Affiliate Opinion: Would you like to use one login to access all NATS programs? - GoFuckYourself.com

TMM_John · 02-21-2010, 11:44 AM

Let's say you could use your TMMid (http://www.tmmid.com) to login to and use any NATS program. Would you like that ability?

Iron Fist · 02-21-2010, 11:46 AM

Yes please with sugar on top?

Juicy D. Links · 02-21-2010, 11:47 AM

Yes that would be nice and convenient

closer · 02-21-2010, 11:48 AM

Like the idea too

fuzebox · 02-21-2010, 11:48 AM

Probably not. As both an affiliate and a paysite owner I would much prefer nats the way it is.

ColetteX · 02-21-2010, 11:49 AM

sounds good, but please remove from nats4 option to view others encoded links. i choose to use encoded link cause i want to be hidden a bit, but in nats4 you can see username from any encoded link, that is not good imho

TMM_John · 02-21-2010, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzebox

Probably not. As both an affiliate and a paysite owner I would much prefer nats the way it is.

In what way wouldn't you like it?

ColetteX · 02-21-2010, 11:50 AM

and btw thinking about the one login to all nats, i think its not needed as we have nifty

TMM_John · 02-21-2010, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColetteX

sounds good, but please remove from nats4 option to view others encoded links. i choose to use encoded link cause i want to be hidden a bit, but in nats4 you can see username from any encoded link, that is not good imho

I'm not quite sure what you mean here. Could you explain in more detail?

baddog · 02-21-2010, 11:52 AM

I think it would be easier . . . . should be anyway.

MrDeiz · 02-21-2010, 11:52 AM

that would be good
but what with all existing logins? or there will be an option to integrate them all under one tmmid acc?

TMM_John · 02-21-2010, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daizzzy

that would be good
but what with all existing logins?

There are a lot of issues that come up and we have ideas to solve them. I just don't to share all of those details quite yet.

Tho, with this issue you'd simply be able to tie your existing account to your TMMid and use your TMMid login instead. Your account wouldn't change, your username / old links / etc. wouldn't go away, you'd simply be able to tie that existing account to your TMMid and use your TMMid to login to it.

martinsc · 02-21-2010, 11:52 AM

yup, I think I'd like it.

ColetteX · 02-21-2010, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMM_John

I'm not quite sure what you mean here. Could you explain in more detail?

in nats4, in link codes section, you can see "Detail" of any link. in detail you see username and other informations from encrypted nats links, but not only from yours, but from any nats link

Nikitos · 02-21-2010, 11:56 AM

Yes, one login would be good indeed.

cybermike · 02-21-2010, 11:57 AM

Fuck that.. what would be awesome in a dream world would be a system where checks come from one source so we can all push nats programs without fears of not getting paid like ccbill..

People will always have a satancash like situation in the back of their minds..

Farang · 02-21-2010, 11:57 AM

Yes please

TMM_John · 02-21-2010, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColetteX

in nats4, in link codes section, you can see "Detail" of any link. in detail you see username and other informations from encrypted nats links, but not only from yours, but from any nats link

Yes, the encoded link codes were never designed nor intended to hide someone's identity.

They aren't "encrypted". They are simply encoded. It is not a secret manner in which they are, but rather a very simple & public manner. They exist to avoid having a lot of variables and a query string on your linking codes and to simply allow you to have /somecode/ as your linking code.

chupachups · 02-21-2010, 12:01 PM

YES YES YES MOTHERFUCKING PLEASE!!!

ColetteX · 02-21-2010, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMM_John

Yes, the encoded link codes were never designed nor intended to hide someone's identity.

They aren't "encrypted". They are simply encoded. It is not a secret manner in which they are, but rather a very simple & public manner. They exist to avoid having a lot of variables and a query string on your linking codes and to simply allow you to have /somecode/ as your linking code.

thank you for reply, i just thought it may be nice if nobody knows where i am promoting my sponsors. now i find any nats link anywhere and i know in second who is owner of the account. not good imho but just my two cents, nats rocks!

goldfish · 02-21-2010, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharphead

Yes please with sugar on top?

yep and don't worry about the cherry, this would a great change!!!! So much easier!

rowan · 02-21-2010, 12:10 PM

What about security concerns? Does TMM become the middleman that uses an API to query each program, therefore seeing all of our stats on the way through?

bbobby86 · 02-21-2010, 12:11 PM

no sugar please...

TMM_John · 02-21-2010, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rowan

What about security concerns? Does TMM become the middleman that uses an API to query each program, therefore seeing all of our stats on the way through?

No, that is not at all the case.

Inter-Sex · 02-21-2010, 12:16 PM

That would be nice, you signup for just 1 program
and program owner knows the login from you, from all your NATS-accounts.

If the peeps are really lazy, they can buy roboform or someting.

epitome · 02-21-2010, 12:21 PM

Would love it!

Would also be cool if you could use your username and password to pre-fill the signup form for new NATS programs the same way CCBill does it!

I don't understand why people feel there would be security concerns. They'd be addressed by TMM ... it's not like it'd suddenly become a giant free-for-all.

kada · 02-21-2010, 12:24 PM

its not a bad idea.. But a central payment system would be somethin more interesting.

Paul&John · 02-21-2010, 12:27 PM

Sounds like a great idea ;)

MrDeiz · 02-21-2010, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kada

its not a bad idea.. But a central payment system would be somethin more interesting.

+1
i bet many beginning program owners would like to join that option as well. it should be like with ccbill - integrated paying nats programs will be paying for all signups in one check

TMM_John · 02-21-2010, 12:31 PM

Unfortunately a centralized payment system isn't going to happen. That would require either every affiliate program leaving a huge deposit with us (the CJ method) or all of the money a program makes from passing through our hands first (the CCBill method). Neither of these are going to happen.

IMO, the single payer method raises a much larger risk than the individual payment method. However, that is a bigger discussion and best saved for another thread.

woj · 02-21-2010, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMM_John

No, that is not at all the case.

Can you clarify how you are thinking of setting it up?

TMM_John · 02-21-2010, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

Can you clarify how you are thinking of setting it up?

I don't want to get too into details at this point.

What Rowan was thinking was something more along the lines of statsremote/niftystats where stats would be retrieved and presented together. That is not what I'm referring to here (tho we do have something similar in the works). What I'm referring to here is allowing you to have one TMMid login which would work at all NATS programs. That's something totally different than what he assumed.

The Heron · 02-21-2010, 01:40 PM

That's the very least of my problems with nats. Hell any webmaster not using roboform or some other system to store user/passes is probably an idiot.
I'd much prefer to get one payment from all nats sponsors if you could do that i'd be impressed.

02-21-2010, 11:44 AM	#1
TMM_John Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 6,664	Affiliate Opinion: Would you like to use one login to access all NATS programs? Let's say you could use your TMMid (http://www.tmmid.com) to login to and use any NATS program. Would you like that ability? __________________ Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

02-21-2010, 11:46 AM	#2
Iron Fist Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 23,400	Yes please with sugar on top? __________________ i like waffles

02-21-2010, 11:52 AM	#11
MrDeiz SignBucksDaily.com Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 9,802	that would be good but what with all existing logins? or there will be an option to integrate them all under one tmmid acc? __________________ Make money with WEBC$MS The only way to still make money in adult

02-21-2010, 11:52 AM	#13
martinsc Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: 127.0.0.1 Posts: 27,047	yup, I think I'd like it. __________________ Make Money

02-21-2010, 11:56 AM	#15
Nikitos Confirmed User Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 372	Yes, one login would be good indeed. __________________ IdolBucks.com - the best Asian affiliate program

02-21-2010, 11:47 AM	#3
Juicy D. Links So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: N.Y. -Long Island -- Posts: 122,992	Yes that would be nice and convenient

02-21-2010, 11:48 AM	#4
closer Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: ICQ :: 34739932 :: Les Pays-Bas Posts: 1,707	Like the idea too

02-21-2010, 11:48 AM	#5
fuzebox making it rain Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: seattle Posts: 22,136	Probably not. As both an affiliate and a paysite owner I would much prefer nats the way it is.

02-21-2010, 11:49 AM	#6
ColetteX So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 539	sounds good, but please remove from nats4 option to view others encoded links. i choose to use encoded link cause i want to be hidden a bit, but in nats4 you can see username from any encoded link, that is not good imho

02-21-2010, 11:50 AM	#8
ColetteX So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 539	and btw thinking about the one login to all nats, i think its not needed as we have nifty

02-21-2010, 11:52 AM	#10
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	I think it would be easier . . . . should be anyway.

02-21-2010, 11:57 AM	#16
cybermike Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Ny Posts: 4,113	Fuck that.. what would be awesome in a dream world would be a system where checks come from one source so we can all push nats programs without fears of not getting paid like ccbill.. People will always have a satancash like situation in the back of their minds.. __________________ Hey surfers how about some The Best Porn Sites

02-21-2010, 11:57 AM	#17
Farang one sick puppy Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Where the worst of the West meets the worst of the East Posts: 11,600	Yes please __________________ i sale uncensored chatbots

02-21-2010, 12:01 PM	#19
chupachups Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Sweden/Spain you sum bitch! Posts: 6,576	YES YES YES MOTHERFUCKING PLEASE!!! __________________

02-21-2010, 12:10 PM	#22
rowan Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 17,393	What about security concerns? Does TMM become the middleman that uses an API to query each program, therefore seeing all of our stats on the way through?

02-21-2010, 12:11 PM	#23
bbobby86 partners.sexier.com Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 11,926	no sugar please... __________________

02-21-2010, 12:16 PM	#25
Inter-Sex Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Spain :) Posts: 2,231	That would be nice, you signup for just 1 program and program owner knows the login from you, from all your NATS-accounts. If the peeps are really lazy, they can buy roboform or someting.

02-21-2010, 12:21 PM	#26
epitome So Fucking Lame Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Petersburg, FL Posts: 12,156	Would love it! Would also be cool if you could use your username and password to pre-fill the signup form for new NATS programs the same way CCBill does it! I don't understand why people feel there would be security concerns. They'd be addressed by TMM ... it's not like it'd suddenly become a giant free-for-all.

02-21-2010, 12:24 PM	#27
kada Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 292	its not a bad idea.. But a central payment system would be somethin more interesting. __________________ Eye luf pusee - Du u?? -

02-21-2010, 12:27 PM	#28
Paul&John Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: YUROP Posts: 8,614	Sounds like a great idea ;) __________________ Use coupon 'pauljohn' for a $1 discount at already super cheap NameSilo! Anal Webcams \| Kinky Trans Cams Live \| Hotwife XXX Tube \| Get your Proxies here

02-21-2010, 12:31 PM	#30
TMM_John Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 6,664	Unfortunately a centralized payment system isn't going to happen. That would require either every affiliate program leaving a huge deposit with us (the CJ method) or all of the money a program makes from passing through our hands first (the CCBill method). Neither of these are going to happen. IMO, the single payer method raises a much larger risk than the individual payment method. However, that is a bigger discussion and best saved for another thread. __________________ Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

02-21-2010, 01:40 PM	#33
The Heron Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Michigan Posts: 4,488	That's the very least of my problems with nats. Hell any webmaster not using roboform or some other system to store user/passes is probably an idiot. I'd much prefer to get one payment from all nats sponsors if you could do that i'd be impressed.