Yep, I was just saying that.

Is this what this industry has become? Is that is all it's about now? Stealing from once another for a business model?

Fucking retarded.

:mad:

That pretty much sums you up...

And on the other hand, what was the reason you banned the guy? Cause he didnt agree with you on something? Cause he aint a cocksucker and doesnt care about his postcount being lost? Way teh feking go.... :2 cents:

So fucking typical, you whine about your content being stolen and tubes ruining the industry, but you agree 100% with stealing from your customer and eventually drive more idiots to tube sites cause EVERY idiot is ripping off his own customers.

Time to eat your own shit.

:thumbsup

Frank's new fake nic. See above. LOL

How much is Brazzers paying you?

http://www.extremetube.com/video/how-fat-can-you-be-
http://www.extremetube.com/video/fucking-like-bunnies-
http://www.extremetube.com/video/let...at-booty-babe-
http://www.extremetube.com/video/massive-tna
http://www.extremetube.com/video/cum...hubby-is-away-
http://www.extremetube.com/video/it-...gle-down-there

I just sent the DMCA, let's see how long it takes or if it happens.

i just mail cheeks / bastone now honestly - they will take things down at the site itself, and let's them know that you know what the score is.

their staff would do it, but its just rediculous. i emailed, they took down and didn't bother to reply, works for me.

So it's the staff who put it up AND takes it down?

LOL

i have no proof as to who puts it up ... obviously I have my ideas, but I know who will make sure to take them down.

they can play ignorant to how they get up there, but they can't ignore the programs that have or may do biz with them, so I know how to take them down. now I'm thinking I should use all the floating IWeb staff to do my own RYC on Roids to help Eric and myself out :)

Back to the top for the quest to 10,000

I am still shocked by the content on that site, and I produce gang bangs and cum snorting videos.

Simulated rape videos, even thought obviously staged to someone who is in the adult industry, are one more reason I am really for a US Government review board that works in conjunction with the billing companies.

If we had a review board we would know exactly what we could or could not produce.

It would legitimize or industry as we would not have to worry about prosecution from the US Government.

Canada (where Brazzers head honchos are) has a review board, and as far as I can tell the Canadian obscenity code is tougher than the US one as it's a lot more clearer. No Miller test, no first amendment battles. Their obscenity code states that violence coupled with the exploitation of sex is obscene.

Wisely Brazzers is trying to disguise shameonher as not theirs and using overseas processing, but I can't imagine that's going to work, and creating a labyrinth of shell companies only seems to give FBI guys a hardon for unraveling it all.

Boocoo bucks, shell companies, rape videos....Eric Holder are you listening?

That's pretty juicy.

i've posted and told this to people who have a hardon for Brazzers - Canada's criminal code when it comes to obscenity is much more defined than American obscenity law. That content is criminal in Canada. You wanna cause trouble for them get the RCMP on their asses. You just can't couple sex with any type of brutality towards women.

Canadian law provides that "any publication a dominant characteristic of which is the undue exploitation of sex, or of sex and one or more of the following subjects, namely crime, horror, cruelty and violence, shall be deemed to be obscene" (Section 163 of the Criminal Code). The test for obscenity applied by the courts is guided by the application of a community standard of tolerance test, "concerned not with what Canadians would not tolerate being exposed to themselves, but what they would not tolerate other Canadians being exposed to" (Supreme Court decision in R. v. Butler, February 1992). Generally, any material will be considered obscene, and therefore illegal, if it contains: sex coupled with violence; exploitive sex that degrades or dehumanizes any person, female or male; or explicitly sexual material that employs children in its production.

That's some interesting stuff there Mutt. But I've been promoting Sweet Money for three times as long as Brazzers has even existed. They have plenty of stuff that runs all over the law that you posted.
Isn't Sweet Entertainment based in Canada? If so, I'm not too sure that law is really enforced. At least I think Sweet is in Canada, it's possible that my mind is fuzzy in my old age.

SweetMoney did get busted a few years ago for the PeePee sites.

It was around 2000 or 2001...I'll try to find a link to it.

I remember all that.

I know that I still promote those pissing sites as well as their fisting sites, BDSM sites, and the grandaddy of "abuse" sites Sweet Auditions. They send out affiliate emails with galleries like clockwork. I would think that any one of those sites would get them in "trouble" Not to mention this one: http://maxhardcoreporn.net/front.php

I think Max has become the poster boy for the silly that can happen to you if your content gets looked at too hard by a bunch of religious fucks in the deep South.

I'd like to just slap the shit out of all those fucks who are all "holy" and try to force the rest of us to live like they do with their fucking religious fantasy world of superstition.

That is the strange thing about internet porn, you do business on giant global scale, but a couple of hicks can fuck you whole world up.

It happens every time.

I'm just trying to milk this thing to 10000 views now.

cool site.......

fiddy 6x

Damn skippy.

Is this GFY's 1st 10k view thread?

At least since you made that girl quit doing porn a couple years ago

Did that one do 10K? I didn't think it did.

that alphasky thread is at like 20k

I missed that one.

Link?

yes, this is what you should do.

get a password to brazzers free

leech their site

make a tube site upselling to a bro's dating traffic

collect checks

Ahh the classic win that is the apple twins melt down.

Consider it done.

odds of anyone actually doing anything to stop them: 0:1,000,000

Government intervention and a massive change in how digital content is managed would be the only real solution. When governments get pissed off enough at the lost revenue (of which porn is a tiny fraction, as compared to software and mainstream media) they will sit down with Intel, AMD, Motherboard manufacturers, etc and solve the problem from a hardware part of the equation.

Until then we are left having moral arguments over whether someone should or should not do something regardless of whether they are able to do it or legally allowed to do it. Those tend not to have teeth, especially in a tight economy. :2 cents:

How long until those same fundamentalists that took down Max turn their eyes to the 'tubes'? How long until they realize that little Johnny can go watch hardcore german fisting in his bedroom without any age verification? How long until they realize that most of these tubes have Traci Lords scenes on them and are thus hosting child pornography?

If you have a link to one of those, please send it to me [email protected] or icq 62835707. That would be easy.

Tubes are here to stay

I don't know if it's got anything to do with this thread, but I'm coming up with a lot of dead files now on that site.

Good thread.

Bump for goodness

very informative read