Google's "Teen Porn Concepts"

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Socks
    Confirmed User
    • May 2002
    • 8475

    #1

    Google's "Teen Porn Concepts"

    So to use Google Adwords, we're forced to remove our "teen porn concepts" from the website. Just having a "teen" category is enough.

    I'm sitting here trying to comprehend what to do. I mean if they do this for adwords and are taking a stance, maybe it's the safe bet to distance ourselves for the future. I mean renaming a category isn't a huge deal I guess, we can setup redirects, but what the fuck else to call it? If "teen" is no good, then surely "18+" is similary bad?

    So where does that leave me.. 19+? 20+? 18-22?

    Maybe we should all start promoting a new made up teen word.. Cuties?
  • Trax
    [----------------------]
    • Aug 2001
    • 14486

    #2
    good question
    worth a bump

    Comment

    • VexXxed
      Confirmed User
      • Sep 2006
      • 544

      #3
      Neet Porn

      Comment

      • JohnnyE4A
        Registered User
        • Jan 2007
        • 54

        #4
        Worth another bump! How about BRL's (Babes Recently Legal), or LHF's (Low Hanging Fruit)
        Johnny @ www.exclusively4affiliates.com
        ICQ: 18576148

        Comment

        • Socks
          Confirmed User
          • May 2002
          • 8475

          #5
          freshy's?

          Comment

          • Idigmygirls
            Confirmed User
            • Jan 2007
            • 498

            #6
            Just Legal Girls?

            Of course, the broader question is what does it mean for the web when big companies like Google start to force us to take legal text off our sites because of their own morality issues. I'm not comfortable with Google telling me how to live my life or run my sites.
            Red Light Center - Adult Metaverse
            https://www.redlightcenter.com

            Comment

            • Socks
              Confirmed User
              • May 2002
              • 8475

              #7
              robots.txt? :D

              I hear you, but Google has been historically very friendly to most of our bank accounts here, so sometimes you just gotta play ball.

              I have stopped writing words like "schoolgirl" out of fear, mostly

              Comment

              • camuseeme
                Confirmed User
                • Feb 2006
                • 413

                #8
                You cannot even run a girls gone wild ad. adwords.

                Get in While it's HOT

                ICQ 190384930
                http://www.girlsgonewildpass.com

                Comment

                • RawAlex
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 9465

                  #9
                  I own 1819.com - I wonder if that would be a teen porn concept?

                  Comment

                  • After Shock Media
                    It's coming look busy
                    • Mar 2001
                    • 35299

                    #10
                    Coed's
                    College girls
                    Sorority girls

                    [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                    Comment

                    • teksonline
                      So Fucking Banned
                      • Jan 2005
                      • 2904

                      #11
                      Google can careless about your content, look at them they are the biggest breading ground for child porn, beastiality etc searching....

                      I think the problem they have, is with new business partners such as Visa, etc, for google checkout etc... Which force them into dealing strategies that power around freedom for cash... Some other companies like to think they have morals lol. And won't do business with companies that don't reflect the same ones.

                      Comment

                      • Pleasurepays
                        BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                        • Aug 2002
                        • 11913

                        #12
                        its interesting that everyone thinks google owes them something whether its related to adwords rules, adsense rules or SERPs. people are weird. its a for profit company that owes you absolutely nothing... remember that while you are building your business and you will be better off.

                        Comment

                        • CC
                          Confirmed User
                          • Feb 2001
                          • 1690

                          #13
                          Socks, I encountered a similar dilemma and decided to go with Coeds (or College Coeds) or 18-19 years old depending on the site.

                          Comment

                          • CyberHustler
                            Masterbaiter
                            • Feb 2006
                            • 28775

                            #14
                            try +33n Porn
                            “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”

                            Comment

                            • Rochard
                              Jägermeister Test Pilot
                              • Dec 2001
                              • 75757

                              #15
                              Originally posted by JohnnyE4A
                              Worth another bump! How about BRL's (Babes Recently Legal), or LHF's (Low Hanging Fruit)
                              "Low hanging fruit"..... That's funny!
                              Herschel Savage
                              Brooklyn, NY

                              Comment

                              • pocketkangaroo
                                Confirmed User
                                • Jan 2005
                                • 8452

                                #16
                                It's kind of hit or miss with the editorial guidelines. I've had sites with girls, schoolgirls, teens written on it that pass editorial. Then I've had sites that they pull because you link to a URL with teen in it.

                                Comment

                                • J.P.
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jun 2004
                                  • 689

                                  #17
                                  I've stopped using adwords because of this issue... My ads got approved by some editor and after a week they got disabled obviously by another one because of a teen porn concept. Even my MILF campaigns got disapproved because I used a word Teens in a navigation Funny thing though, my campaign that leads to my Nubiles.net review is still active, I just don't bid on it anymore
                                  Webmasters! Looking for new affiliate programs to promote?
                                  Affiliate Program Search <-- Search for programs with FHGs, RSS feed, specific niche sponsors, ...

                                  Comment

                                  • Nookster
                                    Confirmed IT Professional
                                    • Nov 2005
                                    • 3744

                                    #18
                                    I went with "Coeds."
                                    The Best Affiliate Software, Ever.

                                    Comment

                                    • Trax
                                      [----------------------]
                                      • Aug 2001
                                      • 14486

                                      #19
                                      I think I am going to go with "18-23"
                                      i have seen tbp uses "Young (18-23)"
                                      whereas I do not really like the young in there... i have seen 4-5 other sites also using 18-23
                                      best I came up with also... coeds is just not 100&#37; fitting

                                      Comment

                                      • Vick!
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Nov 2005
                                        • 6882

                                        #20
                                        t33ns
                                        Affordable Quality Web Hosting

                                        Comment

                                        • MintCams
                                          Registered User
                                          • Jan 2007
                                          • 86

                                          #21
                                          One of my ads got taken down because I used the world girls. Not young girls just girls.
                                          Camsense pays %40 Revshare!!
                                          WIn a Porsche or a Hummer!!

                                          Comment

                                          • MrPinks
                                            Registered User
                                            • Oct 2003
                                            • 1767

                                            #22
                                            Yeah, that has happened before. Even if you changed the name of the category, you might have the word teen throughout your site in reviews or site names (which would be odd to change). It's a hit and miss.

                                            Originally posted by MintCams
                                            One of my ads got taken down because I used the world girls. Not young girls just girls.

                                            Comment

                                            • FirstByte
                                              Registered User
                                              • May 2003
                                              • 95

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Socks
                                              So to use Google Adwords, we're forced to remove our "teen porn concepts" from the website. Just having a "teen" category is enough.

                                              I'm sitting here trying to comprehend what to do. I mean if they do this for adwords and are taking a stance, maybe it's the safe bet to distance ourselves for the future. I mean renaming a category isn't a huge deal I guess, we can setup redirects, but what the fuck else to call it? If "teen" is no good, then surely "18+" is similary bad?

                                              So where does that leave me.. 19+? 20+? 18-22?

                                              Maybe we should all start promoting a new made up teen word.. Cuties?
                                              We've had the same problem in the last 3 weeks. Our account manager when through the site point out what he thought fell into the teen concept category. Hustler's Barely Legal dvds where what trigger our initial account review. Any terms that relate to teens basically will get monitored and flagged for review.

                                              Were currently in the process of tweaking our site to suit, due to the limited traffic in our corner of the world.

                                              We're started to see some teen terms being filtered on Google. adult stores with Barely Legal DVD titles don't list within GG in broad search.

                                              my 2ct
                                              Skype: firstbyte | icq:9092492

                                              Comment

                                              • Paul Markham
                                                Too old to care
                                                • Jun 2001
                                                • 52942

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by teksonline
                                                Google can careless about your content, look at them they are the biggest breading ground for child porn, beastiality etc searching....

                                                I think the problem they have, is with new business partners such as Visa, etc, for google checkout etc... Which force them into dealing strategies that power around freedom for cash... Some other companies like to think they have morals lol. And won't do business with companies that don't reflect the same ones.
                                                Agreed, if it were a moral issue they would build their algorithms to ban sites that had teen porn in them. Go see what comes up.

                                                http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=teen+porn

                                                4,770,000 hits. Seems a lot for people banning teen porn on moral grounds.



                                                Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                                PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                                Comment

                                                • RayBonga
                                                  too cool for highschool
                                                  • Nov 2005
                                                  • 12164

                                                  #25
                                                  Migrate to granny porn.

                                                  Problem solved.

                                                  Comment

                                                  Working...