News obviously does its job well. Sometimes your guys' blind hatred of Obama is pretty childish.

Kiopa_Matt · 11-22-2010, 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart

people dont realize that our nuclear weapons are thousands of times more powerful than they were when they were used on japan..

we have enough nukes just on subs to wipe out the entire world...

when one country decides to use nukes, that will be the day the world comes to an end...

or at least we become a road warrior movie...

this whole treaty business is nothing but a play to try to get the smaller countries to limit their nukes..

heh, I got a bit of a chuckle out of that too. You have both the US and Russia on the media boasting, "Yeah, we're awesome, because we're cutting our nuclear arsenal. No more 14,000 nukes for us! We're only going to have 8000 from now on.".

Ok, and we're supposed to be impressed, because why exactly? A few dozen is probably all you need to get the job done.

Vendzilla · 11-22-2010, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiopa_Matt

Oh, geez. It's because the current START treaty expires December 5th, at which time US inspectors are no longer allowed in Russia military installations. Right now the US knows the extent of Russia's military arsenal, but come Dec 5th that will change unless this new treaty gets signed. You even have the head of the Russian military saying in public that come Dec 5th, Russia will begin deploying new missile technology throughout the country, because they'll no longer be under any obligation to allow the US to see what their arsenal is.

Geez, FOX News obviously does its job well. Sometimes your guys' blind hatred of Obama is pretty childish.

Actually, if you read my posts in this thread, I handled nukes in the Navy, I might know more than you think.
Why did he wait till the last minute to do this then?, SO he can blame the GOP for dragging it's feet?

Vendzilla · 11-22-2010, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stocktrader23

True, but seems most in this thread were born without a brain which is much worse.

Some people , only thing they have to offer is a insulting remark that remarkably resembles you!
Others have something to say to add to the discussion, guess thats not you is it

epitome · 11-22-2010, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

Actually, if you read my posts in this thread, I handled nukes in the Navy, I might know more than you think.

Why do you feel the need to mention this twice? It has zero to do with the topic at hand.

I handle mustard every time I make a sandwich ... I guess I know more than the average person?

potter · 11-22-2010, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiopa_Matt

Oh, geez. It's because the current START treaty expires December 5th, at which time US inspectors are no longer allowed in Russia military installations. Right now the US knows the extent of Russia's military arsenal, but come Dec 5th that will change unless this new treaty gets signed. You even have the head of the Russian military saying in public that come Dec 5th, Russia will begin deploying new missile technology throughout the country, because they'll no longer be under any obligation to allow the US to see what their arsenal is.

Geez, FOX News obviously does its job well. Sometimes your guys' blind hatred of Obama is pretty childish.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiopa_Matt

heh, I got a bit of a chuckle out of that too. You have both the US and Russia on the media boasting, "Yeah, we're awesome, because we're cutting our nuclear arsenal. No more 14,000 nukes for us! We're only going to have 8000 from now on.".

Ok, and we're supposed to be impressed, because why exactly? A few dozen is probably all you need to get the job done.

End thread. Vendzilla proves himself to be a mindless sheeple yet again.

Vendzilla · 11-22-2010, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome

Why do you feel the need to mention this twice? It has zero to do with the topic at hand.

I handle mustard every time I make a sandwich ... I guess I know more than the average person?

Because I know more about nukes than you do , or is that too much for your tiny brain to handle?

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter

End thread. Vendzilla proves himself to be a mindless sheeple yet again.

Hey shit for Brains, got a comment about the subject, make it, passing off a lame insult as intelligence is not working for you! LMAO

Kiopa_Matt · 11-22-2010, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

Actually, if you read my posts in this thread, I handled nukes in the Navy, I might know more than you think.

Ok, so you transporting nukes makes you an expert in the START treaty how exactly?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

Why did he wait till the last minute to do this then?, SO he can blame the GOP for dragging it's feet?

Because the Republicans are being childish cunts, who's sole perogative is to make Obama look bad, with total disregard for the welfare of the United States. These are people who will throw a fit every time Obama gets onto a plane, or takes a shit. Even when they come up with an idea that Obama agrees with and says, "Hey, great idea! Let's do it!", they'll all of a sudden reverse positions and bitch about how its going to bring about the destruction of the USA.

Maybe if they grew up a bit, and quit trying to stall every last little detail, things would happen more efficiently.

Twoface31 · 11-22-2010, 10:04 PM

if this happen maybe this is the start of the Russian Internationa rise of power again.....

directfiesta · 11-22-2010, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

Hey shit for Brains, got a comment about the subject, make it, passing off a lame insult as intelligence is not working for you! LMAO

Vendzilla · 11-23-2010, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiopa_Matt

Ok, so you transporting nukes makes you an expert in the START treaty how exactly?

Means I know more about it than you do, why do keep asking me to repeat myself shit head? Like do you know what a tactical nuke is, compared to a strategic?

Quote:

Because the Republicans are being childish cunts, who's sole perogative is to make Obama look bad, with total disregard for the welfare of the United States. These are people who will throw a fit every time Obama gets onto a plane, or takes a shit. Even when they come up with an idea that Obama agrees with and says, "Hey, great idea! Let's do it!", they'll all of a sudden reverse positions and bitch about how its going to bring about the destruction of the USA.

Maybe if they grew up a bit, and quit trying to stall every last little detail, things would happen more efficiently.

It wasn't the republicans voting that took out the democrat control of the house, it was people registered as independents like me you pin head.
I questioned yet another bad call on Obama, too bad you are too fucking ignorant to debate the subject, but instead just blaming the OTHER party, what a fucking loser

Vendzilla · 11-23-2010, 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

Yes , you're like the idiot in the back of the class room that doesn't understand the question, so you laugh, sorry to strain your brain!

11-22-2010, 01:49 PM	#2
IllTestYourGirls Ah My Balls Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Under the gold leaf ICQ 388-454-421 Posts: 14,311	Maybe you didnt hear, Obama is spending 50% more than Bush on Nuclear weapon DEVELOPMENT. Smoke and mirrors. __________________

11-22-2010, 01:57 PM	#3
Slutboat Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 2,388	Welcome to another colossally moronic right-wing-spam thread. __________________ The Slut Boat soon will be making another run The Slut Boat promises something for everyone

11-22-2010, 02:27 PM	#8
MaDalton I am Amazing Content! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 39,829	i wondered when this will come up and what way it will be twisted to "nuke" a treaty that was negotiated for years and finally agreed on. btw - Russia might join NATO and also join in on the missile defense. and the nuclear arsenal on both sides can destroy life on this planet multiple times anyways - also after START 2. the only reason to target this now is to avoid any small chance of positive news for Obama. any. welcome to the powerless States of America __________________ AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003 Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you! Skype: madalton02826 - Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

11-22-2010, 02:35 PM	#10
PornMD Mainstream Businessman Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Diego Posts: 9,291	Seems like our president plays checkers when everyone else plays chess. __________________ Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.

11-22-2010, 03:00 PM	#14
Vendzilla Biker Gnome Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: cell#324 Posts: 23,200	It's funny that Obama is pushing hard to get it done now in lame duck, instead of waiting, but then he likes to appoint people during recess a lot too __________________ Webair died? Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants think about that

11-22-2010, 02:06 PM	#4
_Richard_ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Earth Posts: 30,989	speechless.

11-22-2010, 02:39 PM	#11
marketsmart HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane Posts: 20,419	people dont realize that our nuclear weapons are thousands of times more powerful than they were when they were used on japan.. we have enough nukes just on subs to wipe out the entire world... when one country decides to use nukes, that will be the day the world comes to an end... or at least we become a road warrior movie... this whole treaty business is nothing but a play to try to get the smaller countries to limit their nukes.. .

11-22-2010, 02:56 PM	#13
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	They were for it before now their agenda dictates they have to be against it

11-22-2010, 10:04 PM	#27
Twoface31 Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 2,746	if this happen maybe this is the start of the Russian Internationa rise of power again..... __________________ Email: [email protected] HentaiG4h * Lusty Life ICQ: 291-953