GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Is anyone promoting dollars4all.com? Well you won't be after seeing this.... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=91645)

FlyingIguana 12-03-2002 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sambuka


Ummm, I've ran paysites for many years and I know that most $40 signups have fucking terrible rebill rates. I'd say most big paysites with mainly plugin content would have rebill rates of 1.5 months per customer, which an't great.

Sammy

chances are they're shaving because their site sucks. if you have a solid members area paying per sign up can make you more money in the long run.

UnseenWorld 12-03-2002 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by suesheboy
Keep posting this and forward to to whom ever in the governement controlls these things.

I would assume the attorney general

I would assume the hacking is a felony, too. Get the popcorn ready!

rowan 12-03-2002 12:16 PM

This may be a stupid question, but how do they shave if it goes via a third party biller? Do they route the clicks through dollars4all.com, and sometimes 'forget' (cough) the refid passed to ibill?

salsbury 12-03-2002 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by UnseenWorld


I would assume the hacking is a felony, too. Get the popcorn ready!

i'm sure prosecutors would rather go after the shaving affiliate for the thousands of dollars they've defrauded than go after a guy who got a login and password off of ICQ. :)

then again, thousands of dollars isn't very much money.

DTK 12-03-2002 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rowan
This may be a stupid question, but how do they shave if it goes via a third party biller? Do they route the clicks through dollars4all.com, and sometimes 'forget' (cough) the refid passed to ibill?
From what I've heard, using a third party biller does not necessarily prevent shaving.

Fletch XXX 12-03-2002 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DTK


From what I've heard, using a third party biller does not necessarily prevent shaving.

With 3rd party billers the code runs through the Processors site, has nothing to do is Dollars4All 'shaving' or not.

How is it done?

good question.

Tipsy 12-03-2002 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rowan
This may be a stupid question, but how do they shave if it goes via a third party biller? Do they route the clicks through dollars4all.com, and sometimes 'forget' (cough) the refid passed to ibill?
It's very easy to do if the hit doesn't go straight to the 3rd party biller and instead passes through a script somewhere. Why would it be difficult?

Juge 12-03-2002 12:39 PM

Wow, this is amazing...

jimmy3way 12-03-2002 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX


With 3rd party billers the code runs through the Processors site, has nothing to do is Dollars4All 'shaving' or not.

How is it done?

good question.

There are several ways, but you people are confusing third party 'stats' with a third party 'processor' you can process sales anyway you want and then pass on the billing information to your processor of choice.

In this case iBill was billing the credit cards, but the sales and affiliate ceredits were processed in house. This is pretty common, Lightspeed for instance has their own in house affiliate tracking but still process sales through CCBill.

This is not to imply that Lightspeed operates in any way like these scumbags. I think anybody would agree that Lightspeed sets the benchmark for honesty in porn.

Snake Doctor 12-03-2002 12:40 PM

I'd like to take this opportunity to annouce my new companies with a new marketing strategy.
TOTAL HONESTY

dollars4half.com
Shitty payouts, shitty conversions, PLUS we shave over 50% of your signups.....but at least we tell the truth about it.


likedown.com
Our all new hosting company. When you want websites that go down more than a $2 whore, likedown.com is the host for you.
(Coming soon, a first in the adult industry, a 10GIG network.....it won't matter because that will be constantly down too, but hey, its BIG)


i-cant-bill.com
Is your website getting too many new members? Tired of seeing that recurring money add up month after month? Then i-cant-bill.com is the processor for you. Not only do we scrub the skin right off of your potential customers with our patented loofah software, but we lose rebills from the database all the time.
For customer service see our sister site irefund.com......no questions asked :thumbsup


Coming Soon - Free hosted galleries designed by Donovan Phillips, and free bannerless virtual hosting courtesy of Cologroup.

eroswebmaster 12-03-2002 12:42 PM

Fucking Funny Lenny.:1orglaugh

Darkystar 12-03-2002 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX


With 3rd party billers the code runs through the Processors site, has nothing to do is Dollars4All 'shaving' or not.

How is it done?

good question.

it depends on how webmasters send them traffic
there are two ways:
1) send surfers through ibill's cookie placer url
2) send surfers straight to Dollars4All script (in this case)

#2 is almost always true for per signup programs, and in #2 shaving is very possible.

[The Leader] 12-03-2002 12:53 PM

I don't see why people are supprised at all. I mean it's hilarious that they got busted so hardcore, this is worse that how CEN got busted.

Every sponsor who pays $30 or more per signup is shaving you. I doubt this is even an extreme case, someone hack Nasty Dollars' stats system, you'll really be supprised when you see 80% of your sales being shaved.

Get your heads out of your asses and find a good, HONEST recurring program.

HungSolo 12-03-2002 12:55 PM

holy shit. for some reason, though... this kind of feels/seems like a red herring... dunno why... just something nagging at the back of my mind...

SpeakEasy 12-03-2002 01:02 PM

This is awesome. I love it that these dumb fucks got busted .....LMAO......:1orglaugh

Candyman69 12-03-2002 01:03 PM

pretty funny stuff :thumbsup

FlyingIguana 12-03-2002 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by [The Leader]
I don't see why people are supprised at all. I mean it's hilarious that they got busted so hardcore, this is worse that how CEN got busted.

Every sponsor who pays $30 or more per signup is shaving you. I doubt this is even an extreme case, someone hack Nasty Dollars' stats system, you'll really be supprised when you see 80% of your sales being shaved.

Get your heads out of your asses and find a good, HONEST recurring program.

nasty dollars is one of my best converting sponsors. damn, if i started my own paysite i'd prolly make a killing if they actually shave that much.

[The Leader] 12-03-2002 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FlyingIguana


nasty dollars is one of my best converting sponsors. damn, if i started my own paysite i'd prolly make a killing if they actually shave that much.

Yes, it's safe to say if you had the content and layouts Nasty Dollars has, and set up your own paysite, you'd be making a killing.

Remember that guy who stole the content from one of thier sites and started processing with ibill? Ask him how well the site really sells. :Graucho

Backov 12-03-2002 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darkystar


it depends on how webmasters send them traffic
there are two ways:
1) send surfers through ibill's cookie placer url
2) send surfers straight to Dollars4All script (in this case)

#2 is almost always true for per signup programs, and in #2 shaving is very possible.

It's possible (and easy) to shave both ways. But talking about it is damn dumb - do you really want your next sponsor to have heard on gfy "Oh ya, you can shave with CCBill/IBill THIS way"

Trust me, it can be done.

Cheers,
Backov

[Labret] 12-03-2002 01:17 PM

ND has the shave turned up HARD this week. I would love to see someone out them. I am pulling them, its a shame, so good at times.

Jak 12-03-2002 01:29 PM

http://www.fuckjob.com/imagine/pixie/shaving2.jpg http://www.fuckjob.com/imagine/pixie/shaving.jpg



Jak

volante 12-03-2002 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by HungSolo
holy shit. for some reason, though... this kind of feels/seems like a red herring... dunno why... just something nagging at the back of my mind...
Either CEN is trying to divert attention away from themselves, or JJMedia wants a new DVD player :Graucho

DarkJedi 12-03-2002 01:33 PM

notice how none of the Big Playas posted their oppinion on this.
they all shave.

justsexxx 12-03-2002 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
notice how none of the Big Playas posted their oppinion on this.
they all shave.

Well don't you think it's very unprofessional for them to post here?

BTW dollars4all is NOT a big player 30.000 dollars in a whole year is not much at all...

Andre

SpaceAce 12-03-2002 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jak

Hehe I knew someone would tag me on this, but that's why I said "Quick calculation". :Graucho

What are the actual percentages of people who forget to cancel? What are the actual percentages of people who retain memberships at most of these sites? Come on, we've all visited some of these paysites at one time or another and taken a quick peek inside their members area. Most of them blow chunks and I can't imagine that many people sticking around.

I was going to go into details on how the salesman I paid $50.00 to would get me customers that I could upsell to, etc. but in the long run the percentages just wouldn't ever work out high enough in my favor. That's why shaving goes on.

If you're going to tag me and say my logic is flawed, and that the companies actually do make money from retaining memberships, upselling, etc. then you're going to also state that shving doesn't happen. Otherwise the execution of my logic might have been screwy, but the end result is the same. You can't make an honest profit by paying out 10 times more than what you take in.

Jak

Actually, one doesn't follow the other. Let's say that I believe that these companies make a profit from rebills and upsells. OK, that's point one. Now, you say if I believe that I must also believe they don't shave. That is not the next logical step. I don't see any reason why they couldn't turn a profit on their rebills and shave, anyway. Then they just make BIGGER profits and greed is a powerful force.

SpaceAce

SpaceAce 12-03-2002 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by justsexxx


Well don't you think it's very unprofessional for them to post here?

BTW dollars4all is NOT a big player 30.000 dollars in a whole year is not much at all...

Andre

Um, I believe that was $30,000 in 4 days. That pay period was the 1 - 7 of this month.

SpaceAce

Dildozer 12-03-2002 02:20 PM

WOW

Not that i find it surprising, but it's amazing to see someone caught with their pants down like that.
Fuckin thieves! I'd love to see the stats on other sponsors as well.

So which sponsor is gonna be the first to "leak" a login/pass to one of their "real" non-shaving stats?
BEWARE
someone is bound to use that trick for their own profit

candyflip 12-03-2002 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by [The Leader]

Remember that guy who stole the content from one of thier sites and started processing with ibill? Ask him how well the site really sells. :Graucho

Is this the one? http://largenaturals.com/

justsexxx 12-03-2002 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SpaceAce


Um, I believe that was $30,000 in 4 days. That pay period was the 1 - 7 of this month.

SpaceAce

NO IT was not. Yes the date field is saying that. But the printscreen is made from whole year.

http://www.babiex.com/Dollars4All.htm LOok at the SIGNUP dates if you don't believe me..

see?

Andre

Jak 12-03-2002 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SpaceAce


Actually, one doesn't follow the other. Let's say that I believe that these companies make a profit from rebills and upsells. OK, that's point one. Now, you say if I believe that I must also believe they don't shave. That is not the next logical step. I don't see any reason why they couldn't turn a profit on their rebills and shave, anyway. Then they just make BIGGER profits and greed is a powerful force.

SpaceAce

You're right SpaceAce. I tried to make a small point without having to write a paragraph full of disclaimers stating the obvious fact that things aren't ever strictly black and white.

You're right. I'm right. Gray is a wonderful shade.

Jak

jimmyf 12-03-2002 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FlyingIguana
so is this how most paysites make money? throw up some plug in content, shave like mad and make extra coin on upsells?
I think you got it just about right on. Shit some company posted on here about some new program they had and all the *** BIG GUYS *** said they were going to buy, rent or sign up for this company's program. It had right in it for
** SHAVE ** and the % you could enter. Now of course they fucked up by posting here with that info. And of course after it was public, guess what they said? OH we are taking that out *RAT* now and it will not be sold with this program... Me thinks this is 1000% fucking bull shit. Am thinking about taking all except one (1) sponsor off all my god dam sites...

scoreman 12-03-2002 02:39 PM

Those poor bastards who subscribed to the shemale site and have been active for 200 days probably never thought that their names and emails were going to be posted online. Lets see, thomas bontempo (252 days shemale) better pray to God that site doesnt get spidered by Google. I can just see his wife/Mom/boss doing a search on his name and getting that nice bit of info.

jimmyf 12-03-2002 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by eroswebmaster


Actually I do...I'd love for them to go in and shut some of these big motherfuckers down.

RICO act on them like a mother fucker...seize their cars...their houses...anything and everything they "earned," or purchased with their illgotten gains.

This sure will keep some of the smaller guys from trying the same kinda bullshit.

:2 cents:

you'll see it happen... 2 much money in the porn business. Most likely old John's boys/girls have been checking them out. Anything he can do 2 give porn a worse name, am sure he'll be doing it. And I hope the hell he does it soon. The only thing he won't just take everything they own he'll put'm in Jail and for a long time.

jimmyf 12-03-2002 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DTK


From what I've heard, using a third party biller does not necessarily prevent shaving.

This is VERY VERY correct.

Naughty 12-03-2002 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimmyf
I think you got it just about right on. Shit some company posted on here about some new program they had and all the *** BIG GUYS *** said they were going to buy, rent or sign up for this company's program. It had right in it for
** SHAVE ** and the % you could enter. Now of course they fucked up by posting here with that info. And of course after it was public, guess what they said? OH we are taking that out *RAT* now and it will not be sold with this program... Me thinks this is 1000% fucking bull shit. Am thinking about taking all except one (1) sponsor off all my god dam sites...

I remember that well, wouldn't it be fun to dig that one up now...

Ian 12-03-2002 03:12 PM

I've heard over the years that $30/signup is about the break even and maybe the sponsor makes a few bucks.

We're not smart enough to shave, pay 60/40 on everything and have some great niche sites that hang on to a hard-earned signup. :)

jimmyf 12-03-2002 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Naughty


I remember that well, wouldn't it be fun to dig that one up now...

yes it would.... then later on some dip shit woman webmaster (not that women are dip shits) saw it and said she had signed up... I posted, I had just signed up for her partners program. Told her I wouldn't be promoting her site( went right over her head ).. am not going 2 name names but if you send over 90% unique traffic and don't get any sign ups something is wrong. I don't care what kind of traffic it is or how much. That's another excuse the traffic you send, I think it's bull shit. Just like someone else posted they keep telling you this and that over and over pretty soon you start to believe it.

I got some good advice about 2 years or so ago from Wolfshade about paysites that shave. And it WAS... They are 2 busy fucking the little guy to fuck with the big guys.

Jizar II 12-03-2002 03:26 PM

:1orglaugh fucking scammer company..

Nbritte 12-03-2002 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX


With 3rd party billers the code runs through the Processors site, has nothing to do is Dollars4All 'shaving' or not.

How is it done?

good question.

It doesnt matter if it is a third party processor or not it would be easy for someone to write a script in perl or php that would allow
a site to shave sales but does everyone what how to do it posted on a message board so all sponsors can try it out?


Nbritt

nemcis 12-03-2002 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RockDaddy
They are based out of the netherlands so you probably have no legal jurisdiction there. One more thing to take into consideration when promoting a sponsor now I guess.

Although, I've been doing this since '96 and this is the first "documented" evidence I've ever seen. I'm sure it will be a very long time before you ever see it again. Sadly.

Although there is NL mentioned, nothing in the address nor the city looks like something here in Holland. When some can find out more details, contact me and I try to trace it for you at the Dutch Chambers of Commerce.

mail me at mvl@<remove this>msu.nl

Marianne
Holland

bignosejimmy 12-03-2002 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by [Labret]
ND has the shave turned up HARD this week. I would love to see someone out them. I am pulling them, its a shame, so good at times.

No shit! I'd love to see someone hack into thier system.

My girlfriend and I are sending the exact same traffic.

She's getting 1 : 80

I'm getting 1 : 1000

What the fuck!

kenny 12-03-2002 04:01 PM

There should be legal regulations preventing companies from doing things like this, prehaps this will open a door

ServerGenius 12-03-2002 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bignosejimmy



No shit! I'd love to see someone hack into thier system.

My girlfriend and I are sending the exact same traffic.

She's getting 1 : 80

I'm getting 1 : 1000

What the fuck!

That's because your girlfriend is sending them first.....afterwards
you send the exact same users to the exact same site again :Graucho

That's not shaving....that's stupid :winkwink:

DynaMite

Nbritte 12-03-2002 04:04 PM

Just a thought.
this really could be a problem for dollars4all for several reasons first they have to change ever user pass. which means the customers are most likely getting pissed cause they can not log in.
and if someone used all those e-mail address to send the url to the page with all that info on it I think that everyone who has a membership would be running to cancel it quickly.

Nbritt

p1mpdogg 12-03-2002 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
There should be legal regulations preventing companies doing things like this, prehaps this will open a door
LOL

TODAY ON CNN

"Late breaking news from gofuckyourself.com.. shaving!!!

It was a myth until today.. but those sneaky gfy'ers let the cat out of the bag... We here at CNN have been very concerned witht his matter, and we will urge ALL americans to pull together and help out our fellow pornographers... more at 8.

thanks.. now for a word from our sponsor(which we will be investigating as well, for shaving !!)"

hahahahah

shen_kid 12-03-2002 04:07 PM

thanks for revealing my username and password dude! :D

lol, this is a fucking funny thread

DTK 12-03-2002 04:09 PM

Quote:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by DTK


From what I've heard, using a third party biller does not necessarily prevent shaving.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by jimmyf
This is VERY VERY correct.
What I think is classic are these 'sponsors' who say shit like "We use a 3rd party processor so there's no way we can shave you". That's a bunch of BS and they know it.

Bobo 12-03-2002 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
There should be legal regulations preventing companies from doing things like this, prehaps this will open a door
I agree. It's downright scandalous. This internet thing is still too much of a free-for-all. Some more regulation is required. An affiliate should know that they're getting the money they earned. Anything less is pathetic.

Bobo 12-03-2002 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by p1mpdogg


LOL

TODAY ON CNN

"Late breaking news from gofuckyourself.com.. shaving!!!

It was a myth until today.. but those sneaky gfy'ers let the cat out of the bag... We here at CNN have been very concerned witht his matter, and we will urge ALL americans to pull together and help out our fellow pornographers... more at 8.

thanks.. now for a word from our sponsor(which we will be investigating as well, for shaving !!)"

hahahahah

Nobody is debating that shaving exists. At 50% and 60% it's called fraud and few webmasters become affiliates to programs if they know the shave is on that high.

kenny 12-03-2002 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by p1mpdogg


LOL

TODAY ON CNN

"Late breaking news from gofuckyourself.com.. shaving!!!

It was a myth until today.. but those sneaky gfy'ers let the cat out of the bag... We here at CNN have been very concerned witht his matter, and we will urge ALL americans to pull together and help out our fellow pornographers... more at 8.

thanks.. now for a word from our sponsor(which we will be investigating as well, for shaving !!)"

hahahahah

If a webmaster was promoting them and had a copy of whatever was in that admin area (I didnt see it), they would have grounds to sue. Wouldnt they? And maybe during the procss of a trial laws would fall in place to prevent these type of activities. But that probably will not happen


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123